Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 68(5): 2669-2675, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351995

RESUMEN

African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly contagious and fatal viral disease affecting both domestic and wild suids. The virus was introduced to Southeast Asia in early 2019 and has since spread rapidly throughout the region. Although significant efforts have been made to track and diagnose the disease in domestic pigs, very little is known about ASF in free-ranging wild boar and their potential role in maintaining the disease within Southeast Asia. Through a collaboration between government and non-government actors in Laos, Viet Nam, and Cambodia, investigations were conducted to (a) characterize the interface between domestic pigs and wild boar, (b) document risk factors for likely ASF spillover into wild boar populations by way of this interface, and (c) determine whether ASF in wild boar could be detected in each country. An extensive overlap between wild boar habitat and domestic pig ranging areas was found around villages bordering forests in all three countries, creating a high-risk interface for viral spillover between domestic pig and wild boar populations. Fifteen and three wild boar carcasses were detected through passive reporting in Laos and Viet Nam, respectively, in 2019 and early 2020. Four of five carcasses screened in Laos and two of three in Viet Nam were confirmed positive for African swine fever virus using real-time PCR. There were no confirmed reports of wild boar carcasses in Cambodia. This is the first confirmation of ASF in wild boar in Southeast Asia, the result of a probable viral spillover from domestic pigs, which highlights the importance of early reporting and monitoring of ASF in wild boar to enable the implementation of appropriate biosecurity measures.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Africana , Fiebre Porcina Africana , Porcinos/virología , Fiebre Porcina Africana/diagnóstico , Fiebre Porcina Africana/epidemiología , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Africana/genética , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Africana/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Cambodia , Laos , Factores de Riesgo , Sus scrofa/virología , Vietnam
2.
Vaccine ; 33(36): 4513-9, 2015 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26192355

RESUMEN

Pigs play a significant role during outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) due to their ability to amplify the virus. It is therefore essential to determine what role vaccination could play to prevent clinical disease and lower virus excretion into the environment. In this study we investigated the efficacy of the double oil emulsion A Malaysia 97 vaccine (>6PD50/dose) against heterologous challenge with an isolate belonging to the A SEA-97 lineage at 4 and 7 days post vaccination (dpv). In addition, we determined whether physical separation of pigs in the same room could prevent virus transmission. Statistically there was no difference in the level of protection offered by 4 and 7 dpv. However, no clinical disease or viral RNA was detected in the blood of pigs challenged 4 dpv, although three of the pigs had antibodies to the non-structural proteins (NSPs), indicating viral replication. Viral RNA was also detected in nasal and saliva swabs, but on very few occasions. Two of the pigs vaccinated seven days prior to challenge had vesicles distal from the injection site, but on the inoculated foot, and two pigs had viral RNA detected in the blood. One pig sero-converted to the NSPs. In contrast, all unvaccinated and inoculated pigs had evidence of infection. No infection occurred in any of the susceptible pigs in the same room, but separated from the infected pigs, indicating that strict biosecurity measures were sufficient under these experimental conditions to prevent virus transmission. However, viral RNA was detected in the nasal swabs of one group of pigs, but apparently not at sufficient levels to cause clinical disease. Vaccination led to a significant decrease in viral RNA in vaccinated pigs compared to unvaccinated and infected pigs, even with this heterologous challenge, and could therefore be considered as a control option during outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/inmunología , Fiebre Aftosa/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/aislamiento & purificación , Malasia , Mucosa Nasal/virología , Aceites/administración & dosificación , ARN Viral/análisis , Saliva/virología , Porcinos , Vacunas Virales/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Vaccine ; 33(24): 2778-85, 2015 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25917677

RESUMEN

Early protection with a high potency (>6PD50) foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) O1 Manisa (Middle-East South Asia lineage) vaccine against challenge with O/VIT/2010 (O Mya98 lineage) was tested in pigs. Only two pigs that were vaccinated seven days prior to challenge had any demonstrable antibodies as a result of vaccination at the time of challenge. However, 80% and 60% of pigs that were vaccinated seven and four days prior to coronary band challenge were protected. Vaccination significantly reduced the amount of virus excreted in nasal swabs, saliva and faeces compared to unvaccinated and infected controls. Virus and viral RNA could be detected in some pigs until termination of the experiment 14 days after challenge. Antibodies to the non-structural proteins (NSP) were detected in only one pig that was challenged four days post vaccination (dpv) and transiently in two pigs that were challenged sevendpv at only one time point. For each vaccine and control group, a group of unvaccinated pigs were kept in the same room but with no direct contact with the infected pigs to determine whether vaccination prevented transmission. Despite the presence of live virus and viral RNA in these indirect contact pigs, the groups in contact with the vaccinated and infected pigs did not develop clinical signs nor did they sero-convert. Contact pigs in the same room as unvaccinated challenged controls did show signs of disease and virus infection that resulted in sero-conversion to the NSP. A breach of the wall that separated the two groups at nine days post challenge might have contributed to this finding. This study showed that high potency vaccine can provide protection to pigs soon after vaccination and that aerosol transmission within rooms is a rare event.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/inmunología , Fiebre Aftosa/prevención & control , Sus scrofa/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Potencia de la Vacuna , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Heces/virología , Fiebre Aftosa/transmisión , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/genética , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/aislamiento & purificación , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Saliva/virología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Vacunación/veterinaria , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Viremia/virología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA