Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prog Transplant ; 31(3): 242-248, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34159867

RESUMEN

The Independent Living Donor Advocate, who is required on the transplant team, advocates, promotes, and protects the interests of the donor. Previously described ethical challenges perceived by these advocates and the variability of their responses prompted further inquiry. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: How are ethical obligations perceived by ILDAs? What ethical principles do ILDAs identify as the basis of their decision making? What are the ethical challenges for ILDAs? STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was designed and administered via REDCap. Participants were recruited from the National Kidney Foundation Living Donor Advocate email list. Quantitative and qualitative data on their role, ethical decision making, and perceived ethical issues, by seriousness and frequency, were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants responded. Nonmaleficence was ranked as the primary ethical principle used in decision making. Participants rated obligations to protect higher than advocacy. Participants reported experiencing internal ethical conflict to protect over advocate for the donor. The most serious ethical challenge participants perceived for donors was their decisional capacity, followed by their emotional or psychological distress, which was also described as a frequent donor challenge experienced in their role. DISCUSSION: The results of this survey validate previous descriptions that the advocate role is largely perceived as protective. Their independent nature as well as the inherent vulnerabilities of the potential living donor compels the continued mitigation of ethical challenges, to enhance advocacy and protection for the living donor.


Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Donadores Vivos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 14(2): 157-63, viii, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12038501

RESUMEN

The power to heal and create "good" in intensive care also stimulates great ethical conflict and discourse. Palliation and end of life issues in intensive care are beginning to be clearly defined and enhanced for the good of the patients. After decades of striving to save life to the very extreme, we are now providing that same effort toward end of life care. The last decade has brought consumerism or medicine's interpretation of such, far beyond any boundaries previously imagined. Issues of power, team communication, and family decision making strategies should hold a higher priority in the ICU. Empowered nurses in authority can make the key difference in when and how ethical resolutions occur.


Asunto(s)
Ética Clínica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA