RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Homeless women are at high risk for substance use disorder (SUD), and are a growing proportion of the homeless population. However, homeless women experience barriers to engaging in substance use services. OBJECTIVES: Among homeless women with SUD, to explore service use, motivation to change, service barriers, and willingness to have substance use and mental health problems addressed in primary health care. METHODS: Women with SUD were sampled from 11 Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) primary care clinics in 9 states, yielding 241 with either an alcohol or drug use disorder who then completed questions about SUD services. RESULTS: Over 60% of women with dual alcohol and drug use disorders used some type of SUD service in the past year, while 52% with a drug only disorder, and 44% with an alcohol only disorder used services. The most mentioned barrier to service use was depression, but cost, wait time, where to find treatment, and facilities located too far away, were also frequently noted. A large proportion across all groups indicated high motivation for treatment and willingness to discuss their SUD in a primary care setting. CONCLUSION: There are continued barriers to SUD service use for homeless women despite high motivation for treatment, and willingness to be asked about SUD and mental health problems in primary care. HCH primary care sites should more systematically ask about SUD and mental health issues and address women's expressed need for support groups and alternative therapies to more holistically address their SUD needs.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Motivación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening for alcohol use in primary care is underutilized, especially for women. The current study implemented systematic women's alcohol use screening in a health care for the homeless primary care program. METHODS: All women (n=541) seeking care over 12 months were screened. RESULTS: Of the 541 screening forms returned, 80 women refused to answer the alcohol use questions. Of 461 completed screens, over 40% reported no alcohol use, while 43.8% reported hazardous drinking. Hazardous drinking was significantly associated with younger age, African American race, and living on the street or in a shelter. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: High rates of drinking were identified among women in different housing situations and use of systematic screening was beneficial to providers. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Health care settings are important sites to identify hazardous drinking as well as alcohol disorders among women with unstable housing histories. The growing integration of behavioral health care into primary care, and the medical home concept, both provide opportunities for brief interventions for at-risk drinkers, as well as treatment options for those with alcohol use disorders that may be particularly appealing to women. Findings support further investigation of the relationship of housing stability to drinking, and suggest African American women may need special attention.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/epidemiología , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Boston/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Homeless women are at high risk of drug and alcohol dependence and may receive less opportunity for treatment. Our objective was to examine the association between experiencing homelessness and motivation to change drug or alcohol use. METHODS: Women (n = 154) participants in a study of substance dependence at an urban medical center (69 with some homeless days in the last 90 days; 85 continuously housed at baseline) completed six items rating motivation to change alcohol or drug use (ie, importance, readiness, and confidence) at baseline and in 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up interviews. Unadjusted and longitudinal analyses controlling for covariates (eg, demographics, insurance status, substance use consequences, mental health status, and participation in treatment) were conducted. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between women experiencing homeless days versus continuously housed women in the odds of reporting high motivation to change alcohol or drug use, either in unadjusted baseline analyses or longitudinal analyses adjusted for covariates. Covariates that were significantly associated with high importance, readiness or confidence to change behavior were higher life time consequences of substance use, and participation in 12-step programs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that clinicians should not make assumptions that homeless women have low motivation to change their substance use. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The same opportunities for addiction treatment should be offered to homeless as to housed women.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/psicología , Consumidores de Drogas/psicología , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Motivación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Adulto , Alcoholismo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is one of the most frequent complaints of patients in primary care, yet both patients and providers report low satisfaction with chronic pain care. This study was designed to explore the views held by a diverse sample of patients with chronic pain complaints about their care experiences to identify ways to improve care. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 17 patient focus groups (size 3-7 participants). Groups used structured questions and were tape recorded, transcribed, and coded using qualitative software. Eleven groups were conducted in English, six groups in Spanish. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 72 adult patients (68% female, 44% Latino, mean age=48.1 years) recruited from four diverse primary care practices in Central Massachusetts. RESULTS: Across all 17 groups, and all gender, ethnicity, and age groups, most patients reported suboptimal interactions with their providers when seeking care for chronic pain. Subjects acknowledged feeling disrespected and distrusted, suspected of drug-seeking, and having their symptoms dismissed as trivial and/or not warranting medical care. Patients reported more satisfaction when they felt a provider listened to them, trusted them, was accessible to address pain concerns between visits, and used patient-centered approaches to establish goals and treatment plans. Patients also recommended some management techniques related to the chronic disease management model to improve pain care. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing patient-centered approaches in caring for individuals with chronic pain and using principles drawn from the chronic disease management model to improve care systems may improve both patient and provider satisfaction with chronic pain care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Efforts to improve the achievement gap between low-income children and their more affluent peers has led to the development of classroom interventions and curricula to increase executive functioning (EF) and social-emotional skills (SE), thought to be foundational for learning. The Second Step Early Learning (SSEL) curriculum is a commercially available curriculum designed to improve school readiness by building EF and SE skills. However, although widely used, it has not been widely studied. Modeling SSEL's underlying theory of change, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to longitudinally examine the effects of the curriculum on low-income preschool children's kindergarten school readiness through the hypothesized mediating role of EF and SE skills in improving pre-academic skills and task behavior in preschool. In a cluster randomized trial, 972 children attending 63 preschool classrooms within 13 low-income Head Start or community preschools were individually tested at the beginning (T1) and end of preschool (T2, n = 836) and followed into kindergarten. Children's average age at T1 was 53 months, with 51% male, 42% Anglo-American, 26% African-American, and 40% Hispanic-American. Children's EF, social skills, pre-literacy/language, and pre-math skills were assessed by trained child assessors blind to study conditions at T1 and T2. Assessors also rated children's task behavior in the testing situation at T1 and T2. School records of children's kindergarten screening scores were obtained on 345 children at T3. It was expected that SSEL would have both direct and indirect effects on kindergarten readiness through improvements in children's SE and EF skills preschool academic skills and on-task behavior. We found no direct effects of SSEL on either pre-academic or on-task behavior outcomes in preschool, nor on later kindergarten readiness. However, SSEL significantly increased EF, and as expected by SSEL's theory of change, growth in EF predicted gains in both pre-academics (particularly pre-math), and on-task behavior in preschool. End-of-year pre-academic skills and on task behavior in turn predicted better kindergarten readiness. Further, SE (although not impacted by SSEL) had direct and indirect effects on kindergarten readiness. Thus, overall, our findings largely support SSEL's theory of change, particularly in relation to EF.
RESUMEN
Despite attempts to increase enrollment of under-represented minorities (URMs: primarily Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American students) in health professional programs, limited progress has been made. Compelling reasons to rectify this situation include equity for URMs, better prepared health professionals when programs are diverse, better quality and access to health care for UMR populations, and the need for diverse talent to tackle difficult questions in health science and health care delivery. However, many students who initiate traditional "pipeline" programs designed to link URMs to professional schools in health professions and the sciences, do not complete them. In addition, program requirements often restrict entry to highly qualified students while not expanding opportunities for promising, but potentially less well-prepared candidates. The current study describes innovations in an undergraduate pipeline program, the Health Equity Scholars Program (HESP) designed to address barriers URMs experience in more traditional programs, and provides evaluative outcomes and qualitative feedback from participants. A primary outcome was timely college graduation. Eighty percent (80%) of participants, both transfer students and first time students, so far achieved this outcome, with 91% on track, compared to the campus average of 42% for all first time students and 58-67% for transfers. Grade point averages also improved (p = 0.056) after program participation. Graduates (94%) were working in health care/human services positions and three were in health-related graduate programs. Creating a more flexible program that admits a broader range of URMs has potential to expand the numbers of URM students interested and prepared to make a contribution to health equity research and clinical care.
Asunto(s)
Educación Profesional , Grupos Minoritarios , Estudiantes , Universidades , Éxito Académico , Negro o Afroamericano , Educación Médica , Educación en Enfermería , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Masculino , TutoríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a common patient complaint in primary care, yet providers and patients are often dissatisfied with treatment processes and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess provider satisfaction with their training for and current management of chronic pain in community clinic settings. To identify perceived problems with delivering chronic pain treatment and issues with opioid prescribing for chronic pain. DESIGN: Mailed survey to primary care providers (PCPs) at 8 community clinics. RESULTS: Respondents (N=111) included attendings, residents, and nurse practioners (NPs)/physician assistants (PAs). They reported 37.5% of adult appointments in a typical week involved patients with chronic pain complaints. They attributed problems with pain care and opioid prescribing more often to patient-related factors such as lack of self-management, and potential for abuse of medication than to provider or practice system factors. Nevertheless, respondents reported inadequate training for, and low satisfaction with, delivering chronic pain treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of adult primary care appointments involve patients with chronic pain complains. Dissatisfaction with training and substantial concerns about patient self-management and about opioid prescribing suggest areas for improving medical education and postgraduate training. Emphasis on patient-centered approaches to chronic pain management, including skills for assessing risk of opioid abuse and addiction, is required.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Manejo del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although depression is common among homeless mothers, little progress has been made in testing treatment strategies for this group. We describe pilot test results of an adapted collaborative care model for homeless mothers with depression. METHOD: We conducted a pilot intervention study of mothers screening positive for depression in 2 randomly selected shelter-based primary care clinics in New York over 18 months in 2010-2012. Study participants completed a psychosocial, health, and mental health assessment at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: One-third of women screened positive for depression (123 of 328 women). Sixty-seven women (63.2% of the eligible sample) enrolled in the intervention. At 6 months, compared to usual-care women, intervention group women were more likely to be receiving depression treatment (40.0% vs 5.9%, P = .01) and antidepressant medication (73.3% vs 5.9%, P = .001, respectively) and had more primary care physician and care manager visits at both 3 months (74.3% vs 53.3%, P = .009 and 91.4% vs 26.7%, P < .001, respectively) and 6 months (46.7% vs 23.5%, P = .003 and 70% vs 17.7%, P = .001, respectively). More women in the intervention group compared to usual-care women reported ≥ 50% improvement in depression symptoms at 6 months (30% vs 5.9%, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found that implementing an adapted collaborative care intervention was feasible in a shelter-based primary care clinic and had promising results that require further testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02723058.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Madres/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Salud de la MujerRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) engage in more high-risk behavior and use less prenatal care. Although treating depression in pregnancy is becoming widespread, options for addressing PTSD are few. This study was designed to test the feasibility of implementing a manualized psychosocial PTSD intervention, Seeking Safety, delivered by prenatal advocates. METHODS: All women entering prenatal care at two federally qualified health centers were screened for current symptoms of PTSD. One site was selected randomly to have prenatal care advocates deliver eight Seeking Safety topics for women that indicated clinical or subclinical PTSD symptoms. Baseline and pre-delivery interviews were conducted, which collected background characteristics and assessed PTSD severity and coping skills. Medical records were collected to document care visits. Documentation of participation rates, fidelity to the treatment, and qualitative feedback from advocates and participants was collected. RESULTS: More than one-half (57.3%) of the intervention women received all Seeking Safety sessions and fidelity ratings of the session showed acceptable quality. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, intervention women participated in significantly more prenatal care visits (M = 11.7 versus 8.9; p < .001), and had a significantly higher rate of achieving adequate prenatal care (72.4% vs. 42.9%; p < .001). Although not significant when accounting for baseline differences, intervention women also reduced negative coping skills but not PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Using prenatal care advocates to deliver Seeking Safety sessions to women screening positive for PTSD symptoms at entry to prenatal care is a promising intervention that seems to increase prenatal care participation and may reduce negative coping strategies.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Adulto , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine family practice provider views of how to improve chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) management in primary care. METHODS: Modified Delphi group process with providers randomly selected from 6 community practice sites: 3 federally qualified community health centers, 1 rural health center, and 2 hospital-owned practices. Providers gave structured written feedback in response to a report of provider and patient concerns about the quality of CNMP in their practice sites and participated in a facilitated discussion in 1 of 3 group meetings. RESULTS: 54% participation (n=14) of family physicians, 6 to 30 years out of residency, identified 4 major themes for improvement of CNMP treatment: (1) the need for provider practice guidelines; (2) changes in the monthly opioid prescription refill process; (3) provision of self-management support and access to alternative treatments for patients; and (4) the use of a nurse care manager. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians identified multiple components of practice that would improve both provider and patient experiences during and outcomes of CNMP management. Recommendations lend themselves to consideration of CNMP as a chronic illness and use of the Chronic Care Model as an appropriate framework for quality improvement.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Manejo del Dolor , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedad Crónica , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Evaluación de NecesidadesRESUMEN
This paper describes the views of primary care providers about treating depression among adult Medicaid patients and their experiences with managed behavioral health care. It also shows the outcomes of an intervention project that provides a care manager to facilitate connections among PCPs, patients, and behavioral health providers. Despite widespread initiatives to improve depression management in primary care and to manage behavioral health services, it appears that links between the two systems and the use of evidence-based approaches to managing patients are rare. A pilot project to initiate practice redesign, the use of a care manager to assist in patient support, and compliance with both medical and behavioral health treatment has been shown to improve communication and results in positive patient outcomes. Managed behavioral health care can result in incentive structures that create gaps between primary care and behavioral health systems. This project illustrates an initiative co-sponsored by the Massachusetts behavioral health program designed to strengthen links between behavioral health and primary care, and increase rates and effectiveness of depression treatment.