Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 22: 78-83, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32591309

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Designated cross-specialty shock teams have been proposed as a mechanism to manage the complexity of decision-making and facilitate collaborative, patient-centred care-planning in cardiogenic shock. Observational data support the notion that shock protocols and teams may improve survival, but there is an absence of data interrogating how clinicians engage with and value the shock team paradigm. This study sought to explore clinician perceptions of the value of the shock call system on decision making and the management of CGS. MATERIALS & METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. A focus group, semi-structured interview was conducted with twelve cross-specialty members of a shock team at a single tertiary cardiac centre in the UK. The focus group was audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed to capture and describe the clinicians' experience and perceptions of shock team discussions. RESULTS: Eight cardiac intensivists, two heart failure cardiologists, one cardiothoracic surgeon and one interventional cardiologist participated in the focus group. Four key themes were identified from the discussions: supportive decision making; team communication; governance and learning; and future directions. CONCLUSION: This study supports the notion that cross-specialty, real-time patient discussion may provide added value beyond protocolised decision making and account for the complexities of managing patients in a field where definitive, high-quality evidence to guide practice is currently limited.


Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos , Choque Cardiogénico , Comunicación , Humanos , Percepción , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia
2.
Mil Med ; 171(6): 463-7, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808121

RESUMEN

Man is not designed to live or to fight at altitude, and mountains have successfully resisted armies' attempts to conquer them for centuries. High-altitude mountainous terrain imposes great strains on individuals, units, and the health services designed to protect them. Medical personnel are challenged to minimize the damaging effects of the harsh environment, to maximize survival rates, and to preserve combat effectiveness by optimizing physiological and behavioral adaptation. Such challenges are best met with targeted medical training. This article reviews basic altitude physiology, relevant military history, the scope of altitude illnesses, prevention and treatment strategies, and existing mountain medicine training programs.


Asunto(s)
Mal de Altura/prevención & control , Altitud , Hipoxia Encefálica/prevención & control , Medicina Militar/educación , Personal Militar/educación , Transporte de Pacientes , Triaje , Curriculum , Humanos , Montañismo/educación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA