Adding taxane to platin-5-fluorouracil combination does not improve survival rate in patients ≥ 65 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective-multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has a dismal prognosis. Platin-5-fluorouracil (CF) combination chemotherapy is the most widely used protocol and addition of a taxane (TCF) seems to increase survival and toxicity rates. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of TCF as compared to CF in patients older than 65 years and compare them with the patients younger than 65 years. METHODS: A total of 341 patients with AGC have been treated at six different oncology centers in Turkey between 2010 and 2014 and evaluated retrospectively. The characteristics of the patients whose tumors were histologically confirmed and whose survival data were available were registered and analyzed. The study group consisted of 234 patients younger than 65 years (group 1) and 107 patients older than 65 years (group 2). All of the data obtained from the patients were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 58.2 years and the mean follow-up time 14.4 months. For the entire group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9 and 13 months, respectively. Using TCF over CF regimen increased the OS by 4.2 months (i.e., group 1 and 2 together). For group 2, patients with liver metastases and without surgery of the primary tumor were treated with significantly more TCF as compared to CF, respectively. Although TCF yielded significantly higher PFS and OS in group 1 (p=0.0001 and p=0.017), there was no significant difference in group 2 as compared to CF. Also, grade 3-4 toxicity was statistically defined as one of the possible reasons of worsened OS in patients older than 65 years and receiving TCF. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of taxanes to CF backbone leads to a significant increase in both PFS and OS in patients younger than 65 years of age but the triplet regimen with taxanes does not provide superior survival in patients older than 65 years of age.

Effectiveness of low-dose oral etoposide treatment in patients with recurrent and platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of oral etoposide (50 mg/day, days 1-14, every 3 weeks) in recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). 52 recurrent platinum-resistant EOC patients followed up in four centres between April 2000 and December 2013 were analysed retrospectively. There was response in a total of 21 patients [partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)], 12 of them used etoposide in second and third, and 9 of them used it in fourth- to fifth-lines of treatment. The overall response rate was 19.2% and clinical benefit rate was 40.4% [PR (19.2%), SD (21.2%)]. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.95 months (95%CI, 0.2-19.7 months) and 3.2 months (95%CI 2.6-3.8 months), respectively. Grade III-IV haematologic and non-haematologic adverse events were observed in 7 (13.4%) patients. We consider that oral etoposide (50 mg/day, days 1-14, every 3 weeks) is an effective treatment with a manageable adverse effect profile in recurrent platinum-resistant EOC patients. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: Oral etoposide is an effective option for recurrent EOC patients at a dose of 50-100 mg/m2/day (1-21 days, every 28 days) regimen. However, it has a high toxicity rate. What the results of this study add: Oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/kg (1-14 days, every 21 days) is an effective treatment with a manageable toxicity profile in platinum- resistant ovarian cancer patients when it is used as ≤4th-line palliative setting. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: We need trials evaluating the effect of low-dose oral etoposide combination with bevacizumab or other chemotherapy agents (irinotecan and gemcitabine) in platinum-resistant EOC patients.