RESUMEN
Background Clinical effectiveness and safety of biological and synthetic adhesives in digestive closures have been evaluated. Their use is becoming more prevalent, as rigidity and inflexibility are its more remarkable weaknesses. However, little is known about their role in gastric and anastomotic closures. Moreover, usefulness of novel flexible types of synthetic adhesives as n-butyl-cyanoacrylate has not been assessed yet. Materials and Methods One centimeter long gastrotomy was performed in 24 male Wistar rats, which were divided depending on the type of closure method employed: manual USP 5/0 silk interrupted suture versus sutureless closure with Histoacryl Flexible (n-butyl-cyanoacrylate with softener) or Histoacryl Double Component (n-butyl-cyanoacrylate with softener and hardener). Microscopic evaluation of the suture viability and integrity was performed, and adhesion formation during the cicatrization process were assessed. During an 8-week follow-up clinical and histopathological aspects as well as hematologic and inflammatory biomarkers were studied. Results No differences among groups where found in any of the clinical, analytical, or histopathological issues assessed except for a higher incidence rate of adhesions in the Histoacryl Double Component group when compared with hand-sewn suture group (P = .04). Our results support experimental studies in large mammals (pigs) for further study of sutureless hollow viscera closure.
Asunto(s)
Cianoacrilatos/farmacología , Estómago/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos sin Sutura/métodos , Adhesivos Tisulares/farmacología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Animales , Intervalos de Confianza , Masculino , Modelos Animales , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of synthetic adhesives such as cyanoacrylates has been established previously for a wide range of clinical indications. However, more research is necessary to evaluate their use in digestive closures or anastomosis. New chemical formulations developed to achieve more flexibility of synthetic adhesives (i.e., based on n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) could be an alternative to achieve this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using flexible cyanoacrylate adhesives for large gastric incision closure in an animal model. METHODS: Twelve farm pigs were divided in two groups depending on the type of closure method applied. In all cases, extra-large seven centimeters gastrostomies were performed. Braided absorbable hand-sewn interrupted suture versus n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate with softener closure were compared during a 3-week follow-up period. Histopathological aspects, hematologic and inflammatory biomarkers, and endoluminal pressure tolerated until leakage were assessed. The time spent on both closing procedures was compared. RESULTS: No differences between the two groups were found in any of the histopathological and inflammatory variables evaluated. The glued group tolerated a significantly higher pressure than the manual suture group. A reduction of surgery time was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that flexible cyanoacrylates could be a feasible alternative to improve the clinical outcome of the closure of hollow viscera through more efficient sutureless procedures.