RESUMEN
In 2020, we reported the "BD-checklist 92" for patients with Behçet's disease (BD) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of this checklist. Questionnaires using the "BD-checklist 92" and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) were sent to ten affiliated institutions. In total, 174 patients answered the questionnaire (response rate, 32.7%). Criterion validity was evaluated using the correlation coefficient between the number of problem categories extracted from the "BD-checklist 92" and the scores of the eight subscales and two components of the SF-36. Construct validity was assessed based on the number of problem categories extracted as an external criterion for the number of manifestations experienced and specific lesions. The comparison was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate reliability. The number of problem categories in the "Body functions and structures", "Activities and participation", and "Environmental factors" components correlated significantly with all dimensions of the SF-36 questionnaire (P < 0.05 each). Construct validity showed that the number of manifestations experienced in all components (P < 0.001 each) and specific lesions in "Body functions and structures" and "All categories" (P = 0.002 and 0.050, respectively) contributed to an increased number of problems associated with BD. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the "BD-checklist 92" was 0.926. This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the "BD-checklist 92".
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Behçet/fisiopatología , Lista de Verificación/normas , Adulto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to use the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify physical and psychosocial problems associated with symptoms of Behçet's disease (BD) in Japanese patients. Thirty patients with BD were interviewed in a pilot study using the "ICF Checklist", and a team of medical experts selected categories related to physical and psychosocial aspects of BD. To identify specific physical and psychosocial problems of Japanese patients with BD, 100 new patients were interviewed using the selected categories. Among the 128 categories in the original ICF Checklist, 80 categories were identified as impaired, and another 12 ICF categories were added based on expert discussion of patients input. The number of problem categories was significantly greater in patients with BD with eye involvement and fatigue (eye involvement, 25.7 categories; fatigue, 25.2 categories; both P < 0.001). Specifically, patients with eye involvement had more difficulties with problems in daily life, such as writing (odds ratio 4.2), understanding such nonverbal messages as gestures and facial expressions (13.7), moving (5.7), walking in intense sunlight and bright light (17.6), and patients with fatigue had more difficulties with climate problems such as symptoms getting worse at the turn of the seasons or on cold days (2.5), compared to those without these symptoms. This study demonstrated that support focusing not only on physical symptoms but on other aspects of life as well is necessary for patients with BD, particularly patients with eye involvement and fatigue.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Síndrome de Behçet/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Behçet/psicología , Fatiga/fisiopatología , Participación Social , Uveítis/fisiopatología , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Adulto , Anciano , Frío , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud , Japón , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estaciones del Año , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated validation of the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Diabetes Mellitus (ICF-CS for DM) in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DMN). The objective of the present study was to identify differences in experience of physical and psychosocial problems between DMN patients with and without hemodialysis (HD), and diabetes patients without nephropathy using the ICF-CS for DM. METHODS: A total of 302 diabetes outpatients (men, 68 %; mean age, 62 years) were interviewed using four components of the ICF-CS for DM including "Body functions", "Body structures", "Activities and participation", and "Environmental factors". RESULTS: The mean number of categories in which difficulty was experienced in the four components was significantly greater in DMN patients with HD followed by DMN patients without HD, and diabetes patients without nephropathy (23.9 vs. 18.0 vs. 13.1, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression models revealed that, compared with diabetes patients without nephropathy, diabetes patients with nephropathy were more likely to have difficulty with physical problems and social activities and participation. Among DMN patients, dialysis patients were found to have larger numbers of problems, and face difficulty with employment status after adjusting for sex, age, type, and duration of diabetes. CONCLUSION: The results of this study using the ICF-CS for DM identified the areas for improvement among physical and psychosocial problems in DMN patients with and without HD in contrast to diabetes patients without nephropathy.
Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas/psicología , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Anciano , Nefropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy (DMN) is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease. Progression of DMN leads to impairment of physical activity, restriction of daily activities, and diminished social participation. Therefore, the precise assessment of the physical and psychosocial problems of DMN patients is important. The objective of this study was to validate the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Diabetes Mellitus (ICF-CS for DM) from the perspective of DMN patients. METHODS: A total of 176 DMN outpatients were interviewed using the ICF-CS for DM. Content and construct validity were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DMN patients without hemodialysis (HD) (non-HD group) and DMN patients undergoing HD (HD group). Content validity was evaluated based on the frequency of patients who had a problem in each category. For construct validity, the patients were divided into two groups based on DM duration and hemoglobin A1C levels. RESULTS: Content validity evaluation revealed 58 categories reported as problem categories: 39 categories in the non-HD group and 50 categories in the HD group. Construct validity evaluation showed that longer DM duration and poor glycemic control contributes to increased problems. CONCLUSIONS: Content and construct validity of the ICF-CS for DM was supported from the DMN patients' perspective. Some categories of the "Environmental factors" component need further studies to be appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Anciano , Nefropatías Diabéticas/clasificación , Nefropatías Diabéticas/psicología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/clasificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2009, we developed a "100-category checklist" for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and we confirmed its validity. However, we found that for patients' daily assessment, 100 categories were too many. The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate a short version of the "100-category checklist." METHODS: A total of 100 outpatients undergoing HD were recruited. They were interviewed using the "100-category checklist" and asked whether they had experienced problems after starting HD. From the "100-category checklist," we extracted categories that had greater than a 50 % rate of "yes" responses. Content validity was evaluated using the frequency of patients who had a problem in each category. Criterion validity was evaluated based on the correlation of the score from the "short-version checklist" categories with that from the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL™) questionnaire. Construct validity was evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficients between the number of problem categories and the presence of HD-related complications. Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated to evaluate internal consistency. RESULTS: Twenty-two categories were identified as problem categories. Criterion validity showed that 12 categories were significantly correlated with subscales of the KDQOL™. Construct validity showed that the presence of complications contributed to an increased number of problems associated with HD. Cronbach's coefficient alpha of this checklist was 0.79. CONCLUSION: The "short-version checklist" had a certain degree of validity, suggesting its usefulness in a simplified assessment of patients undergoing HD.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the challenges of self-management of diabetes comparing gender. METHODS: Sixty-four women and 129 men (mean age 63 vs. 60 years) with diabetes mellitus (DM) were interviewed using 12 categories (classification codes b1300, d240, d570, d620, d845, d920, e410 + e414, e420, e425, e465, e560) related to self-care management selected from 99 categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for DM. In a mixed-methods analysis, interviews were analyzed according to the Grounded Theory approach, and gender effects on ICF categories related to self-care management were investigated using logistic models. RESULTS: In quantitative data, compared with men, women tended to experience greater difficulty obtaining foods/ingredients for well-balanced meals to maintain appropriate glucose level (P = 0.004); handling stress and other psychological demands around diabetes treatment (P = 0.034); and social norms, practices, and ideologies that defined an experience of unpleasant treatment after disclosure of DM diagnosis to close family and friends (P = 0.023). Qualitative data shows that women perceived prejudice against people with DM from close family, friends, and neighbors. In contrast, men reported excessive media information on diabetes treatment, which induced prejudice by family members and at the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Women were more likely to be sensitive to attention from close family and friends, whereas men were more likely to be occupied by work and daily living concerns. Health professionals should pay attention to such gender differences in a patient-professional relationship.
RESUMEN
Black soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) are known to be rich in polyphenols, including anthocyanins, and they have been consumed since ancient times for their beneficial effects on health. In addition, it has been reported that black soybean (BS) seed coat may ameliorate obesity and insulin resistance. In the present study, we administered BS extract to type 2 diabetics for 2 months to investigate the effects of BS on glycemic control and lipid metabolism parameters. In addition, we administered BS and antihyperlipidemic agent, fenofibrate, to patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by postprandial hyperlipidemia for 2 months and assessed the combined effects of fenofibrate and BS on serum lipid profile. The results showed that administration of the BS alone had no effect on the blood glucose or lipid levels, but that administration of fenofibrate alone and fenofibrate in combination with the BS significantly lowered their serum triglyceride (TG) level at fasting state, and the percent decrease in the serum TG level after combined administration was significantly higher than in the subjects who received fenofibrate alone. Furthermore, the serum LDL cholesterol concentration, which did not decrease when fenofibrate was administered alone, decreased significantly when the BS and fenofibrate were administered in combination. These results suggest that combined administration of the BS with fenofibrate enhanced the antihyperlipidemic action of fenofibrate, and the results of this study demonstrated the usefulness of the BS in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Fenofibrato/uso terapéutico , Glycine max/química , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Lípidos/sangre , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Periodo Posprandial , Adulto , Anciano , Glucemia/metabolismo , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Femenino , Fenofibrato/farmacología , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/sangre , Hipolipemiantes/farmacología , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fitoterapia , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Polifenoles/farmacología , Polifenoles/uso terapéutico , Semillas , Triglicéridos/sangreRESUMEN
In 2009, we reported a "100-category checklist" for hemodialysis (HD) patients based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of this checklist. The present study included 100 participants who had been on HD for at least 5 years when they were interviewed using the checklist. Subjects were asked whether they had experienced problems in each category since starting HD treatment. Categories for which more than 25% of subjects answered "yes" were extracted as problem categories. Additionally, the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) instrument was administered to the study subjects. Content validity was evaluated using the frequency and percentage of subjects who had a problem in each category. Criterion validity was performed based on correlation of the findings from the "100-category checklist" categories with the findings of the KDQOL. Construct validity was assessed based on the number of problem categories extracted as external criteria in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), anemia, and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). For reliability evaluation, we used Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Content validity showed that 54 were identified as problem categories. Criterion validity showed that 45 categories in all components correlated significantly with each subscale of the KDQOL. Construct validity showed that CTS, anemia, and SHPT contributed to an increased number of problems associated with HD. Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the "100-category checklist" was 0.86. This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the "100-category checklist".
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/normas , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anemia/epidemiología , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/epidemiología , Enfermedades Renales/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to identify the common health problems of Japanese patients on hemodialysis (HD) using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The participants of this study had been on HD for at least five years when they were interviewed. The ICF checklist was used to initially interview 32 HD patients. Fifty-seven categories of the ICF Checklist were identified as impaired; another 35 ICF categories, chosen based on interviews and expert discussion, as well as 8 categories relevant to HD, were included in the final checklist. This final checklist was then used to interview 104 patients. Overall, 10 categories in "Body functions" and 3 categories in "Body structures" were reported as problems by more than 50% of patients. Two categories in "Activities and participation" and 4 categories in "Environmental factors" were reported as restricted or a barrier for more than 30% of patients. A higher percentage of patients who started HD before 50 years of age and had a longer duration of HD reported problems in "Body functions" and "Body structures", while more patients with a shorter duration of HD reported problems in relationships with their family. Japanese patients on maintenance HD have various physical and psychosocial problems. In addition, HD duration and the age when HD was started affect patients' reports of physical and psychosocial problems.