Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Drug Investig ; 30(8): 559-63, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20586518

RESUMEN

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used drugs in the treatment or prophylaxis of peptic ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. In addition to their well documented efficacy, these drugs are generally well tolerated with only rare serious adverse effects having been reported. Neutropenia and agranulocytosis are rare adverse events associated with PPI treatment. All previously published cases of isolated neutropenia have involved omeprazole, but leukopenia is labelled as a possible adverse effect in the summary of product characteristics of the other PPIs. In this report, we describe a case of omeprazole-induced neutropenia with further recurrence upon pantoprazole treatment. A 60-year-old man with chronic alcoholism and a medical history of pulmonary tuberculosis, untreated chronic C hepatitis, peripheral artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stable stage 3 chronic kidney disease was admitted with dehydration and malnutrition. Omeprazole 20 mg/day and sucralfate 3 g/day were started for diffuse gastritis on gastric endoscopy. While the patient's blood cell count had been within the normal range before this treatment, routine laboratory examination revealed moderate neutropenia (0.9 x 109/L) after 9 days of treatment. His blood cell count returned to the normal range after discontinuation of omeprazole and no further episodes of neutropenia were noted in the following months. One year later, oesophago-gastroscopy revealed a hiatal hernia with an extensive zone of Barrett's oesophagus. As the lesions did not improve with ranitidine and sucralfate therapy, the patient was started on pantoprazole 40 mg/day. His initial white blood cell count was normal, but moderate neutropenia (0.8 x 109/L) was again noted after only 2 days of pantoprazole treatment. Complete and further stable normalization was obtained within 3 days after replacement of pantoprazole with ranitidine. Toxic and immune-mediated mechanisms are the two commonly proposed mechanisms to explain the pathogenesis of drug-induced neutropenia. This report suggests that PPI-induced neutropenia is immune mediated and argues for a possible cross-reactivity between the two PPIs, as has already been described for PPI-induced hypersensitivity reactions. The report also indicates that patients with a history of neutropenia induced by one PPI may be at risk of recurrence of neutropenia if given another member of this drug class. In these patients, close haematological monitoring is proposed.


Asunto(s)
2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Omeprazol/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/inmunología , Pantoprazol
4.
Liver Int ; 27(6): 865-8, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17617130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Arterio-portal fistulas (APFs) are rare vascular disorders of various origins that can lead to severe portal hypertension. Even if surgery was initially the treatment of choice, more recently, interventional radiological procedures have been considered as the first line therapeutic option. CASE REPORT: A man with no history of liver disease was admitted for abdominal pain and distension. Abdominal ultrasonography with Doppler, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) scan showed ascites, splenomegaly and a probable APF between the left branches of both the hepatic artery and portal vein, associated with hepatofugal portal flow. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed large oesophageal varices without bleeding. A celiac and mesenteric arteriography and a splenic arteriography were performed and confirmed the existence of multiple intrahepatic APFs. The initial treatment consisted of two sessions of percutaneous transcatheter endovascular embolization. Unfortunately, ascites worsened, and the patient did not respond to diuretic treatment. Therefore, a surgical treatment was considered to be the only suitable treatment because of the absence of improvement after embolization procedures. A left hepatectomy with hepatic artery ligation was performed. Clinical evolution was favourable; an improvement of ascites was obtained; control ultrasonography and CT scan disclosed no residual haemodynamic abnormality; and the portal vein was normal with a hepatopedal flow. Currently, 12 months after surgery, the clinical condition of the patient is good. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of portal hypertension by embolizing multiple large APF has been described to be an effective method. Nevertheless, failure of such conservative treatment is possible and must lead to a salvage surgery.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Hepatectomía , Arteria Hepática , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Vena Porta , Terapia Recuperativa , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Fístula Arteriovenosa/complicaciones , Fístula Arteriovenosa/patología , Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirugía , Embolización Terapéutica , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/terapia , Arteria Hepática/patología , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Portal/patología , Hipertensión Portal/cirugía , Hipertensión Portal/terapia , Ligadura , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA