RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Prone position is used in acute respiratory distress syndrome and in coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, it is unclear how responders may be identified and whether an oxygenation response improves outcome. The objective of this study was to quantify the response to prone position, describe the differences between coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute respiratory distress syndrome, and explore variables associated with survival. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, multicenter, international cohort study. SETTING: Seven ICUs in Italy, United Kingdom, and France. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy-six adults (220 coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome and 156 acute respiratory distress syndrome). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preproning, a greater proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients had severe disease (53% vs 40%), worse Pao2/Fio2 (13.0 kPa [interquartile range, 10.5-15.5 kPa] vs 14.1 kPa [interquartile range, 10.5-18.6 kPa]; p = 0.017) but greater compliance (38 mL/cm H2O [interquartile range, 27-53 mL/cm H2O] vs 31 mL/cm H2O [interquartile range, 21-37 mL/cm H2O]; p < 0.001). Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome had a longer median time from intubation to prone position (2.0 d [interquartile range, 0.7-5.0 d] vs 1.0 d [interquartile range, 0.5-2.9 d]; p = 0.03). The proportion of responders, defined by an increase in Pao2/Fio2 greater than or equal to 2.67 kPa (20 mm Hg), upon proning, was similar between acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome (79% vs 76%; p = 0.5). Responders had earlier prone position (1.4 d [interquartile range, 0.7-4.2 d] vs 2.5 d [interquartile range, 0.8-6.2 d]; p = 0.06)]. Prone position less than 24 hours from intubation achieved greater improvement in oxygenation (11 kPa [interquartile range, 4-21 kPa] vs 7 kPa [interquartile range, 2-13 kPa]; p = 0.002). The variables independently associated with the "responder" category were Pao2/Fio2 preproning (odds ratio, 0.89 kPa-1 [95% CI, 0.85-0.93 kPa-1]; p < 0.001) and interval between intubation and proning (odds ratio, 0.94 d-1 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99 d-1]; p = 0.019). The overall mortality was 45%, with no significant difference observed between acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Variables independently associated with mortality included age (odds ratio, 1.03 yr-1 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05 yr-1]; p < 0.001); interval between hospital admission and proning (odds ratio, 1.04 d-1 [95% CI, 1.002-1.084 d-1]; p = 0.047); and change in Pao2/Fio2 on proning (odds ratio, 0.97 kPa-1 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99 kPa-1]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Prone position, particularly when delivered early, achieved a significant oxygenation response in ~80% of coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome, similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome. This response was independently associated with improved survival.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Posición Prona , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Pediatric lumbar puncture : indications, execution and complications. Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed procedure with specific indications and technical considerations in pediatrics. The principal indication is for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection, but in case of meningitis in infants, nuchal rigidity may be absent and the clinical picture is more likely to be marked by axial hypotonia associated with abnormal behavior and/or a bulging fontanel. Pharmacological agents and non-pharmacological techniques (reassuring approach, distraction, presence of a parent) should be used whenever possible, to create successful environmental conditions for the completion of the LP procedure in childhood. During the procedure, the LP needle should be moved forward slightly and perpendicularly to the patient's back, and the stylet should be removed regularly to check CSF reflux, as resistance related to the spinal ligaments and dura mere are often absent in young children. In children, post-LP headaches may be prevented by the use of atraumatic and/or the smallest LP needle, and the replacement of the stylet prior to needle removal.
La ponction lombaire chez l'enfant : indications, réalisation et complications. La ponction lombaire est un acte diagnostique et thérapeutique dont les indications ainsi que la procédure du geste présentent des spécificités chez l'enfant. L'indication principale est celui du diagnostic d'une méningite, mais chez le jeune nourrisson une raideur de nuque est souvent absente et le tableau clinique est marqué par une hypotonie axiale associée à des anomalies du comportement et/ou une fontanelle bombée. L'information de la famille et la mise en condition de l'enfant visant à créer les conditions environnementales propices à la réussite du geste est indispensable et comprend des moyens non médicamenteux et médicamenteux. Au cours du geste, l'aiguille de ponction doit être enfoncée perpendiculairement au plan vertical du dos du patient et le stylet doit être régulièrement retiré pour visualiser un reflux de liquide céphalorachidien, le ressaut indiquant le passage du ligament jaune et de la dure-mère étant souvent manquant chez le jeune enfant. Enfin, la prévention des céphalées post-ponction lombaire chez l'enfant repose principalement sur l'utilisation d'aiguilles plus fines ou atraumatiques et le replacement du stylet en fin de geste.
Asunto(s)
Punción Espinal , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , AgujasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Assessing measurement error in alveolar recruitment on computed tomography (CT) is of paramount importance to select a reliable threshold identifying patients with high potential for alveolar recruitment and to rationalize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to assess both intra- and inter-observer smallest real difference (SRD) exceeding measurement error of recruitment using both human and machine learning-made lung segmentation (i.e., delineation) on CT. This single-center observational study was performed on adult ARDS patients. CT were acquired at end-expiration and end-inspiration at the PEEP level selected by clinicians, and at end-expiration at PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O. Two human observers and a machine learning algorithm performed lung segmentation. Recruitment was computed as the weight change of the non-aerated compartment on CT between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included, of whom 11 (85%) presented a severe ARDS. Intra- and inter-observer measurements of recruitment were virtually unbiased, with 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) encompassing zero. The intra-observer SRD of recruitment amounted to 3.5 [CI95% 2.4-5.2]% of lung weight. The human-human inter-observer SRD of recruitment was slightly higher amounting to 5.7 [CI95% 4.0-8.0]% of lung weight, as was the human-machine SRD (5.9 [CI95% 4.3-7.8]% of lung weight). Regarding other CT measurements, both intra-observer and inter-observer SRD were close to zero for the CT-measurements focusing on aerated lung (end-expiratory lung volume, hyperinflation), and higher for the CT-measurements relying on accurate segmentation of the non-aerated lung (lung weight, tidal recruitment ). The average symmetric surface distance between lung segmentation masks was significatively lower in intra-observer comparisons (0.8 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-0.9]) as compared to human-human (1.0 mm [IQR 0.8-1.3] and human-machine inter-observer comparisons (1.1 mm [IQR 0.9-1.3]). CONCLUSIONS: The SRD exceeding intra-observer experimental error in the measurement of alveolar recruitment may be conservatively set to 5% (i.e., the upper value of the CI95%). Human-machine and human-human inter-observer measurement errors with CT are of similar magnitude, suggesting that machine learning segmentation algorithms are credible alternative to humans for quantifying alveolar recruitment on CT.