Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 28(1): 36-43, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18259896

RESUMEN

To test the hypotheses that: (1) standard definitions of common obstetric terms exist and (2) frontline workers in daily obstetric practice have common understandings of these terms, we undertook (a) a review of definitions for nine common terms from latest editions of standard texts and resources, and (b) an exploratory questionnaire survey of these definitions applied in a work setting among four groups; trainee and consultant obstetricians, student and qualified midwives (five of each). Definitions for nine selected obstetric terms in common use (labour, parity, precipitate labour, primary postpartum haemorrhage, primiparity, PROM, secondary postpartum haemorrhage, term and viability) were inconsistent in standard texts. Obstetric staff had no agreed perception of the precise definitions. There is a potentially hazardous lack of clarity about obstetric terms, and a need to develop standard definitions. This would benefit students, practitioners, information technology experts and, most importantly, patients.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Partería/normas , Obstetricia/normas , Terminología como Asunto , Comunicación , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Londres , Embarazo , Medicina Estatal/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA