Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 41(9): 1428-1435, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29876597

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of Light Puncture Robot (LPR) as a patient-mounted robot, in positioning a sham needle under MRI guidance for abdominal percutaneous interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This monocentric, prospective and non-controlled study was approved by the ethics review board. The study evaluated the accuracy of LPR V3 to achieve a virtual puncture in 20 healthy volunteers. Three trajectories were tried on each volunteer, under 3-T MRI guidance. RESULTS: Accuracy under 5 mm in attaining a 10 cm-deep target was reached in 72% of attempts after 2 robot motions with a median error of 4.1 mm [2.1; 5.1]. Median procedure time for one trajectory was 12.9 min [10.2; 18.0] and median installation time was 9.0 min [6.0; 13.0]. CONCLUSION: LPR accuracy in the deployment of a sham needle inside the MRI tunnel and its setup time are promising. Further studies need to be conducted to confirm these results before clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Agujas , Punciones/instrumentación , Radiología Intervencionista/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Placebos , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA