The Midline Catheter: A Clinical Review.

BACKGROUND: Venous access in the emergency department (ED) is an often under-appreciated procedural skill given the frequency of its use. The patient's clinical status, ongoing need for laboratory investigation, and intravenous therapeutics guide the size, type, and placement of the catheter. The availability of trained personnel and dedicated teams using ultrasound-guided insertion techniques in technically difficult situations may also impact the selection. Appropriate device selection is warranted on initial patient contact to minimize risk and cost. OBJECTIVE: To compare venous access device indications and complications, highlighting the use of midline catheters as a potentially cost-effective and safe approach for venous access in the ED. DISCUSSION: Midline catheters (MC) offer a comparable rate of device-related bloodstream infection to standard peripheral intravenous catheters (PIV), but with a significantly lower rate than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and central venous catheters (CVC) (PIV 0.2/1000, MC 0.5/1000, PICC 2.1-2.3/1000, CVC 2.4-2.7/1000 catheter days). The average dwell time of a MC is reported as 7.69-16.4 days, which far exceeds PIVs (2.9-4.1 days) and is comparable to PICCs (7.3-16.6 days). Cost of insertion of a MC has been cited as comparable to three PIVs, and their use has been associated with significant cost savings when placed to avoid prolonged central venous access with CVCs or in patients with difficult-to-access peripheral veins. Placement of a MC includes modified Seldinger and accelerated, or all-in-one, Seldinger techniques with or without ultrasound guidance, with a high rate of first-attempt success. CONCLUSION: The MC is a versatile venous access device with a low complication rate, long dwell time, and high rate of first-attempt placement. Its utilization in the ED in patients deemed to require prolonged hospitalization or to have difficult-to-access peripheral vasculature could reduce cost and risk to patients.

Aggressive treatment of afterload mismatch to address left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair: A case report.

Mitral regurgitation (MR), one of the most common valvulopathies, occurs in at least 10% of the individuals older than 75 years. The long-standing volume overload occurring in severe MR inevitably leads to left ventricular (LV) enlargement and dysfunction; untreated, severe MR can progress to heart failure and death. Hypotension following separation from cardiopulmonary bypass after mitral valve intervention should alert an anesthesiologist to consider a myriad of differential diagnoses. This includes, but is not limited to, afterload mismatch, which can contribute to severe LV dysfunction, even in patients with seemingly normal preoperative ejection fraction. We present a case of acute on chronic biventricular failure after mitral valve repair due to afterload mismatch and discuss its management intraoperatively. Admittedly, identifying the causes of hypotension to guide treatment after mitral valve surgery in patients with severe MR is challenging. High index of suspicion and transesophageal echocardiogram guidance are important for prompt diagnosis, increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes with appropriate clinical management.