Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 221(1): 16-20, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711165

RESUMEN

Maternal influenza vaccination is increasingly recognized to protect infants from influenza infection in their first 6 months. We used the screening method to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza in infants in England, using newly available uptake data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink pregnancy register, matched on week of birth and region and adjusted for ethnicity. We found VE of 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-84%) in the 2013-2014 season and 50% (95% CI, 11%-72%) in 2014-2015, with similar VE against influenza-related hospitalization. VE against the dominant circulating influenza strain was higher, at 78% (95% CI, 16%-94%) against H1N1 in 2013-2014, and 60% (95% CI, 16%-81%) against H3N2 in 2014-2015.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Gripe Humana/virología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Euro Surveill ; 22(4)2017 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182539

RESUMEN

The United Kingdom is introducing a universal annual influenza vaccination programme for children. Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalisation in 2 to 6 year-olds in England was measured in 2015/16 using the screening method. VE adjusted for age, geography and month was 54.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 31.5% to 68.4%) for all influenza types combined; 48.3% (95% CI: 16.9% to 67.8%) for A(H1N1)pdm09 and 70.6% (95% CI: 33.2% to 87.1%) for B. The findings support on-going programme roll-out.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Laboratorios , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Potencia de la Vacuna , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación
3.
Nat Hum Behav ; 8(2): 288-299, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049560

RESUMEN

Despite evidence suggesting that some migrants are at risk of under-immunization and have experienced severe health inequities during the pandemic, data are limited on migrants' COVID-19 vaccine coverage globally. Here we linked data from non-European Union migrants and resettled refugees to the national COVID-19 vaccination dataset in England. We estimated patterns in second and third dose delays and overdue doses between 12 December 2020 and 20 April 2022 by age, visa type and ethnicity. Of the 465,470 linked records, 91.8% (427,073/465,470) of migrants received a second dose and 51.3% (238,721/465,470) received a third. Refugees had the highest risk of delayed second (adjusted odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval 1.55-1.79) and third dose (1.55; 1.43-1.69). Black migrants were twice as likely to have a second dose delayed (2.37; 2.23-2.54) than white migrants, but this trend reversed for the third dose. Older migrants (>65 years) were four times less likely to have received their second or third dose compared with the general population in England aged >65 or older. Policymakers, researchers and practitioners should work to understand and address personal and structural barriers to vaccination for diverse migrant populations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Refugiados , Migrantes , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Cobertura de Vacunación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
4.
Vaccine ; 42(7): 1656-1664, 2024 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342716

RESUMEN

We present England 2021/22 end-of-season adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) against laboratory confirmed influenza related emergency care use in children aged 1-17 and in adults aged 50+, and serological findings in vaccinated vs unvaccinated adults by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Influenza vaccination has been routinely offered to all children aged 2-10 years and adults aged 65 years + in England. In 2021/22, the offer was extended to children to age 15 years, and adults aged 50-64 years. Influenza activity rose during the latter half of the 2021/22 season, while remaining comparatively low due to COVID-19 pandemic control measures. Influenza A(H3N2) strains predominated. A test negative design was used to estimate aVE by vaccine type. Cases and controls were identified within a sentinel laboratory surveillance system. Vaccine histories were obtained from the National Immunisation Management Service (NIMS), an influenza and COVID-19 vaccine registry. These were linked to emergency department presentations (excluding accidents) with respiratory swabbing ≤ 14 days before or ≤ 7 days after presentation. Amongst adults, 423 positive and 32,917 negative samples were eligible for inclusion, and 145 positive and 6,438 negative samples among children. Those admitted to hospital were further identified. In serology against the circulating A(H3N2) A/Bangladesh/4005/2020-like strain, 61 % of current season adult vaccinees had titres ≥ 1:40 compared to 17 % of those unvaccinated in 2020/21 or 2021/22 (p < 0.001). We found good protection from influenza vaccination against influenza requiring emergency care in children (72.7 % [95 % CI 52.7, 84.3 %]) and modest effectiveness in adults (26.1 % [95 % CI 4.5, 42.8 %]). Adult VE was higher for A(H1N1) (81 % [95 % CI 50, 93 %]) than A(H3N2) (33 % [95 % CI 6, 53 %]). Consistent protection was observable across preschool, primary and secondary school aged children. Imperfect test specificity combined with very low prevalence may have biased estimates towards null. With limited influenza circulation, the study could not determine differences by vaccine types.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estaciones del Año , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Pandemias/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Vacunación , Atención Primaria de Salud
5.
Int J Med Inform ; 170: 104974, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36577202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In England routine vaccinations are recorded in either the patients General Practice record or in series of sub-national vaccine registers that are not interoperable. During the COVID-19 pandemic it was established that COVID vaccines would need to be delivered in multiple settings where current vaccine registers do not exist. We describe how a national vaccine register was created to collect data on COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: The National Immunisation Management System (NIMS) was developed by a range of health and digital government agencies. Vaccinations delivered are entered on an application which is verified by individual National Health Service number in a centralised system. UKHSA receive a feed of this data to use for monitoring vaccine coverage, effectiveness, and safety. To validate the vaccination data, we compared vaccine records to self-reported vaccination dose, manufacturer, and vaccination date from the enhanced surveillance system from 11 February 2021 to 24 August 2021. RESULTS: With the Implementation of NIMS, we have been able to successfully record COVID-19 vaccinations delivered in multiple settings. Of 1,129 individuals, 97.8% were recorded in NIMS as unvaccinated compared to those who self-reported as unvaccinated. One hundred percent and 99.3% of individuals recorded in NIMS as having at least one dose and two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were also self-reported as having at least one and two doses, respectively. Of the 100% reporting at least one dose, 98.3% self-reported the same vaccination date as NIMS. A total of 98.8% and 99.3% had the same manufacturer information for their first dose and second dose as that which was self-reported, respectively. DISCUSSION: Daily access to individual-level vaccine data from NIMS has allowed UKHSA to estimate vaccine coverage and provide some of the world's first vaccine effectiveness estimates rapidly and accurately.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Pandemias , Medicina Estatal , Programas de Inmunización , Sistema de Registros , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e055278, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232787

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine coverage among individuals aged 50 years and above in England since the beginning of the programme. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study assessed by logistic regression and mean prevalence margins. SETTING: COVID-19 vaccinations delivered in England from 8 December 2020 to 17 May 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 30 624 257/61 967 781 (49.4%) and 17 360 045/61 967 781 (28.1%) individuals in England were recorded as vaccinated in the National Immunisation Management System with a first dose and a second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Vaccination status with COVID-19 vaccinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion, adjusted ORs and mean prevalence margins for individuals not vaccinated with dose 1 among those aged 50-69 years and dose 1 and 2 among those aged 70 years and above. RESULTS: Of individuals aged 50 years and above, black/African/Caribbean ethnic group was the least likely of all ethnic groups to be vaccinated with dose 1 of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, of those aged 70 years and above, the odds of not having dose 2 was 5.53 (95% CI 5.42 to 5.63) and 5.36 (95% CI 5.29 to 5.43) greater among Pakistani and black/African/Caribbean compared with white British ethnicity, respectively. The odds of not receiving dose 2 was 1.18 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.20) higher among individuals who lived in a care home compared with those who did not. This was the opposite to that observed for dose 1, where the odds of being unvaccinated was significantly higher among those not living in a care home (0.89 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.91)). CONCLUSIONS: We found that there are characteristics associated with low COVID-19 vaccine coverage. Inequalities, such as ethnicity are a major contributor to suboptimal coverage and tailored interventions are required to improve coverage and protect the population from SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación
7.
Vaccine ; 39(45): 6622-6627, 2021 10 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627625

RESUMEN

Vaccines are a key part of the global strategy to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR) since prevention of infection should reduce antibiotic use. England commenced national rollout of a live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) programme for children aged 2-3 years together with a series of geographically discrete pilot areas for primary school age children in 2013 extending to older children in subsequent seasons. We investigated vaccine programme impact on community antibiotic prescribing rates. Antibiotic prescribing incidence rates for respiratory (RTI) and urinary tract infections (UTI; controls) were calculated at general practice (GP) level by age category (children<=10 years/adults) and season for LAIV pilot and non-pilot areas between 2013/14 and 2015/16. To estimate the LAIV (primary school age children only) intervention effect, a random effects model was fitted. A multivariable random-effects Poisson regression investigated the association of antibiotic prescribing rates in children with LAIV uptake (2-3-year-olds only) at GP practice level. RTI antibiotic prescribing rates for children <=10 years and adults showed clear seasonal trends and were lower in LAIV-pilot and non-pilot areas after the introduction of the LAIV programme in 2013. The reductions for RTI prescriptions (children) were similar (within 3%) in all areas, which coincided with the start the UK AMR strategy. Antibiotic prescribing was significantly (p < 0.0001) related to LAIV uptake in 2-3-year-olds with antibiotic prescribing reduced by 2.7% (95% CI: 2.1% to 3.4%) for every 10% increase in uptake. We found no evidence the LAIV programme for primary school age children resulted in reductions in RTI antibiotic prescribing, however we detected a significant inverse association between increased vaccine uptake in pre-school age children and antibiotic prescribing at GP level. The temporal association of reduced RTI and UTI antibiotic prescribing with the launch of the UK's AMR Strategy in 2013 highlights the importance of a multifaceted approach to tackle AMR.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , Vacunación , Vacunas Atenuadas
8.
J Infect ; 83(2): 237-279, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989631

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 vaccination programme commenced in England on 8th December 2020 primarily based on age; by 7th March 2021 approximately 93% of the English population aged 70+ years had received at least 1 dose of either the Pfizer BioNTech or AstraZeneca vaccines. Using a nucleoprotein assay that detects antibodies following natural infection only and a spike assay that detects infection and vaccine-induced responses, we aim to describe the impact of vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in English blood donors.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Anciano , Formación de Anticuerpos , Donantes de Sangre , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunación
10.
Vaccine ; 35(38): 5110-5114, 2017 09 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28822644

RESUMEN

In England, primary care providers use standardised coding systems to record health events such as vaccination as well as patient characteristics. This information can be automatically extracted to estimate coverage for vaccine programmes delivered through primary care, in the general population as well as in specific geographical, ethnic, age or clinical groups. This system provides timely vaccine coverage estimates as well as the flexibility to extract tailored data in order to directly inform a continuously evolving national vaccine programme. It is however limited by the quality and completeness of clinical coding in primary care. A centralised, individual-level register would however improve data quality, completeness and reliability and remains the gold standard.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/métodos , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas/uso terapéutico , Inglaterra , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA