[The challenges of surgical tourism in the field of aesthetic surgery]. / Les enjeux du tourisme chirurgical dans le domaine de la chirurgie esthétique.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical tourism is a growing phenomenon, causing a surge demand for the management of its complications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate complications that occur after cosmetic breast surgery abroad; and their costs for the public health system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical files of patients treated in our department for a complication after cosmetic breast surgery outside Switzerland and assessed all complications requiring hospitalization; and estimated the overall medical costs. RESULTS: Over a two-year period, 26 patients were treated for 39 complications. The main complication was infection (71% of cases), mainly with a multidrug-resistant organism (47%) and atypical mycobacteria. Of the 16 patients with breast prosthesis, 7 implants were removed. The effective average costs incurred for the hospital care of these cases was estimated to 14'724 Swiss Francs (∼12'963 Euros) per patient. CONCLUSION: The high rate of multidrug-resistant and mycobacterial atypical infections are a major public health problem. It is necessary to inform patients much better about the risks of surgical tourism. Furthermore, the danger of transfer of multidrug-resistant or atypical germs from abroad should not be overlooked. Physicians should be informed about this risk and take necessary measures for treatment and diagnosis of these complications.

Randomized non-inferiority trial to compare trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin versus linezolid for the treatment of MRSA infection.

OBJECTIVES: The therapeutic arsenal for MRSA infections is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the non-inferiority of a combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin versus linezolid alone for the treatment of MRSA infection. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, single-centre, non-inferiority trial comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg three times daily) plus rifampicin (600 mg once a day) versus linezolid (600 mg twice a day) alone in adult patients with various types of MRSA infection. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either regimen. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 6 weeks after the end of treatment (non-inferiority margin 20%) assessed by both ITT and PP analyses. Secondary outcomes included the microbiologically documented persistence of MRSA in clinical cultures, mortality and adverse events. The study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00711854). RESULTS: Overall, 150 patients were randomized to one of the two treatment arms between January 2009 and December 2013 and were included in the ITT analysis. Of these 56/75 (74.7%) in the linezolid group and 59/75 (78.7%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group experienced clinical success (risk difference 4%, 95% CI -9.7% to 17.6%). The results were confirmed by the PP analysis, with 54/66 (81.8%) cured patients in the linezolid group versus 52/59 (88.1%) in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group (risk difference 6.3%, 95% CI -6.8% to 19.2%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes, including microbiologically documented failure. Four adverse drug reactions attributed to the study medication occurred in the linezolid group versus nine in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin seems to be non-inferior in the treatment of MRSA infection.

Challenges in diagnosing infection in the diabetic foot.

Diagnosing the presence of infection in the foot of a patient with diabetes can sometimes be a difficult task. Because open wounds are always colonized with microorganisms, most agree that infection should be diagnosed by the presence of systemic or local signs of inflammation. Determining whether or not infection is present in bone can be especially difficult. Diagnosis begins with a history and physical examination in which both classic and 'secondary' findings suggesting invasion of microorganisms or a host response are sought. Serological tests may be helpful, especially measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in osteomyelitis, but all (including bone biomarkers and procalcitonin) are relatively non-specific. Cultures of properly obtained soft tissue and bone specimens can diagnose and define the causative pathogens in diabetic foot infections. Newer molecular microbial techniques, which may not only identify more organisms but also virulence factors and antibiotic resistance, look very promising. Imaging tests generally begin with plain X-rays; when these are inconclusive or when more detail of bone or soft tissue abnormalities is required, more advanced studies are needed. Among these, magnetic resonance imaging is generally superior to standard radionuclide studies, but newer hybrid imaging techniques (single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) look to be useful techniques, and new radiopharmaceuticals are on the horizon. In some cases, ultrasonography, photographic and thermographic methods may also be diagnostically useful. Improved methods developed and tested over the past decade have clearly increased our accuracy in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.

[Management of an infection associated with a prosthetic arthroplasty: the necessity of collaboration between surgeon and infectiologist]. / Prise en charge des infections d'arthroplasties prothétiques une collaboration entre chirurgiens et infectiologues.

The total number of total knee and hip joint arthroplasties is constinuously rising, due to an increasing population of physically active elderly patients. For primary elective arthroplasties, the infection risk ranges between I and 2%, but equals to a high morbidity, costs and complications for the individual infected patient. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections are improving. We review the latest consensus on the diagnosis and management of these infections and reveal some insight in still debated issues.

