Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to-date. METHODS: This multicenter IRB-approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow-up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature. RESULTS: The study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time-to-repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50-70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.

Minimizing osteoradionecrosis after mandibular reconstruction and radiation in advanced head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis may develop on the residual mandible or reconstructed fibula because of inadequate soft tissue coverage and compromised tissue perfusion post mandibular reconstruction, and radiation. This study was to investigate the incidence of osteoradionecrosis following class III mandibular defect reconstructions with an OPAC flap versus a fibula OSC flap. METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of mandibular reconstructions between 1999 and 2010 was performed. Mandibular defects and corresponding flap types were analyzed with emphasis on outcome, complications, and rates of osteoradionecrosis among the two subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 121 fibula flaps were performed, consisting of 53 OPAC and 68 fibula OSC flaps. Complications trended higher for OPAC flaps in partial and total flap loss rates as well as venous congestion when compared with the OSC flap cohort. The OPAC group had statistically significant lower rates of osteoradionecrosis and plate exposure than the OSC group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The OPAC flap may be preferable to fibula OSC flap in mandibular reconstruction given its lower rates of osteoradionecrosis and plate exposure. This flap type may be the flap of choice for class III defects where additional vascularized tissue may be critical for addressing significant soft tissue deficiency. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:399-404. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.