Low sensitivity of invasive tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with bleeding ulcer.

BACKGROUND: A high false negative rate for antral infection with Helicobacter pylori when assessed by rapid urease test has recently been reported in patients with bleeding ulcer. This result could partly explain the differing prevalence of H. pylori infection in bleeding and non-bleeding ulcers. AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of a rapid urease test (UT), histology and culture for detection of H. pylori in antral biopsies from acute bleeding peptic ulcer patients using a serological test as reference. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with active bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcer at endoscopic examination admitted in six university hospitals in France were considered for inclusion. Five antral biopsies were taken during the diagnostic endoscopy for UT, culture and histology. A blood sample was taken for H. pylori serology. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty one patients were included and 129 (71%) had a positive serology. The sensitivity of UT, histology and culture for detection of H. pylori infection were 41%, 33% and 34%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of the three invasive tests were 48.8% (95% CI: 40.2-57.4) and 90.6% (95% CI: 82. 6-99) respectively. In the 52 serologically negative patients, only 5 had at least one invasive positive test. The sensitivity of the invasive tests decreased significantly with age but was not influenced by NSAIDs intake. Of 80 patients with a positive serological test and negative histological evaluation for H. pylori, chronic antral inflammation was found in 70 patients (87%). In 46 patients with both negative serological test and H. pylori negative test according to histology, only 13 (28%) had chronic antral inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of invasive tests for detection of H. pylori is low during acute ulcer bleeding, and they should be used with caution in this condition. A serological test is recommended to identify patients with H. pylori infection in spite of negative invasive tests.

[Diffuse jejuno-ileitis of Crohn's disease: a separate form of the disease?]. / Maladie de Crohn jéjuno-iléale diffuse: une forme particulière de la maladie?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diffuse jejuno-ileitis of Crohn's disease may be a homogeneous clinical subgroup. The aim of this work was to compare the demographic and clinical data at diagnosis and the initial treatments of patients with diffuse jejuno-ileitis of Crohn's disease and to the ones without this localization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For demographic and clinical studies, 48 (32M/16F) incident cases of diffuse jejuno-ileitis of Crohn's disease diagnosed between 1988 and 1994 in the EPIMAD register were compared with 96 (48M/48F) controls diagnosed the same year. As far as for the therapeutic management, the 48 incident cases were compared with 48 controls. RESULTS: Diffuse jejuno-ileitis constituted 3.3% of the total incident cases. Median age at diagnosis was significantly lower (20 vs 23 years, P = 0.01) and an upper digestive involvement was more frequent (56% vs 34%, P = 0.03) in patients with diffuse jejuno-ileitis. These patients were more often treated by total parenteral nutrition (43.8% vs 19.6%, P = 0.01) or azathioprine (50% vs 20.8%, P = 0.005). Azathioprine was also introduced earlier (20.7 vs 40.3 months, P = 0.009). Surgery for resection was less often required in diffuse jejuno-ileitis than in controls (65.2% vs 99.8%, P = 0.02) while more stricturoplasties were performed (52.9% vs 10%, P = 0.003); overall surgical rates did not significantly differ in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our series suggest that diffuse jejuno-ileitis of Crohn's disease is a subgroup of patients characterized by a young age at diagnosis, with more frequent and earlier requirement for azathioprine.