RESUMEN
Background Publicly-insured and uninsured individuals-many of whom are marginalized because of race/ethnicity, disability and/or sexual preferences-experience barriers to accessing evidence-based interventions for eating disorders (EDs). Additionally, EBIs have not been developed with or for diverse populations, exacerbating poor treatment uptake. Mobile technology is perfectly positioned to bridge this gap and increase access to low-cost, culturally-sensitive EBIs. Methods This study leverages a user-centered design approach to adapt an existing coached cognitive-behavioral therapy-based digital program and evaluate its usability in a sample of 11 participants with (sub)clinical binge-purge type EDs who are publicly-insured ( n = 10) or uninsured ( n = 1). Participants were primarily Non-Hispanic White ( n = 8) women ( n = 8). Two semi-structured interviews occurred with participants: one to assess treatment needs and the other to obtain app-specific feedback. Interviews were coded using inductive thematic analysis. Results Interview 1 feedback converged on three themes: Recovery Journey, Treatment Experiences, and Engagement with and Expectations for Online Programs. Participants endorsed facing barriers to healthcare, such as poor insurance coverage and a lack of trained providers, and interest in a coach to increase treatment accountability. Interview 2 feedback converged on three themes: Content Development, Participant Experiences with Mental Health, and Real-World Use. Participants liked the content but emphasized the need to improve diverse representation (e.g., gender, body size). Conclusions Overall, user feedback is critical to informing adaptations to the original EBI so that the intervention can be appropriately tailored to the needs of this underserved population, which ultimately has high potential to address critical barriers to ED treatment. Trial Registration This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University California, San Francisco (IRB #22-35936) and the IRB at Washington University in St. Louis (IRB ID 202304167).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No guidelines currently exist that represent a standardization of care for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) on an inpatient service. Unique features of this diagnosis (e.g., sensory sensitivity contributing to involuntary emesis) suggest that established protocols that were developed for anorexia nervosa might be less effective for adolescents with ARFID. To inform improved inpatient medical stabilization and care for these patients, we first provide an overview of clinical characteristics for patients with ARFID who presented to a pediatric hospital for inpatient eating disorder care. We use these descriptives to outline the rationale for, and executions of, modifications to an inpatient protocol designed to flexibly meet the needs of this clinical population. METHODS: Chart review with descriptive statistics were conducted for patients who had received an ARFID diagnosis from March 2019 to March 2023 (N = 32, aged 9-23). We then present a case series (n = 3) of adolescents who either transitioned to a novel adjusted protocol from an original standard of care on the inpatient service, or who received only the standard protocol. RESULTS: The sample was aged M(SD) = 15.6 (3.3) years, 53% male, and a majority (69%) presented with the ARFID presentation specific to fear of negative consequences. On average, patients had deviated from their growth curve for just over two years and presented with mean 76% of their estimated body weight. Of those requiring nasogastric tube insertion during admission (n = 8, 25%), average duration of tube placement was 15 days. From within this sample, case series data suggest that the adjusted protocol will continue to have a positive impact on care trajectory among adolescents admitted for ARFID including improved weight gain, reduction of emesis, and improved food intake. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate the likely need to tailor established medical inpatient protocols for those with ARFID given different symptom presentation and maintenance factors compared to patients with anorexia nervosa. Further research is warranted to explore the longer-term impact of protocol changes and to inform standardization of care for this high priority clinical population across care sites.
No current standard of care exists for pediatric patients with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) who are hospitalized for medical stabilization related to complications secondary to malnutrition. Clinical features of this diagnosis (e.g., sensory sensitivity) suggest that existing treatment protocols developed for patients with other restrictive eating disorders, like anorexia nervosa, may be less effective for patients with ARFID. This study first describes a pediatric sample of patients with ARFID upon admission to an inpatient service. Then, a case series is used to illustrate the potential benefits of using an adjusted protocol that was modified to better suit the needs of children and adolescents with ARFID. Findings support future study of the proposed adjusted protocol and may inform future standardization of improved care for this high priority clinical population.