Self-rated executive dysfunction in adults with epilepsy and effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention (HOBSCOTCH).

RATIONALE: Cognitive problems are common in adults with epilepsy and significantly affect their quality of life. HOBSCOTCH (HOme Based Self-management and COgnitive Training CHanges lives) was developed to teach problem-solving and compensatory memory strategies to these individuals. This study examined whether HOBSCOTCH is associated with improvement in specific aspects of subjective executive functions. METHODS: Fifty-one adults, age 18-65, with epilepsy and subjective cognitive concerns were randomized to receive HOBSCOTCH (n = 31) or a care-as-usual control sample (n = 20). Participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult version (BRIEF-A), as well as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess depression. Rates of elevated (i.e., T ≥ 65, impaired) BRIEF-A scores at baseline, as well as pre-post score changes for the BRIEF-A clinical scales were evaluated. Significance was set at α = 0.05, one-tailed, given our directional hypothesis. RESULTS: At baseline, a considerable percentage of patients in the overall sample endorsed executive dysfunction on BRIEF-A scales: Inhibit = 28%, Shift = 51%, Emotional Control = 45%, Self-Monitor = 33%, Initiate = 35%, Working Memory = 88%, Plan/Organize = 45%, Task Monitor = 47%, Organization of Materials = 28%. Significant improvement was seen in mean T-scores for Inhibit, Shift, Initiate, and Working Memory in the treatment group, but only Working Memory improved in the control group. The control group endorsed worse task monitoring and organization of materials at baseline and follow-up. Change in depression was not observed for either group, and there was no association between changes in depression and BRIEF-A scores. CONCLUSIONS: A sizeable subset of adults with epilepsy reported experiencing executive dysfunction in their everyday lives, especially for working memory. HOBSCOTCH resulted in amelioration of subjective executive functioning independent of changes in mood.

Differentiating epilepsy from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using neuropsychological test data.

OBJECTIVE: Differentiating epileptic seizures (ES) from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) represents a challenging differential diagnosis with important treatment implications. This study was designed to explore the utility of neuropsychological test scores in differentiating ES from PNES. METHOD: Psychometric data from 72 patients with ES and 33 patients with PNES were compared on various tests of cognitive ability and performance validity. Individual measures that best discriminated the diagnoses were then entered as predictors in a logistic regression equation with group membership (ES vs. PNES) as the criterion. RESULTS: On most tests of cognitive ability, the PNES sample outperformed the ES sample (medium-large effect) and was less likely to fail the Reliable Digit Span. However, patients with PNES failed two embedded validity indicators at significantly higher rates (risk ratios (RR): 2.45-4.16). There were no group differences on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). A logistic regression equation based on seven neuropsychological tests correctly classified 85.1% of patients. The cutoff with perfect specificity was associated with 0.47 sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous research, the utility of psychometric methods of differential diagnosis is limited by the complex neurocognitive profiles associated with ES and PNES. Although individual measures might help differentiate ES from PNES, multivariate assessment models have superior discriminant power. The strongest psychometric evidence for PNES appears to be a consistent lack of impairment on tests sensitive to diffuse neurocognitive deficits such as processing speed, working memory, and verbal fluency. While video-electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring is the gold standard of differential diagnosis, psychometric testing has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in complex or unclear cases such as patients with nondiagnostic video-EEGs. Adopting a standardized, fixed neuropsychological battery at epilepsy centers would advance research on the differential diagnostic power of psychometric testing.

Logical memory, visual reproduction, and verbal paired associates are effective embedded validity indicators in patients with traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study was design to evaluate the potential of the recognition trials for the Logical Memory (LM), Visual Reproduction (VR), and Verbal Paired Associates (VPA) subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scales-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) to serve as embedded performance validity tests (PVTs). METHOD: The classification accuracy of the three WMS-IV subtests was computed against three different criterion PVTs in a sample of 103 adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESULTS: The optimal cutoffs (LM ≤ 20, VR ≤ 3, VPA ≤ 36) produced good combinations of sensitivity (.33-.87) and specificity (.92-.98). An age-corrected scaled score of ≤5 on either of the free recall trials on the VPA was specific (.91-.92) and relatively sensitive (.48-.57) to psychometrically defined invalid performance. A VR I ≤ 5 or VR II ≤ 4 had comparable specificity, but lower sensitivity (.25-.42). There was no difference in failure rate as a function of TBI severity. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to LM, VR, and VPA can also function as embedded PVTs. Failing validity cutoffs on these subtests signals an increased risk of non-credible presentation and is robust to genuine neurocognitive impairment. However, they should not be used in isolation to determine the validity of an overall neurocognitive profile.

Critical item (CR) analysis expands the classification accuracy of performance validity tests based on the forced choice paradigm-Replicating previously introduced CR cutoffs within the Word Choice Test.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to replicate previous research on critical item analysis within the Word Choice Test (WCT). METHOD: Archival data were collected from a mixed clinical sample of 119 consecutively referred adults (Mage = 51.7, Meducation = 14.7). The classification accuracy of the WCT was calculated against psychometrically defined criterion groups. RESULTS: Critical item analysis identified an additional 2%-5% of the sample that passed traditional cutoffs as noncredible. Passing critical items after failing traditional cutoffs was associated with weaker independent evidence of invalid performance, alerting the assessor to the elevated risk for false positives. Failing critical items in addition to failing select traditional cutoffs increased overall specificity. Non-White patients were 2.5 to 3.5 times more likely to Fail traditional WCT cutoffs, but select critical item cutoffs limited the risk to 1.5-2. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirmed the clinical utility of critical item analysis. Although the improvement in sensitivity was modest, critical items were effective at containing false positive errors in general, and especially in racially diverse patients. Critical item analysis appears to be a cost-effective and equitable method to improve an instrument's classification accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Patient safety considerations in the rehabilitation of the individual with cognitive impairment.

Deficits in cognitive functioning are associated with many safety concerns, including difficulties performing activities of daily living, medication errors, motor vehicle accidents, impaired awareness of deficits, decision-making capacity, falls, and travel away from home. Preventing adverse safety outcomes is particularly relevant in rehabilitation patients. Integration of information and recommendations stemming from allied disciplines, such as rehabilitation medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychology, is the most effective way to limit poor outcomes. Education and prevention counseling by health care professionals is an important approach in limiting adverse safety outcomes in patients with cognitive impairment.