[Community-acquired bacterial septic arthritis in adults: diagnosis and treatment]. / Arthrite septique bactérienne communautaire chez l'adulte: du diagnostic au traitement.

The diagnosis of acute native joint bacterial infection can be difficult, because of its non- specific clinical and biological manifestation. Its management is often an emergency. Following a joint puncture, early joint lavage is performed, either by surgical drainage or by repeated arthrocentesis; and accompanied by systemic antibiotics, of which the ideal duration and route of administration remains unknown. The postoperative care is characterized by joint mobilization to avoid joint stiffening.

Diabetic foot infections: state-of-the-art.

Foot infections are frequent and potentially devastating complications of diabetes. Unchecked, infection can progress contiguously to involve the deeper soft tissues and ultimately the bone. Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are most often the consequence of one or more of the following: peripheral sensory neuropathy, motor neuropathy and gait disorders, peripheral arterial insufficiency or immunological impairments. Infection develops in over half of foot ulcers and is the factor that most often leads to lower extremity amputation. These amputations are associated with substantial morbidity, reduced quality of life and major financial costs. Most infections can be successfully treated with optimal wound care, antibiotic therapy and surgical procedures. Employing evidence-based guidelines, multidisciplinary teams and institution-specific clinical pathways provides the best approach to guide clinicians through this multifaceted problem. All clinicians regularly seeing people with diabetes should have an understanding of how to prevent, diagnose and treat foot infections, which requires familiarity with the pathophysiology of the problem and the literature supporting currently recommended care.

Managing diabetic foot infections: a review of the new guidelines.

Foot infections are amongst the most frequent and severe complications linked to diabetes mellitus and are the most common non-traumatic cause of lower limb amputation. Appropriate management of these infections, however, can improve their outcome. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) constituted a panel of multidisciplinary experts in 2004 to develop guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections, which have been widely used and validated. Because there have been many new publications in the field, and the IDSA updated the format for all guidelines, they asked the diabetic foot infection committee to revise the 2004 publication. The revised guidelines, based on a thorough and systematic review of the literature, were published in 2012. They are built around 10 key questions concerning diagnosis and treatment; these are answered, with a summary of the evidence provided, and given a GRADE rating for the strength of the recommendation and quality of the evidence. The updated guidelines also include advice on implementing these recommendations, suggestions for regulatory changes to enhance care for diabetic foot infections, recommendations on performance measures and suggested areas for future research. They also include 14 tables, 1 figure, and 345 references, most of which were published after the first guidelines in 2004. Implementing these guidelines should improve outcomes in patients with a DFI.

[Deep soft tissue infections]. / Infections profondes des tissus mous.

The clinical presentations of deep soft tissue infections can, initially, mimicry superficial skin infections such as erysipelas. However, a rapidly deteriorating health status, the spreading of the lesions and the lack of clear visual limitation of the infection on the skin are hallmarks of a more severe underlying infection, which may endanger patients' life. An immediate adequate multidisciplinary approach to therapy within a few hours is mandatory. The first step is surgical exploration with debridement of all infected tissues, accompanied by antibiotic therapy and additional supportive measures. Despite progress in the understanding of the physiopathology, the delay between suspicion of diagnosis and surgical exploration remains critical. Because of the low incidence of such severe infections, only multicenter studies might reveal deeper insights of optimal therapeutic strategies in the future and for possible improved patients' survival.

[Where are we in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis?]. / Où en est-on dans le traitement médical des ostéomyélites chroniques?

Chronic osteomyelitis is a multifaceted bacterial infection with common features, which requires surgery for remission. The duration and modality of concomitant administration of antibiotic agents for adult patients is still based on expert opinions. The traditional recommendation of 6 to 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy with intravenous administration for at least the first 2 weeks is more and more challenged in favor of an oral antibiotic treatment with selected agents from the start. There is no evidence that the total duration of antibiotic therapy for more than 6-12 weeks improves outcome, when compared with shorter regimens. External advice from an expert team with combined surgeons and infectious disease physicians may help to reduce antibiotic consumption in a cost-effective way.

Prevalence of isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility in orthopedic device-related infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

We evaluated, by an improved susceptibility testing method, the prevalence and significance of low-level glycopeptide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, which belonged to a previously described, retrospective cohort of patients treated for orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) at the Geneva University Hospital between 2000 and 2008. Fifty-seven individual or multiple isolates were retrieved from 41 ODRI patients for glycopeptide susceptibility and clonality studies, including 20 patients with prosthetic joint (PJ) and 21 with osteosynthesis (OS) MRSA infections. Low-level glycopeptide resistance was detected by elevated teicoplanin or/and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs ≥ 4 mg/L), as determined by a previously validated combination of macrodilution and agar dilution assays of improved sensitivity. MRSA isolates with elevated teicoplanin MICs were detected in 20/41 (49 %) ODRI patients at the onset or during the course of glycopeptide therapy, namely, in 10 of 20 patients with PJ and 10 of 21 patients with OS infections. Only one isolate developed a concomitant increase in vancomycin MIC during therapy. 13/20 (65 %) glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA)-infected patients, including 7/10 (70 %) with PJ and 6/10 (60 %) with OS, experienced treatment failure. In contrast, therapy failed in only 5/21 (24 %) ODRI patients with non-GISA isolates (p = 0.012), including 2/10 (20 %) with PJ and 3/11 (27 %) with OS infections. The emergence of low-level teicoplanin resistance could not be explained by teicoplanin administration, since only four patients received teicoplanin. The evaluation of low-level teicoplanin resistance may improve the detection of GISA isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of low-level teicoplanin resistance on the outcome of glycopeptide therapy.

[Measures against surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery]. / Prévention des infections postopératoires en orthopédie.

Orthopaedic surgery has low healthcare-associated infection incidences compared to other surgical disciplines. However, whenever they occur, these infections are associated with substantial morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, high costs, and difficulties of eradication with life-long recurrence risks. Among the many measures to prevent orthopaedic surgical site infections, only few are based on strong evidence, and there is insufficient evidence to ascertain which element is superior to any other. This highlights the need for multimodal approaches involving active post-discharge surveillance, as well as measures at every step of the care process; from the individual patient to department-wide interventions targeting all infections, and including antibiotic stewardship.

Predicting the pathogen of diabetic toe osteomyelitis by two consecutive ulcer cultures with bone contact.

In this study, we investigate the accuracy of two consecutive ulcer cultures with bone contact compared to bone biopsy for the diagnosis of diabetic toe osteomyelitis. The same nurse and orthopaedic surgeon obtained all samples: sample A-1: bone contact swabbing through the ulcer; sample A-2: a second culture swabbing from the bone surface within 24 h; sample B: surgical bone biopsy in the operating theatre. The kappa statistic measure between samples A-1 and A-2 (bone contact swabs) indicated 82.35% agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the two samples A compared to B were 96%, 79%, 92% and 88%, respectively, for the causative pathogen. These results were similar with prior antibiotic treatment, discordant bone surface swabs or with monomicrobial infections. As a conclusion, two consecutive diabetic toe cultures with bone contact accurately predict the pathogen of diabetic toe osteomyelitis in 90% of cases.

[Diabetic foot infection: a multidisciplinary approach]. / Traitement du pied diabétique infecté: une approche multidisciplinaire par excellence.

Diabetic foot infection is a frequent, multifactorial and multifacettal disease. Its management requires an interdisciplinary collaboration. Multiple medical and surgical specialties are enrolled for its prevention and treatment, for good reasons. Concomitant management by various specialists shows a significant reduction in amputation rates. We review the issues of this interdisciplinary collaboration.

[Open fractures of the tibia in the adult: surgical treatment and complications]. / Fractures ouvertes de la diaphyse tibiale chez l'adulte: prise en charge chirurgicale et complications.

Open tibial shaft fractures represent high-energy trauma and are associated with a substantial risk of complications. Management is an emergency, and the first steps in treatment include antibiotic prophylaxis, tetanus booster, surgical debridement, irrigation of the wound and stabilization of the fracture. The Gustilo and Anderson classification helps to guide definitive treatment. Intramedullary nailing is the surgical technique of choice. An indirect approach utilizing external fixation is recommended for Gustilo IIIB and IIIC fractures. The most prevalent complications are compartment syndrome (10%), infection (2%-40% without antibiotics according to Gustilo grading, most notably in the presence of vascular lesions), aseptic nonunion (23%), venous thromboembolism (60% without prevention) and anterior knee pain (>50%).

Risk factors for treatment failure in orthopedic device-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and microbiological risk factors for treatment failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopedic device-related infection (ODRI). A retrospective cohort study of patients with MRSA ODRI who were treated at Geneva University Hospitals between 2000 and 2008 was undertaken. Stored MRSA isolates were retrieved for genetic characterization and determination of the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Fifty-two patients were included, of whom 23 (44%) had joint arthroplasty and 29 (56%) had osteosynthesis. All 41 of the retrieved MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC

Posttraumatic ankle arthritis due to a novel Nocardia species.

INTRODUCTION: Nocardial arthritis in immunocompetent patients is rare, and the optimum duration of antimicrobial therapy is unknown, although several months of antibiotic treatment is often recommended. CASE REPORT: We here report the first case of human infection with a novel Nocardia sp., summarise the epidemiology of nocardial arthritis and outline the feasibility of relatively short antibiotic treatments after careful surgical drainage.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures in arthroplasty patients]. / Utilité de la prophylaxie antibiotique avant un geste dentaire pour tes porteurs de prothèses totales du genou ou de la hanche.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly prescribed to patients with total arthroplasties before a dental intervention. This attitude is not evidence-based for several reasons: 1) the usual pathogens of prosthetic joint infections are not of oral origin; 2) even if given, systemic antibiotic do not completely suppress the occult bacteraemia occurring during dental intervention and 3) humans may have up to twelve episodes of occult bacteraemia of dental origin per day. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis should be clearly distinguished from the antibiotic treatment required in case of established oral cavity infection. A constant optimal oral and dental hygiene is more important in terms of prevention and should be routinely recommended to every patient carrying a joint arthroplasty.

[New methods for the diagnosis of implant-associated infections]. / Nouvelles méthodes pour le diagnostic des infections liées aux implants.

For successful treatment of prosthetic joint infection, the identification of the infecting microorganism is crucial. Cultures of synovial fluid and intraoperative periprosthetic tissue represent the standard method for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection. Rapid and accurate diagnostic tools which can detect a broad range of causing microorganisms and their antimicrobial resistance are increasingly needed. With newer diagnostic techniques, such as sonication of removed implants, microcalorimetry, molecular methods and mass spectrometry, the sensitivity has been significantly increased. In this article, we describe the conventional and newer diagnostic techniques with their advantages and potential future applications.

Bone and joint infections of the hand.

BACKGROUND: Little guidance is currently available for standardized diagnostic protocols and therapeutic recommendations for bone and joint infections (BJIs) of the hand. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the available data in the scientific English-language literature on the diagnosis and treatment of native BJIs of the hand. To illustrate these concepts from a narrative point of view in areas where there is lack of evidence. SOURCES: We performed a systematic PubMed and Internet search of studies that investigated hand BJIs in adult patients. CONTENT: Few studies have systematically investigated and validated diagnostic concepts, classifications or surgical treatment protocols. Most concepts derive from traditional intra-institutional experience, expert opinions and extrapolations from infections in large joints and long bones. Similarly, there is no uniformly accepted infection definition of BJIs of the hand. The best-documented literature is available for microbiological findings and antibiotic treatment duration in uncomplicated native joint arthritis of the fingers. Retrospective studies and one prospective randomized trial suggest that post-surgical targeted antibiotic therapy of 2 weeks results in a microbiological cure rate of ≥88%. IMPLICATIONS: Studies on diagnostic workup and infection definition and classification are urgently needed to compare inter-institutional outcome results and generate guidelines for the best patient care. For uncomplicated pyogenic arthritis of native joints, current evidence suggests that a 2-week course of antibiotic therapy following surgery cures the infection.

Association between treatment duration and mortality or relapse in adult patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of duration of therapy (DOT) on mortality and relapse for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-centre cohort study including adult patients with SAB. We determined the association between DOT (≤14 days versus >14 days) and mortality by adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals through Cox regression adjusted for immortal-time bias and confounding by indication, stratified by presence of complicated SAB (any of: endocarditis, implant, duration of SAB >2 days, fever >3 days). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was 90-day relapse. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and December 2015, we included 530 patients, of whom 94 out of 530 (17.7%) had methicillin-resistant SAB and 305 out of 530 (57.6%) had complicated SAB. Ninety-day mortality was 27.0% (143/530), with no significant trend across the study period; median time to death was 17 days (interquartile range (IQR) 8-30) after onset of SAB. Median DOT was 20 days (IQR 13-39). Patients with complicated SAB had significantly reduced mortality with DOT >14 days (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64). DOT was not associated with mortality in patients with uncomplicated SAB (aHR 0.85; 0.41-1.78). Eighteen (18/530) patients (3.4%) relapsed; on univariate analysis, DOT was not associated with relapse (HR 1.01; 0.97-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: DOT >14 days is associated with higher survival in patients with complicated SAB, but not for patients with uncomplicated SAB. No association was found for relapse, but 90-day relapse was very low in this cohort. Importantly, 90-day mortality remained high across the study period.