Influence of non-invasive blood pressure measurement intervals on the occurrence of intra-operative hypotension.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Standards for Basic Monitoring recommends blood pressure (BP) measurement every 5 min. Research has shown distractions or technical factors can cause prolonged measurement intervals exceeding 5 min. We investigated the relationship between prolonged non-invasive BP (NIBP) measurement interval and the incidence of hypotension, detected post-interval. Our secondary outcome was to determine independent predictors of these prolonged NIBP measurement intervals. Retrospective data were analyzed from 139,509 general anesthesia cases from our institution's Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS). Absolute hypotension (AH) was defined a priori as a systolic BP < 80 mmHg and relative hypotension (RH) was defined as a 40% decrease in systolic BP from the preoperative baseline. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals and Pearson's Chi square Test reported the association of prolonged NIBP measurement intervals on hypotension detected post-NIBP measurement interval. Logistic regression models were developed to determine independent predictors of NIBP measurement intervals. The analysis revealed that NIBP measurement intervals greater than 6 and 10 min are associated with an approximately four times higher incidence of a patient transitioning into hypotension (AH/RH > 6 min OR 4.0 / 3.6; AH/RH > 10 min OR 4.3 / 3.9; p < 0.001). A key finding was that the "> 10-minute AH model" indicated that age 41-80, increased co-morbidity profile, obesity and turning (repositioning) of the operative room table were significant predictors of prolonged NIBP measurement intervals (p < 0.001). While we do not suggest NIBP measurement intervals cause hypotension, intervals greater than 6 and 10 min are associated with a fourfold increase in the propensity of an undetected transition into both RH or AH. These data support current monitoring guidelines.

Success of Intubation Rescue Techniques after Failed Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group.

BACKGROUND: Multiple attempts at tracheal intubation are associated with mortality, and successful rescue requires a structured plan. However, there remains a paucity of data to guide the choice of intubation rescue technique after failed initial direct laryngoscopy. The authors studied a large perioperative database to determine success rates for commonly used intubation rescue techniques. METHODS: Using a retrospective, observational, comparative design, the authors analyzed records from seven academic centers within the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group between 2004 and 2013. The primary outcome was the comparative success rate for five commonly used techniques to achieve successful tracheal intubation after failed direct laryngoscopy: (1) video laryngoscopy, (2) flexible fiberoptic intubation, (3) supraglottic airway as part of an exchange technique, (4) optical stylet, and (5) lighted stylet. RESULTS: A total of 346,861 cases were identified that involved attempted tracheal intubation. A total of 1,009 anesthesia providers managed 1,427 cases of failed direct laryngoscopy followed by subsequent intubation attempts (n = 1,619) that employed one of the five studied intubation rescue techniques. The use of video laryngoscopy resulted in a significantly higher success rate (92%; 95% CI, 90 to 93) than other techniques: supraglottic airway conduit (78%; 95% CI, 68 to 86), flexible bronchoscopic intubation (78%; 95% CI, 71 to 83), lighted stylet (77%; 95% CI, 69 to 83), and optical stylet (67%; 95% CI, 35 to 88). Providers most frequently choose video laryngoscopy (predominantly GlideScope [Verathon, USA]) to rescue failed direct laryngoscopy (1,122/1,619; 69%), and its use has increased during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Video laryngoscopy is associated with a high rescue intubation success rate and is more commonly used than other rescue techniques.

Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group.

BACKGROUND: Research regarding difficult mask ventilation (DMV) combined with difficult laryngoscopy (DL) is extremely limited even though each technique serves as a rescue for one another. METHODS: Four tertiary care centers participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group used a consistent structured patient history and airway examination and airway outcome definition. DMV was defined as grade 3 or 4 mask ventilation, and DL was defined as grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopic view or four or more intubation attempts. The primary outcome was DMV combined with DL. Patients with the primary outcome were compared to those without the primary outcome to identify predictors of DMV combined with DL using a non-parsimonious logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 492,239 cases performed at four institutions among adult patients, 176,679 included a documented face mask ventilation and laryngoscopy attempt. Six hundred ninety-eight patients experienced the primary outcome, an overall incidence of 0.40%. One patient required an emergent cricothyrotomy, 177 were intubated using direct laryngoscopy, 284 using direct laryngoscopy with bougie introducer, 163 using videolaryngoscopy, and 73 using other techniques. Independent predictors of the primary outcome included age 46 yr or more, body mass index 30 or more, male sex, Mallampati III or IV, neck mass or radiation, limited thyromental distance, sleep apnea, presence of teeth, beard, thick neck, limited cervical spine mobility, and limited jaw protrusion (c-statistic 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.87]). CONCLUSION: DMV combined with DL is an infrequent but not rare phenomenon. Most patients can be managed with the use of direct or videolaryngoscopy. An easy to use unweighted risk scale has robust discriminating capacity.

Intraoperative medications associated with hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To facilitate the identification of drugs and patient factors associated with hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. DESIGN: Using an existing database containing complete perioperative records, instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were identified using a physiologic and treatment-based screening algorithm. All cases were manually reviewed by 2 clinicians, with a third adjudicating disagreements, and confirmed cases were matched 3:1 with control cases. Intraoperative medications given in instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis and patient risk factors were compared with control cases. SETTING: University of Michigan Hospital, a large, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2004, and January 5, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis during anesthesia. Patient risk factors and intraoperative medications associated with hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis occurred in 55 of 461 986 cases (1 in 8400). Hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis occurred in 52 patients, with 1 patient experiencing 3 instances and another patient 2 instances. Only 1 drug was associated with an increased risk of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis: protamine (odds ratio, 11.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-99.26; P=.0233). No category of drugs was associated with increased risk. Of patient risk factors, only personal history of anaphylaxis was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio, 77.1; 95% confidence interval, 10.46-567.69; P=<.0001). Postoperative follow-up and evaluation of patients were low at our institution. A serum tryptase level was sent in only 49% of cases, and 41% of levels were positive, an overall positive rate of 20% of cases. Following instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis, only 29% of patients were seen and evaluated by an allergist at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis is a rare complication of anesthesia, with an incidence consistent with the existing literature. Contrary to most existing literature, only protamine was associated with increased risk. A personal history of anaphylaxis appears to best predict risk of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis.