Allograft entrapment after lung transplantation: a simple solution using a pleurocutaneous catheter.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pleural effusion following lung transplantation (LTx) is often responsible for respiratory insufficiency and can lead to lung entrapment. Decortication carries considerable morbidity, and extended use of tube thoracostomy is not practical. We have utilized an indwelling pleurocutaneous catheter in the setting of intractable post-transplant effusion and have reviewed our experience to determine whether this strategy: 1) facilitates resolution of effusion, and 2) adequately palliates lung entrapment. METHODS: Twelve PleurX (Denver Biomedical, Golden, CO, USA) catheters were placed in 9 LTx patients (6 unilateral, 3 bilateral) for refractory pleural effusions after standard tube thoracostomy drainage failed (12/12). Two-thirds of the patients (8/12) also had concomitant lung entrapment. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Median time from LTx to catheter placement was 79 days (range 21-769). Catheter use achieved the desired outcome in 11/12 placements. Catheters remained in place for a median of 86 days (range 35-190). Direct catheter-related complications included hemothorax (1) and empyema (1). CONCLUSION: Use of an indwelling pleurocutaneous catheter effectively achieves its intended goals of pleurodesis and management of entrapped lungs after LTx.

Cluster analysis of risk factor genetic polymorphisms in Alzheimer's disease.

Multiple genetic variants may contribute to the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. We have analyzed polymorphisms in 9 genes to determine whether particular combinations would contribute to this risk. The genes were APOE, LDLr, CST3, CTSD, TNF, BACE1, MAPT, STH, eNOS, and TFCP2. Three risk groups for the disease were identified. Risk group I was younger, was heterozygous for the CST3 (GA), CTSD2936 (AG), TNF -308 (AG) genetic variants. Risk group II was older, was homozygous for the -427 APOE promoter polymorphism (TT), and heterozygous for the MAPT deletion and for the STH variant (QR). Group III had both the youngest and oldest subjects, were heterozygous for the -863 (AC) and -1031 (CT) TNF promoter polymorphisms. All three groups carried the APOE 4 allele and were heterozygous for both BACE1 polymorphisms. The control groups were carriers of the APOE 3 allele and were homozygous for the BACE1 genetic variants.

Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in Europe and North America. Alarm features are used to prioritize access to urgent investigation, but there is little information concerning their utility in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature was carried out to assess the diagnostic accuracy of alarm features in predicting colorectal cancer. Primary or secondary care-based studies in unselected cohorts of adult patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (up to October 2007). The main outcome measures were accuracy of alarm features or statistical models in predicting the presence of colorectal cancer after investigation. Data were pooled to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to predefined criteria. RESULTS: Of 11 169 studies identified, 205 were retrieved for evaluation. Fifteen studies were eligible for inclusion, evaluating 19 443 patients, with a pooled prevalence of colorectal carcinoma of 6% (95% CI 5% to 8%). Pooled sensitivity of alarm features was poor (5% to 64%) but specificity was >95% for dark red rectal bleeding and abdominal mass, suggesting that the presence of either rules the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in. Statistical models had a sensitivity of 90%, but poor specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Most alarm features had poor sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, whilst statistical models performed better in terms of sensitivity. Future studies should examine the utility of dark red rectal bleeding and abdominal mass, and concentrate on maximising specificity when validating statistical models.

Review article: the role of surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Rates for laparoscopic fundoplication are declining in the United States and there is no consensus on the indications for referral to surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To highlight recent studies on the outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication in adults that cast doubt on the traditional indications for surgery in reflux disease. RESULTS: Patients who are well maintained on medical therapy have more to lose with surgical intervention than to gain, and should not be offered surgery. Likewise, the notion that surgery prevents oesophageal cancer is a hypothesis that is not supported by current evidence, therefore surgical intervention should not be offered to these patients. The only clear-cut candidates for surgery include: patients with anatomic abnormalities such as a large hiatus hernia, or those with persistent regurgitation that causes troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy; and carefully selected patients with extra-oesophageal disorders who have symptoms of reflux disease such as heartburn and regurgitation, an incomplete response to medical therapy and persistent plus demonstrable reflux on pH or impedance testing that is associated with their symptoms. Patients should be aware of the high likelihood of needing continued acid inhibitory therapy following surgery and the possibility of side-effects. CONCLUSION: Only a few carefully selected patients should undergo fundoplication for reflux disease.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for laryngeal symptoms attributed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Many investigators have proposed an association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms, suggesting that medical or surgical therapy for reflux may be useful. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of medical or surgical therapy for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal symptoms presumed to be due to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing medical or surgical treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease against placebo were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-September 2005), EMBASE (1974-September 2005), the CCRCT (until September 2005) and abstracts from gastroenterology and ENT meetings. The relative risks of reporting symptomatic improvement or resolution of symptoms was evaluated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five studies using high-dose proton pump inhibitor as intervention met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No surgical studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled relative risk was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.74). There was no heterogeneity between studies but evidence of significant publication bias. Sub-group analysis performed evaluating Jadad scores and symptom type, did not change the relative risk. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor is no more effective than placebo in producing symptomatic improvement or resolution of laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms. Further studies are necessary to identify the characteristics of patients that may respond to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

One-week acid suppression trial in uninvestigated dyspepsia patients with epigastric pain or burning to predict response to 8 weeks' treatment with esomeprazole: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: While empiric acid-suppressive therapy for uninvestigated dyspepsia patients with symptoms of epigastric pain or burning is standard practice, it is unknown whether an early response to therapy predicts outcome. AIM: To evaluate whether a 1-w acid suppression trial is effective for predicting 8-w response in such patients. METHODS: Helicobacter pylori-negative patients (aged 18-50 years) in primary care with uninvestigated epigastric pain or burning were randomized to esomeprazole 40 mg q.d.s. or b.d. for 1w, followed by esomeprazole 40 mg q.d.s. or placebo for 7w. Each day, patients rated the severity of their symptoms. RESULTS: Based on the last 3d, 1-w response rates were 39% (231 of 588) and 43% (258 of 596) with esomeprazole 40 mg q.d.s. and b.d., respectively. Based on the last 7d, response rates at 4w were 38% (283 of 738) and 25% (93 of 380) for esomeprazole and placebo, respectively, and 47% (339 of 716) and 34% (124 of 368), respectively, at 8w (both P < 0.001 vs. placebo). The sensitivity and specificity of esomeprazole treatment were 58% and 70%, respectively, at 8w. CONCLUSION: A 1-w acid suppression trial is of limited clinical value for predicting 8-w response in patients with symptoms of epigastric pain or burning. Esomeprazole provides greater symptom control than placebo at 4w and 8w.

Randomized-controlled trial of esomeprazole in functional dyspepsia patients with epigastric pain or burning: does a 1-week trial of acid suppression predict symptom response?

BACKGROUND: Early identification of true responders to acid suppression in functional dyspepsia patients with symptoms of epigastric pain or burning may enable clinicians to optimally tailor treatment. AIM: To evaluate whether a 1-w acid suppression trial is useful for identifying true responders in this population. METHODS: Patients (18-70 years) were randomized to either esomeprazole 40 mg q.d.s., b.d. or placebo for 1w, and then esomeprazole 40 mg q.d.s. or placebo for 7w. Epigastric pain and/or burning were recorded on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 3 = severe). Trial-week response was defined as symptom score sum < or = 1 on last 3d of therapy; response at 8w was symptom score sum < or = 1 over preceding 7d. RESULTS: 1-w response rates were 33% (199 of 597), 29% (188 of 629) and 23% (71 of 315) with esomeprazole q.d.s., esomeprazole b.d. and placebo, respectively (P = 0.002 for esomeprazole groups vs. placebo). At 8w, trial week sensitivity and specificity were 46% and 80%, respectively, for esomeprazole (40 or 80 mg), and 33% and 87%, respectively, for placebo. The positive and negative predictive values for esomeprazole were 60% and 69%. CONCLUSION: Response to a 1-w acid suppression trial is of limited use for predicting symptom response at 8w in patients with unexplained epigastric pain or burning.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a progressive disease.

It is controversial whether gastrooesophageal reflux disease represents a spectrum disease from a nonerosive to a complicated one, or whether it is a categorial disease, i.e. it can be divided into three categories, such as nonerosive gastrooesophageal reflux disease, erosive gastrooesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus (BE) with little or no transition from one category to the other. This controversy might be of general interest, because it has some implications in the management of the patient. However, literature data concerning the natural history of gastrooesophageal reflux disease are very limited, and in particular very few papers have dealt with the issue of describing the natural history of patients with nonerosive gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Aim of the present review is to reassess these scanty data, and to try to demonstrate that progression from milder to more severe forms of gastrooesophageal reflux disease is possible and documented.

Diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is enhanced by adding oesophageal histology and excluding epigastric pain.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in clinical practice is limited by the sensitivity and specificity of symptoms and diagnostic testing. AIM: To determine if adding histology as a criterion and excluding patients with epigastric pain enhances the diagnosis for GERD. METHODS: Patients with frequent upper gastrointestinal symptoms who had not taken a proton pump inhibitor in the previous 2 months and who had evaluable distal oesophageal biopsies were included (Diamond study: NCT00291746). Epithelial hyperplasia was identified when total epithelial thickness was at least 430 µm. Investigation-based GERD criteria were: presence of erosive oesophagitis, pathological oesophageal acid exposure and/or positive symptom-acid association probability. Symptoms were assessed using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire and a pre-specified checklist. RESULTS: Overall, 127 (55%) of the 231 included patients met investigation-based GERD criteria and 195 (84%) met symptom-based criteria. Epithelial hyperplasia was present in 89 individuals, of whom 61 (69%) met investigation-based criteria and 83 (93%) met symptom-based criteria. Adding epithelial hyperplasia as a criterion increased the number of patients diagnosed with GERD on investigation by 28 [12%; number needed to diagnose (NND): 8], to 155 (67%). The proportion of patients with a symptom-based GERD diagnosis who met investigation-based criteria including epithelial hyperplasia was significantly greater when concomitant epigastric pain was absent than when it was present (P < 0.05; NND: 8). CONCLUSIONS: Histology increases diagnosis of GERD and should be performed when clinical suspicion is high and endoscopy is negative. Excluding patients with epigastric pain enhances sensitivity for the diagnosis of GERD.

The effect of over-the-counter ranitidine 75 mg on night-time heartburn in patients with erosive oesophagitis on daily proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy.

BACKGROUND: H2-receptor antagonists are widely used with proton pump inhibitors. AIM: To determine if H2-receptor antagonists used in conjunction with proton pump inhibitors were effective for nocturnal heartburn in patients taking proton pump inhibitors. METHODS: We evaluated 386 patients with erosive oesophagitis documented at endoscopy who were receiving single daily maintenance proton pump inhibitor therapy to determine if they had symptoms of nocturnal heartburn. Patients with two or more episodes of night-time a week were invited to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to a single dose of an over-the-counter preparation of ranitidine 75 mg at bedtime or matching placebo for 14 days. RESULTS: The prevalence of nocturnal symptoms was 10.6%. Mean symptom scores on the first day of the trial (baseline) were similar between the treatment group (1.1 +/- 0.9) and the placebo group (1.1 +/- 1.1). On day 3, symptom scores were significantly lower in the ranitidine group (0.71 +/- 0.69) compared with the control group (1.4 +/- 1.2; P = 0.045). On day 14, mean symptom scores were similar in the ranitidine group (0.82 +/- 0.95) and the control group (1 +/- 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal heartburn is uncommon on proton pump inhibitor therapy; the addition of ranitidine at bedtime resulted in a decrease in symptom scores on day 3 but there were no differences on day 14.

Patterns of gastritis and the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Western patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is controversial. Aim To determine the incidence of symptoms of reflux disease and of erosive oesophagitis, and the relationship to changes in histological gastritis, in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia over 12 months. METHODS: Six hundred and ninety-three patients in two similar randomized placebo controlled trials of H. pylori eradication in non-ulcer dyspepsia were studied. Symptoms were assessed using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale during a 1-week run-in period, at 6 months and 12 months. Endoscopy was performed at baseline to exclude patients with pathology and at 3 months and 12 months to determine if oesophagitis was present. Gastric biopsies were scored using the modified Sydney Classification. RESULTS: Patients without predominant heartburn, oesophagitis or ulcers at endoscopy were randomized to active (n = 297, omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) treatment or to placebo/omeprazole (n = 306) for 1 week. The eradication rate was 82% in the active treatment group. Antrum-predominant gastritis (55%) was more frequently found than corpus-predominant gastritis (6%). In patients with antrum-predominant gastritis, heartburn and regurgitation scores improved significantly 12 months after eradication. Erosive oesophagitis developed in 15/232 patients in the eradication group (7%) compared with 2/227 (2%) in the control group, but there was no significant difference when adjusted for oesophagitis present at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Antrum-predominant gastritis is the most common pattern of gastritis seen in non-ulcer dyspepsia in Western populations. Heartburn and regurgitation improve after eradication therapy or placebo in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia; the development of oesophagitis is uncommon.

Sleep disturbance due to heartburn and regurgitation is common in patients with functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Reflux symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) are common in patients with functional dyspepsia who do not have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of reflux symptoms with sleep disturbances in patients with functional dyspepsia without GERD and in those with GERD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of data from the Diamond study (NCT00291746) included patients with frequent upper gastrointestinal symptoms, of whom 137 had functional dyspepsia and 193 had GERD (diagnosed by endoscopy and pH monitoring). Patients completed symptom questionnaires and were interviewed by physicians. RESULTS: During the seven nights before study entry, 46.0% of patients with functional dyspepsia and 64.8% of those with GERD reported sleep disturbances (any frequency) related to reflux symptoms. Frequent (often/every night) sleep disturbances were experienced by 12.4% of patients with functional dyspepsia and 24.9% of those with GERD (p = 0.005). Among patients with functional dyspepsia, the prevalence of sleep disturbances was highest in those whose heartburn and/or regurgitation were moderate to severe (vs mild/very mild) and frequent (4-7 vs 1-3 days/week). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbances due to reflux symptoms are common in patients with functional dyspepsia who do not have GERD, and become more frequent with increasing reflux symptom severity and frequency.

Review article: how valuable are proton-pump inhibitors in establishing a diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

Diagnostic studies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (endoscopy, pH testing) have significant limitations. A short trial of acid suppression with a proton-pump inhibitor is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. If there is a significant improvement in symptoms, the patient is considered to have gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Several studies have evaluated the administration of proton-pump inhibitors as a diagnostic test for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A recent meta-analysis found that response to a proton-pump inhibitor had limited value as a diagnostic test. Likelihood ratios for a positive test ranged from 0.45 to 1.86. The positive predictive value of the test ranged from 0.17 to 0.90 and the negative predictive value from 0.17 to 1, depending on the gold standard against which comparisons were made. These results may be explained by the inadequacy of the gold standard against which the proton-pump inhibitor test is compared or by the inability of acid suppression to differentiate between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease or dyspepsia. Although a trial of acid suppression may have pragmatic value in clinical practice, the proton-pump inhibitor test is not an accurate test for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

