The evidence behind robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advancements, the advantage of robotic surgery over other traditional modalities still harbors academic inquiries. We seek to take a recently published high-profile narrative systematic review regarding robotic surgery and add meta-analytic tools to identify further benefits of robotic surgery. METHODS: Data from the published systematic review were extracted and meta-analysis were performed. A fixed-effect model was used when heterogeneity was not significant (Chi2 p ≥ 0.05, I2 ≤ 50%) and a random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was significant (Chi2 p < 0.05, I2 > 50%). Forest plots were generated using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Robotic surgery had comparable overall complications compared to laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.85), which was significantly lower compared to open surgery (odds ratio 0.68, p = 0.005). Compared to laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery had fewer open conversions (risk difference - 0.0144, p = 0.03), shorter length of stay (mean difference - 0.23 days, p = 0.01), but longer operative time (mean difference 27.98 min, p < 0.00001). Compared to open surgery, robotic surgery had less estimated blood loss (mean difference - 286.8 mL, p = 0.0003) and shorter length of stay (mean difference - 1.69 days, p = 0.001) with longer operative time (mean difference 44.05 min, p = 0.03). For experienced robotic surgeons, there were less overall intraoperative complications (risk difference - 0.02, p = 0.02) and open conversions (risk difference - 0.03, p = 0.04), with equivalent operative duration (mean difference 23.32 min, p = 0.1) compared to more traditional modalities. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that compared to laparoscopy, robotic surgery may improve hospital length of stay and open conversion rates, with added benefits in experienced robotic surgeons showing lower overall intraoperative complications and comparable operative times.

Pre-stimulus bioelectrical activity in light-adapted ERG under blue versus white background.

To compare the baseline signal between two conditions used to generate the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram (ERG): red flash on a blue background (RoB) and white flash on a white background (LA3). The secondary purpose is to identify how the level of pre-stimulus signal affects obtaining an unambiguous PhNR component. A retrospective chart review was conducted on four cohorts of patients undergoing routine ERG testing. In each group, LA3 was recorded the same way while RoB was generated differently using various luminances of red and blue light. The background bioelectrical activity 30 ms before the flash was extracted, and the root mean square (RMS) of the signal was calculated and compared between RoB and LA3 using Wilcoxon test. Pre-stimulus noise was significantly higher under RoB stimulation versus LA3 in all four conditions for both right and left eyes (ratio RoB/LA3 RMS 1.70 and 1.57 respectively, p < 0.033). There was also no significant difference between the RMS of either LA3 or RoB across protocols, indicating that the baseline noise across cohorts were comparable. Additionally, pre-stimulus noise was higher in signals where PhNR was not clearly identifiable as an ERG component versus signals with the presence of unambiguous PhNR component under RoB in all four groups for both eyes (p < 0.05), whereas the difference under LA3 was less pronounced. Our study suggests that LA3 produces less background bioelectrical activity, likely due to decreased facial muscle activity. As it seems that the pre-stimulus signal level affects PhNR recordability, LA3 may also produce a better-quality signal compared to RoB. Therefore, until conditions for a comparable bioelectrical activity under RoB are established, we believe that LA3 should be considered at least as a supplementary method to evaluate retinal ganglion cell function by ERG.

Spontaneous globe rupture in a patient with extensive ocular surgical history.

Globe rupture is visually dramatic in appearance for emergency clinicians and is a sight-threatening injury for the patient. It requires prompt ophthalmologic surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Cases are typically the result of ocular trauma; however, this case highlights a rare instance of spontaneous globe rupture in a patient with an extensive ocular surgical history.

Disposable Gastrointestinal Scopes: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopes are an essential tool in the diagnosis, screening, and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration issued a news release, recommending that duodenoscope manufacturers and health care facilities phase out fully reusable duodenoscopes with fixed endcaps in lieu of duodenoscopes that are either fully disposable or those that contain disposable endcaps. With this study, we systematically reviewed the published literature on single-use disposable gastrointestinal scopes to describe the current state of the literature and provide summary recommendations on the role of disposable gastrointestinal endoscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For our inclusion criteria, we searched for studies that were published in the year 2015 and afterward. We performed a literature search in PubMed using the keywords, "disposable," "reusable," "choledochoscope," "colonoscope," "duodenoscope," "esophagoscope," "gastroscope," and "sigmoidoscope." After our review, we identified our final article set, including 13 articles relating to disposable scopes, published from 2015 to 2023. RESULTS: In this review, we show 13 articles discussing the infection rate, functionality, safety, and affordability of disposable gastrointestinal scopes in comparison to reusable gastrointestinal scopes. Of the 3 articles that discussed infection rates (by Forbes and colleagues, Ridtitid and colleagues, and Ofosu and colleagues), each demonstrated a decreased risk of infection in disposable gastrointestinal scopes. Functionality was another common theme among these articles. Six articles (by Muthusamy and colleagues, Bang and colleagues, Lisotti and colleagues, Ross and colleagues, Kang and colleagues, and Forbes and colleagues) demonstrated comparable functionality of disposable scopes to reusable scopes. The most reported functionality issue in disposable scopes was decreased camera resolution. Disposable scopes also showed comparable safety profiles compared with reusable scopes. Six articles (by Kalipershad and colleagues, Muthusamy and colleagues, Bang and colleagues, Lisotti and colleagues, Luo and colleagues, and Huynh and colleagues) showed comparable rates of AEs, whereas 1 article (by Ofosu and colleagues) demonstrated increased rates of AEs with disposable scopes. Lastly, a cost analysis was looked at in 3 of the articles. Two articles (by Larsen et al and Ross and colleagues) remarked that further research is needed to understand the cost of disposable scopes, whereas 1 article (by Kang and colleagues) showed a favorable cost analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After a review of the literature published since the 2015 Food and Drug Administration safety communication, disposable scopes have been shown to be effective in decreasing infection risks while maintaining similar safety profiles to conventional reusable scopes. However, more research is required to compare disposable and reusable scopes in terms of functionality and cost-effectiveness.

Effect of Resident Involvement in Ophthalmic Surgery on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of resident- vs attending-led surgeries on patient outcomes in ophthalmic surgery. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Two independent authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2022. Categorical data from studies were pooled to report odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. Continuous data were analyzed to yield standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs. Propensity-matched studies were analyzed separately. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. Seventeen of the 20 outcomes had no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. Notably, many critical cataract surgery-related outcomes showed no significant differences, including posterior capsular tear, lens fragment retainment, and retinal detachment. Among propensity-scored studies, the resident-led surgeries had longer operative duration (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.29, 1.33; 3 studies [260 patients], I2 = 74%) and had an increased risk of an unplanned return to the operating room (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.31, 5.06; 4 studies [342 patients], I2 = 0%). Among 2 non-propensity-scored, resident-led surgeries had increased incidence of choroidal detachment or choroidal effusion (OR 2.28, 95% 1.02, 5.09; 2 studies [401 patients], I2 = 19%). No significant difference was found for ocular hypotony. Significant heterogeneity existed among propensity-scored studies. CONCLUSIONS: Resident-led surgeries appear overall safe, effective, and comparable to attending-led surgeries with respect to commonly encountered perioperative complications. Specific differences in outcomes exhibit significant heterogeneity and small sample sizes, and may be of unclear or equivocal clinical significance.

A Retrospective Analysis of Vitamin D Levels in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Introduction Despite using anti-coagulation therapy in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, they have high rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between vitamin D deficiency and thrombotic events (defined as the occurrence of a new PE or DVT) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 208 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received a computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) based on clinical suspicion of PE between January 1, 2020, and February 5, 2021. A <20 ng/mL serum vitamin D level was used to categorize vitamin D deficiency. Nonparametric tests and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between serum vitamin D levels and clinical outcomes. Results The mean vitamin D level was 26.7±13.0 ng/mL (n=208), and approximately one-third of patients were vitamin D deficient (n=68, 32.7%). No association was found between vitamin D deficiency and the occurrence of thrombotic events. The incidence of PE was 19.1% in vitamin D deficient patients compared to 11.4% in vitamin D sufficient patients (p=0.13). Vitamin D deficiency was positively associated with ICU admission (OR 3.047, 95%CI 1.57-5.91, p=0.001) and mortality (OR 3.76, 95%CI 1.29-11.01, p=0.016). Conclusions This study found no association between vitamin D deficiency and the occurrence of a new PE or DVT in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients with vitamin D deficiency were more likely to be admitted to the ICU and had increased overall mortality.