RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in the USA, with limited treatment options. Ibezapolstat is a novel DNA polymerase IIIC inhibitor with in vitro activity against C. difficile. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ibezapolstat in healthy volunteers. Microbiome changes associated with ibezapolstat were compared with vancomycin over a 10 day course using shotgun metagenomics. RESULTS: A total of 62 subjects aged 31 ± 7 years (45% female; average BMI: 25 ± 3 kg/m2) were randomized. Ibezapolstat was well tolerated with a safety signal similar to placebo. Ibezapolstat had minimal systemic absorption with the majority of plasma concentrations less than 1 µg/mL. In the multiday, ascending dose study, ibezapolstat concentrations of 2000 µg/g of stool were observed by Day 2 and for the remainder of the dosing time period. In the multiday, multiple-dose arm, baseline microbiota was comparable between subjects that received ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin. At Day 10 of dosing, differential abundance analysis and ß-diversity demonstrated a distinct difference between the microbiome in subjects given vancomycin compared with either dose of ibezapolstat (P = 0.006). α-Diversity changes were characterized as an increase in the Actinobacteria phylum in subjects that received ibezapolstat and an increase in Proteobacteria in subjects given vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Ibezapolstat was shown to be safe and well tolerated, with minimal systemic exposure, high stool concentrations and a distinct microbiome profile compared with oral vancomycin. These results support further clinical development of ibezapolstat for patients with C. difficile infection.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Microbiota , Administración Oral , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ANS-6637, an orally bioavailable selective and reversible aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) inhibitor, is under development for drug and alcohol use disorders. During the elimination of alcohol, ALDH2 metabolizes acetaldehyde to acetate; inhibiting this enzyme can lead to aversive reactions due to the accumulation of acetaldehyde. Thus, understanding the safety and tolerability of ANS-6637 in combination with alcohol is essential. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty eight healthy males participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose cohort study of oral ANS-6637. Eligible participants were randomized to ANS-6637 (n = 36) or placebo (n = 12) in a 3:1 fashion in each of 6 dose cohorts (8 per cohort; ANS-6637 dose levels were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg). Two hours after receiving study drug, participants drank up to 5 standard drinks, 1 every 30 minutes. Safety assessments, pharmacodynamic measures, and pharmacokinetic blood samples were obtained. RESULTS: Flushing was the most common adverse event (AE) associated with ANS-6637 (24 of 36 participants) compared with placebo (3 of 12). Statistically significant, but modest, increases in heart rate (HR) occurred (+10.5 bpm after 2 drinks; +16.9 to + 20.5 bpm after 3rd through 5th drink). No participant met HR or systolic blood pressure criteria for stopping ethanol administration. There were no clinically significant QTc interval prolongations. Individuals receiving ANS-6637 reported lower ratings of liking, alcohol effects, and feeling drunk. CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of ANS-6637 with up to 5 standards drinks over 2.5 hours was generally well tolerated in healthy males. The most common pharmacological response was flushing and an increase in HR, which are known effects of acetaldehyde accumulation and consistent with inhibition of ALDH2 with oral ANS-6637 in combination with alcohol. The results of this alcohol interaction study support further testing of ANS-6637 in individuals who consume alcohol heavily.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Acetaldehído Deshidrogenasa/efectos adversos , Disuasivos de Alcohol/efectos adversos , Bebidas Alcohólicas , Aldehído Deshidrogenasa Mitocondrial/antagonistas & inhibidores , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Etanol/efectos adversos , Rubor/inducido químicamente , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Acetaldehído Deshidrogenasa/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Disuasivos de Alcohol/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea , Método Doble Ciego , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Voluntarios Sanos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Piridinas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Hydromorphone (HM) is a potent µ-opioid receptor agonist with high susceptibility for abuse. A prodrug of hydromorphone, asalhydromorphone (ASAL-HM), has been designed to deter nonoral forms of abuse associated with hydromorphone. This study evaluated the intranasal (IN) pharmacokinetics and exploratory abuse potential of ASAL-HM compared with HM. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. SETTING: Clinical research site. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent recreational opioid users. METHODS: Subjects (N = 26) were randomized to receive IN administration of 16.1 mg of ASAL-HM and 8.0 mg of HM (molar-equivalent with respect to hydromorphone). Blood samples were taken through 24 hours postdose, and pharmacodynamic end points (Drug Liking, Feeling High, Take Drug Again, Overall Drug Liking) were assessed through eight hours postdose. Nasal irritation and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Relative to IN HM, the rate (Cmax) and extent (area under the curve [AUC0-last, AUC0-inf]) of exposure to hydromorphone following IN ASAL-HM were reduced by ≥50%. Consistent with these findings, scores on "at-the-moment" (i.e., Drug Liking Emax, High Emax) and retrospective (i.e., Take Drug Again, Overall Drug Liking) end points were statistically significantly lower for IN ASAL-HM, with mean/median differences ranging from 11.4 to 25.0 points. ASAL-HM produced greater nasal-related effects, such as nasal burning and facial pain, and a lower incidence of typical opioid-related adverse events such as euphoria, pruritus, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The novel hydromorphone prodrug ASAL-HM produced marked reductions in hydromorphone exposure and abuse-related effects following IN administration compared with HM. ASAL-HM has desirable molecular features for incorporation into putative abuse-deterrent immediate-release and extended-release hydromorphone products.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Hidromorfona/administración & dosificación , Hidromorfona/farmacocinética , Profármacos/administración & dosificación , Profármacos/farmacocinética , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the human abuse potential, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of oral NKTR-181 (oxycodegol), a novel full mu-opioid receptor agonist, relative to oral oxycodone. DESIGN: This double-blind, randomized, single-dose, crossover human abuse potential study was conducted in healthy, adult, non-physically dependent recreational opioid users. SETTING: Inpatient clinical research site. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one subjects randomized (95.7% male, 65.2% African American, mean age = 31.7 years). METHODS: The primary objective was to compare two therapeutic doses of NKTR-181 (400 and 600 mg) with 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone and a supratherapeutic dose (1200 mg) of NKTR-181 with 60 mg of oxycodone using visual analog scale (VAS) ratings for Drug Liking "at this moment" (Drug Liking). Secondary objectives included VAS ratings for other subjective measures, and central nervous system (CNS) mu-opioid effects were assessed using pupillometry. Each subject received single oral doses of five treatments and matching placebo. RESULTS: Compared with 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone, the maximum mean Drug Liking score at 400 and 600 mg NKTR-181 was significantly lower, and the rate of onset and extent of Drug Liking for all NKTR-181 doses in the first two hours postdose were also significantly lower. Delayed attenuated Drug Liking and pupillary miosis response following administration of NKTR-181 vs oxycodone were consistent with slower NKTR-181 CNS entry kinetics and mu-opioid receptor binding. No adverse events were rated as severe, and somnolence and dizziness occurred more frequently when subjects received oxycodone. CONCLUSIONS: NKTR-181 at oral doses of 400 and 600 mg showed significantly fewer and less severe subjective effects accepted as representative of opioid abuse potential, such as lower peak Drug Liking in recreational opioid users, than 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Morfinanos/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Uso Recreativo de DrogasRESUMEN
Preclinical data indicate that selective kappa opioid receptor antagonists reduce nicotine self-administration and withdrawal symptoms. The aim of the current study was to determine whether treatment with CERC-501, an orally available, potent, and selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, could alleviate nicotine withdrawal and craving and mitigate mood alterations associated with nicotine withdrawal in humans. Healthy, adult cigarette smokers were enrolled into this randomized, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants completed two 8-day treatment phases during which they received either CERC-501 (15 mg, p.o., once daily) or placebo. On the seventh day of each dosing phase, participants were admitted as inpatients for an 18-hour cigarette abstinence period followed by experimental testing. The primary outcome measures were (a) performance on the McKee Smoking Lapse test (ie, latency to smoke in exchange for money) and (b) number of cigarettes self-administered during a 60-minute ad lib smoking period. Other outcomes included measures of craving, mood, anxiety, nicotine withdrawal, and subjective effects of cigarette smoking. A total of 71 participants who smoked an average of approximately 23 cigarettes per day were enrolled, and 56 subjects completed the study. CERC-501 was well tolerated, but it did not significantly alter the latency to start smoking (CERC-501: 16.5 min vs placebo: 17.7 min) or the number of cigarettes smoked (CERC-501: 3.3 cigarettes vs placebo: 3.1 cigarettes). Compared with placebo, CERC-501 also did not affect cigarette craving, mood, anxiety, nicotine withdrawal, or subjective effects of smoking. These findings do not support a role for CERC-501 in the treatment of nicotine use disorder.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/farmacología , Fumar Cigarrillos/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Pirrolidinas/farmacología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/metabolismo , Tabaquismo/metabolismo , Adulto , Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Ansiedad/fisiopatología , Ansia/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nicotina/efectos adversos , Agonistas Nicotínicos/efectos adversos , Distribución Aleatoria , Receptores Opioides kappa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/etiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/fisiopatología , Tabaquismo/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
A major goal for the treatment of opioid use disorder is to reduce or eliminate the use of illicit opioids. Buprenorphine, a µ-opioid receptor partial agonist and kappa opioid receptor antagonist, is now being developed as a monthly, sustained-release formulation (RBP-6000). The objective of this study was to demonstrate that RBP-6000 blocks the subjective effects and reinforcing efficacy of the µ-opioid receptor agonist hydromorphone (intramuscularly administered) in subjects with moderate or severe opioid use disorder. Subjects were first inducted and dose stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (8-24 mg daily; dose expressed as the buprenorphine component), then received two subcutaneous injections of RBP-6000 (300 mg) on Day 1 and Day 29. Hydromorphone challenges (6 mg, 18 mg or placebo administered in randomized order) occurred on 3 consecutive days of each study week before and after receiving RBP-6000. Subjects reported their responses to each challenge on various 100-mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects also completed a choice task to assess the reinforcing efficacy of each hydromorphone dose relative to money. At baseline, mean "drug liking" VAS scores for hydromorphone 18 mg and 6 mg versus placebo were 61 mm (95% confidence interval, 52.3-68.9) and 45 mm (95% confidence interval, 37.2-53.6), respectively. After 300 mg RBP-6000 was administered, mean VAS score differences from placebo were less than 10 mm through week 12. The reinforcing efficacy of hydromorphone decreased in a parallel manner. This study demonstrated that RBP-6000 at a 300 mg dose provides durable and potent blockade of the subjective effects and reinforcing efficacy of hydromorphone in subjects with moderate or severe opioid use disorder.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina/administración & dosificación , Hidromorfona/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Buprenorfina/farmacología , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hidromorfona/farmacología , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The effects of steady-state faldaprevir on the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of steady-state methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone were assessed in 34 healthy male and female subjects receiving stable addiction management therapy. Subjects continued receiving a stable oral dose of either methadone (up to a maximum dose of 180 mg per day) or buprenorphine-naloxone (up to a maximum dose of 24 mg-6 mg per day) and also received oral faldaprevir (240 mg) once daily (QD) for 8 days following a 480-mg loading dose. Serial blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. The pharmacodynamics of the opioid maintenance regimens were evaluated by the objective and subjective opioid withdrawal scales. Coadministration of faldaprevir with methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone resulted in geometric mean ratios for the steady-state area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24,ss)), the steady-state maximum concentration of the drug in plasma (C(max,ss)), and the steady-state concentration of the drug in plasma at 24 h (C(24,ss)) of 0.92 to 1.18 for (R)-methadone, (S)-methadone, buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and naloxone, with 90% confidence intervals including, or very close to including, 1.00 (no effect), suggesting a limited overall effect of faldaprevir. Although individual data showed moderate variability in the exposures between subjects and treatments, there was no evidence of symptoms of opiate overdose or withdrawal either during the coadministration of faldaprevir with methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone or after faldaprevir dosing was stopped. Similar faldaprevir exposures were observed in the methadone- and buprenorphine-naloxone-treated subjects. In conclusion, faldaprevir at 240 mg QD can be coadministered with methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone without dose adjustment, although given the relatively narrow therapeutic windows of these agents, monitoring for opiate overdose and withdrawal may still be appropriate. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01637922.).
Asunto(s)
Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/farmacocinética , Metadona/farmacocinética , Oligopéptidos/farmacocinética , Tiazoles/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adulto , Ácidos Aminoisobutíricos , Buprenorfina/análogos & derivados , Buprenorfina/sangre , Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/sangre , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Leucina/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Metadona/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/farmacología , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Quinolinas , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiazoles/farmacología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Samatasvir is a pan-genotypic inhibitor of the hepatitis C (HCV) non-structural protein 5A (NS5A). This study evaluated the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics and safety of samatasvir monotherapy in treatment-naïve subjects infected with HCV genotype 1-4. METHODS: Thirty-four genotype 1 and thirty genotype 2, 3 or 4 subjects were randomized to receive for 3days placebo or samatasvir 25-100mg per day. Plasma samples for HCV RNA, pharmacokinetics and sequencing were collected up to day 10. RESULTS: Samatasvir achieved potent antiviral activity across genotypes: mean maximum reductions from baseline were 3.2-3.6 (genotype 1a), 3.0-4.3 (genotype 1b), 3.2-3.4 (genotype 3), and 3.6-3.9 (genotype 4) log10/ml respectively; no viral rebound was observed during the 3-day treatment period. For genotype 2 HCV, samatasvir was active in subjects with NS5A L31 polymorphism at baseline (individual range 2.5-4.1 log10/ml), but showed minimal activity in those with baseline M31 polymorphism. Samatasvir exhibited a long plasma half-life of approximately 20h which supports once daily dosing. Samatasvir was well tolerated in all subjects with no safety-related discontinuations or serious adverse events. The most common adverse events included constipation, nausea and headache and occurred at similar frequency in active and placebo subjects. All events were mild or moderate in intensity. There were no patterns or dose dependence of adverse events, vital signs, laboratory parameters or electrocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: Samatasvir 25-100mg monotherapy for 3days was well tolerated and induced a rapid and profound reduction in plasma HCV RNA in subjects infected with HCV genotype 1-4. Samatasvir is being evaluated in combination with other direct-acting antiviral agents in subjects with HCV infection.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/farmacocinética , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/farmacocinética , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Genotipo , Semivida , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo Genético , ARN Viral/sangre , ARN Viral/genética , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: DX-2930 is a human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of plasma kallikrein under investigation for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DX-2930 in healthy subjects. METHODS: A single-center, double-blinded study was performed in 32 healthy subjects randomized 3:1 to receive a single subcutaneous administration of DX-2930 or placebo within 1 of 4 sequential, ascending dose cohorts (n = 8 each): 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Headache was the most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse event (AE), occurring at a rate of 25% in the DX-2930- and placebo-treated groups; none were severe and all resolved. There were no serious AEs, discontinuations owing to an AE, or deaths. Two subjects had a severe AE reported as related to treatment by the blinded investigator; the 2 AEs were asymptomatic creatinine phosphokinase elevations of 902 U/L in 1 subject receiving 0.1 mg/kg DX-2930 and 1,967 U/L in 1 subject receiving placebo. For the 0.1-, 0.3-, 1.0-, and 3.0-mg/kg dose groups, respectively, mean maximum plasma concentrations were 0.6, 1.4, 5.6, and 14.5 µg/mL and mean elimination half-lives were 20.6, 16.8, 17.6, and 21.2 days. Exploratory biomarker assays, involving ex vivo activation of the kallikrein pathway, showed dose- and time-dependent inhibition of plasma kallikrein, with evidence of sustained bioactivity consistent with the pharmacokinetics profile. CONCLUSION: A single administration of DX-2930 in healthy subjects up to doses of 3.0 mg/kg was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data provide evidence for a long-acting biological effect relevant to long-term prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01923207.
Asunto(s)
Angioedemas Hereditarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Calicreínas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Serdexmethylphenidate (SDX) chloride (Cl) is a novel prodrug of d-methylphenidate (d-MPH). These studies evaluated the abuse potential of SDX Cl when administered orally, intranasally (IN), and intravenously (IV). METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies were conducted in recreational drug users to evaluate the abuse-related effects of oral SDX (120 and 240 mg) vs. extended-release (ER) d-MPH (80 mg) and phentermine (60 mg); IN SDX (80 mg) vs. d-MPH (40 mg), and IV SDX (30 mg) vs. d-MPH (15 mg). Abuse-related subjective measures, pharmacokinetics, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of maximum (Emax) Drug Liking (DL) (0-100-point scale) was significantly higher following d-MPH vs. placebo, validating the studies. In the oral study, DL Emax was significantly higher following 80 mg ER d-MPH (Emax = 81.5) than 120 mg SDX (Emax = 62.8, p < .001) and 240 mg SDX (Emax = 63.8, p = .006); and following 60 mg phentermine (Emax = 80.2) than 120 mg SDX (p = .0195), but not 240 mg SDX (p = .0665). DL Emax scores were significantly higher following IN d-MPH vs SDX (Emax = 93.2 vs. 71.0, p < .0001) and following IV d-MPH vs. SDX (Emax = 84.3 vs. 56.6, p = .001). Intravenous SDX was non-inferior to placebo (p = .001) for DL Emax. Secondary endpoints (e.g. Take Drug Again) were generally consistent with the primary endpoint. Maximal and overall d-MPH exposure was lower for SDX than d-MPH for all routes. Adverse events typical of stimulants were more frequent with d-MPH than SDX. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the novel d-MPH prodrug, SDX, has lower abuse potential than d-MPH and support its classification as a C-IV controlled substance.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Metilfenidato , Profármacos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Fentermina , Profármacos/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor with activity against both wild-type and mutant Janus kinase 2, has pH-dependent solubility, with free solubility at pH 1. Concomitant administration of drugs that reduce gastric acid secretion, such as pantoprazole, may decrease the absorption of fedratinib and affect patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 7-day repeated 40-mg doses of pantoprazole on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single 500-mg dose of fedratinib in healthy male subjects. METHODS: In this phase I, single-center, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, fixed-sequence crossover study, healthy male subjects were administered a single dose of fedratinib 500 mg on day 1 in Period 1, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 7 days (day 1 to day 7) and a single dose of fedratinib 500 mg on day 7 in Period 2. After the discontinuation of nine subjects due to vomiting, the protocol was amended to provide ondansetron as antiemetic prophylaxis to an additional ten enrolled subjects. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were included. Repeated doses of pantoprazole 40 mg resulted in clinically insignificant increases in fedratinib exposure. Maximum plasma concentration increased by 1.09-fold and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity increased by 1.15-fold. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, except for one instance of neutropenia, which was considered unrelated to study intervention. CONCLUSION: Coadministration with pantoprazole did not have clinically meaningful effects on fedratinib PK. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with fedratinib.
Asunto(s)
Interacciones Farmacológicas , Janus Quinasa 2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pantoprazol , Pirrolidinas , Sulfonamidas , Adulto , Disponibilidad Biológica , Estudios Cruzados , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Pantoprazol/administración & dosificación , Pantoprazol/efectos adversos , Pantoprazol/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacocinética , Pirrolidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirrolidinas/efectos adversos , Pirrolidinas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Analytical data suggesting that immunoglobulin given intramuscularly (IGIM) may have reduced protection against hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection led to an update in the recommended IGIM dose (0.2 ml/kg). METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical study evaluated whether a single 0.2 ml/kg dose of IGIM provided protective levels of anti-HAV antibodies (≥ 10 mIU/ml for up to 60 days) in HAV-seronegative healthy adults. RESULTS: Of the 28 subjects enrolled and dosed, 26 (93%) completed the study. Mean uncorrected anti-HAV antibody titers peaked at 109 mIU/ml on day 5 and stayed above 10 mIU/ml through day 60 (N = 26). The mean uncorrected anti-HAV antibody titers had a median Tmax of 95.33 h, a mean Cmax of 118 mIU/ml, and a mean observed Thalf of 63.3 days; baseline-corrected titers had a median Tmax of 95.33 h, a mean Cmax of 114 mIU/ml, and a mean observed Thalf of 47.1 days (N = 27). All subjects (28/28) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with a total of 83 TEAEs reported; none was serious, and 96% (80/83) resolved without sequelae. Most (63%) events judged definitely and possibly related to study treatment involved localized pain due to intramuscular injections. There were no serious adverse events and no deaths or discontinuations due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: A single 0.2 ml/kg dose of IGIM provided protective anti-HAV levels for at least 60 days, with acceptable safety and tolerability profiles in healthy subjects. Uncorrected and baseline-corrected pharmacokinetic findings were similar and consistent with the corresponding sampling points in previous research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03351933.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A/inmunología , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Inmunoglobulina G/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Hepatitis A/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis A/inmunología , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ibuprofen and acetaminophen has been developed that provides greater analgesic efficacy than either agent alone at the same doses without increasing the risk for adverse events. METHODS: We report three clinical phase I studies designed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the FDC of ibuprofen/acetaminophen 250/500 mg (administered as two tablets of ibuprofen 125 mg/acetaminophen 250 mg) in comparison with its individual components administered alone or together, and to determine the effect of food on the PK of the FDC. Two studies in healthy adults aged 18-55 years used a crossover design in which subjects received a single dose of each treatment with a 2-day washout period between each. In the third study, the bioavailability of ibuprofen and acetaminophen from a single oral dose of the FDC was assessed in healthy adolescents aged 12-17 years, inclusive. RESULTS: A total of 35 and 46 subjects were enrolled in the two adult studies, respectively, and 21 were enrolled in the adolescent study. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the FDC were bioequivalent to the monocomponents administered alone or together. With food, the maximum concentration (Cmax) for ibuprofen and acetaminophen from the FDC was reduced by 36% and 37%, respectively, and time to Cmax (i.e. tmax) was delayed. Overall drug exposure to ibuprofen or acetaminophen in the fed versus fasted states was similar. In adolescents, overall exposure to acetaminophen and ibuprofen was comparable with that in adults, with a slightly higher overall exposure to ibuprofen. Exposure to acetaminophen and ibuprofen in adolescents aged 12-14 years was slightly higher versus those aged 15-17 years. Adverse events were similar across all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FDC of ibuprofen/acetaminophen 250/500 mg has a PK profile similar to its monocomponent constituents when administered separately or coadministered, indicating no drug-drug interactions and no formulation effects. Similar to previous findings for the individual components, the rates of absorption of ibuprofen and acetaminophen from the FDC were slightly delayed in the presence of food. Overall, adolescents had similar exposures to acetaminophen and ibuprofen as adults, while younger adolescents had slightly greater exposure than older adolescents, probably due to their smaller body size. The FDC was generally well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/farmacocinética , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/farmacocinética , Ibuprofeno/farmacocinética , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Buprenorphine/samidorphan combination (BUP/SAM) is an opioid system modulator being investigated as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. BUP/SAM is a fixed-dose combination of buprenorphine, a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist and κ-opioid receptor antagonist, and samidorphan, a µ-opioid receptor antagonist added to address the abuse and dependence potential of buprenorphine. In this study, we assessed the effect of samidorphan on the abuse potential of buprenorphine in the BUP/SAM combination in nondependent, recreational, adult opioid users (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02413281). Participants were randomized to 6 treatments in a blinded, Williams crossover design: placebo, BUP/SAM at the intended therapeutic dose (2 mg/2 mg), at 4-fold (8 mg/8 mg) and 8-fold (16 mg/16 mg) the therapeutic dose, and buprenorphine alone (8 mg and 16 mg). The primary end point was maximum effect (Emax ) on the visual analog scale for "at the moment" Drug Liking. Emax of Drug Liking for the BUP/SAM 2 mg/2 mg dose was similar to that for placebo (median within-subject difference [90% confidence interval]: 2.5 [0.0-9.0]). The supratherapeutic doses of BUP/SAM showed differences of small magnitude on Drug Liking Emax compared to placebo. Drug Liking Emax for all BUP/SAM doses were significantly lower than those observed for either buprenorphine dose alone. Fewer participants reported adverse events associated with abuse potential with BUP/SAM than with buprenorphine alone, and the overall safety profile of BUP/SAM was consistent with prior reports in healthy volunteers. These findings indicate that samidorphan substantially reduces the abuse potential of buprenorphine in the BUP/SAM combination.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina/efectos adversos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Naltrexona/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/farmacocinética , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naltrexona/efectos adversos , Naltrexona/farmacocinética , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , PlacebosRESUMEN
Mirogabalin is a selective calcium channel α2δ subunit ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. In accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, the human abuse potential of mirogabalin (15-105 mg) was examined, relative to placebo, diazepam (15 or 30 mg), and pregabalin (200 or 450 mg), in two single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies in recreational polydrug users who could discern between positive comparator and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum observed effect (E max) for Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale. At therapeutic doses, mirogabalin Drug Liking E max did not differ significantly from placebo and was significantly lower than diazepam and pregabalin. This indicates therapeutic doses mirogabalin may have less abuse potential versus diazepam or pregabalin. At supratherapeutic doses (⩾4× therapeutic dose), mirogabalin had significantly higher Drug Liking E max than placebo, but lower E max than pregabalin. In both studies, therapeutic doses of mirogabalin demonstrated limited evidence of abuse potential.
RESUMEN
Samidorphan is a µ-opioid receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of schizophrenia, in combination with olanzapine, and major depressive disorder, in combination with buprenorphine, at proposed therapeutic doses of samidorphan 10 mg and 2 mg, respectively. A double-blind, double-dummy, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluated the abuse potential of samidorphan in healthy, nondependent, recreational opioid users. Following a qualification phase, participants were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment sequences of study drugs: placebo, samidorphan (10 or 30 mg), oxycodone (40 mg), pentazocine (30 mg), and naltrexone (100 mg) in a 6 × 6 Williams design. The primary end point was maximum effect (Emax ) for "at-the-moment" Drug Liking visual analog scale scores. Secondary end points included Emax visual analog scale scores for Take Drug Again and Overall Drug Liking and safety assessments. Among 47 participants, at-the-moment Emax Drug Liking scores for positive study controls oxycodone and pentazocine were significantly higher than placebo (P < .001) and samidorphan (both doses; P < .001). Both samidorphan doses had Emax Drug Liking scores similar to placebo and naltrexone (median within-subject differences of 0.0). Emax Take Drug Again scores for samidorphan (both doses) were higher than placebo, but similar to naltrexone, an unscheduled µ-opioid receptor antagonist. Adverse events to evaluate abuse potential occurred less frequently with samidorphan, naltrexone, and placebo than with oxycodone and pentazocine. Findings from this study support a lack of abuse potential with samidorphan at doses up to 30 mg and a safety profile consistent with previous samidorphan clinical studies.
Asunto(s)
Naltrexona/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naltrexona/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Oxicodona , Pentazocina , PlacebosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the human abuse potential of solriamfetol (formerly JZP-110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with robust wake-promoting effects. METHODS: Adults with a recent history of recreational polydrug use, including stimulants, and who met criteria in a Qualification Phase were randomized to one of six sequences in a Test Phase. Each Test Phase sequence included a single administration of placebo, solriamfetol (300, 600, and 1200 mg), and phentermine (45 and 90 mg), with a two-day washout between periods. The primary endpoint was peak rating ( Emax) of Liking at the Moment across the first 12 h on a liking/disliking visual analog scale; key secondary endpoints were Next Day Overall Drug Liking, how much the participant would like to Take the Drug Again, and positive and negative subjective effects. Safety was also assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 43 participants (74.4% male; mean age 29.3 years), 37 completed the study. Peak Emax Liking at the Moment for all solriamfetol doses was significantly greater than placebo and significantly less than phentermine 90 mg ( p < 0.05). Overall Next Day Drug Liking was greater than placebo for solriamfetol 300 mg and phentermine 45 and 90 mg ( p < 0.05). Willingness to Take the Drug Again was significantly greater than placebo and significantly less than both doses of phentermine for all doses of solriamfetol ( p < 0.05). Ratings of negative subjective effects (bad effects, disliking, anxiety, agitation) were higher with solriamfetol 600 and 1200 mg relative to phentermine. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with solriamfetol were hypervigilance, elevated mood, dry mouth, hyperhidrosis, and insomnia. CONCLUSION: Solriamfetol appears to have abuse potential similar to or lower than phentermine.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Captación de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/farmacología , Adulto , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/farmacología , Estudios Cruzados , Inhibidores de Captación de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación de Dopamina/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fentermina/administración & dosificación , Fentermina/efectos adversos , Fentermina/farmacología , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Arhalofenate (ARH), in development for gout, has uricosuric and anti-flare activities. ARH plus febuxostat (FBX) were evaluated in subjects with gout for serum uric acid (SUA) lowering, drug interaction, and safety. METHODS: Open phase II trial in gout volunteers (NCT02252835). Cohort 1 received ARH 600 mg for 2 weeks, followed by sequential 1-week co-administration of FBX 80 mg followed by 40 mg. FBX 40 mg was continued alone for 2 weeks. Cohort 2 received ARH 800 mg for 2 weeks, followed by sequential 1-week co-administration of FBX 40 mg followed by 80 mg. FBX 80 mg was continued alone for 2 weeks. SUA, its fractional excretion (FEUA), and plasma oxypurines were assessed. Pharmacokinetics of FBX and ARH were determined alone and in combination for cohort 2. RESULTS: Baseline mean SUA was 9.4 mg/dl for cohort 1 (n = 16) and 9.2 mg/dl for cohort 2 (n = 16). The largest SUA decrease (63%) was observed with ARH 800 mg + FBX 80 mg, with all subjects reaching SUA < 6 mg/dl and 93% < 5 mg/dl. The area under the curve (AUC)(0-t) of ARH acid + FBX/ARH acid was 108%. The AUC(0-t) of FBX + ARH acid/FBX was 87%. As expected, FBX increased oxypurines and increases were unaffected by ARH co-administration. Baseline FEUA were low (3.5%-4.6%) and ARH increased them toward normal without overexcretion of UA. ARH was well tolerated and appeared safe. CONCLUSION: ARH and FBX lowered SUA by complementary mechanisms. The combination provided greater decreases than each drug alone. The combination was well tolerated and appeared safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02252835.
Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Febuxostat/uso terapéutico , Supresores de la Gota/uso terapéutico , Gota/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperuricemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fenilacetatos/uso terapéutico , Acetamidas/efectos adversos , Acetamidas/farmacología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Febuxostat/efectos adversos , Febuxostat/farmacología , Femenino , Gota/sangre , Supresores de la Gota/efectos adversos , Supresores de la Gota/farmacología , Humanos , Hiperuricemia/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenilacetatos/efectos adversos , Fenilacetatos/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Uricosúricos/efectos adversos , Uricosúricos/farmacología , Uricosúricos/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: Buprenorphine is an efficacious, widely used treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Daily oral transmucosal formulations can be associated with misuse, diversion, and nonadherence; these limitations may be obviated by a sustained release formulation. Objective: To evaluate the ability of a novel, weekly, subcutaneous buprenorphine depot formulation, CAM2038, to block euphorigenic opioid effects and suppress opioid withdrawal in non-treatment-seeking individuals with OUD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, double-blind, randomized within-patient study was conducted at 3 controlled inpatient research facilities. It involved 47 adults with DSM-V moderate-to-severe OUD. The study was conducted from October 12, 2015 (first patient enrolled), to April 21, 2016 (last patient visit). Interventions: A total of five 3-day test sessions evaluated the response to hydromorphone (0, 6, and 18 mg intramuscular in random order; 1 dose/session/day). After the first 3-day session (ie, qualification phase), participants were randomized to either CAM2038 weekly at 24 mg (n = 22) or 32 mg (n = 25); the assigned CAM2038 dose was given twice, 1 week apart (day 0 and 7). Four sets of sessions were conducted after randomization (days 1-3, 4-6, 8-10, and 11-13). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was maximum rating on the visual analog scale for drug liking. Secondary end points included other visual analog scale (eg, high and desire to use), opioid withdrawal scales, and physiological and pharmacokinetic outcomes. Results: A total of 46 of 47 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 35.5 [9] years; 76% male [n = 35]) completed the study. Both weekly CAM2038 doses produced immediate and sustained blockade of hydromorphone effects (liking maximum effect, CAM2038, 24 mg: effect size, 0.813; P < .001, and CAM2038, 32 mg: effect size, 0.753; P < .001) and suppression of withdrawal (Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, CAM2038, 24 mg: effect size, 0.617; P < .001, and CAM2038, 32 mg: effect size, 0.751; P < .001). CAM2038 produces a rapid initial rise of buprenorphine in plasma with maximum concentration around 24 hours, with an apparent half-life of 4 to 5 days and approximately 50% accumulation of trough concentration from first to second dose (trough concentration = 0.822 and 1.23 ng/mL for weeks 1 and 2, respectively, with 24 mg; trough concentration = 0.993 and 1.47 ng/mL for weeks 1 and 2, respectively, with 32 mg). Conclusions and Relevance: CAM2038 weekly, 24 and 32 mg, was safely tolerated and produced immediate and sustained opioid blockade and withdrawal suppression. The results support the use of this depot formulation for treatment initiation and stabilization of patients with OUD, with the further benefit of obviating the risk for misuse and diversion of daily buprenorphine while retaining its therapeutic benefits. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02611752.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Hidromorfona/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/antagonistas & inhibidores , Buprenorfina/efectos adversos , Buprenorfina/farmacocinética , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The safety and efficacy of guanfacine extended release (up to 4 mg/day) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years is well documented. Data suggest that weight-adjusted doses of guanfacine extended release >0.08 mg/kg but ≤0.12 mg/kg, if tolerated, may provide additional clinical benefits. For many adolescents, such dosing would exceed 4 mg/day, the highest approved dose. This open-label multicenter study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and steady-state pharmacokinetics of guanfacine extended release at escalated forced doses ≤9 mg/day in adolescents (N = 31) aged 13-17 years with ADHD. Following doses of approximately 0.12 mg/kg, the highest weight group (>70-90 kg) exhibited lower mean clearance at steady-state than the lowest weight group (≥30-50 kg). Consistent with its known antihypertensive effects, guanfacine extended release was associated with dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). The physiologic response of increased BP upon standing was blunted in a dose-related manner while the physiologic response of increased HR upon standing was not substantively affected. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, dizziness, and sinus bradycardia. These results, and those from prior studies, support further examination of the efficacy and safety of higher weight-adjusted doses of guanfacine extended release for ADHD.