RESUMEN
Layer 5 neurons of the neocortex receive their principal inputs from layer 2/3 neurons. We seek to identify the nature and extent of the plasticity of these projections with motor learning. Using optogenetic and viral intersectional tools to selectively stimulate distinct neuronal subsets in rat primary motor cortex, we simultaneously record from pairs of corticospinal neurons associated with distinct features of motor output control: distal forelimb vs. proximal forelimb. Activation of Channelrhodopsin2-expressing layer 2/3 afferents onto layer 5 in untrained animals produces greater monosynaptic excitation of neurons controlling the proximal forelimb. Following skilled grasp training, layer 2/3 inputs onto corticospinal neurons controlling the distal forelimb associated with skilled grasping become significantly stronger. Moreover, peak excitatory response amplitude nearly doubles while latency shortens, and excitatory-to-inhibitory latencies become significantly prolonged. These findings demonstrate distinct, highly segregated, and cell-specific plasticity of layer 2/3 projections during skilled grasp motor learning.
Asunto(s)
Miembro Anterior , Corteza Motora , Plasticidad Neuronal , Animales , Miembro Anterior/fisiología , Plasticidad Neuronal/fisiología , Corteza Motora/fisiología , Corteza Motora/citología , Ratas , Aprendizaje/fisiología , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Neuronas/fisiología , Masculino , Tractos Piramidales/fisiología , Destreza Motora/fisiología , Femenino , Optogenética , Ratas Long-EvansRESUMEN
Neuroscience dogma avers that astrocytic "scars" inhibit axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury (SCI). A recent report suggested however that astrocytes form "borders" around lesions that are permissive rather than inhibitory to axonal growth. We now provide further evidence supporting a facilitatory role of astrocytes in axonal regeneration after SCI. First, even 6months after SCI, injured axons are retained within regions of densely reactive astrocytes, in direct contact with astrocyte processes without being repelled. Second, 6 month-delayed implants of neural stem cells extend axons into reactive astrocyte borders surrounding lesions, densely contacting astrocyte surfaces. Third, bioengineered hydrogels implanted into sites of SCI re-orient reactive astrocytic processes to align along the rostral-to-caudal spinal cord axis resulting in successful regeneration into the lesion/scaffold in close association with astrocytic processes. Fourth, corticospinal axons regenerate into neural progenitor cells implanted six months after injury in close association with host astrocytic processes. Thus, astrocytes do not appear to inhibit axonal regeneration, and the close association of newly growing axons with astrocytic processes suggests a facilitatory role in axonal regeneration.