High Expectations Among Patients Who Have Undergone TKA Do Not Correlate With Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: One of five patients is dissatisfied with the outcome of TKA. With the increasing number of TKAs, this affects many patients. It has been suggested that high expectations may influence satisfaction, but the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction remains poorly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are preoperative patient expectations correlated with postoperative satisfaction? (2) Are expectations correlated with patient characteristics or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? (3) Is satisfaction correlated with patient characteristics or PROMs? (4) Do patients report specific items as more relevant to their expectations? METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective, comparative study involving patients who underwent TKA. Between December 2020 and June 2022, three senior surgeons performed 306 TKAs. Of these, 76% (234) had the preoperative PROMs required for this study, and of these, 82% (193) had completed PROMs at the 12-month follow-up interval and were analyzed. Of the 193 included patients, 53% (102) were women; the mean age was 68 ± 9 years. Data were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Twelve months of follow-up has been shown to be adequate in studies with PROMs. Patient expectations were measured using the validated Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher expectations. We also assessed patient satisfaction, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Forgotten Joint Score, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, EQ-5D-3L, and the objective Knee Society Score. Bivariate linear correlations were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman test. RESULTS: Preoperative patient expectations did not correlate with postoperative satisfaction. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey score was 82 ±16 points and did not correlate with satisfaction at either 4 months (r = -0.061; p = 0.42) or 12 months (r = -0.126; p = 0.11). Expectations did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative or postoperative PROMs or the Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was 88% (158 of 179) at 4 months and 83% (160 of 193) at 12 months and did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative PROMs or Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was medium to strongly correlated with postoperative PROMs and Knee Society Score. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey items with the most frequent expected improvement were "ability to walk" (99% [192 of 193]), "go downstairs" (99% [191 of 192]), and "go upstairs" (99% [192 of 193]). CONCLUSION: Preoperative expectations were not correlated with postoperative satisfaction or PROMs. Surgeons should be aware that patients have high expectations. However, these expectations appear to be less relevant in determining postoperative satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Custom total knee arthroplasty with personalised alignment showed better 2-year functional outcome compared to off-the-shelf arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Customised individually made (CIM) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with personalised alignment is relatively new and evidence is limited. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures between CIM and off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA patients in a matched-pair analysis with a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: In this single-centre, prospective cohort study, propensity score matching was performed on 51 CIM and 51 OTS TKA. Data were measured at baseline, at 4 months, 1 and 2 years and included the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the EQ-5D-3L, the EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, satisfaction, overall knee improvement, willingness to undergo the surgery again and the Knee Society Score. RESULTS: At 2 years follow-up, the FJS-12 (77 vs. 67, p = .058), HAAS (13 vs. 11, p < .001), KOOS daily living (92 vs. 86, p = .029), KOOS sport (76 vs. 65, p = .019), KOOS quality of life (81 vs. 71, p = .028) and the EQ-5D (.95 vs. .90, p = .030) were higher for CIM TKA compared to OTS TKA. Satisfaction rate was 92% for CIM TKA and 84% for OTS TKA (p = .357). Most patients reported an improvement in the overall knee state (94% CIM and 90% OTS, p = .487) and almost all patients would undergo the surgery again (96% CIM and 98% OTS, p = .999). CONCLUSION: The current study found that CIM TKA patients had better functional outcomes at 2 years. Patient satisfaction was high and not statistically significantly different from OTS TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II prospective cohort study.

Satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched-pair analysis of patients with customised individually made and off-the-shelf implants.