The cost-effectiveness of biomarkers for predicting the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The recommended surveillance strategy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma may prevent as few as 50% of cancer deaths. Tissue biomarkers have been proposed to identify high-risk patients. AIM: To determine performance characteristics of an ideal biomarker, or panel of biomarkers, that would make its use more cost-effective than the current surveillance strategy. METHODS: We created a Markov model using data from published literature, and performed a cost-utility analysis. The population consisted of 50-year-old Caucasian men with gastro-oesophageal reflux, who were monitored until age 80. We examined strategies of observation only, current practice (dysplasia-guided surveillance), surveillance every 3 months for patients with a positive biomarker (biomarker-guided surveillance), and oesophagectomy immediately for a positive biomarker (biomarker-guided oesophagectomy). The primary outcome was the threshold cost and performance characteristics needed for a biomarker to be more cost-effective than current practice. RESULTS: Regardless of the cost, the biomarker needs to be at least 95% specific for biomarker-guided oesophagectomy to be cost-effective. For biomarker-guided surveillance to be cost-effective, a $100 biomarker could be 80% sensitive and specific. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers predicting the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma would need to be fairly accurate and inexpensive to be cost-effective. These results should guide the development of biomarkers for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Comprehension and awareness of symptoms in women with dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Overlapping symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia are a problem for physicians and patients. AIM: This study explored comprehension of dyspepsia symptoms and associated medical terminology among women with symptoms of dyspepsia. METHODS: The US women aged > or = 18 years with dyspepsia (defined by Rome II criteria) were recruited in two phases, via direct mail, the Internet, clinical investigators and/or gastroenterologists. In phase I, subjects took part in an hour-long telephonic interview comprising open-ended questions relating to symptom frequency/duration, triggers/patterns and severity. During phase II, subjects took part in a 45-min telephonic interview, which explored their understanding of dyspepsia symptoms and their predominant or most bothersome symptom. RESULTS: Subjects with 'pure' dyspepsia (without overlapping symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or irritable bowel syndrome) were sought, but of 777 subjects screened, most were excluded because of gastrointestinal comorbidities (irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). Only 85 (11%) subjects had 'pure' dyspepsia of whom 11 withdrew. Of the 74 subjects interviewed, 70% were unfamiliar with the term 'dyspepsia'. Subjects reported several symptoms, including bloating (65%), gas (50%), nausea (41%) and discomfort (36%). Most subjects could distinguish between symptom bothersomeness and severity, and between pain and discomfort. Terms such as 'satisfactory relief', 'central upper abdominal discomfort', 'early satiety' and 'postmeal fullness' were often misunderstood. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with 'pure' dyspepsia are rare, because of comorbidities. Dyspepsia-related terminology is often misunderstood by subjects.

Endoscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: is sooner better? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: While the effectiveness of upper endoscopy has been established for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage, its optimal timing has not been clearly defined. Early endoscopy has been advocated for its ability to achieve prompt diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic hemostasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early vs delayed endoscopy improves patient and economic outcomes for all risk groups with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage. METHODS: A systematic review of 3 computerized databases (MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) was performed along with hand searching of published abstracts to identify English-language citations from 1980 to 2000. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met explicit inclusion criteria. The highest-quality study examining outcomes in low-risk patients found no significant complications at 1-month follow-up for any outpatients managed with early endoscopy. The largest randomized trial of high-risk patients showed no mortality benefit but a significant decrease in transfusion requirements with early endoscopy. Seven of the 8 studies examining the effect of early endoscopy on length of stay as a measure of resource utilization demonstrated a significant reduction compared with that of delayed endoscopy. However, most included studies were found to suffer from 1 or more potentially significant methodologic shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of existing data suggest that early endoscopy is safe and effective for all risk groups. The clinical and economic outcomes of early endoscopy should be confirmed in additional well-designed randomized controlled trials. Given the strength of the evidence, efforts to develop a more standardized and time-sensitive approach to acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage should be undertaken.

Cost savings in duodenal ulcer therapy through Helicobacter pylori eradication compared with conventional therapies: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Gastrointestinal Utilization Trial Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that treatment of duodenal ulcer disease with antibiotic therapy directed toward Helicobacter pylori infection is more cost-effective than therapy with antisecretory agents. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of adult patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive 500 mg of clarithromycin 3 times a day plus 40 mg of omeprazole daily for 14 days followed by 20 mg of omeprazole daily for an additional 14 days (group 1), 20 mg of omeprazole daily for 28 days (group 2), or 150 mg of ranitidine hydrochloride twice a day for 28 days (group 3). The use of ulcer-related health care resources was documented during monthly interviews for 1 year after the initial therapy. Clinical success was evaluated 4 to 6 weeks and 1 year after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 819 patients enrolled, 727 completed the study. Group 1 included 243 patients; group 2, 248 patients; and group 3, 236 patients. Patients in group 1 used fewer ulcer-related health care resources during the 1 year after therapy compared with groups 2 and 3 (comparisons are given as group 1 vs group 2 and group 1 vs group 3, respectively): the number of endoscopies performed, 28 vs 76 (P<.001) and vs 71 (P<.001); patients receiving drugs to treat an ulcer, 118 vs 180 (P<.001) and vs 168 (P<.001); clinic visits, 83 vs 135 (P=.05) and vs 161 (P<.001); hospitalizations, 0 vs 5 (P=.045) and vs 6 (P=.02); and length of hospital stay, 0 vs 24 days (P=.04) and vs 37 (P=.04). When ulcer-related costs were defined as the outcome variable in a multivariate linear regression analysis, therapy was determined to have a significant influence on costs (group 1 vs group 2, P<.001; group 1 vs group 3, P=.008). Clinical success rates at the end of the study and cure of H. pylori infection were significantly greater in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (P<.001). Therapy with clarithromycin plus omeprazole provided savings of $1.94 and $2.96 (compared with therapy with omeprazole and with ranitidine hydrochloride, respectively) per dollar spent within the first year after therapy. This incremental cost-benefit translates to savings of $547 or $835 per patient in group 1 (compared with patients in group 2 or group 3, respectively) during the first year after therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with clarithromycin and omeprazole resulted in significantly fewer uses of ulcer-related health care resources than conventional antisecretory therapy during a 1-year follow-up and significant savings in associated costs during the same period. Patients who received clarithromycin plus omeprazole also showed a significantly improved clinical outcome compared with patients who received only omeprazole or ranitidine.

Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori therapies in a clinical practice setting.

BACKGROUND: Whether eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens obtained in controlled clinical trials (efficacy) can also be obtained in clinical practice (effectiveness) is unknown because no such trials have been reported in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To determine the eradication rates of H pylori in a community practice setting and the effects of practice variation in the choice of treatment regimen on patient outcome (H pylori infection cure) and cost. METHODS: Between February 1 and December 30, 1996, 38 community-based gastroenterologists in the Portland, Ore, metropolitan area enrolled a total of 250 patients infected with H pylori, as determined by endoscopic or noninvasive methods. Various therapeutic regimens aimed at eradicating H pylori were used by the gastroenterologists, and a posttreatment urea breath test was used to determine H pylori infection cure. Compliance and incidental effects were also measured and decision analysis was used to estimate the cost of treatment. RESULTS: The regimens used varied considerably. Patients receiving a 2- or 3-times-a-day treatment regimen were significantly more compliant (P=.01) than those receiving a 4-times-a-day regimen. Proton pump inhibitor-based triple-therapy regimens were significantly more effective than all other treatment regimens combined (87% vs 70%; P = .001) in eradicating H pylori. These proton pump inhibitor-based triple-therapy regimens were also more cost-effective by decision analysis for a hypothetical cohort of patients with duodenal ulcer disease. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variation in the choice of treatment regimens affects the clinical and economic outcomes of patients undergoing therapy for H pylori infection. Whether these data reflect the outcome in other communities is unknown but should be determined. It will be necessary to determine if the dissemination of these data results in a reduction of practice variation and improvement in clinical and economic outcomes of patients being treated for H pylori infection in clinical practice.

Gender differences in symptoms in partial responders to proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences may exist in the symptom experience of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyse gender differences in partial responders to PPIs. METHODS: Patients with GERD who responded partially to PPIs (n = 580; NCT00703534) completed the Reflux Symptom Questionnaire 7-day recall (RESQ-7) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Women had significantly higher RESQ-7 domain scores than men for Heartburn (frequency: 4.3 vs 3.9; intensity: 3.1 vs 2.8), Burping (frequency: 4.9 vs 4.4; intensity: 3.1 vs 2.8) and Hoarseness, cough and difficulty swallowing (frequency: 2.6 vs 2.2; intensity: 1.8 vs 1.5), and had higher GSRS domain discomfort scores than men for Abdominal pain (3.51 vs 3.23), Indigestion (3.80 vs 3.45) and Constipation (2.69 vs 2.17) (all p < 0.05). Anxiety and depression were significantly more prevalent in women than in men. CONCLUSION: In this population of partial responders, women had more frequent/intense heartburn and extra-oesophageal symptoms and more discomfort from abdominal pain, indigestion and constipation than men. Comorbid anxiety and depression may contribute to the increased symptom burden in women.