RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Notwithstanding guidelines, indications for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke are multifactorial and can be complex. Our aim was to exploratively evaluate decision-making on the advisability of performing MT in cases presented as an interview-administered questionnaire. METHODS: Fifty international raters assessed 12 cases and decided to recommend or exclude MT. Each case contained a brief summary of clinical information and eight representative images of the initial multimodal CT. The demographic characteristics and stroke protocols were recorded for raters. For each case, the reasons for excluding MT were recorded. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed for the different demographic and case characteristics to identify factors that might influence decision-making. RESULTS: All raters performed MT (median MTs/hospital/year [IQR], 100 [50-141]) with a median of 7 years of experience as first operator (IQR, 4-12). Per case, diversity in decision-making ranged between 1 (case 6, 100% yes MT) and 0.50 (case 12, 54.2% yes MT and 45.8% no MT). The most common reasons for excluding MT were small CBV/CBF mismatch (17%, 102/600), size of infarct core on the CBV map (15.2%, 91/600), and low NIHSS score (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, 8.3%, 50/600). All clinical and radiological characteristics significantly affected the decision regarding MT, but the general characteristics of the raters were not a factor. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and imaging characteristics influenced the decision regarding MT in stroke. Nevertheless, a consensus was reached in only a minority of cases, revealing the current divergence of opinion regarding therapeutic decisions in difficult cases. KEY POINTS: ⢠This is the first study to explore differences in decision-making in respect of mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke with complex clinical and radiological constellations. ⢠Fifty experienced international neurointerventionalists answered this interview-administered stroke questionnaire and made decisions as to whether to recommend or disadvise thrombectomy in 12 selected cases. ⢠Diversity in decision-making for thrombectomy ranged from 1 (100% of raters offered the same answer) to 0.5 (50% indicated mechanical thrombectomy). There was a consensus in only a minority of cases, revealing the current disparity of opinion regarding therapeutic decisions in difficult cases.