Generalization of fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior as predictors of work resumption after back surgery: a study protocol for a prospective study (WABS).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that about 20% of the individuals undergoing back surgery are unable to return to work 3 months to 1 year after surgery. The specific factors that predict individual trajectories in postoperative pain, recovery, and work resumption are largely unknown. The aim of this study is to identify modifiable predictors of work resumption after back surgery. METHODS: In this multisite, prospective, longitudinal study, 300 individuals with radicular pain undergoing a lumbar decompression will be followed until 1-year post-surgery. Prior to surgery, participants will perform a computer task to assess fear of movement-related pain, avoidance behavior, and their generalization to novel situations. Before and immediately after surgery, participants will additionally complete questionnaires to assess fear of movement-related pain, avoidance behavior, optimism, expectancies towards recovery and work resumption, and the duration and severity of the pain. Six weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, they will again complete questionnaires to assess sustainable work resumption, pain severity, disability, and quality of life. The primary hypothesis is that (generalization of) fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior will negatively affect sustainable work resumption after back surgery. Second, we hypothesize that (generalization of) fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior, negative expectancies towards recovery and work resumption, longer pain duration, and more severe pain before the surgery will negatively affect work resumption, pain severity, disability, and quality of life after back surgery. In contrast, optimism and positive expectancies towards recovery and work resumption are expected to predict more favorable work resumption, better quality of life, and lower levels of pain severity and disability after back surgery. DISCUSSION: With the results of this research, we hope to contribute to the development of strategies for early identification of risk factors and appropriate guidance and interventions before and after back surgery. Trial registration The study was preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04747860 on February 9, 2021.

Predictors of Recovery After Conservative Treatment of AO-Type A Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Without Neurological Deficit.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, correlational, exploratory, clinical research. OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors determining a patient's recovery after conservative treatment of compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reported results of compression fractures are poor. These results are not influenced by the severity of compression, the fracture site, or the residual deformity. Otherwise, the factors that determine a patient's recovery are unknown. METHODS: In 48 conservatively treated patients the preinjury versus the 12-month follow-up differences (Δ) in back pain (visual analogue scale for pain), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Greenough and Fraser low back outcome scale were prospectively recorded. For these differences and for time lost from work and satisfaction, multiple linear regressions with combinations of 16 factors were performed. RESULTS: At 1 year, patients with an income-insurance were 9% (P = 0.096) more disabled than those without. They reported a 15% less favorable global outcome and 27% less participation. Smokers were 13% (P = 0.010) more disabled and 11% (P = 0.044) less satisfied. With each increase of the AO-fracture type from A1 to A3 the disability was 8% worse. Patients with pre-existent chronic low back pain (CLBP) returned two points (on a visual analogue scale [VAS] pain total of 10) more closely (P = 0.041) to their preinjury pain level than those without but were 21% (P = 0.001) less satisfied. Our model offers an explanation for more than 25% of the variability of ΔODI and of the satisfaction. For sick leave, no significant predictors were found. CONCLUSION: Smoking and insurance status are the strongest negative predictors for recovery. LBP patients returned more closely to their preinjury back pain level, but were less satisfied. The AO fracture type had a marked influence on disability, the sagittal deformity had not. The time lost from work did not depend on patient or injury-related factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Limping in childhood.

Limp is an abnormal gait which can be caused by pain, muscular dysfunction or deformity. Limp is never normal and the cause should be established. There is a long list of possible diagnoses. A complete history and thorough physical examination are the most helpful tools in sorting out the various causes of limping. Laboratory tests and imaging studies should be based on findings in the history and physical examination. Certain causes of limping must be diagnosed at the first visit. Sometimes the cause of limping cannot be determined, and after exclusion of any serious disease, the child should be observed. Many of them will have spontaneous resolution without treatment.

Decrease in postural sway and trunk stiffness during cognitive dual-task in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients, performance compared to healthy control subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: A 2-group experimental design. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a cognitive dual-task on postural sway of pelvis and trunk during unstable sitting in nonspecific chronic patients with low back pain (CLBP) compared to healthy control subjects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Higher cognitive systems as well as sensory processes contribute to postural control. An increase in postural sway due to a cognitive dual task could mean more need of cognitive systems to control balance. METHODS: A total of 21 CLBP patients and 21 control subjects were included based on detailed clinical criteria. Every subject was submitted to 2 postural control tests in an unstable sitting position (easy test position: 2 feet on the ground and difficult test position: 1 foot lifted). Both tests were performed with and without cognitive dual-task. A 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used measure angular displacement of trunk and pelvis in the 3 cardinal planes. RESULTS: In the most difficult balance position, postural sway increases in the control group when the cognitive dual-task is added, for 50% of the variables the increase is significant (P between 0.02 and 0.05). On the contrary, postural sway decreases, not significantly, in the CLBP group when the dual-task is added. These findings are the same for trunk as for pelvis deviations. The Pearson correlation coefficient between trunk and pelvis movement from the CLBP group are lower for all 3 movement directions in the dual-task condition (r between 0.441 and 0.988) compared to the single task condition (r between 0.982 and 0.995). CONCLUSION: In nonspecific CLBP patients, a cognitive dual-task reduces both postural sway and trunk stiffness due to the distracting effect of the dual-task. This effect is only visible when the balance task is difficult.

Differences in balance strategies between nonspecific chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects during unstable sitting.

STUDY DESIGN: A 2-group experimental design. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in postural control strategies of pelvis and trunk movement between nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and healthy control subjects using 3-dimensional motion analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Increased postural sway assessed by center of pressure displacements have been documented in patients with low back pain (LBP). The 3-dimensional movement strategies used by patients with LBP to keep their balance are not well documented. METHODS: Nineteen CLBP patients and 20 control subjects were included based on detailed clinical criteria. Every subject was submitted to a postural control test in an unstable sitting position. A 3-dimensional motion analysis system, equipped with 7 infrared M1 cameras, was used to track 9 markers attached to the pelvis and trunk to estimate their angular displacement in the 3 cardinal planes. RESULTS: The total angular deviation in all 3 directions of pelvis and trunk was higher in the CLBP group compared with the control group. In 4 of the 6 calculated differences, a significant higher deviation was found in the CLBP group (significant P-values between 0.013 and 0.047). Subjects of both groups mostly used rotation compared with lateral flexion and flexion/extension displacements of pelvis and trunk to adjust balance disturbance. The CLBP group showed a high correlation (Pearson: 0.912-0.981) between movement of pelvis and trunk, compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: A higher postural sway and high correlation between pelvis and trunk displacements was found in the LBP group compared with healthy controls.

Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal.

The purpose of this study was to identify those factors that influence the outcome after conservative treatment of undisplaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal. This was done with univariate analyses and, for the first time, with regression analyses of day-to-day clinical practice. Thirty-eight patients were treated with plaster and periods of no weight bearing (NWB). Their mean age was 48 years. They were evaluated using the Olerud ankle score, with analogue scales for pain and comfort, and with questions about cosmesis and wearing of shoes. Six patients sustained a Jones fracture and 32 a tuberosity avulsion fracture. The mean period of NWB was 17 days and of casting was 38 days. Three Jones fractures and all the avulsion fractures were healed at the end of treatment. After a mean of 490 days, the global ankle score was 82/100. Ten patients reported problems with shoes and nine reported cosmetic problems. The linear analogue scale for pain was 2.11/10 and for comfort 8.42/10. Gender, age, and fracture type did not affect outcome. The most significant predictor of poor functional outcome was longer NWB, which was strongly associated with worse global outcome, discomfort, and reported stiffness. NWB should be kept to a minimum for acute avulsions of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal.

The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

One hundred forty-nine medial prostheses were implanted in 140 patients between 1988 and 1996. After a mean of 67 months 28 patients had died, without the need for revision. Seventeen prostheses were lost to follow-up. Revision surgery using a total knee prosthesis was performed in 16 cases. In four others, a lateral prosthesis was implanted subsequently to a medial one. One of these four was revised to a total knee prosthesis 6 years later. In another four cases, late complications of the meniscal bearing were treated with replacement of this bearing. The surviving prostheses were seen back after a mean of 126 months. The cumulative survival rate at 10 years was 82% for the whole population and 84% when knees with a previous high tibial osteotomy were excluded. Since these results compare poorly to the survival of total knee arthroplasty, this prosthesis is not the first-choice implant. Because it preserves a maximum of bone stock and is revised to a total prosthesis almost without difficulty, it is the first-choice implant for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients younger than 65. Further research is mandatory to confirm that this prosthesis very rarely needs revision in patients older than 75. It should not be used in osteotomized knees.

Bowing fractures of the forearm in children: a long-term followup.

Eleven children with forearm bowing fractures were followed up after 80 months. They were evaluated specifically for pain, function, and cosmesis. Remodeling was assessed by comparing radiographs. The mean age when the trauma occurred was 7 years 5 months. Forces longitudinal to the forearm axis are considered responsible for this injury. In six patients the deforming force was longitudinal, but in two other patients it might have been transversal. In three patients the mechanism of injury was unknown. The initial diagnosis was missed three times. Reduction was cumbersome in five of seven patients. In nine patients a residual curve was accepted. This resulted in a unique opportunity to evaluate the spontaneous remodeling. After 6 years of age, remodeling was less than generally accepted. From this it can be concluded that a transversal force is also capable of causing these injuries, that remodeling is less than generally accepted, and that reduction under general anesthesia should be considered in patients older than 6 years who have a cosmetically unacceptable bowing deformity that is greater than 10 degrees.