Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(22): 514-516, 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843099

RESUMEN

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), caused by infection with the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis, usually manifests as meningitis or septicemia and can be severe and life-threatening (1). Six serogroups (A, B, C, W, X, and Y) account for most cases (2). N. meningitidis is transmitted person-to-person via respiratory droplets and oropharyngeal secretions. Asymptomatic persons can carry N. meningitidis and transmit the bacteria to others, potentially causing illness among susceptible persons. Outbreaks can occur in conjunction with large gatherings (3,4). Vaccines are available to prevent meningococcal disease. Antibiotic prophylaxis for close contacts of infected persons is critical to preventing secondary cases (2).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Neisseria meningitidis/aislamiento & purificación , Niño , Preescolar , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lactante , Anciano , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Viaje
3.
J Infect ; 87(6): 498-505, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251470

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Trends in the incidence of O157 and non-O157 serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections have markedly diverged. Here, we estimate the extent to which STEC serogroups share the same transmission routes and risk factors, potentially explaining these trends. METHODS: With 3048 STEC cases reported in Minnesota from 2010 to 2019, we used lasso penalized regression to estimate pooled odds ratios (pOR) for the association between STEC risk factors and specific STEC serogroups and Shiga toxin gene profiles. We used random forests as a confirmatory analysis. RESULTS: Across an extended period of time, we found evidence for person-to-person transmission associated with the O26 serogroup, relative to other serogroups (pOR = 1.32 for contact with an individual with diarrhea). Rurality was less associated with non-O157 serogroups than O157 (pOR = 1.21 for each increasing level of rurality). We also found an association between unpasteurized juice and strains carrying only stx1 (pOR = 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these results show differences in risk factors across STEC types, which suggest differences in the most effective routes of transmission. Serogroup-specific disease control strategies should be explored. Specifically, preventative measures for non-O157 STEC need to extend beyond those we have employed for O157 STEC.


Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica , Humanos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/genética , Serogrupo , Diarrea , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35329187

RESUMEN

Grocery workers were essential to the workforce and exempt from lockdown requirements as per Minnesota Executive Order 20-20. The risk of COVID-19 transmission in grocery settings is not well documented. This study aimed to determine which factors influenced seropositivity among grocery workers. We conducted a cross-sectional study of Minnesota grocery workers aged 18 and older using a convenience sample. Participants were recruited using a flyer disseminated electronically via e-mail, social media, and newspaper advertising. Participants were directed to an electronic survey and were asked to self-collect capillary blood for IgG antibody testing. Data were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for urbanicity, which confounded the relationship between number of job responsibilities in a store and seropositivity. Of 861 Minnesota grocery workers surveyed, 706 (82%) were tested as part of this study, of which 56 (7.9%) tested positive for IgG antibodies. Participants aged 65-74 years had the highest percent positivity. Having multiple job responsibilities in a store was significantly associated with seropositivity in our adjusted model (OR: 1.14 95% CI: 1.01-1.27). Workplace factors influenced seropositivity among Minnesota grocery workers. Future research will examine other potential factors (e.g., in-store preventive measures and access to PPE) that may contribute to increased seropositivity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Supermercados
5.
One Health ; 11: 100175, 2020 Dec 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392374

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a life-threatening complication of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection. The relationship between STEC exposure and severity of clinical outcomes is not well documented. We examined whether direct contact with farm animals increased the likelihood of HUS among Indiana residents diagnosed with STEC. METHODS: Exposure data for laboratory-confirmed STEC cases among Indiana residents during 2012-2018 were retrieved. Logistic regression and mediation analysis were performed to determine the extent to which a history of direct contact with farm animals was associated with post-diarrheal HUS independent of age and mediated by stx2 gene presence. RESULTS: A total of 784 STEC cases were retrieved. Of these, 46 (6%) developed HUS. Complete exposure data were available for 600 (77%) cases. A total of 24 (52%) HUS patients reported direct contact with farm animals, while 114 (21%) STEC patients who did not develop HUS reported this exposure. Among all STEC cases, HUS was associated with direct farm animal contact after adjusting for age (OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.81, 6.40). Detection of stx2 genes mediated 12% of the association between farm animal contact and HUS. CONCLUSIONS: Direct farm animal contact was a risk factor for development of HUS among laboratory-confirmed STEC cases, independent of stx2 presence. Direct farm animal contact should be considered a potential predictor of progression to HUS when patients present for care and the mechanism for its effect on virulence investigated.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA