Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Digit Imaging ; 36(2): 395-400, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36385677

RESUMEN

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. With its many advantages, including ease of use, real-time multisystem assessment, affordability, availability, and accuracy, it has been adopted by all medical specialties. Despite its advantages, the lack of standard workflow and automated billing solutions makes it difficult to launch a comprehensive POCUS program. In this work, we describe how we created and implemented an efficient standardized EHR-based workflow for POCUS that has been used across multiple division and settings within our organization.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Humanos , Flujo de Trabajo , Documentación , Ultrasonografía
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(2): 301-309, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29295773

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to adapt our radiology reports to provide the documentation required for specific International Classification of Diseases, tenth rev (ICD-10) diagnosis coding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed to identify the reports with the greatest number of unspecified ICD-10 codes assigned by computer-assisted coding software. A two-part quality improvement initiative was subsequently implemented. The first component involved improving clinical histories by utilizing technologists to obtain information directly from the patients or caregivers, which was then imported into the radiologist's report within the speech recognition software. The second component involved standardization of report terminology and creation of four different structured report templates to determine which yielded the fewest reports with an unspecified ICD-10 code assigned by an automated coding engine. RESULTS: In all, 12,077 reports were included in the baseline analysis. Of these, 5,151 (43%) had an unspecified ICD-10 code. The majority of deficient reports were for radiographs (n = 3,197; 62%). Inadequacies included insufficient clinical history provided and lack of detailed fracture descriptions. Therefore, the focus was standardizing terminology and testing different structured reports for radiographs obtained for fractures. At baseline, 58% of radiography reports contained a complete clinical history with improvement to >95% 8 months later. The total number of reports that contained an unspecified ICD-10 code improved from 43% at baseline to 27% at completion of this study (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The number of radiology studies with a specific ICD-10 code can be improved through quality improvement methodology, specifically through the use of technologist-acquired clinical histories and structured reporting.


Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/normas , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Ohio , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Software de Reconocimiento del Habla
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA