Prospective Sensory Outcomes for Targeted Nipple Areola Complex Reinnervation (TNR) in Gender-Affirming Double Incision Mastectomy with Free Nipple Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyses the anatomy and sensory outcomes of targeted nipple areola complex reinnervation (TNR) in gender-affirming double incision mastectomy with free nipple grafting (FNG). BACKGROUND: TNR is a novel technique to preserve and reconstruct intercostal nerves (ICN) to improve postoperative sensation. There is little evidence on relevant anatomy and outcomes. METHODS: 25 patients were prospectively enrolled. Data included demographics, surgical technique, and axon/fascicle counts. Quantitative sensory evaluation using monofilaments and qualitative patient reported questionnaires were completed preoperatively, and at one, three, six, nine and twelve months postoperatively. RESULTS: 50 mastectomies were performed. Per mastectomy, the median number of ICN found and used was 2 (1-5). Axon and fascicle counts were not significantly different between ICN branches ( P >0.05). BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 and mastectomy weight ≥800 g were associated with significantly worse preoperative sensation ( P <0.05). Compared to preoperative values, NAC sensation was worse at 1 month ( P <0.01), comparable at 3 months ( P >0.05), and significantly better at 12 months ( P <0.05) postoperatively. Chest sensation was comparable to the preoperative measurements at 1 and 3 months ( P >0.05), and significantly better at 12 months ( P <0.05) postoperatively. NAC sensation was significantly better when direct coaptation was performed compared to use of allograft only ( P <0.05), and with direct coaptation of ≥2 branches compared to direct coaptation of a single branch ( P <0.05). All patients reported return of nipple and chest sensation at one year postoperatively and 88% reported return of some degree of erogenous sensation. CONCLUSION: TNR allows for restoration of NAC and chest sensation within 3 months postoperatively. Use of multiple ICN branches and direct coaptation led to the best sensory outcomes.

Neuroma Analysis in Humans: Standardizing Sample Collection and Documentation.

INTRODUCTION: The biology of symptomatic neuromas is poorly understood, particularly the factors causing pain in human neuromas. Pain presence varies among and within individuals, with some having painful and nonpainful neuromas. To bridge these knowledge gaps, our group developed a protocol for assessing neuroma pain and collecting tissue for molecular analysis. This manuscript outlines our workflow and challenges and aims to inspire other centers to share their experiences with these tissues. METHODS: For every included patient and collected nerve or bone tissue specimens, we perform a detailed chart review and a multifaceted analysis of pain and pain perception immediately before surgery. We collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on pain, function, and mental well-being outcomes at preoperative assessment and at the 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Before surgery, the patient is assessed once again to obtain an immediate preoperative pain status and identify potential differences in pain intensity of different neuromas. Intraoperatively, specimens are obtained and their gross anatomical features are recorded, after which they are stored in paraformaldehyde or frozen for later sample analyses. Postoperatively, patients are contacted to obtain additional postoperative PROMs. RESULTS: A total of 220 specimens of nerve tissue have been successfully obtained from 83 limbs, comprising 95 specimens of neuromas and 125 specimens of nerves located proximal to the neuromas or from controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach outlines the methods combining specimen collection and examination, including both macroscopic and molecular biological features, with PROMs, encompassing physical and psychological aspects, along with clinical metadata obtained through clinical teams and chart review.

Technical Variables in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity free flap failure rates are higher than in other areas of the body. While prior studies assessed the effect of intraoperative technical variables, these generally investigated individual variables and did not examine relationships between the many individual technical decisions made during free tissue reconstruction. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of variation in intraoperative microsurgical techniques on flap outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients requiring lower extremity free flap coverage. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity at two level 1 trauma centers from January 2002 to January 2020 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes, followed by a review of medical records. Information regarding demographics and comorbidities, indications, intraoperative technical details, and complications was collected. Outcomes of interest included an unplanned return to the operating room, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, partial flap failure, and total flap failure. Bivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: In total, 410 patients underwent 420 free tissue transfers. The median follow-up time was 17 months (interquartile ranges: 8.0-37). Total flap failure occurred in 4.9% (n = 20), partial flap failure in 5.9% (n = 24), and unplanned reoperation in 9.0% (n = 37), with arterial thrombosis in 3.2% (n = 13) and venous thrombosis in 5.4% (n = 22). Overall complications were significantly associated with recipient artery choice, with arteries other than PT and AT/DP having a higher rate (p = 0.033), and with arterial revisions (p = 0.010). Total flap failure was also associated with revision of the arterial anastomosis (p = 0.035), and partial flap failure was associated with recipient artery choice (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Many interoperative options and techniques are available when performing microvascular lower extremity reconstruction that leads to equally high success rates. However, the use of arterial inflow outside of the posterior tibial and anterior tibial arteries leads to a higher overall complication rate and partial flap failure rate. Intraoperative revision of the arterial anastomosis portends poorly for ultimate flap survival.

What Are the Functional and Surgical Outcomes of Tibial Turnup-plasty for Salvage in Patients With Chronic Lower Extremity Infection?

BACKGROUND: Tibial turnup-plasty is a rarely performed surgical option for large bone defects of the distal or entire femur and can serve as an alternative to hip disarticulation or high above-knee amputation. It entails pedicled transport of the ipsilateral tibia with or without the proximal hindfoot for use as a vascularized autograft. It is rotated 180° in the coronal or sagittal plane to the remaining proximal femur or pelvis, augmenting the functional length of the thigh. Prior reports consist of small case series with heterogeneous surgical techniques. Patient-reported outcome measures after the procedure have not been reported, and ambulatory status after the procedure is also unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of patients underwent reoperation after tibial turnup-plasty? (2) What is the ambulatory status and what proportion of patients used a prosthesis after tibial turnup-plasty? (3) What are the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 mental and physical function scores after tibial turnup-plasty? METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 11 patients who underwent tibial turnup-plasty between 2003 and 2021 by a single orthopaedic oncology division in collaboration with a reconstructive plastic surgery team. Nine patients were men, with a median age of 55 years (range 34 to 75 years). All had chronic infections after arthroplasty or oncologic reconstructions, with a median number of 13 surgeries before turnup-plasty. All were considered to have no other surgical options other than hip disarticulation or high transfemoral amputation. All patients who were offered this possibility accepted it. Data of interest included patient demographics and comorbidities, surgical history that led to limb compromise, medical and surgical perioperative complications, date of prosthesis fitting, and functional capacity at the most recent follow-up interval based on ambulatory status and PROMIS Global-10 mental and physical function scores. The statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: The median number of reoperations after turnup-plasty was one (range 0 to 11). Of the six patients who underwent at least one reoperation, indications for surgery included wound infection (four patients), nonunion of the osteosynthesis site (two), heterotopic ossification (one), tumor recurrence (one), and flap hypoperfusion treated with local tissue revision (one). One patient underwent conversion to external hemipelvectomy for tumor recurrence. Ten of the 11 patients were ambulatory at the final follow-up interval with standard above-knee amputation prostheses. Two ambulated unassisted, four used a single crutch or cane, and four used two crutches or a walker. Of the nine patients for whom scores were available, the median PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores were 48 (range 30 to 68) and 53 (range 41 to 68), both within the standard deviation of the population mean of 50. CONCLUSION: The tibial turnup-plasty is a complex surgical option for patients with large bone defects of the femur for whom there are no alternative surgeries capable of producing residual extremities with acceptable functional length. This should be viewed as a procedure of last resort to avoid a hip disarticulation or a high transfemoral amputation in patients who have typically undergone numerous prior operations. Although ambulation with a prosthesis within 1 year can be expected, almost all patients will require an assistive device to do so, and reoperations are frequent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Long-Term Opioid Use Following Surgery for Symptomatic Neuroma.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at risk for prolonged opioid use following surgery for symptomatic neuroma would be beneficial for perioperative management. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with postoperative opioid use of >4 weeks in patients undergoing neuroma surgery. METHODS: After retrospective identification, 77 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic neuroma of the upper or lower extremity were enrolled. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, and a custom medication questionnaire at a median of 9.7 years (range: 2.5-16.8 years) following surgery. Neuroma excision followed by nerve implantation (n = 39, 51%), nerve reconstruction/repair (n = 18, 23%), and excision alone (n = 16, 21%) were the most common surgical treatments. RESULTS: Overall, 27% (n = 21) of patients reported opioid use of more than 4 weeks postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (30%) reported preoperative opioid use of which 11 (48%) did not report opioid use for >4 weeks, postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, preoperative opioid use was independently associated with opioid use of >4 weeks, postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-14.3, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Neuroma surgery reduces opioid use in many patients but patients who are taking opioids preoperatively are at risk for longer opioid use. Almost one-third of patients reported opioid use longer than 4 weeks, postoperatively.

Evidence-Based Approach to Timing of Nerve Surgery: A Review.

ABSTRACT: Events causing acute stress to the health care system, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, place clinical decisions under increased scrutiny. The priority and timing of surgical procedures are critically evaluated under these conditions, yet the optimal timing of procedures is a key consideration in any clinical setting. There is currently no single article consolidating a large body of current evidence on timing of nerve surgery. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically reviewed for clinical data on nerve repair and reconstruction to define the current understanding of timing and other factors affecting outcomes. Special attention was given to sensory, mixed/motor, nerve compression syndromes, and nerve pain. The data presented in this review may assist surgeons in making sound, evidence-based clinical decisions regarding timing of nerve surgery.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Upper-Extremity Amputation for the Treatment of Pain Severity and Symptoms.

PURPOSE: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a technique for the management of peripheral nerves in amputation. Phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) trouble many patients after amputation, and TMR has been shown to reduce this pain when performed after the initial amputation. We hypothesize that TMR at the time of amputation may improve pain for patients after major upper-extremity amputation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent major upper-extremity amputation with TMR performed at the time of the index amputation (early TMR). Phantom limb pain and RLP intensity and associated symptoms were assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS), the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short-Form 3a, the Pain Behavior Short-Form 7a, and the Pain Interference Short-Form 8a. The TMR cohort was compared with benchmarked data from a sample of upper-extremity amputees. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent early TMR and were compared with 55 benchmark patients. More than half of early TMR patients were without PLP (62%) compared with 24% of controls. Furthermore, half of all patients were free of RLP compared with 36% of controls. The median PROMIS PLP intensity score for the general sample was 47 versus 38 in the early TMR sample. Patients who underwent early TMR reported reduced pain behaviors and interference specific to PLP (50 vs 53 and 41 vs 50, respectively). The PROMIS RLP intensity score was lower in patients with early TMR (36 vs 47). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that early TMR is a promising strategy for treating pain and improving the quality of life in the upper-extremity amputee. Early TMR may preclude the need for additional surgery and represents an important technique for peripheral nerve surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Risk Factors for Neuropathic Pain Following Major Upper Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Active treatment (targeted muscle reinnervation [TMR] or regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces [RPNIs]) of the amputated nerve ends has gained momentum to mitigate neuropathic pain following amputation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the predictors for the development of neuropathic pain after major upper extremity amputation. METHODS: Retrospectively, 142 adult patients who underwent 148 amputations of the upper extremity between 2000 and 2019 were identified through medical chart review. All upper extremity amputations proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints were included. Patients with a follow-up of less than 6 months and those who underwent TMR or RPNI at the time of amputation were excluded. Neuropathic pain was defined as phantom limb pain or a symptomatic neuroma reported in the medical charts at 6 months postoperatively. Most common indications for amputation were oncology (n = 53, 37%) and trauma (n = 45, 32%), with transhumeral amputations (n = 44, 30%) and shoulder amputations (n = 37, 25%) being the most prevalent. RESULTS: Neuropathic pain occurred in 42% of patients, of which 48 (32%) had phantom limb pain, 8 (5.4%) had a symptomatic neuroma, and 6 (4.1%) had a combination of both. In multivariable analysis, traumatic amputations (odds ratio [OR]: 4.1, p = 0.015), transhumeral amputations (OR: 3.9, p = 0.024), and forequarter amputations (OR: 8.4, p = 0.003) were independently associated with the development of neuropathic pain. CONCLUSION: In patients with an upper extremity amputation proximal to the elbow or for trauma, there is an increased risk of developing neuropathic pain. In these patients, primary TMR/RPNI should be considered and this warrants a multidisciplinary approach involving general trauma surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, and vascular surgeons.

Targeted muscle reinnervation following external hemipelvectomy or hip disarticulation: An anatomic description of technique and clinical case correlates.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to decrease or prevent neuropathic pain, including phantom and residual limb pain, after extremity amputation. Currently, a paucity of data and lack of anatomical description exists regarding TMR in the setting of hemipelvectomy and/or hip disarticulations. We elaborate on the technique of TMR, illustrated through cadaveric and clinical correlates. METHODS: Cadaveric dissections of multiple transpelvic exposures were performed. The major mixed motor and sensory nerve branches were identified, dissected, and tagged. Amputated peripheral nerves were transferred to identified, labeled target motor nerves via direct end-to-end nerve coaptations per traditional TMR technique. A retrospective review was completed by our multi-institutional teams to include examples of clinical correlates for TMR performed in the setting of hemipelvectomies and hip disarticulations. RESULTS: A total of 12 TMR hemipelvectomy/hip disarticulation cases were performed over a 2 to 3-year period (2018-2020). Of these 12 cases, 9 were oncologic in nature, 2 were secondary to traumatic injury, and 1 was a failed limb salvage in the setting of chronic refractory osteomyelitis of the femoral shaft. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript outlines the technical considerations for TMR in the setting of hemipelvectomy and hip disarticulation with supporting clinical case correlates.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation is an emerging surgical technique to treat neuroma pain whereby sensory and mixed motor nerves are transferred to nearby redundant motor nerve branches. In a recent randomized controlled trial, targeted muscle reinnervation was recently shown to reduce postamputation pain relative to conventional neuroma excision and muscle burying. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve residual limb pain and phantom limb pain in the period before surgery to 1 year after surgery? (2) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve Patient-reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) pain intensity and pain interference scores at 1 year after surgery? (3) After 1 year, does targeted muscle reinnervation improve functional outcome scores (Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey [OPUS] with Rasch conversion and Neuro-Quality of Life [Neuro-QOL])? METHODS: Data on patients who were ineligible for randomization or declined to be randomized and underwent targeted muscle reinnervation for pain were gathered for the present analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 2013 to 2017. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 10 of whom lacked 1-year follow-up, leaving 33 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes measured were the difference in residual limb and phantom limb pain before and 1 year after surgery, assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were change in PROMIS pain measures and change in limb function, assessed by the OPUS Rasch for upper limbs and Neuro-QOL for lower limbs before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: By 1 year after targeted muscle reinnervation, NRS scores for residual limb pain from 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2 (mean difference -2.7 [95% CI -4.2 to -1.3]; p < 0.001) and phantom limb pain decreased from 6.0 ± 3.1 to 3.6 ± 2.9 (mean difference -2.4 [95% CI -3.8 to -0.9]; p < 0.001). PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference scores improved with respect to residual limb and phantom limb pain (residual limb pain intensity: 53.4 ± 9.7 to 44.4 ± 7.9, mean difference -9.0 [95% CI -14.0 to -4.0]; residual limb pain interference: 60.4 ± 9.3 to 51.7 ± 8.2, mean difference -8.7 [95% CI -13.1 to -4.4]; phantom limb pain intensity: 49.3 ± 10.4 to 43.2 ± 9.3, mean difference -6.1 [95% CI -11.3 to -0.9]; phantom limb pain interference: 57.7 ± 10.4 to 50.8 ± 9.8, mean difference -6.9 [95% CI -12.1 to -1.7]; p ≤ 0.012 for all comparisons). On functional assessment, OPUS Rasch scores improved from 53.7 ± 3.4 to 56.4 ± 3.7 (mean difference +2.7 [95% CI 2.3 to 3.2]; p < 0.001) and Neuro-QOL scores improved from 32.9 ± 1.5 to 35.2 ± 1.6 (mean difference +2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.9]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted muscle reinnervation demonstrates improvement in residual limb and phantom limb pain parameters in major limb amputees. It should be considered as a first-line surgical treatment option for chronic amputation-related pain in patients with major limb amputations. Additional investigation into the effect on function and quality of life should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to-date. METHODS: This multicenter IRB-approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow-up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature. RESULTS: The study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time-to-repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50-70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.

Instillation negative pressure wound therapy: An effective approach for hardware salvage.

Wound infection involving hardware can be notoriously difficult to treat, often requiring the removal of the infected implant. The goal of this study was to determine the utility of instillation negative pressure wound therapy to help eradicate infection and allow for definitive wound closure in patients without removing the infected hardware. A retrospective review was performed on the outcomes of 28 patients who presented with open wounds with exposed or infected hardware and who were treated with a combination of surgical debridement and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi). Eleven patients were treated for infected spinal hardware, 12 for extremity, and 5 for sternal hardware. Twenty-five of 28 (89%) patients had successful retention or replacement of hardware, with clearance of infection and healed wounds. Original hardware was maintained in 17 of 28 (61%) patients. In 11 patients, original hardware was removed, with subsequent replacement in eight of those patients after a clean wound was achieved. Average time to definitive closure was 12.6 days. Average follow-up was 135 days. This series supports NPWTi as an effective adjunct therapy to help expeditiously eradicate hardware infection, allowing for hardware retention.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) to "standard treatment" of neuroma excision and burying into muscle for postamputation pain. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To date, no intervention is consistently effective for neuroma-related residual limb or phantom limb pain (PLP). TMR is a nerve transfer procedure developed for prosthesis control, incidentally found to improve postamputation pain. METHODS: A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted. 28 amputees with chronic pain were assigned to standard treatment or TMR. Primary outcome was change between pre- and postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain scores for residual limb pain and PLP at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included NRS for all patients at final follow-up, PROMIS pain scales, neuroma size, and patient function. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, changes in PLP scores at 1 year were 3.2 versus -0.2 (difference 3.4, adjusted confidence interval (aCI) -0.1 to 6.9, adjusted P = 0.06) for TMR and standard treatment, respectively. Changes in residual limb pain scores were 2.9 versus 0.9 (difference 1.9, aCI -0.5 to 4.4, P = 0.15). In longitudinal mixed model analysis, difference in change scores for PLP was significantly greater in the TMR group compared with standard treatment [mean (aCI) = 3.5 (0.6, 6.3), P = 0.03]. Reduction in residual limb pain was favorable for TMR (P = 0.10). At longest follow-up, including 3 crossover patients, results favored TMR over standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this first surgical RCT for the treatment of postamputation pain in major limb amputees, TMR improved PLP and trended toward improved residual limb pain compared with conventional neurectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02205385 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in oncologic amputees: Early experience of a novel institutional protocol.

BACKGROUND: We describe a multidisciplinary approach for comprehensive care of amputees with concurrent targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) at the time of amputation. METHODS: Our TMR cohort was compared to a cross-sectional sample of unselected oncologic amputees not treated at our institution (N = 58). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NRS, PROMIS) were used to assess postamputation pain. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent amputation with concurrent TMR during the study; 27 patients completed pain surveys; 15 had greater than 1 year follow-up (mean follow-up 14.7 months). Neuroma symptoms occurred significantly less frequently and with less intensity among the TMR cohort. Mean differences for PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference for phantom limb pain (PLP) were 5.855 (95%CI 1.159-10.55; P = .015), 5.896 (95%CI 0.492-11.30; P = .033), and 7.435 (95%CI 1.797-13.07; P = .011) respectively, with lower scores for TMR cohort. For residual limb pain, PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference mean differences were 5.477 (95%CI 0.528-10.42; P = .031), 6.195 (95%CI 0.705-11.69; P = .028), and 6.816 (95%CI 1.438-12.2; P = .014), respectively. Fifty-six percent took opioids before amputation compared to 22% at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary care of amputees including concurrent amputation and TMR, multimodal postoperative pain management, amputee-centered rehabilitation, and peer support demonstrates reduced incidence and severity of neuroma and PLP.

Understanding the Impact and Misconceptions of Rural Plastic Surgery.

In the United States, 54 million people live in a designated health service area with either no plastic surgeon or less than 1 plastic surgeon per 100,000 population. Previous studies demonstrate that patients in rural communities often have limitations with access to basic primary care services and subspecialty care services. Such limitations can have significant adverse impacts on health care and quality of life. Plastic and reconstructive surgeons offer unique advantages especially within rural settings given their broad scope of surgical skillsets. The purposes of this study are to illustrate the shortage of plastic and reconstructive surgeons within rural America catchment regions, identify and outline certain care offerings provided by these surgical specialists, and highlight the potential impact having such specialists directly involved in provision of care to patients within rural community settings. Our group will present data demonstrating misperceptions and an unawareness by hospital administrators on routine care services provided through plastic surgery practices. We will also report on selective surgical offerings of 2 rural-based plastic surgeons and outline certain financial and reimbursement findings from their practices, while also illustrating the impact of their practice on their patients and the health care systems they provide coverage.

Improving Care of Cleft-Related Velopharyngeal Incompetence on Humanitarian Missions Using a Multidisciplinary Team Approach.

BACKGROUND: Proper evaluation and analysis of speech surgery outcomes for cleft-related velopharyngeal incompetence in children and young adults performed on humanitarian missions is poorly characterized. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of using a multidisciplinary team on cleft-related humanitarian missions. The effect on patient selection, velopharyngeal mechanism imaging, and speech outcomes after surgery will be highlighted. METHODS: A review of the Medical Readiness Training Exercise database for craniofacial missions to the Dominican Republic from 2009 to 2011 was performed. A speech pathologist and a craniofacial surgeon evaluated all patients with a diagnosis of cleft palate and speech abnormalities. Patients were screened using speech analysis and selective nasal endoscopy. Data collected included sex, age, diagnosis, speech scores, date, and type of surgical procedure-that is, pharyngeal flap (PF) versus sphincter pharyngoplasty (SP), morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with cleft palate were screened during the study period by a craniofacial surgeon and secondarily by a speech pathologist. Twenty-eight patients were identified with nasal quality speech of whom 12 patients (12/126 = 9.5% of total surgical cases) underwent PF/SP surgery after previous primary repair of a cleft palate defect. The 16 remaining patients (16/28 = 57%) with nonsurgical speech abnormalities were determined that surgery was not going to be beneficial and they were spared unnecessary surgery after speech pathology evaluation and nasal endoscopy. Eight patients were female and 4 patients were male; average age was 13.3 years (range 4-27 years). Seven pharyngeal flaps (58%) and 5 (42%) sphincter pharyngoplasty procedures were performed. The average presurgical speech score was 11.4 (range 6-24). There was a significant decrease in postsurgical speech scores with the average postsurgical speech score of 5.2 (range 0-21, P value = 0.0028). Follow-up evaluation averaged 18 months (range 6-24). Average hospital stay was 2 days for PF/SP surgery. Two patients, both with developmental delay, retained speech scores greater than 6. There were no major complications or reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal flap/sphincter pharyngoplasty surgery in young adults resulted in improved speech scores and comprehensibility after speech surgery on Medical Readiness Training Exercise military humanitarian missions. Speech surgery in older patients in relatively austere environments is safe and effective. After comprehensive multidisciplinary team evaluation, 43% of the patients who were screened to have velopharyngeal incompetence were identified as surgical candidates. Fifty-seven percent of patients evaluated by speech pathologist were recommend nonsurgical solution toward improving speech scores sparing them unnecessary surgery. The incorporation of a speech pathologist to the humanitarian mission resulted in identifying surgical candidates who would benefit the most from intervention and improved speech surgery outcomes.

Minimizing osteoradionecrosis after mandibular reconstruction and radiation in advanced head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis may develop on the residual mandible or reconstructed fibula because of inadequate soft tissue coverage and compromised tissue perfusion post mandibular reconstruction, and radiation. This study was to investigate the incidence of osteoradionecrosis following class III mandibular defect reconstructions with an OPAC flap versus a fibula OSC flap. METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of mandibular reconstructions between 1999 and 2010 was performed. Mandibular defects and corresponding flap types were analyzed with emphasis on outcome, complications, and rates of osteoradionecrosis among the two subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 121 fibula flaps were performed, consisting of 53 OPAC and 68 fibula OSC flaps. Complications trended higher for OPAC flaps in partial and total flap loss rates as well as venous congestion when compared with the OSC flap cohort. The OPAC group had statistically significant lower rates of osteoradionecrosis and plate exposure than the OSC group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The OPAC flap may be preferable to fibula OSC flap in mandibular reconstruction given its lower rates of osteoradionecrosis and plate exposure. This flap type may be the flap of choice for class III defects where additional vascularized tissue may be critical for addressing significant soft tissue deficiency. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:399-404. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use of a Dermal Regeneration Template Wound Dressing in the Treatment of Combat-Related Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Injuries.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of treatment with a dermal regeneration template (DRT) in a cohort of combat casualties with severe upper extremity injuries. METHODS: Records of all active duty military patients treated with DRT at our institution between November 2009 and July 2013 were screened. Inclusion criteria were upper extremity open wounds sustained during combat, requiring split-thickness or full-thickness skin grafting for closure. The primary outcome measure was wound healing after the first attempt at definitive treatment (defined as the first application of split-thickness or full-thickness skin graft). Independent variables collected included time from injury to arrival at our facility, mechanism of injury, wound infection, tobacco use, location of wound, number of operative debridements, and patient demographics. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with 69 wounds met the inclusion criteria. Most wounds were to the wrist or forearm (54%) or fingers (19%). All wounds were heavily contaminated, requiring a mean of 2.5 operative debridements before DRT placement. All wounds treated with full-thickness skin grafting after DRT healed completely without further complication. Split-thickness skin grafting was successful in 96% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: DRT wound dressings are a helpful adjunct in the treatment of contaminated war wounds to the upper extremity. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Light-Activated Sealing of Acellular Nerve Allografts following Nerve Gap Injury.

Introduction Photochemical tissue bonding (PTB) uses visible light to create sutureless, watertight bonds between two apposed tissue surfaces stained with photoactive dye. In phase 1 of this two-phase study, nerve gaps repaired with bonded isografts were superior to sutured isografts. When autograft demand exceeds supply, acellular nerve allograft (ANA) is an alternative although outcomes are typically inferior. This study assesses the efficacy of PTB when used with ANA. Methods Overall 20 male Lewis rats had 15-mm left sciatic nerve gaps repaired using ANA. ANAs were secured using epineurial suture (group 1) or PTB (group 2). Outcomes were assessed using sciatic function index (SFI), gastrocnemius muscle mass retention, and nerve histomorphometry. Historical controls from phase 1 were used to compare the performance of ANA with isograft. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Bonferroni all-pairs comparison. Results All ANAs had signs of successful regeneration. Mean values for SFI, muscle mass retention, nerve fiber diameter, axon diameter, and myelin thickness were not significantly different between ANA + suture and ANA + PTB. On comparative analysis, ANA + suture performed significantly worse than isograft + suture from phase 1. However, ANA + PTB was statistically comparable to isograft + suture, the current standard of care. Conclusion Previously reported advantages of PTB versus suture appear to be reduced when applied to ANA. The lack of Schwann cells and neurotrophic factors may be responsible. PTB may improve ANA performance to an extent, where they are equivalent to autograft. This may have important clinical implications when injuries preclude the use of autograft.