RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Obstrucción Ureteral , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Riñón/fisiología , Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of urological malignancies in renal transplant recipients (RTR). RECENT FINDINGS: Although optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management in these patients remain controversial, adherence to general guidelines is recommended. Kidney transplantation is recognized as the standard of care for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as it offers prolonged survival and better quality of life. In the last decades, survival of RTRs has increased as a result of improved immunosuppressive therapy; nonetheless, the risk of developing cancer is higher among RTRs compared to the general population. Urological malignancies are the second most common after hematological cancer and often have more aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Receptores de Trasplantes , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Since World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic, urology services have developed strategies to prioritize and not to differ urgent and oncological patient's medical attention, in order to optimize resources and decrease infection probability among staff and patients. This unprecedented situation has generated a decrease in assistance and academic activities in most medical residences. The aim of this manuscript is to evaluate the impact of this health crisis on training programs through a survey addressed to urology medical residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross sectional designed study, with multiple-choice non validated survey answered online by residents. Questionnaire was developed through the CAU EDUCACION platform. RESULTS: A total of 148 responses from 18 countries coming from Latin America and Spain answering the survey. Of total, 82% answered that the activity of their urology department was significantly reduced, attending only urgent surgical pathologies, 15 % that, the urology activity has been closed completely and the staff was assigned to COVID-19 patients care, 3% continue with the regular clinic activity. Likewise, 75% stated that their surgical training has been completely affected, 93% receive urological information through tools such as Skype, ZOOM meeting, Cisco Webex, being Webinar modality the most used. Despite technological boom, 65% answered their academic training has been partially or completely affected. Most of the surveyed residents consider that period of residence should be extended to retrieve the educational targets. CONCLUSION: This unprecedented reality is negatively impacting the heterogeneous residency programs that American Confederation of Urology (CAU) nucleates. It is necessary to continue with technological innovation and allocate time and resources to easily generate accessible tools to favor the training of future urologists.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Internado y Residencia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Urología/educación , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , América Latina , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Obliterative urethral stenosis is a type of urethral lesion that compromises the whole corpus spongiosum's circumference. We present our experience in resolving complex long segment urethral obliteration in a single procedure using a combination of dorsal onlay oral mucosa graft (OMG) and ventral fasciocutaneous penile skin flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed, which included data of men presenting long, obliterative strictures. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up before one year. Failure was defined as need for further urethral instrumentation. The surgical technique used consisted on the fixation of OMG to the tunica albuginea of the corpus cavernosum, thus creating a new urethral plate. Penile or foreskin flaps were employed to complete the ventral aspect. Postoperative follow-up was done with a voiding cystourethrography at week 3. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included with a median age of 49 years. Mean follow-up was 25 months. Failure was found for 3 patients (2 of them needing dilations and only one required a new urethral reconstruction). CONCLUSION: Single stage combination of dorsal OMG with ventral fasciocutaneous penile flap showed good results for selected patients affected with obliterative urethral stenosis.
Asunto(s)
Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Pene/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/trasplante , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore the current situation faced by Latin American urology departments during the COVID-19 Outbreak in terms of knowledge, actions, prioritization of urology practices, and implementation of internal clinical management protocols for inpatients and outpatients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-validated, structured, self-administered, electronic survey with 35 closed multiple choice questions was conducted in Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and English and Deutsch versions from April 1st to April 30th, 2020. The survey was distributed through social networks and the official American Confederation of Urology (CAU) website. It was anonymous, mainly addressed to Latin American urologists and urology residents. It included 35 questions exploring different aspects: 1) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and internal management protocols for healthcare providers; 2) Priority surgeries and urological urgencies and 3) Inpatient and outpatient care. RESULTS: Of 864 surveys received, 846 had at least 70% valid responses and were included in the statistical analyses. Surveys corresponded to South America in 62% of the cases, Central America and North America in 29.7%. 12.7% were residents. Regarding to PPE and internal management protocols, 88% confirmed the implementation of specific protocols and 45.4% have not received training to perform a safe clinical practice; only 2.3% reported being infected with COVID-19. 60.9% attended urgent surgeries. The following major uro-oncologic surgeries were reported as high priority: Radical Nephrectomy (RN) 58.4%, and Radical Cystectomy (RC) 57.3%. When we associate the capacity of hospitalization (urologic beds available) and percentage of high-priority surgery performed, we observed that centers with fewer urological beds (10-20) compared to centers with more urological beds (31-40) performed more frequently major urologic cancer surgeries: RN 54.5% vs 60.8% (p=0.0003), RC 53.1% vs 64.9% (p=0.005) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of writing (May 13th 2020) our data represents a snapshot of COVID-19 outbreak in Latin American urological practices. Our findings have practical implications and should be contextualized considering many factors related to patients and urological care: The variability of health care scenarios, institutional capacity, heterogeneity and burden of urologic disease, impact of surgical indications and decision making when prioritizing and scheduling surgeries in times of COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Urología/tendencias , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , América Latina , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy and functional outcomes after open vesicourethral re - anastomosis using different approaches based on previous urinary continence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients treated from 2002 to 2017 due to vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) post radical prostatectomy (RP) who failed endoscopic treatment with at least 3 months of follow-up. Continent and incontinent patients post RP were assigned to abdominal (AA) or perineal approach (PA), respectively. Demographic and perioperative variables were registered. Follow-up was completed with clinical interview, uroflowmetry and cystoscopy every 4 months. Success was defined as asymptomatic patients with urethral lumen that allows a 14 French flexible cystoscope. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent open re-anastomosis for VUAS after RP between 2002 and 2017. Mean age was 63.7 years (standard deviation 1.4) and median follow-up was 10 months (range 3 - 112). The approach distribution was PA 10 patients (50%) and AA 10 patients (50%). The mean surgery time and median hospital time were 246.2 ± 35.8 minutes and 4 days (range 2 - 10), respectively with no differences between approaches. No significant complication rate was found. Three patients in the AA group had gait disorder with favorable evolution and no sequels. Estimated 2 years primary success rate was 80%. After primary procedures 89.9% remained stenosis - free. All PA patients remained incontinent, and 90% AA remained continent during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Open vesicourethral re - anastomosis treatment is a reasonable treatment option for recurrent VUAS after RP. All patients with perineal approach remained incontinent while incontinence rate in abdominal approach was rather low.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/métodos , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study is to analyze the imaging findings described in MRI and the histopathologic type of testicular lesions to determine which findings are the best predictors of malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty six (46) patients with testicular lesions were initially studied with ultrasound (US) and with testicular MRI (tMRI) on a 1.5-T magnet. MRIs were reviewed by a radiologist with 8 years of experience and imaging findings such as the size of the lesion, the signal intensity in T1, T2 weighted sequences, and the enhancement after endovenous contrast administration, were correlated with the histopathologic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: The enhancement after administration of contrast was the finding of better performance with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 90 (71-97), 47 (24-71), 74 (56-87) and 73 (40-92), respectively. Meanwhile, the results for hypointense/heterogeneous lesions in T2 weighted sequences and with enhancement with intravenous contrast were 87 (49-84), 47 (44-89), 74 (55-86) y 67 (35-89), respectively. CONCLUSION: The finding of a testicular lesion of low signal intensity and heterogeneous in T2 weighted sequences, with IV contrast enhancement represents a valuable predictor of malignancy. The latter being the most sensitive as a predictor of malignancy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Neoplasias Testiculares , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Low certainty exists on how bladder cancer (BCa) after pelvic radiotherapy (RT) differs from BCa in radiation-naive patients from a histopathological and clinical perspective. This study aims to compare histopathological features of bladder tumors between patients with previous RT for prostate cancer (PCa) and radiation-naive patients using single-institutional data and to estimate relapse-free survival (eRFS) and cystectomy-free survival (eCFS) in both groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative study in adult men diagnosed with BCa in Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina, between January 2015 and December 2020. Included patients were categorized as previously irradiated for PCa or radiation-naive. PRIMARY OUTCOME: differences in prevalence of aggressiveness features of bladder tumors (variant histology; high-grade tumors; muscle-invasive disease; criteria compliance for high or very-high risk of progression) between irradiated and radiation-naive patients at diagnosis of BCa. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: differences in eRFS and eCFS between groups. RESULTS: In total, 34 and 291 patients were included in the Irradiated and Radiation-naive groups, respectively. Mean age at the time of diagnosis of BCa was 72.7 years (CI 95% 71.6-73.8). Median follow-up of the overall cohort was 25 months (IQR 11-45.5). Concerning primary outcomes, no statistical differences were found except for a higher prevalence of low-grade tumors between irradiated patients and high-grade tumors between radiation-naive patients (P 0.018). Regarding secondary outcomes, prior RT did not increase neither eRFS nor eCFS in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: BCa after RT for PCa has similar histological features and cystectomy free-survival compared to BCa in a radiation-naive population. For patients with non-muscle invasive BCa arising after prostate RT, the risk of recurrences appears to be similar to non-irradiated patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Cistectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Análisis MultivarianteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In the present study, we aim to provide more evidence about benefits of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). Our main objective is to assess prostatic-specific antigen control and postoperative urinary incontinence in open and robotic approaches as primary outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After the Institutional Review Board approval (IRB00010193), we retrospectively analyzed 76 consecutive patients who underwent open or robot-assisted SRP for locally relapsed prostate cancer between 2004 and 2019 at the Urology Department of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Data were collected from our electronic medical record and prospective database.Postoperative variables, such as urinary incontinence, erectile function preservation, and vesicourethral anastomosis stricture development, were analyzed. RESULTS: Before SRP, 59 patients (76.6%) were treated with 3D external beam radiotherapy, 11 (14.3%) with brachytherapy, and 6 (7.8%) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Fifty patients underwent open SRP, and 26, robot-assisted SRP. Comparing surgical approaches, the global incontinence rate was 34.2% versus 9.1% in open versus robot-assisted approach, respectively (p: 0.01).Vesicourethral anastomosis stricture occurred in six patients (8.7%), all in the open approach group (p: 0.07). Five patients of 69 (7.2%) preserved erectile function with/without use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Two patients in the open approach group needed blood transfusion. Estimated 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate in the open approach group and robot-assisted group was 67% (95% confidence interval: 53.7-80.3) and 60.9% (95% confidence interval: 40.5-81.3), respectively, with no statistical difference (log-rank test p: 0.873). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted SRP is a reliable procedure to treat local recurrences after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, reducing the risk of anastomotic strictures and blood loss and improving continence outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical-surgical factors associated with Complex Urethral Surgery (CUC) in anterior urethral stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a cross-sectional study with retrospective data recording, including all male patients who under went anterior urethroplasty between 2011 and 2018. CUC included two or more grafts urethroplasty, excisional augmented anastomotic urethroplasty, combined flaps and grafts urethroplasty and stages surgery. The data were collected from the electronic medical record, recording the demographic data, background of previous treatments as well as the characteristics of the stenosis (etiology, anatomical location, length, number of strictures, among others). A univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted using the chi-squared test and logistic regression to identify the variables related to CUC. RESULTS: The data of 665 patients met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean age was 56.1 years, 27.5% were smokers, 32.5% had received some previous treatment, and dilatations were the most common procedure. The most prevalent etiology was iatrogenic, followed by idiopathic in a 61.1 and 20.3% respectively. Bulbar urethral stricture were the most common location (56.2%) while the mean length of the stenosis was 4.8 cm. After univariate and multivariate analysis, previous dilations (HR 2.6), multifocality (2.51), lengthof stenosis (>4 cm) (HR 1.49) and the hypospadias etiology (HR 11.9) were independent predictors for CUC (p<0.05)CONCLUSIONS: Hypospadias was the only etiology factor that predicts the need for CUC. Regarding radiological findings, extensive and multifocal stenosis, were predictors of complex surgery. History of previous dilations were also predictors of CUC.
OBJETIVO: Determinar los factores predictores asociados a Cirugía Uretral Compleja (CUC) en los casos de estenosis de la uretra anterior.MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio transversal con registro de datos retrospectivo, incluye a todos los pacientes masculinos a quienes se les practicó una plastía de la uretra anterior entre 2011 y 2018. Como CUC se consideró a la Uretroplastia con dos o más injertos, la anastomosis término terminal ampliada, la uretroplastia combinada y la cirugía por estadíos. Los datos se recabaron de la historia clínica electrónica consignándose aquellos demográficos, antecedente de tratamientos previos, así como las características de la estenosis (etiología, ubicación anatómica, longitud, número de estenosis entre otras). Se realizó un análisis univariado y multivariado para identificar variables predictoras de CUC. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron los datos de 665 pacientes con criterios de inclusión válidos. La media de edad fue de 56,1 años, 27,5% eran fumadores crónicos, 32,5% habían recibido algún tratamiento previo, siendo las dilataciones el procedimiento más común (17,6%), la etiología más prevalente fue la iatrógena seguida por la idiopática en un 61,1 y un 20,3% respectivamente, la ubicación más común fue la uretra bulbar en 56,2% mientras que la media de longitud de la estenosis fue de 4,8 cm. En el análisis univariado y multivariable el antecedente de dilataciones (HR 2,6), la multifocalidad (HR 2,51), la longitud de la estenosis (>4 cm) (HR 1,49) y la etiología hipospadias (HR 11,9) resultaron ser factores predictores independientes para CUC (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La hipospadia fue dentro de las etiologías analizadas la única que predice la necesidad de CUC. En lo que respecta a antecedentes y hallazgos radiológicos, las dilataciones y las estenosis extensas y multifocales respectivamente fueron predictores de CUC.
Asunto(s)
Estrechez Uretral , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos MasculinosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stricture recurrence and urinary incontinence (UI) rates in patients who underwent bulbomembranous anastomosis for management of short (≤ 2cm) bulbomembranous urethral stricture (BMS) after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgical treatment. In addition, we studied if there was any relation between post urethroplasty UI and the method employed for BPH surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2011 and October 2019. We included all patients who developed BMS after undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate or Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP). We excluded patients with UI after BPH surgical treatment as well as patients who underwent a dorsal or ventral onlay oral graft urethroplasty for longer proximal bulbar strictures, and also patients with associated bladder neck contracture or other strictures locations. We defined failure as the need for any intervention to restore the urethral caliber. RESULTS: Overall, 77 patients were included in the study with mean age 70 years (sd 8). Median BMS length was 1.5 cm (IQR 1-2). Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR 24 to 82). Of the patients, 74/77 (96.1%) were classified as success and 3/77 (3.9%), as failure. Out of the 6/77 (7.8%) patients who had postoperative UI, 5 of them had been treated for their BPH with OSP (p 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bulbomembranous anastomosis is a suitable reconstructive option for short proximal bulbar urethral strictures after BPH surgical treatment. OSP was associated with postoperative UI more frequently than endoscopic treatments modalities.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty technique by subcoronal approach and glans preservation in distal penile urethral strictures with fossa navicularis involvement and to report safety, effectiveness, and cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of patients treated at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires between January 2011 and December 2019. Main surgical steps: ventral subcoronal incision, dorsal dissection of glandelar urethra until piercing the tip of the glans, dorsal urethrotomy, and graft transposition. Low urinary tract symptoms, uroflowmetry, and urinalysis were assessed at follow-up. Simplified International Index Erectile Function and Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation were applied 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with a median age of 56.5 years (IQR 35.7-66.7) were included. Median stricture length was 5.5 cm (IQR 4-8.7). In 3 patients, Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications were reported. At 1 year, median peak flow was 18 mL/seg (IQR 12.7-27.4) and median mean flow 7.8 mL/seg (IQR 6.1-9.9). At 41.5 months follow-up (IQR 13.2-74), all patients were stricture free and had no changes in erectile function. Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation score ≥14 points was achieved by 14 patients (87.5%). CONCLUSION: For treatment of distal penile urethral strictures with fossa navicularis involvement, dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft by subcoronal approach and glans preservation is a feasible technique with excellent functional outcomes, minimal complications, and substantial cosmetic results.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Pene/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/complicaciones , Estrechez Uretral/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of clinical and pathological variables on cancer-specific and overall survival (OS) in de novo metastatic patients from a collaborative of primarily Latin American countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 4,060 patients with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 2015, a total of 530 (14.5%) had metastasis at clinical presentation. Relationships between clinical and pathological parameters and treatment-related outcomes were analyzed by Cox regression and the log-rank method. RESULTS: Of 530 patients, 184 (90.6%) had died of renal cell carcinoma. The median OS of the entire cohort was 24 months. American Society of Anesthesiology classification 3-4 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.64), perirenal fat invasion (HR: 2.02), and ≥ 2 metastatic organ sites (HR: 2.19) were independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS in multivariable analyses. We created a risk group stratification with these variables: no adverse risk factors (favorable group), median OS not reached; one adverse factor (intermediate group), median OS 33 months (HR: 2.04); and two or three adverse factors (poor risk group), median OS 14 months (HR: 3.58). CONCLUSION: Our study defines novel prognostic factors that are relevant to a Latin American cohort. With external validation, these easily discerned clinical variables can be used to offer prognostic information across low- and middle-income countries.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty. Material and Methods: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: Since World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic, urology services have developed strategies to prioritize and not to differ urgent and oncological patient's medical attention, in order to optimize resources and decrease infection probability among staff and patients. This unprecedented situation has generated a decrease in assistance and academic activities in most medical residences. The aim of this manuscript is to evaluate the impact of this health crisis on training programs through a survey addressed to urology medical residents. Materials and Methods: Cross sectional designed study, with multiple-choice non validated survey answered online by residents. Questionnaire was developed through the CAU EDUCACION platform. Results: A total of 148 responses from 18 countries coming from Latin America and Spain answering the survey. Of total, 82% answered that the activity of their urology department was significantly reduced, attending only urgent surgical pathologies, 15 % that, the urology activity has been closed completely and the staff was assigned to COVID-19 patients care, 3% continue with the regular clinic activity. Likewise, 75% stated that their surgical training has been completely affected, 93% receive urological information through tools such as Skype, ZOOM meeting, Cisco Webex, being Webinar modality the most used. Despite technological boom, 65% answered their academic training has been partially or completely affected. Most of the surveyed residents consider that period of residence should be extended to retrieve the educational targets. Conclusion: This unprecedented reality is negatively impacting the heterogeneous residency programs that American Confederation of Urology (CAU) nucleates. It is necessary to continue with technological innovation and allocate time and resources to easily generate accessible tools to favor the training of future urologists.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Urología/educación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pandemias , Internado y Residencia , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , América LatinaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Purpose: Obliterative urethral stenosis is a type of urethral lesion that compromises the whole corpus spongiosum's circumference. We present our experience in resolving complex long segment urethral obliteration in a single procedure using a combination of dorsal onlay oral mucosa graft (OMG) and ventral fasciocutaneous penile skin flap. Materials and methods: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed, which included data of men presenting long, obliterative strictures. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up before one year. Failure was defined as need for further urethral instrumentation. The surgical technique used consisted on the fixation of OMG to the tunica albuginea of the corpus cavernosum, thus creating a new urethral plate. Penile or foreskin flaps were employed to complete the ventral aspect. Postoperative follow-up was done with a voiding cystourethrography at week 3. Results: A total of 21 patients were included with a median age of 49 years. Mean follow-up was 25 months. Failure was found for 3 patients (2 of them needing dilations and only one required a new urethral reconstruction). Conclusion: Single stage combination of dorsal OMG with ventral fasciocutaneous penile flap showed good results for selected patients affected with obliterative urethral stenosis.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Pene/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/trasplante , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tempo Operativo , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of patients treated with Radical Prostatectomy (RP) and Brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer and to determine the Biochemical Recurrence (BCR) risk according to the treatment performed. METHODS: The study included 129 patients treated with iodine-125 seeds Brachytherapy, 98 patients treated with Laparoscopic RP (LRP), and 61 patients treated with Robotic RP (RRP) at our institution between December 1999 and January 2010, who had a low-risk disease according to D'Amico criteria (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason < or = 6, cT1c-T2a), or an intermediate-risk disease (PSA = or >10 and < 20 ng/mL, Gleason = 7, cT2b), but with a tumor burden of up to 30%. Follow-up was conducted with PSA at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every six months. As for Brachytherapy, annual digital rectal examinations were also performed. A PSA level increase of 2 ng/mL above the nadir in Brachytherapy (confirmed in 2 cases) and a PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL after RP were considered BCR. RESULTS: Overall mean follow-up was 60.5 months (R:1-152), with a mean time for BCR of 51.7 months (R:1-138). Estimated 5-year Biochemical Recurrence-free Survival (BCRFS) in patients with D'Amico low-risk was 85.7%, 77.2% and 90.7% (p 0.336), while for intermediate-risk it was 75.8%, 68.1% and 65.1% (p 0.114), for Brachytherapy, LRP and RRP respectively. In the univariate analysis, the Gleason score 7, a clinical stage T2b, and a D'Amico intermediate-risk were associated with an increased BCR risk, and treatment with Brachytherapy was associated with a decreased BCR risk, all these being statistically significant. In the multivariate analysis, only the Gleason score 7 was significant; treatment with LRP, RRP or Brachytherapy was not associated with a greater BCR risk. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy and Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy showed no difference in terms of Biochemical Recurrence risk in patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk tumors, with low tumor volume.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Purpose: To explore the current situation faced by Latin American urology departments during the COVID-19 Outbreak in terms of knowledge, actions, prioritization of urology practices, and implementation of internal clinical management protocols for inpatients and outpatients. Material and Methods: A non-validated, structured, self-administered, electronic survey with 35 closed multiple choice questions was conducted in Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and English and Deutsch versions from April 1st to April 30th, 2020. The survey was distributed through social networks and the official American Confederation of Urology (CAU) website. It was anonymous, mainly addressed to Latin American urologists and urology residents. It included 35 questions exploring different aspects: 1) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and internal management protocols for healthcare providers; 2) Priority surgeries and urological urgencies and 3) Inpatient and outpatient care. Results: Of 864 surveys received, 846 had at least 70% valid responses and were included in the statistical analyses. Surveys corresponded to South America in 62% of the cases, Central America and North America in 29.7%. 12.7% were residents. Regarding to PPE and internal management protocols, 88% confirmed the implementation of specific protocols and 45.4% have not received training to perform a safe clinical practice; only 2.3% reported being infected with COVID-19. 60.9% attended urgent surgeries. The following major uro-oncologic surgeries were reported as high priority: Radical Nephrectomy (RN) 58.4%, and Radical Cystectomy (RC) 57.3%. When we associate the capacity of hospitalization (urologic beds available) and percentage of high-priority surgery performed, we observed that centers with fewer urological beds (10-20) compared to centers with more urological beds (31-40) performed more frequently major urologic cancer surgeries: RN 54.5% vs 60.8% (p=0.0003), RC 53.1% vs 64.9% (p=0.005) respectively. Conclusions: At the time of writing (May 13th 2020) our data represents a snapshot of COVID-19 outbreak in Latin American urological practices. Our findings have practical implications and should be contextualized considering many factors related to patients and urological care: The variability of health care scenarios, institutional capacity, heterogeneity and burden of urologic disease, impact of surgical indications and decision making when prioritizing and scheduling surgeries in times of COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urología/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pandemias , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , América LatinaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate safety, efficacy and functional outcomes after open vesicourethral re - anastomosis using different approaches based on previous urinary continence. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients treated from 2002 to 2017 due to vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) post radical prostatectomy (RP) who failed endoscopic treatment with at least 3 months of follow-up. Continent and incontinent patients post RP were assigned to abdominal (AA) or perineal approach (PA), respectively. Demographic and perioperative variables were registered. Follow-up was completed with clinical interview, uroflowmetry and cystoscopy every 4 months. Success was defined as asymptomatic patients with urethral lumen that allows a 14 French flexible cystoscope. Results: Twenty patients underwent open re-anastomosis for VUAS after RP between 2002 and 2017. Mean age was 63.7 years (standard deviation 1.4) and median follow-up was 10 months (range 3 - 112). The approach distribution was PA 10 patients (50%) and AA 10 patients (50%). The mean surgery time and median hospital time were 246.2 ± 35.8 minutes and 4 days (range 2 - 10), respectively with no differences between approaches. No significant complication rate was found. Three patients in the AA group had gait disorder with favorable evolution and no sequels. Estimated 2 years primary success rate was 80%. After primary procedures 89.9% remained stenosis - free. All PA patients remained incontinent, and 90% AA remained continent during follow-up. Conclusion: Open vesicourethral re - anastomosis treatment is a reasonable treatment option for recurrent VUAS after RP. All patients with perineal approach remained incontinent while incontinence rate in abdominal approach was rather low.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Objetivos: Analizar la performance diagnóstica de la punción biopsia prostática (PBP) guiada mediante ecografía con fusión de imágenes de resonancia magnética (RM) para la detección del cáncer de próstata (CP) en pacientes con biopsia previa negativa. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron todas las PBP transrrectales dirigidas bajo ecografía con fusión de imágenes de RM en pacientes mayores de 40 años de edad con sospecha de CP y biopsia previa randomizada negativa efectuadas durante el período comprendido entre enero de 2015 y enero de 2018. Se calculó la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo de dicho procedimiento. Resultados: De un total de 40 pacientes, 25 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. La PBP transrrectal guiada bajo ecografía con fusión de imágenes de RM presentó una sensibilidad del 90% en la detección de CP clínicamente significativo (CPsig), mostrando una mejoría en la detección del 20% respecto de la biopsia randomizada. Conclusiones: La PBP transrrectal guiada con ecografía y fusión de imágenes de RM mejora la performance en la detección de CPsig en pacientes con biopsia previa negativa(AU)
Objective: To analyze the diagnostic performance of transrectal prostate US (ultrasonography) guided biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with negative previous biopsy. Materials and methods: Between January 2015 to January 2018, transrectal prostate biopsies under US guided with MRI fusion were performed in patients older than 40 years with suspicion of prostate cancer and prior negative biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the procedure were analyzed. Results: Out of a total of 40 patients, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Transrectal prostate US guided biopsy with MRI fusion presented a sensitivity of 90%, showing an improvement of 20% in the clinically significant prostate cancer detection compared with randomized biopsy. Conclusions: Transrectal prostate US guided biopsy with MRI fusion showed high performance in the detection of significative prostate cancer in patients with negative previous biopsy(AU)