VERITAC-2: a Phase III study of vepdegestrant, a PROTAC ER degrader, versus fulvestrant in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Vepdegestrant (ARV-471) is an oral PROTAC ER degrader that binds an E3 ubiquitin ligase and ER to directly trigger ubiquitination of ER and its subsequent proteasomal degradation. In a first-in-human Phase I/II study, vepdegestrant monotherapy was well tolerated with clinical activity in pretreated patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. The global, randomized Phase III VERITAC-2 study compares efficacy and safety of vepdegestrant versus fulvestrant in adults with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer after treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy. Progression-free survival by blinded independent central review (primary end point) will be assessed in the intention-to-treat population and ESR1 mutation-positive subpopulation. Secondary end points include overall survival, tumor response, safety, pharmacokinetics, patient-reported outcomes, and circulating tumor DNA biomarkers.Clinical trial registration: NCT05654623 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

VERITAC-2 is a clinical trial comparing vepdegestrant, a new drug that degrades estrogen receptors, to an existing treatment called fulvestrant in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer grows in response to estrogen, a hormone in the body, and has low levels or no HER2 protein. People living with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer that has grown, spread to another part of the body, or cannot be removed by surgery are often treated with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapies, but their cancer may get worse on these treatments and new treatments are needed. Fulvestrant, an endocrine therapy that attaches to estrogen receptors, lowers estrogen's effect on tumors and can slow or stop cancer growth. Vepdegestrant, a new medicine being tested for ER+ breast cancer, is a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) protein degrader that attaches to estrogen receptors and causes them to be tagged for removal by the cell's natural protein disposal system. By removing estrogen receptors, vepdegestrant may cause tumors to stop growing or shrink.This paper describes the Phase III VERITAC-2 clinical study comparing vepdegestrant versus fulvestrant in people living with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy.Patients will be randomly assigned to receive vepdegestrant (a pill taken once daily by mouth) or fulvestrant (a shot given into the muscle). The purpose of the study is to find out how long people live without their cancer getting worse with vepdegestrant or fulvestrant. VERITAC-2 will also look at how long people live during the study, side effects people may experience, and the overall well-being of people throughout the study.

Do benzodiazepines reduce the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of concomitant use of benzodiazepines on the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TR-MDD). METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing rTMS treatment outcomes between patients taking benzodiazepines (n = 59) and those who were not (n = 136). Participants completed the HAM-A, HAM-D17, MADRS and ZUNG at baseline and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Patients taking benzodiazepines during rTMS treatment did not show any difference in partial response, response or remission rates compared to patients not treated with benzodiazepines. There was a significant decrease (p < .0001) in depression and anxiety scores from baseline to post-treatment among both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant benzodiazepine treatment had no effect on the efficacy of rTMS treatment of TRD, contrary to previous research.

Contributions of Cathepsin A and Carboxylesterase 1 to the Hydrolysis of Tenofovir Alafenamide in the Human Liver, and the Effect of CES1 Genetic Variation on Tenofovir Alafenamide Hydrolysis.

The prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a first-line antiviral agent for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. TAF activation involves multiple steps, and the first step is an ester hydrolysis reaction catalyzed by hydrolases. This study was to determine the contributions of carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) and cathepsin A (CatA) to TAF hydrolysis in the human liver. Our in vitro incubation studies showed that both CatA and CES1 catalyzed TAF hydrolysis in a pH-dependent manner. At their physiologic pH environment, the activity of CatA (pH 5.2) was approximately 1,000-fold higher than that of CES1 (pH 7.2). Given that the hepatic protein expression of CatA was approximately 200-fold lower than that of CES1, the contribution of CatA to TAF hydrolysis in the human liver was estimated to be much greater than that of CES1, which is contrary to the previous perception that CES1 is the primary hepatic enzyme hydrolyzing TAF. The findings were further supported by a TAF incubation study with the CatA inhibitor telaprevir and the CES1 inhibitor bis-(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate. Moreover, an in vitro study revealed that the CES1 variant G143E (rs71647871) is a loss-of-function variant for CES1-mediated TAF hydrolysis. In summary, our results suggest that CatA may play a more important role in the hepatic activation of TAF than CES1. Additionally, TAF activation in the liver could be affected by CES1 genetic variation, but the magnitude of impact appears to be limited due to the major contribution of CatA to hepatic TAF activation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Contrary to the general perception that carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) is the major enzyme responsible for tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hydrolysis in the human liver, the present study demonstrated that cathepsin A may play a more significant role in TAF hepatic hydrolysis. Furthermore, the CES1 variant G143E (rs71647871) was found to be a loss-of-function variant for CES1-mediated TAF hydrolysis.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis of guselkumab in healthy subjects and patients with psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis.

AIMS: Guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin 23, is approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), generalized pustular psoriasis, and erythrodermic psoriasis in various countries. The purpose of this analysis was to develop a comprehensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for guselkumab to determine whether PK differs across different disease populations and healthy subjects. METHODS: A nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach was used to analyse 23 097 serum PK samples obtained from 2623 healthy subjects and patients with PsO, PsA and PPP across 9 phase 1-3 clinical trials. RESULTS: Guselkumab concentrations were adequately described by a 2-compartment linear PK model with first-order absorption and elimination. Clearance (CL), central and peripheral volume of distribution, intercompartmental flow, absorption rate constant and absolute bioavailability estimates were 0.255 L/d, 3.60 L, 1.78 L, 0.369 L/d, 0.313 d-1 and 49.2%, respectively, for a subject weighing 70 kg. Terminal half-life was estimated to be approximately 14.6 days. Body weight was the primary factor affecting CL and central volume of distribution. CL of guselkumab was similar among patients with PsA, PsO and PPP, but CL in disease populations was 11-17% lower than that in healthy subjects after other covariate effects such as body weight were considered. CONCLUSION: The population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that, after other covariate effects were taken into account, patients with PsO, PsA and PPP had similar PK characteristics, with CL in these disease populations being slightly lower than in healthy individuals.

S-warfarin limited sampling strategy with a population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate exposure and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 activity in healthy adults.

PURPOSE: S-warfarin is used to phenotype cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 activity. This study evaluated S-warfarin limited sampling strategy with a population pharmacokinetic (PK) approach to estimate CYP2C9 activity in healthy adults. METHODS: In 6 previously published studies, a single oral dose of warfarin 10 mg was administered alone or with a CYP2C9 inducer to 100 healthy adults. S-warfarin concentrations were obtained from adults during conditions when subjects were not on any prescribed medications. A population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modeling. Limited sampling models (LSMs) using single- or 2-timepoint concentrations were compared with full PK profiles from intense sampling using empiric Bayesian post hoc estimations of S-warfarin AUC derived from the population PK model. Preset criterion for LSM selection and validation were a correlation coefficient (R2) >0.9, relative percent mean prediction error (%MPE) >-5 to <5%, relative percent mean absolute error (%MAE) ≤ 10%, and relative percent root mean squared error (%RMSE) ≤ 15%. RESULTS: S-warfarin concentrations (n=2540) were well described with a two-compartment model. Mean apparent oral clearance was 0.56 L/hr and volume of distribution was 35.5 L. Clearance decreased 33% with the CYP2C9 *3 allele and increased 42% with lopinavir/ritonavir co-administration. During CYP2C9 constitutive conditions, LSMs at 48 hr and at 72 hr as well as 2-timepoint LSMs were within acceptable limits for R2, %MPE, %MAE, and %RMSE. During CYP2C9 induction, S-warfarin LSMs had unacceptable %MPE, %MAE, and %RMSE. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotyping studies with S-warfarin in healthy subjects can utilize a single- and/or a 2-timepoint LSM with a population PK approach to estimate constitutive CYP2C9 activity.

Impact of CYP2B6 genotype, tuberculosis therapy, and formulation on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in infants and children under 40 months of age.

OBJECTIVE: Dosing efavirenz (EFV) in children less than 3 years of age is challenging due to large variability in drug levels. This study evaluated differences in pharmacokinetics with tuberculosis (TB) therapy, formulation, age, and CYP2B6 genotype. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic data from three IMPAACT/PACTG studies (P382, P1021, and P1070) for children initiating therapy less than 40 months of age were evaluated. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were combined in a population pharmacokinetic model. Exposure from the 2-week pharmacokinetic visit was compared with changes in viral RNA between the Week 0 and Week 4 visits. RESULTS: The model included 103 participants (19 on TB therapy). CYP2B6 516 genotype information was available for 82 participants (TT: 15, GT: 28, GG: 39). Median age at the first pharmacokinetic visit was 17.0 months (range: 2.0-39.0 months). Liquid formulation led to a 42% decrease in bioavailability compared with opened capsules. TB therapy (isoniazid and rifampin) led to a 29% decreased clearance, however Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the majority of participants on TB therapy receiving standard EFV dosing to be in the target area under the curve range. Clearance was 5.3-fold higher for GG than TT genotype and 3.3-fold higher for GT than TT genotype. Age did not have a significant effect on clearance in the final model. Initial viral RNA decay was lower for patients in the lowest quartile of exposures (area under the curves) than for higher quartiles (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: EFV dosing should account for CYP2B6 516 genotype and formulation, but does not require adjustment for concurrent TB therapy.

Drugs for the Treatment of Zika Virus Infection.

Zika virus is an emerging flavivirus that causes the neurodevelopmental congenital Zika syndrome and that has been linked to the neuroinflammatory Guillain-Barré syndrome. The absence of a vaccine or a clinically approved drug to treat the disease combined with the likelihood that another outbreak will occur in the future defines an unmet medical need. Several promising drug candidate molecules have been reported via repurposing studies, high-throughput compound library screening, and de novo design in the short span of a few years. Intense research activity in this area has occurred in response to the World Health Organization declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on February 1, 2016. In this Perspective, the authors review the emergence of Zika virus, the biology of its replication, targets for therapeutic intervention, target product profile, and current drug development initiatives.

Lithium reduces tau phosphorylation but not A beta or working memory deficits in a transgenic model with both plaques and tangles.

Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is a major kinase implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and reducing its activity may have therapeutic efficacy. Two variants exist, referred to as GSK-3 alpha and GSK-3beta. In addition to the latter's well-described role in the phosphorylation of tau, reports also suggest that GSK-3 alpha may regulate amyloid precursor protein processing and Abeta formation. The activities of both GSK-3 alpha and GSK-3beta are reduced by lithium, a well-tolerated drug used in humans to combat bipolar disorder. Here, we investigate the therapeutic efficacy of chronic lithium administration in aged 3xTg-AD mice that harbor both plaques and tangles. We found that lithium reduced tau phosphorylation but did not significantly alter the A beta load. Despite the reduction in phosphotau, lithium treatment did not improve deficits in working memory. Although other studies have investigated the effects of lithium on tau biochemistry, this study represents the first to address comprehensively its therapeutic potential on other critical aspects of AD including its effect on A beta and learning and memory. It remains to be determined from human clinical trials whether lithium treatment alone will improve the clinical outcome in AD patients. These results, however, suggest that the most efficacious treatment will be combining lithium with other anti-A beta interventions.