Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 19(8): 409-411, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460361

RESUMEN

The sensitivity of plastic artists to human suffering has been expressed in different ways. This article recounts the circumstances that led the Spanish-Mexican surrealist painter, Remedios Varo, to depict in an original way the two cardinal manifestations of fibromyalgia; widespread pain and insomnia.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología , Dolor , México
3.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 61: 152218, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37229846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia overlaps and/or mimics other rheumatic diseases and may be a confounding factor in the clinimetric assessment of these illnesses. Allodynia is a distinctive fibromyalgia feature that can be elicited during routine blood pressure measurement. For epidemiological purposes fibromyalgia can be diagnosed using the 2016 Wolfe et al. criteria questionnaire. No physical examination is required. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a straightforward question formulated during routine blood pressure measurement for fibromyalgia detection in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult patients attending our Rheumatology outpatient clinic were invited to participate. While awaiting their medical consultation, they filled-out the 2016 Wolfe et al. FM diagnostic criteria questionnaire. During the ensuing routine physical examination, the physician advanced the following guideline: "I am going to take your blood pressure; tell me if the cuff's pressure causes pain". Then, blood pressure cuff was inflated to 170 mm/Hg. Sphygmomanometry induced allodynia was defined as any local discomfort caused by blood pressure measurement. If a patient voiced any uneasiness, a follow-up dichotomic question was formulated "did it hurt much or little". Sphygmomanometry-induced allodynia was correlated with the presence of fibromyalgia according to the 2016 Wolfe diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-one patients were included in the study; most of them (84%) were female. The female cohort displayed the following features: Twenty five percent had fibromyalgia. Twenty seven percent had sphygmomanometry-induced allodynia. In women, sphygmomanometry-evoked allodynia had 63% sensitivity and 84% specificity for fibromyalgia diagnosis. The area under curve was 0.751. Moreover, having "much" local pain elicitation during blood pressure testing had 23% sensitivity and 96% specificity for fibromyalgia diagnosis. Men behaved differently; 15% fulfilled the fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria, but only 2% had sphygmomanometry induced allodynia. CONCLUSIONS: Inquiring female patients about local discomfort during routine blood pressure measurement is a simple and efficient procedure for fibromyalgia detection. This undemanding approach could be implemented in all clinical settings. There is marked sexual dimorphism in the link between sphygmomanometry-induced allodynia and fibromyalgia diagnosis. The presence of fibromyalgia is almost certain in those individuals having substantial pain elicitation during blood pressure measurement.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Hiperalgesia/diagnóstico , Hiperalgesia/etiología , Presión Sanguínea , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 19(7): 379-385, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156651

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe the distribution of adult and pediatric rheumatologists with current certification in Mexico and the factors associated with this distribution. METHODS: The databases of the Mexican Council of Rheumatology and the Mexican College of Rheumatology for 2020 were reviewed. The rate of rheumatologists per 100,000 inhabitants by state of the Mexican Republic was calculated. To find out the number of inhabitants by state, the results of the 2020 population census of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography were consulted. The number of rheumatologists with current certification by state, age, and sex was analyzed. RESULTS: In Mexico, there are 1002 registered adult rheumatologists with a mean age of 48.12 ±â€¯13 years. The male gender prevailed with a ratio of 1.18:1. Ninety-four pediatric rheumatologists were identified with a mean age of 42.25 ±â€¯10.4 years, with a predominance of the female gender with a ratio of 2.2:1. In Mexico City and Jalisco, more than one rheumatologist/100,000 inhabitants were reported in the specialty of adults and only in Mexico City in pediatrics. The current certification is 65%-70% on average and the factors associated with a higher prevalence were younger age, female gender and geographic location. CONCLUSIONS: There is a shortage of rheumatologists in Mexico and in the pediatric area there are underserved regions. It is important that health policies apply measures that allow a more balanced and efficient regionalization of this specialty. Although most rheumatologists have current certification, it is necessary to establish strategies to increase this proportion.


Asunto(s)
Reumatólogos , Reumatología , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , México , Certificación , Bases de Datos Factuales
5.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(1): 205-210, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476351

RESUMEN

Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (VCP) allows non-invasive assessment of the microcirculation. Adequate training in this field is relevant for rheumatologists. There is increasing evidence of the reliability of VCP findings among different readers. Objective: To evaluate inter- and intra-reader agreement of rheumatologists to identify normal images and systemic sclerosis (SSc) patterns on VCP ("early," "active," and "late" proposed by Cutolo et al.). Thirteen rheumatologists with different experience in nailfold VCP received training to standardize reading criteria. They rated 60 VCP images from healthy and SSc patients at baseline and 4 weeks later, using an electronic platform. The reading of an expert was considered the gold standard. Data were analyzed using Cohen's kappa for concordance and Student's t test and ANOVA to compare kappa means for inter-reader, intra-reader, and inter-pattern readings. Mean inter-reader and intra-reader kappa were 0.45 and 0.49, respectively, (moderate agreement). Kappa scores were higher among experienced vs inexperienced readers (inter-reader kappa 0.58 vs 0.34, p = 0.001, intra-reader kappa 0.65 vs 0.37, p = 0.01). Agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.61) for the identification of normal vs abnormal images and higher for the identification of active (0.48, p = 0.009) and late SSc patterns (0.56, p = 0.008) than for the early SSc pattern (0.35, p = 0.003). There is moderate agreement among rheumatologists for the identification of SSc videocapillaroscopy patterns (higher among experienced rheumatologists) and substantial agreement, regardless of previous experience in VCP, in the identification of normal and abnormal images. Agreement for the identification of active and late patterns is higher than for the early pattern.


Asunto(s)
Capilares/ultraestructura , Angioscopía Microscópica , Microscopía por Video , Uñas/irrigación sanguínea , Esclerodermia Sistémica/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Microcirculación , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reumatólogos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
6.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(9): 2327-2337, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31177397

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to produce a consensus-based report for capillaroscopy in rheumatology to be used in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A written Delphi questionnaire regarding capillaroscopy report was developed from a literature review and expert consensus. The Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international panel including 25 rheumatologists experts in capillaroscopy, asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. The exercise consisted of three online rounds and a face-to-face (live meeting) that took place in the PANLAR 2018 congress held in Buenos Aires, Argentina. RESULTS: The participants to the first, second, third, and face-to-face round were 22, 21, 21, and 16 rheumatologists, respectively. Fifty-five items were discussed in the first round, 58 in the second, 22 in the third, and 9 in the face-to-face meeting. At the end of the exercise, 46 recommendations for the capillaroscopy report in rheumatology reached a consensus. CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based report in capillaroscopy. It will be useful in daily clinical practice and to address the effort of the standardization in the technique. KEY POINTS: • The current lack of consensus for the capillaroscopy report makes difficult the interpretation of findings as well as follow-up of rheumatic diseases. • This study produced the first international consensus for the format and content of the naifold capillaroscopy report in rheumatology. • The report is an integral part of the capillaroscopy examination and its use in a homogeneous form can help in the correct interpretation of findings in daily practice.


Asunto(s)
Angioscopía Microscópica/métodos , Uñas/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Reumatología , Consenso , Humanos , Uñas/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
Reumatol Clin ; 11(5): 295-304, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25639457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases is associated with several maternal and fetal complications. The development of clinical practice guidelines with the best available scientific evidence may help standardize the care of these patients. OBJECTIVES: To provide recommendations regarding prenatal care, treatment, and a more effective monitoring of pregnancy in women with lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). METHODOLOGY: Nominal panels were formed for consensus, systematic search of information, development of clinical questions, processing and grading of recommendations, internal validation by peers, and external validation of the final document. The quality criteria of the AGREE II instrument were followed. RESULTS: The various panels answered the 37 questions related to maternal and fetal care in SLE, RA, and APS, as well as to the use of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation. The recommendations were discussed and integrated into a final manuscript. Finally, the corresponding algorithms were developed. We present the recommendations for pregnant women with SLE in this first part. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the Mexican clinical practice guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with SLE integrate the best available evidence for the treatment and follow-up of patients with these conditions.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/terapia , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , México , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico
8.
Reumatol Clin ; 11(5): 305-15, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25683368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases is associated with several maternal and fetal complications. The development of clinical practice guidelines with the best available scientific evidence may help standardize the care of these patients. OBJECTIVES: To provide recommendations regarding prenatal care, treatment, and a more effective monitoring of pregnancy in women with lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODOLOGY: Nominal panels were formed for consensus, systematic search of information, development of clinical questions, processing and staging of recommendations, internal validation by peers and external validation of the final document. The quality criteria of the AGREE II instrument were followed. RESULTS: The panels answered 37 questions related to maternal and fetal care in lupus erythematosus, RA and APS, as well as for use of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation. The recommendations were discussed and integrated into a final manuscript. Finally, the corresponding algorithms were developed. In this second part, the recommendations for pregnant women with RA, APS and the use of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation are presented. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the Mexican clinical practice guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with RA and APS integrate the best available evidence for the treatment and follow-up of patients with these conditions.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/terapia , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , México , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico
9.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 13(3): 214-227, jul.-sep. 2006. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-636738

RESUMEN

En este artículo revisamos los diferentes métodos de evaluación radiográfica del daño anatómico producido por la artritis reumatoide; sus ventajas y limitaciones, así como las principales características.


In this article we reviewed the different radiologic methods of evaluation of the anatomical damage produced by rheumatoid arthritis; its advantages and limitations, as well as the main characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide , Radiografía , Anatomía , Signos y Síntomas , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA