Successful Concomitant Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy and Heart Transplant.

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard of therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Submassive pulmonary embolism in a patient with heart failure is generally considered a contraindication to immediate heart transplantation, given the risk of right heart failure posttransplant. Generally patients must wait for extended periods of time to recover from pulmonary embolism therapies before being listed for transplant. We report a case of successful concomitant pulmonary thromboendarterectomy and heart transplantation.

Benefits of Neurohormonal Therapy in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have dramatically improved short-term outcomes among patients with advanced heart failure. While neurohormonal blockade (NHB) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, its effect after LVAD placement has not been established. We reviewed medical records of 307 patients who underwent primary LVAD implantation from January 2006 to September 2015 at two institutions in the United States. Patients were followed for at least 2 years post-LVAD implantation or until explantation, heart transplantation, or death. Cox regression analysis stratifying on center was used to assess associations with mortality. Neurohormonal blockade use was treated as a time-dependent predictor. Stepwise selection indicated treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53 [0.30-0.95], p = 0.03), age at the time of implantation (HR = 1.28 [1.05-1.56] per decade, p = 0.02), length of stay postimplantation (HR = 1.16 [1.11-1.21] per week, p < 0.01) and INTERMACS profile of 1 or 2 (HR = 1.86 [1.17-2.97], p < 0.01) were independent predictors of mortality. In this large, retrospective study, treatment with ACEIs or ARBs was an independent factor associated with decreased mortality post-LVAD placement.

Management of RVAD Thrombosis in Biventricular HVAD Supported Patients: Case Series.

Patients with biventricular assist devices (BIVAD) are severely critically ill compared with patients who receive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support alone and portend a significant risk for greater adverse events including pump thrombosis (PT). Current approaches to treat PT are limited to LVAD with variable outcomes depending on the management strategy implemented. Moreover the management of PT in patients with BIVAD support, specifically to the right ventricular assist device (RVAD), is unknown. We describe the first care series to date on the management of PT in patients with durable right ventricular assist device and their outcomes.

Durable Biventricular Support Using Right Atrial Placement of the HeartWare HVAD.

Patients with Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels 1-2 who either have or are at risk for right ventricular failure face significant morbidity and mortality after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. Currently, the options for biventricular support are limited the Total Artificial Heart (TAH; CardioWest, Syncardia, Tuscon, AZ) or biventricular assist device (BiVAD), which uses bulky extracorporeal or implantable displacement pumps. We describe a successful series based on an innovative approach for biventricular support in consecutive INTERMACS levels 1-2 patients utilizing a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD; HeartWare, Framingham, MA) in a left ventricular (LV-HVAD) and a right atrial (RA-HVAD) configuration. From June 2014 through May 2016, 11 consecutive INTERMACS levels 1-2 patients with evidence of biventricular failure underwent implantation of a CF LVAD (10 LV-HVAD and 1 HeartMate II LVAD, Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) and RA-HVAD pumps. A total of 4,314 BiVAD support days were accumulated in our case series. Seven patients have undergone orthotopic heart transplant, whereas 3 are ambulatory and are either waiting transplant or reconsideration for transplantation. There is one mortality in this case series, which was due to an intracranial bleed from supratherapeutic anticoagulation. Two other patients experienced hemorrhagic strokes, but without neurologic sequelae, whereas no patients have experienced ischemic strokes. There were two episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding. This is the largest series to date involving this approach with outcomes superior to those previously described in patients receiving biventricular support. We conclude this novel therapy is a viable alternative to current practices in the management of biventricular failure.

Potential new drug treatments for congestive heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) has increased globally in recent decades. Advances in our understanding of underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms have given rise to new therapies for treating the growing HF population. Nonetheless, morbidity and mortality associated with HF and its financial implications are daunting. Thus, novel therapies that can improve the natural history of HF patients are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews new investigational drugs being developed for the treatment of both acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It presents the background of these drugs with a focus on their mechanism of action, their pharmacology, evidence from clinical studies and their potential role in HF management. EXPERT OPINION: The mortality benefit associated with serelaxin treatment in the RELAX-HF trial is being tested in RELAX-AHF II, while two other drugs, ularitide and TRV027, are also being evaluated in ADHF patients. Two new agents for the treatment of chronic HFrEF, LCZ696 and ivabradine, have been recently been approved for use by the FDA and four novel agents which have shown considerable promise in early studies, omecamtiv mecarbil, vericiguat, finerenone, and neuregulin, are currently being evaluated in late-phase clinical trials.

A Case Series of Biventricular Circulatory Support Using Two Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Operative Approach.

Increased use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to treat advanced heart failure has heightened concern for right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Biventricular support is required in up to 30% of LVAD recipients. Currently, no durable long-term right ventricular assist device (RVAD) has been approved other than the Syncardia (Tucson, AZ) total artificial heart. A recent publication reported the placement of continuous flow LVAD in the heavily trabeculated right ventricle; however, this orientation may jeopardize both assist device and right ventricle function. We describe three cases of right-sided mechanical circulatory support with durable RVAD implanted in the right atrium, allowing long-term support with fewer anatomic limitations as compared with right ventricular cannulation.