Evaluation of enterovirus concentration, species identification, and cerebrospinal fluid parameters in patients of different ages with aseptic meningitis in São Paulo, Brazil.

Human enteroviruses (EV) are the most common cause of aseptic meningitis worldwide. Data on EV viral load in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and related epidemiological studies are scarce in Brazil. This study investigated the influence of EV viral load on CSF parameters, as well as identifying the involved species. CSF samples were collected in 2018-2019 from 140 individuals at The Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo. The EV viral load was determined using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while EV species were identified by 5'UTR region sequencing. Median viral load was 5.72 log10 copies/mL and did not differ by subjects' age and EV species. Pleocytosis was observed in 94.3% of cases, with the highest white blood cell (WBC) counts in younger individuals. Viral load and WBC count were correlated in children (p = 0.0172). Elevated lactate levels were observed in 60% of cases and correlated with the viral load in preteen-teenagers (p = 0.0120) and adults (p = 0.0184). Most individuals had normal total protein levels (70.7%), with higher in preteen-teenagers and adults (p < 0.0001). By sequencing, 8.2% were identified as EV species A and 91.8% as species B. Age-specific variations in CSF characteristics suggest distinct inflammatory responses in each group.

Intranasal Liposomal Formulation of Spike Protein Adjuvanted with CpG Protects and Boosts Heterologous Immunity of hACE2 Transgenic Mice to SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Mucosal vaccination appears to be suitable to protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we tested an intranasal mucosal vaccine candidate for COVID-19 that consisted of a cationic liposome containing a trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and CpG-ODNs, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, as an adjuvant. In vitro and in vivo experiments indicated the absence of toxicity following the intranasal administration of this vaccine formulation. First, we found that subcutaneous or intranasal vaccination protected hACE-2 transgenic mice from infection with the wild-type (Wuhan) SARS-CoV-2 strain, as shown by weight loss and mortality indicators. However, when compared with subcutaneous administration, the intranasal route was more effective in the pulmonary clearance of the virus and induced higher neutralizing antibodies and anti-S IgA titers. In addition, the intranasal vaccination afforded protection against gamma, delta, and omicron virus variants of concern. Furthermore, the intranasal vaccine formulation was superior to intramuscular vaccination with a recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (Oxford/AstraZeneca) in terms of virus lung clearance and production of neutralizing antibodies in serum and bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL). Finally, the intranasal liposomal formulation boosted heterologous immunity induced by previous intramuscular vaccination with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, which was more robust than homologous immunity.

Nucleoprotein-based ELISA for detection of SARS-COV-2 IgG antibodies: Could an old assay be suitable for serodiagnosis of the new coronavirus?

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of a nucleoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: The ELISA was based on serum IgG reactivity to a 46-kDa protein derived from the recombinant SARS-CoV2 nucleoprotein. Assay sensitivity was assessed using serum samples from 134 COVID-19 confirmed cases obtained > 15 days after symptom onset. Specificity was determined by testing sera from 94 healthy controls. Cross-reactivity was evaluated with sera from 96 individuals with previous dengue or zika virus-confirmed infections, with 44 sera from individuals with confirmed infections to other respiratory viruses or with bacterial and fungal infections that cause pneumonia and with 40 sera negative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein by commercial ELISA kits. RESULTS: The majority of subjects were male and ≥ 60 years old. Assay sensitivity was 90.3 % (95 % confidence interval 84.1 %-94.2 %) and specificity was 97.9 % (92.6 %-99.4 %). There was no cross-reactivity with sera from individuals diagnosed with dengue, zika virus, influenza virus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, seasonal coronavirus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus (S. aureus and coagulase-negative), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. The level of concordance of our test with results from commercial ELISA kits was 100 %. CONCLUSION: The nucleoprotein-based ELISA was specific for detection of IgG anti-nucleoprotein antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. It utilizes a frequently employed low expense assay protocol and is easier to perform than other currently available commercial SARS-CoV2 antibody detection tests.

Identification of respiratory virus in infants with congenital heart disease by comparison of different methods.

Respiratory virus infections are the main cause of infant hospitalization and are potentially severe in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Rapid and sensitive diagnosis is very important to early introduction of antiviral treatment and implementation of precautions to control transmission, reducing the risk of nosocomial infections. In the present study we compare different techniques in the diagnosis of respiratory viruses in CHD infants. Thirty-nine samples of nasopharyngeal aspirate were obtained from CHD infants with symptoms of respiratory infection. The Multiplex PCR (Seeplex® RV 12 ACE Detection) driven to the detection of 12 respiratory viruses was compared with the direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and PCR, both targeting seven respiratory viruses. The positivity found by DFA, Multiplex and PCR was 33.3%, 51.3% and 48.7%, respectively. Kappa index comparing DFA and Multiplex, DFA and PCR and PCR and Multiplex PCR was 0.542, 0.483 and 0.539, respectively. The concordance between techniques was considered moderate. Both Multiplex PCR (p = 0.001) and PCR (p = 0.002) detected significantly more respiratory virus than DFA. As the performance of the tests may vary, the combination of two or more techniques may increase diagnostic sensitivity favoring the diagnosis of co-infections, early introduction of antiviral therapy and implementation of appropriate measures.

Identification of respiratory virus in infants with congenital heart disease by comparison of different methods / Identificação de vírus respiratórios em crianças com cardiopatia congênita por comparação de diferentes métodos

Respiratory virus infections are the main cause of infant hospitalization and are potentially severe in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Rapid and sensitive diagnosis is very important to early introduction of antiviral treatment and implementation of precautions to control transmission, reducing the risk of nosocomial infections. In the present study we compare different techniques in the diagnosis of respiratory viruses in CHD infants. Thirty-nine samples of nasopharyngeal aspirate were obtained from CHD infants with symptoms of respiratory infection. The Multiplex PCR (Seeplex® RV 12 ACE Detection) driven to the detection of 12 respiratory viruses was compared with the direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and PCR, both targeting seven respiratory viruses. The positivity found by DFA, Multiplex and PCR was 33.3 percent, 51.3 percent and 48.7 percent, respectively. Kappa index comparing DFA and Multiplex, DFA and PCR and PCR and Multiplex PCR was 0.542, 0.483 and 0.539, respectively. The concordance between techniques was considered moderate. Both Multiplex PCR (p = 0.001) and PCR (p = 0.002) detected significantly more respiratory virus than DFA. As the performance of the tests may vary, the combination of two or more techniques may increase diagnostic sensitivity favoring the diagnosis of co-infections, early introduction of antiviral therapy and implementation of appropriate measures.

Infecções respiratórias virais são a principal causa de hospitalização infantil e podem ser extremamente graves em crianças com cardiopatia congênita. O diagnóstico rápido e sensível é importante para a introdução precoce de tratamento antiviral e implantação de precauções para controle da transmissão, reduzindo o risco de infecções nosocomiais. Neste estudo, comparamos o desempenho de diferentes técnicas no diagnóstico de vírus respiratórios em crianças com cardiopatia congênita e sintomas respiratórios. Trinta e nove amostras de aspirado de nasofaringe foram obtidas de crianças com sintomas de infecção respiratória. Ensaio de PCR Multiplex que detecta 12 vírus respiratórios (Seeplex® RV 12 ACE Detection) foi comparado à Imunofluorescência Direta (IFD) e à PCR específica, ambas direcionadas a sete vírus. A positividade da IFD foi 33,3 por cento, do Multiplex foi 51,3 por cento e da PCR 48,7 por cento. O índice kappa comparando IFD e Multiplex, IFD e PCR, e PCR e Multiplex foi, respectivamente, 0,542, 0,483 e 0,539, sendo a concordância considerada moderada. O Multiplex e a PCR detectaram significantemente mais vírus que a IFD (p < 0,0001 e 0,002, respectivamente). Como o desempenho dos testes varia o uso de mais de uma técnica pode aumentar a sensibilidade diagnóstica favorecendo a introdução precoce de terapia antiviral e implantação de medidas profiláticas.

Detecçäo de anticorpos IgM nas infecçöes primárias e secundárias pelo citomegalovírus em pacientes submetidos a transplante renal / IGM antibodies detection in primary and secundary cytomegalovirus infections in patients submeted a renal transplantation

Foram acompanhados 27 pacientes submetidos a transplante renal para avaliaçäo do comportamento dos anticorpos IgM e IgG CMV-específicos. Dos 27 casos estudados, 17 (63,0%) tinham anticorpos IgG, detectados pela reaçäo de fixaçäo de complemento (RFC), antes de serem submetidos ao transplante, e 10 (37,0%) eram soro negativos. A pesquisa de anticorpos IgM (técnica de imunofluorescência indireta) foi negativa em todas as amostras pré-transplante. Num período de acompanhamento que variou de 28 a 425 dias (média de 115 dias) após o transplante, observou-se que 20 dos 27 (74,1%) apresentaram evidências sorológicas de infecçäo pelo CMV, ocorrendo a maioria dos casos (14/20,70%) em pacientes que já tinham anticorpos para o CMV antes do transplante. A pesquisa de anticorpos IgM CMV-específicos foi positiva em 12 dos 14 pacientes com evidências sorológicas de reinfecçäo ou reativaçäo da infecçäo pelo CMV, e em 100% (6/6) dos pacientes com infecçäo primária. Dentre os 10 pacientes acompanhados por mais de 4 meses, somente 1 (10%) negativou o IgM neste período