RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To distinguish histological subtypes of renal tumors using radiomic features and machine learning (ML) based on multiphase computed tomography (CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical treatment for renal tumors at two tertiary centers from 2012 to 2022 were included retrospectively. Preoperative arterial (corticomedullary) and venous (nephrogenic) phase CT scans from these centers, as well as from external imaging facilities, were manually segmented, and standardized radiomic features were extracted. Following preprocessing and addressing the class imbalance, a ML algorithm based on extreme gradient boosting trees (XGB) was employed to predict renal tumor subtypes using 10-fold cross-validation. The evaluation was conducted using the multiclass area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Algorithms were trained on data from one center and independently tested on data from the other center. RESULTS: The training cohort comprised n = 297 patients (64.3% clear cell renal cell cancer [RCC], 13.5% papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), 7.4% chromophobe RCC, 9.4% oncocytomas, and 5.4% angiomyolipomas (AML)), and the testing cohort n = 121 patients (56.2%/16.5%/3.3%/21.5%/2.5%). The XGB algorithm demonstrated a diagnostic performance of AUC = 0.81/0.64/0.8 for venous/arterial/combined contrast phase CT in the training cohort, and AUC = 0.75/0.67/0.75 in the independent testing cohort. In pairwise comparisons, the lowest diagnostic accuracy was evident for the identification of oncocytomas (AUC = 0.57-0.69), and the highest for the identification of AMLs (AUC = 0.9-0.94) CONCLUSION: Radiomic feature analyses can distinguish renal tumor subtypes on routinely acquired CTs, with oncocytomas being the hardest subtype to identify. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomic feature analyses yield robust results for renal tumor assessment on routine CTs. Although radiologists routinely rely on arterial phase CT for renal tumor assessment and operative planning, radiomic features derived from arterial phase did not improve the accuracy of renal tumor subtype identification in our cohort.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nephrectomy is the surgical removal of all or part of a kidney. When the aim of nephrectomy is to reduce tumor burden in people with established metastatic disease, the procedure is called cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). CN is typically combined with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). SACT can be initiated before or immediately after the operation or deferred until radiological signs of disease progression. The benefits and harms of CN are controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone or watchful waiting in newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, two trial registries, and other gray literature sources up to 1 March 2024. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SACT and CN versus SACT alone or watchful waiting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were time to death from any cause and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, treatment response, treatment-related mortality, discontinuation due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified 10 records of four unique RCTs that informed two comparisons. In this abstract, we focus on the results for the two primary outcomes. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone Three RCTs informed this comparison. Due to the considerable heterogeneity when pooling across these studies, we decided to present the results of the prespecified subgroup analysis by type of systemic agent. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon immunotherapy versus interferon immunotherapy alone CN plus interferon immunotherapy compared with interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89; I²= 0%; 2 studies, 326 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Assuming 820 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive interferon immunotherapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 132 fewer all-cause deaths (237 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 people who receive CN plus interferon immunotherapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone We are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy compared with TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37; 1 study, 450 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Assuming 574 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive TKI therapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 38 more all-cause deaths (38 fewer to 115 more) per 1000 people who receive CN plus TKI therapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy One study evaluated CN followed by TKI therapy (immediate CN) versus three cycles of TKI therapy followed by CN (deferred CN). Immediate CN compared with deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.53; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assuming 620 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive deferred CN, the effect estimate corresponds to 173 more all-cause deaths (18 more to 294 more) per 1000 people who receive immediate CN. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: CN plus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy versus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause. However, we are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus SACT in the form of TKI therapy versus SACT in the form of TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause. Immediate CN versus deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause. We found no quality of life data for any of these three comparisons. We also found no evidence to inform any other comparisons, in particular those involving newer immunotherapy agents (programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1]/programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] immune checkpoint inhibitors), which have become the backbone of SACT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There is an urgent need for RCTs that explore the role of CN in the context of contemporary forms of systemic immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Espera Vigilante , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Causas de Muerte , SesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety profile of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (a/mRCC) in a real-world setting. METHODS: We analyzed data of adult a/mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. Data were derived from the German non-interventional post-approval multicenter STAR-TOR registry (NCT00700258). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and survival analyses for the entire cohort and patient subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 116 study sites recruited 702 patients treated with sunitinib (73.1% male; median age 68.0 years; median Karnofsky index 90%) between November 2010 and May 2020. The most frequent histological subtype was clear cell RCC (81.6%). Sunitinib was administered as first-line treatment in 83.5%, as second line in 11.7%, and as third line or beyond in 4.8% of the patients. Drug-related AEs and serious AEs were reported in 66.3% and 13.9% of the patients, respectively (most common AE: gastrointestinal disorders; 39.7% of all patients). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds further real-world evidence of the persisting relevance of sunitinib for patients with a/mRCC who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study population includes a high proportion of patients with unfavorable MSKCC poor-risk score, but shows still good PFS and OS results, while the drug demonstrates a favorable safety profile. The STAR-TOR registry is also registered in the database of US library of medicine (NCT00700258).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Sistema de Registros , Sunitinib , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
The most common organs affected by abdominal trauma are the spleen and the liver, often in combination. Pancreatic injuries are rare. In the case of blunt abdominal trauma, which is much more common, a clinical and laboratory examination as well as sonography should be performed. In the initial assessment, the circulatory situation must be screened. If there is haemodynamic instability and presentation of free fluid, an emergency laparotomy is indicated. If the situation is stable or stabilised and a pathological sonography is present, it is essential to perform triphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography, which is also mandatory in polytraumatised patients. If a renal injury is suspected, a late venous phase should be attached. In addition to the classification of the injury, attention should be paid to possible vascular injury or active bleeding. In this case, angiography with the possibility of intervention should be performed. Endoscopic treatment is possible for injuries of the pancreatic duct. If the imaging does not reveal any intervention target and a circulation is stable, a conservative approach is possible with continuous monitoring using clinical, laboratory and sonographic controls. Most injuries can be successfully treated by non-operative management (NOM).There are various surgical options for treating the injury, such as local and resecting procedures. There is also the option of "damage control surgery" with acute bleeding control and second look. Complex surgical procedures should be performed at centres. Postoperative complications arise out of elective surgery.In the less common case of penetrating abdominal trauma, the actual extent of the injury cannot be estimated from the visible wound. Here again, the circulatory situation determines the next steps. An emergency laparotomy should be carried out in case of instability. If the condition is stable, further diagnostics should be performed using contrast enhanced computed tomography. If penetration through the peritoneum cannot be clearly excluded, diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Hígado , Páncreas , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hígado/lesiones , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/cirugía , Páncreas/lesiones , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Bazo/lesiones , Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Traumatismo Múltiple/cirugía , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Laparotomía , Riñón/lesiones , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hospital rating websites (HRW) offer decision support in hospital choice for patients. To investigate the impact of HRWs of uro-oncological patients undergoing elective surgery in Germany. METHODS: From 01/2020 to 04/2021, patients admitted for radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, or renal tumor surgery received a questionnaire on decision-making in hospital choice and the use of HRWs at 10 German urologic clinics. RESULTS: Our study includes n = 812 completed questionnaires (response rate 81.2%). The mean age was 65.2 ± 10.2 years; 16.5% were women. Patients were scheduled for prostatectomy in 49.1%, renal tumor surgery in 20.3%, and cystectomy in 13.5% (other 17.1%). Following sources of information influenced the decision process of hospital choice: urologists' recommendation (52.6%), previous experience in the hospital (20.3%), recommendations from social environment (17.6%), the hospital's website (10.8%) and 8.2% used other sources. Only 4.3% (n = 35) used a HRW for decision making. However, 29% changed their hospital choice due to the information provided HRW. The most frequently used platforms were Weisse-Liste.de (32%), the AOK-Krankenhausnavigator (13%) and Qualitaetskliniken.de (8%). On average, patients rated positively concerning satisfaction with the respective HRW on the Acceptability E-Scale (mean values of the individual items: 1.8-2.1). CONCLUSION: In Germany, HRWs play a minor role for uro-oncologic patients undergoing elective surgery. Instead, personal consultation of the treating urologist seems to be far more important. Although patients predominantly rated the provided information of the HRW as positive, only a quarter of users changed the initial choice of hospital.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Neoplasias Renales , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Cistectomía , Urólogos , ProstatectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that partial nephrectomy (PN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) yield comparable outcomes for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the cost-effectiveness of both treatments still needs to be assessed. PURPOSE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of PN and PCA for patients with cT1a RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analysis was created over a 5-year span from a healthcare payer's perspective computing expected costs and outcomes of PN and PCA in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). After each treatment, the following states were modelled using data from the recent literature: procedural complications, no evidence of disease (NED), local recurrence, metastases, and death from RCC- or non-RCC-related causes. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: PCA and PN yielded health benefits of 3.68 QALY and 3.67 QALY. Overall expected costs were $20,491 and $26,478 for PCA and PN. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PCA was more cost-effective than PN in 84.78% of Monte Carlo simulations. PCA was more cost-effective until its complication risk was at least 38% higher than PN. PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than that of PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than that of PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than that of PN. PCA remained cost-effective until its procedural cost is above $13,875. CONCLUSION: PCA appears to be more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, although the currently available evidence is of limited quality. PCA may be the better treatment strategy in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC-mortality in clinically plausible ranges. KEY POINTS: ⢠For patients with cT1a RCCs, PCA yields a comparable health benefit at lower costs compared to PN, making PCA the dominant and therefore more cost-effective treatment strategy over PN. ⢠PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than PN. ⢠PCA is more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, and it remained so in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC mortality.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Criocirugía , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prostate biopsy technique (transrectal ultrasound (US)-prostate biopsy (PBx) versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-PBx) on intraoperative nerve-sparing and the rate of secondary neurovascular-bundle resection (SNR) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). A real-time investigation with a frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) microscopically excluded or confirmed prostate cancer invasion of the nerve structures resulting in preservation of the neurovascular bundle or SNR. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors related to SNR, such as longer operation time and postoperative complications. METHODS: The total study cohort was stratified according to non-nerve-sparing versus nerve-sparing RARP. Patients with nerve-sparing approach were then stratified according to biopsy technique (PBx vs. MRI-PBx). Further, we compared PBx versus MRI-PBx according to SNR rate. RESULTS: We included a total of 470 consecutive patients, who underwent RARP for PCa at our institution between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients with a preoperative MRI-PBx had a 2.12-fold higher chance of successful nerve-sparing (without SNR) compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.01). Patients with preoperative MRI-PBx required 73% less intraoperative SNR compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.0001). Prior MRI-PBx is thus a predictor for successful nerve-sparing RARP approach. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI-PBx led to better oncological outcomes and less SNR. Young patients with good erectile function could benefit from a preoperative MRI-PBx before nerve-sparing RARP.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Próstata/inervación , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess imaging features of primary renal sarcomas in order to better discriminate them from non-sarcoma renal tumors. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with renal sarcomas from 1995 to 2018 were included from 11 European tertiary referral centers (Germany, Belgium, Turkey). Renal sarcomas were 1:4 compared to patients with non-sarcoma renal tumors. CT/MRI findings were assessed using 21 predefined imaging features. A random forest model was trained to predict "renal sarcoma vs. non-sarcoma renal tumors" based on demographics and imaging features. RESULTS: n = 34 renal sarcomas were included and compared to n = 136 non-sarcoma renal tumors. Renal sarcomas manifested in younger patients (median 55 vs. 67 years, p < 0.01) and were more complex (high RENAL score complexity 79.4% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.01). Renal sarcomas were larger (median diameter 108 vs. 43 mm, p < 0.01) with irregular shape and ill-defined margins, and more frequently demonstrated invasion of the renal vein or inferior vena cava, tumor necrosis, direct invasion of adjacent organs, and contact to renal artery or vein, compared to non-sarcoma renal tumors (p < 0.05, each). The random forest algorithm yielded a median AUC = 93.8% to predict renal sarcoma histology, with sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of 90.4%, 76.5%, and 93.9%, respectively. Tumor diameter and RENAL score were the most relevant imaging features for renal sarcoma identification. CONCLUSION: Renal sarcomas are rare tumors commonly manifesting as large masses in young patients. A random forest model using demographics and imaging features shows good diagnostic accuracy for discrimination of renal sarcomas from non-sarcoma renal tumors, which might aid in clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: ⢠Renal sarcomas commonly manifest in younger patients as large, complex renal masses. ⢠Compared to non-sarcoma renal tumors, renal sarcomas more frequently demonstrated invasion of the renal vein or inferior vena cava, tumor necrosis, direct invasion of adjacent organs, and contact to renal artery or vein. ⢠Using demographics and standardized imaging features, a random forest showed excellent diagnostic performance for discrimination of sarcoma vs. non-sarcoma renal tumors (AUC = 93.8%, sensitivity = 90.4%, specificity = 76.5%, and PPV = 93.9%).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Cava InferiorRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between axitinib, sunitinib and temsirolimus toxicities and patient survival in metastatic renal cell cancer patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of metastatic renal cell cancer patients from the prospective multicenter STAR-TOR study were assessed using multivariable Cox models. A total of 1195 patients were included (n = 149 axitinib; n = 546 sunitinib; n = 500 temsirolimus). The following toxicities significantly predicted outcomes: hand-foot skin reaction (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29) for PFS with axitinib; stomatitis (HR = 0.62) and pneumonitis (HR = 0.23) for PFS with temsirolimus; stomatitis (HR = 0.52) and thrombocytopenia (HR = 0.6) for OS with temsirolimus; fatigue (HR = 0.71) for PFS with sunitinib; hand-foot skin reaction (HR = 0.56) and fatigue (HR = 0.58) for OS with sunitinib. In conclusion, in metastatic renal cell cancer, axitinib, sunitinib and temsirolimus demonstrate specific toxicities that are protective OS/PFS predictors.
Asunto(s)
Axitinib/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Sunitinib/efectos adversos , Anciano , Axitinib/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Síndrome Mano-Pie/epidemiología , Síndrome Mano-Pie/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Protectores , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Sunitinib/administración & dosificación , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate if remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can offer any renoprotective value by counteracting the deleterious effect of partial nephrectomy (PN) under warm ischemia on renal function. METHODS: Four groups, each with 5 Wistar albino rats, were constructed; RIPC + PN, PN, RIPC and sham. Right nephrectomy was performed to constitute a solitary kidney model. RIPC denoted sequential clamping/declamping of the femoral artery/vein complex. PN was performed under warm-ischemia following RIPC. Blood samples were collected on multiple occasions until euthanasia on day 7. Immunoassays were conducted to measure the serum and tissues levels of kidney injury markers. Kidneys were examined histologically and morphometric analyzes were performed using digital scanning. RESULTS: IL-33 levels did not differ significantly between the groups. Serum levels of KIM-1, NGAL, and aldose reductase in RIPC + PN, PN and RIPC groups were significantly lower than that of sham group. Tissue biomarker levels were similar across groups. The observed trend in mean necrosis area of PN group was higher than that of RIPC + PN group (p > 0.05). The transitional zone between necrosis and healthy tissue showed a trend towards increasing width in the rats subjected to RIPC before PN vs. those who underwent PN without RIPC (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: RIPC failed to counteract the renal functional consequences of PN under warm ischemia in a solitary kidney animal model. The supportive but marginal histological findings in favor of RIPC's renoprotective potential were not supplemented with the changes in serum and tissue biomarker levels.
Asunto(s)
Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/análisis , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Riñón , Lipocalina 2/análisis , Nefrectomía , Daño por Reperfusión , Aldehído Reductasa/análisis , Animales , Biomarcadores/análisis , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Riñón/metabolismo , Riñón/patología , Riñón/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Renal , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Daño por Reperfusión/sangre , Daño por Reperfusión/etiología , Daño por Reperfusión/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia Tibia/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score-matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80-2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95-2.55, P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Current SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/tendencias , Carcinoma de Células Renales/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Radiocirugia/tendencias , Técnicas de Ablación/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Criocirugía/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review the published evidence on cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) and summarize its diagnostic accuracy for breast lesion assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL libraries. Studies were included if reporting sensitivity and specificity for discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions via breast CT. Sensitivity and specificity were jointly modeled using a bivariate approach calculating summary areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC). All analyses were separately performed for non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CBBCT (NC-CBBCT, CE-CBBCT). RESULTS: A total of 362 studies were screened, of which 6 with 559 patients were included. All studies were conducted between 2015 and 2018 and evaluated female participants. Four of six studies included dense and very dense breasts with a high proportion of microcalcifications. For NC-CBBCT, pooled sensitivity was 0.789 (95% CI: 0.66-0.89) and pooled specificity was 0.697 (95% CI: 0.471-0.851), both showing considerable significant between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 89.4%, I2 = 94.7%, both p < 0.001). Partial AUC for NC-CBBCT was 0.817. For CE-CBBCT, pooled sensitivity was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.785-0.956) and pooled specificity was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.709-0.85), both exhibiting non-significant moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 57.3%, p = 0.0527; I2 = 53.1%, p = 0.0738). Partial AUC for CE-CBBCT was 0.869. CONCLUSION: The evidence available for CBBCT tends to show superior diagnostic performance for CE-CBBCT over NC-CBBCT regarding sensitivity, specificity and partial AUC. Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CBBCT was numerically comparable to that of breast MRI with meta-analyses reporting sensitivity of 0.9 and specificity of 0.72. KEY POINTS: ⢠CE-CBBCT rather than NC-CBBCT should be used for assessment of breast lesions for its higher diagnostic accuracy. ⢠CE-CBBCT diagnostic performance was comparable to published results on breast MRI, thus qualifying CE-CBBCT as a potential imaging alternative for patients with MRI contraindications.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding oncologic, perioperative and functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE libraries were searched for studies comparing PN, RFA, CRA or MWA and reporting on any-cause or cancer-specific mortality, local recurrence, complications or renal function. Network meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies with 24,077 patients were included. Patients receiving RFA, CRA or MWA were older and had more comorbidities compared with PN. All-cause mortality was higher for CRA and RFA compared with PN (incidence rate ratio IRR = 2.58, IRR = 2.58, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in cancer-specific mortality were evident. Local recurrence was higher for CRA, RFA and MWA compared with PN (IRR = 4.13, IRR = 1.79, IRR = 2.52, p < 0.05 respectively). A decline in renal function was less pronounced after RFA versus PN, CRA and MWA (mean difference in GFR MD = 6.49; MD = 5.82; MD = 10.89, p < 0.05 respectively). CONCLUSION: Higher overall survival and local control of PN compared with ablative therapies did not translate into significantly better cancer-specific mortality. Most studies carried a high risk of bias by selecting younger and healthier patients for PN, which may drive superior survival and local control. Physicians should be aware of the lack of high-quality evidence and the potential benefits of ablative techniques for certain patients, including a superior complication profile and renal function preservation. KEY POINTS: ⢠Patients selected for ablation of small renal masses are older and have more comorbidities compared with those undergoing partial nephrectomy. ⢠Partial nephrectomy yields lower all-cause mortality, which is probably biased by patient selection and does not translate into prolonged cancer-free survival. ⢠The decline of renal function is smallest after radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic potential of dynamic real-time MRI for fundoplication failure in patients with persistent or recurrent GERD-like (gastroesophageal reflux disease) complaints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients (male n = 11; female n = 11; median age 59 years) with recurrent or persistent GERD-like symptom after fundoplication were enrolled between 2015 and 2017. Median duration of GERD-like symptoms was 21 months. Real-time MRI (3 Tesla) was performed at 40 ms temporal resolution using undersampled radial fast low-angle shot acquisitions with nonlinear inverse image reconstruction. MRI movies dynamically visualized bolus transit of pineapple juice through the gastroesophageal junction, position of the fundoplication wrap and recurring hernia or reflux during Valsalva maneuver. MRI results were compared to endoscopic findings. RESULTS: Real-time MRI was successfully completed in all patients without adverse events (average examination time 15 min). Morphological correlates for GERD-like symptoms were evident in 20 patients (90.1%) with gastric reflux in 19 cases. Nine patients (40.1%) had wrap disruption and recurrent gastric hernia. Wrap migration or telescoping hernia was detected in nine patients (40.1%). One patient presented with continued reflux despite intact fundoplication wrap. Esophageal dysmotility with delayed bolus passage was observed in one case. On endoscopy, gastric hernia or wrap disruption was diagnosed in seven cases, and esophagitis or Barret's metaplasia in nine cases. CONCLUSION: Real-time MRI is a fast and safe modality for dynamic imaging after fundoplication, without radiation exposure or administration of gadolinium-based contrast media. In a relevant number of cases, real-time MRI reveals correlates for GERD-like symptoms. KEY POINTS: ⢠Real-time MRI reliably visualizes the gastroesophageal junction after fundoplication surgery. ⢠Patients with recurring GERD-like symptoms have a high rate of morphological failure patterns that can be identified by real-time MRI. ⢠Dynamic assessment of gastroesophageal junction by real-time MRI is a perspective diagnostic tool for detection of fundoplication failure.
Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico por imagen , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic potential of real-time MRI for assessment of hiatal hernias in patients with GERD-like symptoms compared to endoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients with GERD-like symptoms were included in this observational cohort study between 2015 and 2017. Real-time MRI was performed at 3.0 Tesla with temporal resolution of 40 ms, dynamically visualizing the esophageal transport of a pineapple juice bolus, its passage through the gastroesophageal junction, and functional responses during Valsalva maneuver. Hernia detection on MRI and endoscopy was calculated using contingency tables with diagnosis of hernia on either modality as reference. RESULTS: Of 108 patients, 107 underwent successful MRI without adverse events; 1 examination was aborted to inability to swallow pineapple juice in supine position. No perforation or acute bleeding occurred during endoscopy. Median examination time was 15 min. Eighty-five patients (79.4%) were diagnosed with hiatal hernia on either real-time MRI or endoscopy. Forty-six hernias were visible on both modalities. Seventeen hernias were evident exclusively on MRI, and 22 exclusively on endoscopy. Sixteen of the 63 MRI-detected hernias (25.4%) were detectable only during Valsalva maneuver, which were smaller compared to hernias at rest (median - 13.5 vs - 33.0 mm, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy for hernia detection was comparable for MRI and endoscopy (sensitivity 74% vs 80%, p = 0.4223; specificity 100% vs 100%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Real-time MRI is a fast and safe modality for assessment of the gastroesophageal junction, without radiation exposure or administration of gadolinium-based contrast media. Although MRI and endoscopy yield comparable diagnostic accuracy, dynamic MRI sequences are able to visualize hiatal hernias that were occult on static MRI sequences or endoscopy in a relevant number of cases. KEY POINTS: ⢠Real-time MRI is a safe and fast imaging modality for examination of the gastroesophageal junction, combining anatomical and functional information for enhanced detection of hiatal hernias. ⢠Real-time MRI and endoscopy yield comparably high diagnostic accuracy: real-time MRI visualizes hiatal hernias that were occult on endoscopy in a relevant number of patients; however, several hiatal hernias detected on endoscopy were occult on real-time MRI. ⢠There is clinical potential of real-time MR imaging in patients with GERD-like symptoms and equivocal findings on endoscopy or pH-metry, for anatomical visualization in patients planned for surgical intervention, or those with suspected fundoplication failures.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Maniobra de ValsalvaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical treatment options are available for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The aim of this study is to compare the most frequently used technics in a comprehensive network approach. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE and COCHRANE libraries was conducted in January 2018. Publications were included that evaluated at least two of the following surgical techniques: open pyeloplasty (OP), endopyelotomy (EP), laparoscopic (LP) and robot assisted pyeloplasty (RP). Main outcomes were operative success, complications, urinary leakage, re-operation, transfusion rate, operating time, and length of stay. Network meta-analyses with random effects models simultaneously assessed effectiveness of all surgical techniques. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies including 3143 patients were analyzed. Compared with RP, EP and LP showed lower operative success rates (EP: OR = 0.09, 95%CI:0.05-0.19; p < 0.001; LP: OR = 0.51, 95%CI:0.31-0.84; p = 0.008). Compared with OP, LP and RP had lower risk for complications (LP: OR = 0.62; 95%CI:0.41-0.95; p = 0.027; RP: OR = 0.41; 95%CI:0.22-0.79; p = 0.007). Compared with RP, no significant differences were detected for urinary leakage or re-operation, transfusion rates. Compared with EP, RP yielded longer operating time (mean = 102.87 min, 95%CI:41.79 min-163.95 min, p = < 0.001). Further significant differences in operating times were detected when comparing LP to EP (mean = 115.13 min, 95%CI:65.63 min-164.63 min, p = < 0.001) and OP to EP (mean = 91.96 min, 95%CI:32.33 min-151.58 min, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple surgical techniques are available for treatment of UPJO. RP has the highest rates of operative success and as well as LP lower complication rates than OP. Although surgical outcomes are worse for EP, its operating time is shorter than OP, RP, and LP. Surgeons should consider these findings when selecting the optimal treatment method for individual patients.
Asunto(s)
Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We summarize the evidence on gender specific differences in disease-free, cancer specific and overall survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Library in July 2017. Studies evaluating gender specific differences in disease-free, cancer specific or overall survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were included in study. Analyses included random effect meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, meta-influence and cumulative meta-analyses. Funnel plots and the Egger test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Of the 3,868 studies identified during the literature search 59 published between 1998 and 2017 were included in analysis. Of the studies 30 in a total of 38,321 patients evaluated disease-free survival, 44 in a total of 69,666 evaluated cancer specific survival and 26 in a total of 30,039 evaluated overall survival. Random effect meta-analyses revealed decreased disease-free, cancer specific survival and overall survival in female patients than in their male counterparts. Pooled estimates showed a HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.0018) for disease-free survival, 1.23 (95% CI 1.15-1.31, p <0.001) for cancer specific survival and 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.12, p = 0.0004) for overall survival. Subgroup analyses confirmed impaired disease-free, cancer specific and overall survival in female patients in all strata. Publication bias was evident only for studies of cancer specific survival (Egger test p = 0.0029). After adjusting for publication bias by the trim and fill method the corrected pooled estimated HR of cancer specific survival was 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.21, p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Female patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer demonstrated worse disease-free, cancer specific and overall survival than their male counterparts. The multifactorial etiology might include epidemiological differences, gender specific health care discrepancies and hormonal influences.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning techniques for malignancy prediction at breast cone-beam CT (CBCT) and to compare them to human readers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Five machine learning techniques, including random forests, back propagation neural networks (BPN), extreme learning machines, support vector machines, and K-nearest neighbors, were used to train diagnostic models on a clinical breast CBCT dataset with internal validation by repeated 10-fold cross-validation. Two independent blinded human readers with profound experience in breast imaging and breast CBCT analyzed the same CBCT dataset. Diagnostic performance was compared using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The clinical dataset comprised 35 patients (American College of Radiology density type C and D breasts) with 81 suspicious breast lesions examined with contrast-enhanced breast CBCT. Forty-five lesions were histopathologically proven to be malignant. Among the machine learning techniques, BPNs provided the best diagnostic performance, with AUC of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.82. The diagnostic performance of the human readers was AUC of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.72 for reader 1 and AUC of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.71, and specificity of 0.67 for reader 2. AUC was significantly higher for BPN when compared with both reader 1 (p = 0.01) and reader 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques provide a high and robust diagnostic performance in the prediction of malignancy in breast lesions identified at CBCT. BPNs showed the best diagnostic performance, surpassing human readers in terms of AUC and specificity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Yohexol/análogos & derivados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Background: Studies have been published showing both increased and decreased utilization of cancer screening services in cancer survivors compared with cancer-free counterparts. This study synthesizes existing evidence in a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in August 2016. Studies were included if they compared the utilization of screening services for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer among adulthood cancer survivors to cancer-free controls. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool estimates. Results: Of 3538 studies, 19 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Cancer survivors were more likely to utilize screening services for breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.42, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.15-1.37, P < 0.001) and cervical cancer (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.75, P < 0.001) than cancer-free controls. Conclusions: Overall, cancer survivors were more likely to utilize cancer screening services when compared with cancer-free controls. Future studies should evaluate, whether the utilization of screening services translates into prolonged survival.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias del Cuello UterinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cartilage calcification (CC) is associated with osteoarthritis (OA) in weight-bearing joints, such as the hip and the knee. However, little is known about the impact of CC and degeneration on other weight-bearing joints, especially as it relates to the occurrence of OA in the ankles. The goal of this study is to analyse the prevalence of ankle joint cartilage calcification (AJ CC) and to determine its correlation with factors such as histological OA grade, age and BMI in the general population. METHODS: CC of the distal tibia and talus in 160 ankle joints obtained from 80 donors (mean age 62.4 years, 34 females, 46 males) was qualitatively and quantitatively analysed using high-resolution digital contact radiography (DCR). Correlations with factors, such as the joint's histological OA grade (OARSI score), donor's age and BMI, were investigated. RESULTS: The prevalence of AJ CC was 51.3% (95% CI [0.40, 0.63]), independent of gender (p = 0.18) and/or the joint's side (p = 0.82). CC of the distal tibia was detected in 35.0% (28/80) (95% CI [0.25, 0.47]) and talar CC in 47.5% (38/80) (95% CI [0.36, 0.59]) of all cases. Significant correlations were noted between the mean amount of tibial and talar CC (r = 0.59, p = 0.002), as well as between the mean amount of CC observed in one ankle joint with that of the contralateral side (r = 0.52, p = 0.02). Furthermore, although the amount of AJ CC observed in the distal tibia and talus correlated with the histological OA-grade of the joint (r = 0.70, p < 0.001 and r = 0.72, p < 0.001, respectively), no such correlation was seen in the general population with relation to age (p = 0.32 and p = 0.49) or BMI (p = 0.51 and p = 0.87). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AJ CC in the general population is much higher than expected. The relationship between the amount of AJ CC and OA, independent of the donors' age and BMI, indicates that CC may play a causative role in the development of OA in ankles.