PURPOSE: Customised individually made (CIM) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to potentially improve patient satisfaction and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to compare PROMs, especially patient satisfaction, of patients with CIM and OTS TKA in a matched-pair analysis with a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study with a propensity score matching of 85 CIM and 85 off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA. Follow-up was at 4 months, 1 year and 2 years. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were as follows: overall improvement, willingness to undergo the surgery again, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, Knee Society Score (KSS) and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction ranged from 86 to 90% and did not differ between CIM and OTS TKA. The EQ-VAS after 4 months and the HAAS after 1 year and 2 years were higher for CIM TKA. KOOS, FJS-12 and EQ-5D-3L were not different at follow-up. The changes in KOOS symptoms, pain and daily living were higher for OTS TKA. The KSS was higher for patients with CIM TKA. Surgeon satisfaction was high throughout both groups. Patients who were satisfied after 2 years did not differ preoperatively from those who were not satisfied. Postoperatively, all PROMs were better for satisfied patients. Patient satisfaction was not correlated with patient characteristics, implant or preoperative PROMs, and medium to strongly correlated with postoperative PROMs. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction was high with no differences between patients with CIM and OTS TKA. Both implant systems improved function, pain and health-related quality of life. Patients with CIM TKA showed superior results in demanding activities as measured by the HAAS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Comparison of Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of different patient-reported outcome measures in patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we assessed patients with TKA before the surgery, after 4 months, after 1 year, and after 2 years. Measures were the objective Knee Society Score (KSS) and the following patient-reported outcome measures: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), KOOS-12, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, and EQ-5D-3L. Responsiveness was determined by effect size (ES), standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, floor and ceiling effects, and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 309 TKAs (272 patients, 56% female). The ES and SRM for the change in KSS, KOOS, KOOS-12, FJS-12, and EQ-5D-3L from baseline to each follow-up were large (>0.8). The largest responsiveness from baseline to follow-up was found for the KSS, KOOS/KOOS-12 quality of life, KOOS-12 summary, KOOS-12 pain, and FJS-12 (2.0 > ES <3.9, 1.4 > SRM <2.4). The area under the curve from baseline to each follow-up was ≥0.7 for KOOS, KOOS-12, and FJS-12 (range 0.71 to 0.95) and <0.7 for KSS and EQ-5D-3L (range 0.65 to 0.74). We found floor or ceiling effects in the KOOS, KOOS-12, and EQ-5D-3L, but not in the KSS, FJS-12, and High-Activity Arthroplasty Score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that responsiveness differed between the various measures. The KOOS-12 and FJS-12 showed the greatest internal and external responsiveness, although ceiling effects occurred in the KOOS-12.

Relevant changes of leg alignment after customised individually made bicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to overstuffing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyse the change in knee alignment after customised individually made (CIM) bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) and the subsequent consequences for patellar tracking. METHODS: Medical records of 23 patients who received 26 CIM BKA (ConforMIS iDuo G2) at our clinic between November 2015 and July 2018 were reviewed. The objective part of the Knee Society Score (KSS), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the tibial mechanical angle (TMA) and femoral mechanical angle (FMA) were recorded preoperative and four months postoperative. Leg alignment was classified as neutral (HKA = 180° ± 3°), varus (HKA < 177°) or valgus (HKA > 183°). Furthermore, patellar tracking was determined on skyline view radiographs and adverse events were recorded. Implant survival rate was determined with the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were pain, satisfaction, overall improvement and if the patient would undergo the surgery again. RESULTS: The mean KSS improved from 61 points preoperative [standard deviation (SD) 14] to 90 points postoperative (SD 7, p < 0.001). The mean change for HKA was 6.3° (SD 3.5), for TMA 1.5° (SD 1.2) and for FMA 3.8° (SD 2.3). Postoperative leg alignment was neutral in 13 CIM BKA (50%), varus in two (8%) and valgus in 11 (42%) and patella tracking was central in 19 CIM BKA (73%) and lateral in seven (27%), respectively. Adverse events occurred in five CIM BKA: three patients required a patella resurfacing and one patient with bilateral CIM BKA needed a revision to a total knee arthroplasty. Implant survival rate was 92.3% at a follow-up of 3.2 years (SD 0.8). PROMs for CIM BKA without revision surgery were available at a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (SD 0.8). Mean pain with level walking decreased to 0.8 points (SD 1.4, p < 0.001) and mean pain with stairs or inclines to 1.6 points (SD 1.3, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was very satisfied or satisfied (78%), neutral (17%) or unsatisfied (4%). Overall improvement was much better or considerably better for 91% of all patients; 87% would undergo the surgery again. CONCLUSION: A relevant change of the leg axis away from the treated femorotibial compartment due to overstuffing was observed. Although, neutral leg alignment was not restored in every case, clinical and patient-reported outcomes improved significantly. Further studies with long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes are required to evaluate whether patients with bicompartmental knee osteoarthritis benefit from CIM BKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

No difference in patient-reported satisfaction after 12 months between customised individually made and off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: A subset of patients is usually not satisfied after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Customised individually made (CIM) TKA are deemed to overcome drawbacks of classical off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA, but evidence is still sparse. The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction of patients with CIM and OTS TKA. METHODS: This prospective cohort study compared clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) between patients with CIM and OTS TKA. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and the EQ-5D-3L after 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 74 CIM TKA and 169 OTS TKA between January 2017 and September 2020. Patients with CIM TKA were slightly younger, more often male, had a lower body mass index, a lower KSS and partially higher preoperative PROMs. Patient satisfaction after 12 months was high and comparable (CIM 87%, OTS 89%). All PROMs improved for both groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ after 12 months (p > 0.063). The majority of patients improved above the minimal important difference (range 65 to 89%) and reported a clear overall improvement (CIM 86%, OTS 87%). The postoperative KSS, notably regarding knee stability, was higher for CIM TKA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in patient satisfaction between CIM and OTS TKA after 12 months. In both groups, patient satisfaction was high and PROMs improved considerably. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

The German version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score is valid and reliable for patients after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The indications for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) broadened to younger and more active patients. The High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a self-administered instrument focussing on the wider range of functional abilities of more active patients. The HAAS was developed in English and is not available in German yet. This study aims to translate, cross-cultural adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the German HAAS in patients 12 months after primary TKA. METHODS: After forward and backward translation, we examined the final version regarding its psychometric properties in patients 12 months after primary TKA. The HAAS was sent out to 70 patients together with routine questionnaires comprising the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) and 2 numerical pain rating scales. Acceptability, reliability, responsiveness, content and construct validity as well as floor and ceiling effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were recruited. The HAAS was well accepted with a mean time to completion of 2.4 min. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.749, test-retest reliability was excellent with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.961. The smallest detectable change was 1.5. Good content validity was confirmed. A strong correlation was found between the HAAS and KOOS sport (r = 0.661) and a medium correlation for all other KOOS subscales (r = 0.324 to 0.453), the FJS-12 (r = 0.425), the EQ-5D-3L (r = 0.427) and pain (r = - 0.439 to - 0.308). The HAAS showed no floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the HAAS provides good validity and reliability. It can be easily self-administered and is recommended to capture high-intensity activities in patients after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

The landscape of pediatric Diamond-Blackfan anemia in Switzerland: genotype and phenotype characteristics.

Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is caused mainly by genetic mutations in large (RPL) or small ribosomal subunit genes (RPS) and presents with macrocytic anemia and congenital malformations. Clinical differences between genotypes are insufficiently understood. The aim of this study was to assess clinical features, treatment strategies, and genotypes in the Swiss pediatric DBA population. We retrospectively reviewed medical charts of pediatric patients with DBA in Switzerland and stratified patients by RPL versus RPS mutations. We report 17 DBA patients in Switzerland who were all genetically investigated. In our cohort, patients showed a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and treatment needs. We found a high proportion of physical malformations (77%) including lower limb (17%) and anorectal (12%) malformations. The two patients with anorectal malformations presented both with antepositioning of the anus needing surgery within the first 15 months of life. One of these patients had sphincteric dysfunction, the other coccygeal agenesis. We found that included patients with an RPL mutation more frequently tended to have physical malformations and a milder anemia compared to patients with an RPS mutation (median hemoglobin at diagnosis 76 g/l versus 22 g/l).Conclusion: We illustrate the wide clinical and genetic spectrum of DBA in Switzerland. Our findings highlight the need to take this diagnosis into consideration in patients with severe anemia but also in patients with mild anemia where malformations are present. Lower limb and anorectal malformation extend the spectrum of DBA-associated malformations. What is Known? • There is a large variation in the phenotype of Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA) and diversity of genetic mutations. • Malformation of the upper limbs, head and face, heart, and genitourinary system is frequently identified. What is New? • Patients with lower limb and anorectal malformations were repetitively found in our cohort enlarging the clinical spectrum of malformations. • We show two patients of the same family with a DBA-like condition where the same RPL17 variant was identified.

Midterm Follow-Up and Assessment of Cartilage Thickness by Arthro-Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Arthroscopic Cam Resection, Labral Repair, and Rim Trimming Without Labral Detachment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome, sum of acetabular and femoral cartilage thickness, and rate of failure in the midterm after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome with femoral osteoplasty, labral repair, and rim trimming without labral detachment. METHODS: This retrospective case series included patients with FAI syndrome who had undergone hip arthroscopy from January 2009 to December 2010 by a single surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 55 months. Data from patients who had undergone arthroscopic hip procedures with labral repair, rim trimming, and femoral osteoplasty were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Clinical outcome (nonarthritic hip score [NAHS], Short Form 36 [SF-36]), range of motion, progression of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade), radiological parameters (α angle, lateral center-edge angle [LCEA], Tönnis angle), femoral and acetabular cartilage thickness (using magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and intraoperative findings were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 148 hip arthroscopies performed, 97 included rim trimming, labral refixation, and femoral osteoplasty. Ten cases were lost to follow-up, leaving 87 hips. Arthroscopic revision was performed on 4 hips and total hip replacement on 4 hips, and 1 hip underwent both arthroscopic revision and total hip replacement. Excluding these 9 cases of revision, for which follow-up was not possible (retrospective study), the remaining 78 hips were followed up for a minimum of 55 months (77 ± 11.4, mean ± SD; range 55 to 124). Mean NAHS (65 to 88, P < .001), SF-36 physical subscale (65 to 85, P < .001), and the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) (5 to 1, P < .001) improved significantly. Outcome scores of minimal clinical importance (NAHS) were achieved in 67.6% of the patients. Mean range of movement improved significantly in flexion (109 to 122, P < .001) and internal rotation (10 to 22.7, P < .001). NAHS was positively associated with flexion of the hip postoperatively (r = 0.307, P = .011). In 16 cases, microfracture was performed (15 acetabular and 1 femoral). Preoperative α angles (anteroposterior and modified Dunn) were significantly higher in this cohort (P < .001, 95% confidence interval 8.9 to 25.2, P = .001). Twenty hips (28 %) progressed to worse Tönnis grades. Initial Tönnis grades were grade 0, 38; grade 1, 48; grade 2, 8. Pre- or postoperative Tönnis grades did not show any correlation with pre- or postoperative NAHS and NRS. MRI measurements at the latest follow-up (69 patients) of the femoral and acetabular cartilage thickness did not reveal any significant reduction at the 12 o'clock position. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic cam resection, rim trimming, and labral repair without detachment of the labrum provides good or excellent outcome in 77.1% of hips based on NAHS in the midterm. Higher range of motion in flexion is associated with higher NAHS postoperatively. Arthroscopic cam resection, rim trimming and labral repair without detachment of the labrum is a successful method for the treatment of FAI syndrome in the midterm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aims to restore knee function and stability, allowing patients to return to the activities they enjoy and minimize further injury to the meniscus and cartilage and their ultimate progression to osteoarthritis. This study aims to present the evolution of graft choice over the last three decades according to members of the ACL Study Group (SG). METHODS: Prior to the January 2020 ACL SG biannual meeting, a survey was administered consisting of 87 questions and 16 categories, including ACLR graft choice. A similar questionnaire has been administered prior to each meeting and survey results from the past 14 meetings (1992 through 2020, excluding 1994) are included in this work. Survey responses are reported as frequencies in percentages to quantify changes in practice over the surgery period. RESULTS: In 1992, the most frequent graft choice for primary ACLR was bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, at nearly 90%. Hamstring tendon (HT) autografts have increased in popularity, currently over 50%, followed by just under 40% BTB autograft. Recently, quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has increased in popularity since 2014. CONCLUSION: Autograft (HT, BTB, QT) is an overwhelming favorite for primary ACLR over allograft. The preference for HT autograft increased over the study period relative to BTB autograft, with QT autograft gaining in popularity in recent years. Graft selection should be individualized for each patient and understanding the global trends in graft choice can help orthopaedic surgeons discuss graft options with their patients and determine the appropriate graft for each case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, Expert Opinion.