RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Regenerative techniques for articular cartilage lesions demonstrated heterogeneous clinical results. Several factors may influence the outcome, with sex being one of the most debated. This study aimed at quantifying the long-term influence of sex on the clinical outcome obtained with a regenerative procedure for knee chondral lesions. METHODS: Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) was used to treat 235 knees which were prospectively evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), EuroQol visual analogue scale, and Tegner scores at 14-year mean follow-up. A multilevel analysis was performed with the IKDC subjective scores standardised according to the age/sex category of each patient and/or the selection of a match-paired subgroup to compare homogeneous men and women patients. RESULTS: At 14 years, men and women showed a failure rate of 10.7% and 28.8%, respectively (p < 0.0005). An overall improvement was observed in both sexes. Women had more patellar lesions and men more condylar lesions (p = 0.001), and the latter also presented a higher preinjury activity level (p < 0.0005). Men had significantly higher IKDC subjective scores at all follow-ups (at 14 years: 77.2 ± 18.9 vs. 62.8 ± 23.1; p < 0.0005). However, the analysis of homogeneous match-paired populations of men and women, with standardised IKDC subjective scores, showed no differences between men and women (at 14 years: -1.6 ± 1.7 vs. -1.9 ± 1.6). CONCLUSION: Men and women treated with MACT for knee chondral lesions presented a significant improvement and stable long-term results. When both sexes are compared with homogeneous match-paired groups, they have similar results over time. However, women present more often unfavourable lesion patterns, which proved more challenging in terms of long-term outcome after MACT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical efficacy of first-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) technique for osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. METHODS: Eleven patients with symptomatic OLTs underwent ACI from December 1997 to October 2002. A total of 9 patients (5 men, 4 women, age 25.2 ± 6.3) were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 10 years, and at final follow-up of minimum 20 years with AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, NRS for pain, and with the Tegner score. RESULTS: The AOFAS score improved significantly from the baseline value of 40.4 ± 19.8 to 82.7 ± 12.9 at the final follow-up (p < 0.0005). The NRS for pain improved significantly from 7.8 ± 0.7 at baseline to 4.8 ± 2.1 at the final follow-up (p < 0.0005). Moreover, the Tegner score underwent a modification from the pre-operative median value of 1 (range: 1-3) and from a pre-injury value of 5 (range: 3-7) to 3 (range: 2-4) at the final follow-up (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: ACI has proven to be an effective treatment option for patients suffering from OLTs, leading to a long-lasting clinical improvement even beyond 20 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
RESUMEN
Purpose: When dealing with the health status of the knee articular surface, the entire osteochondral unit has gained increasing attention, and in particular the subchondral bone, which plays a key role in the integrity of the osteochondral unit. The aim of this article was to discuss the current evidence on the role of the subchondral bone. Methods: Experts from different geographical regions were involved in performing a review on highly discussed topics about the subchondral bone, ranging from its etiopathogenetic role in joint degeneration processes to its prognostic role in chondral and osteochondral defects, up to treatment strategies to address both the subchondral bone and the articular surface. Discussion: Subchondral bone has a central role both from an aetiologic point of view and as a diagnostic tool, and its status was found to be relevant also as a prognostic factor in the follow-up of chondral treatment. Finally, the recognition of its importance in the natural history of these lesions led to consider subchondral bone as a treatment target, with the development of osteochondral scaffolds and procedures to specifically address osteochondral lesions. Conclusion: Subchondral bone plays a central role in articular surface lesions from different points of view. Several aspects still need to be understood, but a growing interest in subchondral bone is to be expected in the upcoming future towards the optimization of joint preservation strategies. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.