Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Target Oncol ; 17(1): 35-41, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34822070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective targeting of RAS mutations has proven elusive until recently. Novel agents directly targeting KRAS G12C have shown promise in early-phase clinical trials that included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Prior reports have suggested that G12C mutation may be predictive of poor outcome. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the specific characteristics and prognostic implications of individual RAS mutation subtypes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of individual RAS mutation types from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Registry between 2006 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 5165 patients entered onto the registry, 2305 (45%) had RAS mutation results available. 772 (33%) had a RAS mutation. The nature of the RAS mutation was available in 668 (87% of those with RAS mutation). Rare mutations (outside codons 12 and 13) made up 12.6% of the total. There were numerical differences in survival between the specific RAS mutation subgroups, with the longest median overall survival (30 months) observed in those with G12S mutations. However, there was no statistical difference in survival when comparing the various RAS mutations, including the comparison of G12C to G12S (p = 0.38). Patients with cancer harbouring rare RAS mutations had a median survival of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the G12S mutation was associated with the longest survival numerically, the observed survival for patients with the most common RAS mutations (G12C, G12V, G12A, G12D and G13D) did not significantly differ.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Proteínas ras , Australia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Mutación , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Sistema de Registros , Australia del Sur , Proteínas ras/genética
2.
Target Oncol ; 14(1): 85-91, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659494

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the molecular marker for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and has been associated with better survival outcomes in early stage disease. In metastatic CRC (mCRC), outcomes for patients with MSI are less clear. There is evolving evidence that treatment pathways for MSI CRC should include programmed-death 1 (PD-1) antibodies. OBJECTIVE: An analysis was performed to explore the impact of MSI status on overall survival (OS) in mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: South Australian Metastatic CRC Registry data were analysed to assess patient characteristics and survival outcomes, comparing patients with MSI CRC with those whose tumours were microsatellite stable (MSS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess OS. Cox regression analysis was undertaken to assess the independence of MSI as a prognostic factor. RESULTS: Of 4359 patients registered on the database, 598 (14%) had been tested for, and 62 (10.1%) of these patients had, demonstrable MSI. There were significantly higher rates of right-sided primary (p < 0.001), poorly differentiated pathology (p = 0.002), and BRAF V600E mutation (p < 0.001) in the MSI group. The MSI group were also less likely to receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001) or to have liver surgery, but more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage. The median overall survival was 9.5 months for those with MSI CRC versus 21.3 months for MSS CRC patients (p = 0.052). Cox regression analysis indicated that MSI was not an independent predictor of OS. Independent predictors of better OS included having liver surgery for metastasis, having chemotherapy, and being initially diagnosed at an early stage. CONCLUSIONS: Only 14% of patients with mCRC were tested for MSI, and 1 in 10 were found to be MSI high. The clinical characteristics of MSI mCRC are in keeping with those previously reported. MSI in this population-based registry was associated with a numerically lower survival which did not attain statistical significance.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Cirugía Colorrectal/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Australia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Mol Diagn Ther ; 20(1): 75-82, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26714964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with BRAF mutation (BRAF MT) generally have a poorer prognosis. BRAF MT may also have implications for treatment strategy. Despite this, inclusion of BRAF in routine molecular testing varies. Here we report the frequency of BRAF reporting in the South Australian (SA) mCRC registry reflecting community practice, together with the survival outcomes based on mutation status. METHODS: The SA population-based mCRC registry was analysed to assess the number of patients where a BRAF MT result was available. The patient characteristics are reported and overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 3639 patients who have been entered in the registry, only 6.2% (227) have BRAF MT results available. Of the patients tested, the BRAF MT rate is 12.7%. The mutation rate was highest in rightsided primary; right colon 23 versus left colon 8.9% and rectum 7%. There was no significant difference in median age or male/female proportion. The median overall survival (mOS) for BRAF MT versus wild-type (WT) patients is 14.0 versus 32.9 months (p = 0.003). For patients who have chemotherapy (plus or minus surgery) the mOS is 14.6 months BRAF MT versus 36.1 months (p ≤ 0.001) WT. Liver or lung resection was performed on only 8% of the BRAF MT group versus 26.5% of the WT group. CONCLUSION: Results in a population setting confirm our understanding that BRAF MT is more frequently right sided and of lower frequency in rectal cancer. Survival is lower for patients with mCRC that have BRAF MT, regardless of the therapy. BRAF testing is currently performed infrequently in an Australian setting despite its importance as a significant prognostic factor, and the implications for alternate therapeutic approaches.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA