Ames test study designs for nitrosamine mutagenicity testing: qualitative and quantitative analysis of key assay parameters.

The robust control of genotoxic N-nitrosamine (NA) impurities is an important safety consideration for the pharmaceutical industry, especially considering recent drug product withdrawals. NAs belong to the 'cohort of concern' list of genotoxic impurities (ICH M7) because of the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of this chemical class. In addition, regulatory concerns exist regarding the capacity of the Ames test to predict the carcinogenic potential of NAs because of historically discordant results. The reasons postulated to explain these discordant data generally point to aspects of Ames test study design. These include vehicle solvent choice, liver S9 species, bacterial strain, compound concentration, and use of pre-incubation versus plate incorporation methods. Many of these concerns have their roots in historical data generated prior to the harmonization of Ames test guidelines. Therefore, we investigated various Ames test assay parameters and used qualitative analysis and quantitative benchmark dose modelling to identify which combinations provided the most sensitive conditions in terms of mutagenic potency. Two alkyl-nitrosamines, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) were studied. NDMA and NDEA mutagenicity was readily detected in the Ames test and key assay parameters were identified that contributed to assay sensitivity rankings. The pre-incubation method (30-min incubation), appropriate vehicle (water or methanol), and hamster-induced liver S9, alongside Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100 and TA1535 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA(pKM101) provide the most sensitive combination of assay parameters in terms of NDMA and NDEA mutagenic potency in the Ames test. Using these parameters and further quantitative benchmark dose modelling, we show that N-nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA) is positive in Ames test and therefore should no longer be considered a historically discordant NA. The results presented herein define a sensitive Ames test design that can be deployed for the assessment of NAs to support robust impurity qualifications.

Drug Interactions for Low-Dose Inhaled Nemiralisib: A Case Study Integrating Modeling, In Vitro, and Clinical Investigations.

In vitro data for low-dose inhaled phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitor nemiralisib revealed that it was a substrate and a potent metabolism-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (P450) 3A4 and a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate. An integrated in silico, in vitro, and clinical approach including a clinical drug interaction study as well as a bespoke physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk. Inhaled nemiralisib (100 µg, single dose) was coadministered with itraconazole, a potent P4503A4/P-gp inhibitor, following 200 mg daily administrations for 10 days in 20 male healthy subjects. Systemic exposure to nemiralisib (AUC0-inf) increased by 2.01-fold versus nemiralisib alone. To extrapolate the clinical data to other P4503A4 inhibitors, an inhaled PBPK model was developed using Simcyp software. Retrospective simulation of the victim risk showed good agreement between simulated and observed data (AUC0-inf ratio 2.3 vs. 2.01, respectively). Prospective DDI simulations predicted a weak but manageable drug interaction when nemiralisib was coadministered with other P4503A4 inhibitors, such as the macrolides clarithromycin and erythromycin (simulated AUC0-inf ratio of 1.7), both common comedications in the intended patient populations. PBPK and static mechanistic models were also used to predict a negligible perpetrator DDI effect for nemiralisib on other P4503A4 substrates, including midazolam (a sensitive probe substrate of P4503A4) and theophylline (a narrow therapeutic index drug and another common comedication). In summary, an integrated in silico, in vitro, and clinical approach including an inhalation PBPK model has successfully discharged any potential patient DDI risks in future nemiralisib clinical trials. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This paper describes the integration of in silico, in vitro, and clinical data to successfully discharge potential drug-drug interaction risks for a low-dose inhaled drug. This work featured assessment of victim and perpetrator risks of drug transporters and cytochrome P450 enzymes, utilizing empirical and mechanistic approaches combined with clinical data (drug interaction and human absorption, metabolism, and pharmacokinetics) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approaches to facilitate bespoke risk assessment in target patient populations.

In vitro investigations into the roles of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes in the disposition and drug interactions of dolutegravir, a HIV integrase inhibitor.

Dolutegravir (DTG; S/GSK1349572) is a potent HIV-1 integrase inhibitor with a distinct resistance profile and a once-daily dose regimen that does not require pharmacokinetic boosting. This work investigated the in vitro drug transport and metabolism of DTG and assessed the potential for clinical drug-drug interactions. DTG is a substrate for the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Its high intrinsic membrane permeability limits the impact these transporters have on DTG's intestinal absorption. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 is the main enzyme responsible for the metabolism of DTG in vivo, with cytochrome P450 (P450) 3A4 being a notable pathway and UGT1A3 and UGT1A9 being only minor pathways. DTG demonstrated little or no inhibition (IC(50) values > 30 µM) in vitro of the transporters Pgp, BCRP, multidrug resistance protein 2, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, or the drug metabolizing enzymes CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, UGT1A1, or 2B7. Further, DTG did not induce CYP1A2, 2B6, or 3A4 mRNA in vitro using human hepatocytes. DTG does inhibit the renal OCT2 (IC(50) = 1.9 µM) transporter, which provides a mechanistic basis for the mild increases in serum creatinine observed in clinical studies. These in vitro studies demonstrate a low propensity for DTG to be a perpetrator of clinical drug interactions and provide a basis for predicting when other drugs could result in a drug interaction with DTG.

Recommendations for the Design of Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction Studies With Itraconazole Using a Mechanistic Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Regulatory agencies currently recommend itraconazole (ITZ) as a strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. This work by an International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development working group (WG) is to develop and verify a mechanistic ITZ physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model and provide recommendations for optimal DDI study design based on model simulations. To support model development and verification, in vitro and clinical PK data for ITZ and its metabolites were collected from WG member companies. The model predictions of ITZ DDIs with seven different CYP3A substrates were within the guest criteria for 92% of area under the concentration-time curve ratios and 95% of maximum plasma concentration ratios, thus verifying the model for DDI predictions. The verified model was used to simulate various clinical DDI study scenarios considering formulation, duration of dosing, dose regimen, and food status to recommend the optimal design for maximal inhibitory effect by ITZ.

Economic evidence for the prevention and treatment of atopic eczema: a protocol for a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Eczema, synonymous with atopic eczema or atopic dermatitis, is a chronic skin disease that has a similar impact on health-related quality of life as other chronic diseases. The proposed research aims to provide a comprehensive systematic assessment of the economic evidence base available to inform economic modelling and decision making on interventions to prevent and treat eczema at any stage of the life course. Whilst the Global Resource of Eczema Trials (GREAT) database collects together the effectiveness evidence for eczema, there is currently no such systematic resource on the economics of eczema. It is important to gain an overview of the current state of the art of economic methods in the field of eczema in order to strengthen the economic evidence base further. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a systematic review of the economic evidence surrounding interventions for the prevention and treatment of eczema. Relevant search terms will be used to search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit, Scopus, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and Web of Science in order to identify relevant evidence. To be eligible for inclusion studies will be primary empirical studies evaluating the cost, utility or full economic evaluation of interventions for preventing or treating eczema. Two reviewers will independently assess studies for eligibility and perform data abstraction. Evidence tables will be produced presenting details of study characteristics, costing methods, outcome methods and quality assessment. The methodological quality of studies will be assessed using accepted checklists. DISCUSSION: The systematic review is being undertaken to identify the type of economic evidence available, summarise the results of the available economic evidence and critically appraise the quality of economic evidence currently available to inform future economic modelling and resource allocation decisions about interventions to prevent or treat eczema. We aim to use the review to offer guidance about how to gather economic evidence in studies of eczema and/or what further research is necessary in order to inform this. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015024633.