Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs may Worsen the Course of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently prescribed or used as self-medication in cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Nevertheless, the consequences of such medication on the risk of pleuroparenchymal complications are not well known. The aim was to investigate whether exposure to NSAIDs prior to hospital admission among patients suffering from CAP is associated with the development of pleural complications or a lung abscess. METHODS: All consecutive non-immunocompromised patients with CAP and admitted to a university hospital were prospectively included (2-year period). The risk of pleuropulmonary complications was analyzed according to previous exposure to NSAIDs. RESULTS: Of the 221 included patients, 40 (18.1%) had developed a pleuropulmonary complication. NSAIDs intake prior to admission was reported for 24 patients (10.9%) who were younger (50.6 ± 18.5 vs. 66.5 ± 16.4 years; p = 0.001), had less comorbidities (60 vs. 25.1%; p = 0.001), had a longer duration between the first symptoms of CAP and the start of an antibiotic therapy (6.1 ± 7.6 vs. 2.8 ± 3.8 days; p = 0.001), and who had a higher incidence of pleuropulmonary complications (33.3 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.048). In multivariate analyses, two factors were independently associated with the development of pleuroparenchymal complications: NSAIDs intake [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.57 [1.02-6.64]; p = 0.049] and alcohol abuse (OR = 2.68 [1.27-5.69]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that NSAIDs, often taken by young and healthy patients, may worsen the course of CAP with delayed therapy and a higher rate of pleuropulmonary complications.

Comparison of two immunoassays for measurement of faecal calprotectin in detection of inflammatory bowel disease: (pre)-analytical and diagnostic performance characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can overlap. Faecal calprotectin has recently been established to be a non-invasive marker for neutrophilic intestinal inflammation. We compared two devices for extraction of faecal calprotectin. Based on these results, two immunoassays for measurement of faecal calprotectin were evaluated. METHODS: Samples were extracted using the Thermo Fisher extraction device (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Smart Pep extraction device (Roche Diagnostics) and measured with the EliA Calprotectin immunoassay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on ImmunoCAP 250. The performance of both assays was investigated by enrolling 183 consecutive patients (79 males, 104 females; median age 32 years) with clinical suspicion of IBD. Faecal calprotectin was measured using a recently launched immunoassay, EliA Calprotectin in comparison with an established immunochomatographic point-of-care-test (POCT, Quantum Blue Calprotectin; Bühlmann). Results were compared with endoscopic and histological findings. RESULTS: The use of the Thermo Fisher extraction device resulted in an underestimation of faecal calprotectin concentrations, especially in liquid stool samples. IBD was diagnosed in 51/183 patients (27.9%) [Crohn's disease (CD, n=37), ulcerative colitis (UC, n=14)]. After adjusting the optimal cut-off for detection of IBD using receiver operating curve analysis, a sensitivity of 94.1% and 90.2% and specificity of 87.9% and 90.9% for the EliA and POCT assay, respectively, were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The Thermo Fisher device is not reliable for extraction of faecal calprotectin. The performance characteristics of the EliA Calprotectin assay are statistically equivalent to the Bühlmann POCT.