Frailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a survey.

BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines on frailty assessment and management recommend frailty screening in older people. This study aimed to determine how Brazilian healthcare professionals (HCPs) identify and manage frailty in practice. METHODS: An anonymous online survey on the assessment and management of frailty was circulated virtually through HCPs across Brazil. RESULTS: Most of the respondants used non-specific criteria such as gait speed (45%), handgrip strength (37.6%), and comprehensive geriatric assessment (33.2%). The use of frailty-specific criteria was lower than 50%. The most frequently used criteria were the Frailty Index (19.1%), Frailty Phenotype (13.2%), and FRAIL (12.5%). Only 43.5% felt confident, and 40% had a plan to manage frailty. In the multivariate-adjusted models, training was the most crucial factor associated with assessing frailty, confidence, and having a management plan (p < 0.001 for all). Those with fewer years of experience were more likely to evaluate frailty (p = 0.009). Being a doctor increased the chance of using a specific tool; the opposite was true for dietitians (p = 0.03). Those who assisted more older people had a higher likelihood of having a plan (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Frailty assessment was heterogeneous among healthcare professions groups, predominantly using non-specific criteria. Training contributed to frailty assessment, use of specific criteria, confidence, and having a management plan. This data informs the need for standardized screening criteria and management plans for frailty, in association with increasing training at the national level for all the HCPs who assist older people.

Long-term care facilities' response to the COVID-19 pandemic: An international, cross-sectional survey.

AIMS: To (i) assess the adherence of long-term care (LTC) facilities to the COVID-19 prevention and control recommendations, (ii) identify predictors of this adherence and (iii) examine the association between the adherence level and the impact of the pandemic on selected unfavourable conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Managers (n = 212) and staff (n = 2143) of LTC facilities (n = 223) in 13 countries/regions (Brazil, Egypt, England, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Spain, Thailand and Turkey) evaluated the adherence of LTC facilities to COVID-19 prevention and control recommendations and the impact of the pandemic on unfavourable conditions related to staff, residents and residents' families. The characteristics of participants and LTC facilities were also gathered. Data were collected from April to October 2021. The study was reported following the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: The adherence was significantly higher among facilities with more pre-pandemic in-service education on infection control and easier access to information early in the pandemic. Residents' feelings of loneliness and feeling down were the most affected conditions by the pandemic. More psychological support to residents was associated with fewer residents' aggressive behaviours, and more psychological support to staff was associated with less work-life imbalance. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pandemic preparedness significantly shaped LTC facilities' response to the pandemic. Adequate psychological support to residents and staff might help mitigate the negative impacts of infection outbreaks. IMPACT: This is the first study to comprehensively examine the adherence of LTC facilities to COVID-19 prevention and control recommendations. The results demonstrated that the adherence level was significantly related to pre-pandemic preparedness and that adequate psychological support to staff and residents was significantly associated with less negative impacts of the pandemic on LTC facilities' staff and residents. The results would help LTC facilities prepare for and respond to future infection outbreaks. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Institutional care in four Latin American countries: the importance of fostering public information and evaluation strategies.

More than 8 million older people in Latin America depend on long-term care (LTC), accounting for 12% of people aged ≥ 60 years and almost 27% of those aged ≥ 80. It is crucial to develop sustainable strategies for providing LTC in the area, including institutional care. This special report aims to characterize institutional LTC in four countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica and Mexico), using available information systems, and to identify the strategies adopted to support institutional care in these countries. This narrative review used nationwide, open-access, public data sources to gather demographic estimates and information about institutional LTC coverage and the availability of open-access data for the proportion of people with LTC needs, the number of LTC facilities and the number of residents living in them. These countries have a larger share of older people than the average in Latin America but fewer LTC facilities than required by the demand. National surveys lack standardization in defining disability, LTC and dependency on care. Information about institutional care is mainly fragmented and does not regularly include LTC facilities, their residents and workers. Data are crucial to inform evidence-based decisions to favor prioritization and to support advances in promoting policies around institutional LTC in Latin America. Although information about institutional care in the region is fragmented and insufficient, this paper profiles the four selected countries. It highlights the need for a better structure for data-driven LTC information systems. The lack of information emphasizes the urgency of the need to focus on and encourage research into this topic.

En América Latina, más de 8 millones de personas mayores dependen de los cuidados a largo plazo (CLP), lo que representa el 12% de las personas de 60 años o más y casi el 27% de las de 80 años o más Resulta crucial elaborar estrategias sostenibles para la prestación de CLP en la región, incluida la atención en centros de CLP. Este artículo especial tiene como finalidad determinar las características de la atención prestada en centros de CLP en cuatro países (Brasil, Chile, Costa Rica y México), utilizando los sistemas de información disponibles, así como determinar cuáles son las estrategias adoptadas en estos países para brindar apoyo a la atención en centros de CLP. En esta revisión descriptiva se utilizaron fuentes de datos públicas, de libre acceso y de ámbito nacional para recopilar estimaciones demográficas e información sobre la cobertura de la atención en centros de CLP, así como sobre la disponibilidad de datos de libre acceso acerca de la proporción de personas con necesidades de CLP, el número de centros de CLP y su correspondiente número de residentes. Estos países tienen una proporción de personas mayores superior a la media de América Latina, pero menos centros de CLP de los necesarios para cubrir la demanda. En las encuestas nacionales no hay una definición estandarizada de la discapacidad, los cuidados a largo plazo y la dependencia. La mayor parte de la información sobre la atención en centros de CLP está fragmentada y no incluye datos periódicos sobre los centros de CLP existentes, sus residentes o sus trabajadores. Estos datos son cruciales para fundamentar decisiones basadas en la evidencia destinadas a propiciar la priorización y brindar apoyo a los avances en la promoción de políticas en materia de centros de CLP en América Latina. Aunque la información sobre la atención en centros de CLP en la región es fragmentaria e insuficiente, en este artículo se presenta el perfil de los cuatro países seleccionados. Se resalta la necesidad de mejorar la estructura de los sistemas de información sobre CLP basados en datos. Esta falta de información pone de relieve la necesidad urgente de centrarse en este tema y fomentar la investigación al respecto.

Na América Latina, mais de 8 milhões de pessoas idosas dependem de cuidados de longa duração (CLD), o que representa 12% das pessoas com mais de 60 anos e quase 27% das pessoas com mais de 80 anos. É fundamental criar estratégias sustentáveis para oferecer CLD na região, inclusive cuidados institucionais. O objetivo deste relatório especial é caracterizar CLD institucionais em quatro países (Brasil, Chile, Costa Rica e México), usando os sistemas de informação disponíveis, e identificar as estratégias adotadas para apoiar os cuidados institucionais nesses países. Esta revisão narrativa usou dados públicos de acesso aberto de âmbito nacional para coletar estimativas demográficas e informações sobre a cobertura de CLD institucionais e a disponibilidade de dados de acesso aberto sobre a porcentagem de pessoas com necessidades de CLD, o número de instituições de CLD e o número de residentes nessas instituições. Esses países têm uma parcela maior de pessoas idosas do que a média da América Latina, mas menos instituições de CLD do que a demanda exige. Falta padronização na definição de incapacidade, CLD e dependência de cuidados nas pesquisas nacionais. Em sua maior parte, as informações sobre cuidados institucionais são fragmentadas e não incluem instituições de CLD, seus residentes e trabalhadores de maneira regular. É essencial usar dados para guiar decisões baseadas em evidências a fim de favorecer a priorização e apoiar avanços que promovam políticas para CLD institucionais na América Latina. Embora as informações sobre cuidados institucionais na região sejam fragmentadas e insuficientes, este documento traça o perfil dos quatro países selecionados, destacando a necessidade de uma estrutura melhor para sistemas de informações de CLD orientados por dados. A falta de informações ressalta a urgência de aumentar o foco no tópico e encorajar pesquisas sobre o assunto.

Promoting workplace retention during global crises: An international survey of the preventive role of psychological support among victims of social discrimination in long-term care facilities.

This international cross-sectional survey examined the potential role of organizational psychological support in mitigating the association between experiencing social discrimination against long-term care (LTC) facilities' healthcare professionals (HCPs) and their intention to stay in the current workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants included a convenience sample of 2,143 HCPs (nurses [21.5 %], nurse aids or residential care workers [40.1 %], social workers [12.1 %], and others [26.4 %]) working at 223 LTC facilities in 13 countries/regions. About 37.5 % of the participants reported experiencing social discrimination, and the percentage ranged from 15.3 % to 77.9 % across countries/regions. Controlling for socio-demographic and work-related variables, experiencing social discrimination was significantly associated with a lower intention to stay, whereas receiving psychological support showed a statistically significant positive association (p-value=0.015 and <0.001, respectively). The interaction term between social discrimination and psychological support showed a statistically significant positive association with the intention to stay, indicating a moderating role of the psychological support.

Long-Term Care Staff Perspectives on the Care of Persons Living With Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic in São Paulo State, Brazil.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Brazilian long-term care (LTC) sector faced many challenges, which accentuated other common issues experienced by persons living with dementia (PLWD). The current pilot study evaluated staff perspectives regarding the care of institutionalized PLWD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using an online survey, we collected the perspectives of 24 workers from seven long-term care facilities (LTCFs) located in São Paulo State, Brazil, about the impact of COVID-19 in caring for PLWD. Results highlight concerns about challenges related to following precautionary measures and the negative effects of social distancing on PLWD. Aspects related to workforce and staffing and person-centered care approaches were recognized by staff as important to provide good care for PLWD. Future research is needed to consider how to support LTCFs in achieving a balance between the protection and well-being of PLWD. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(5), 45-52.].

Comparing objective and self-reported measures of adherence in haemophilia.

AIM: To compare subjective and objective measures of adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we compared participants' self-perceived adherence and their estimate of the number of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) that had been missed over the last period of CFC dispensation with an objective measure of adherence based on counts of CFC vials returned by participants. RESULTS: We included 29 out of 31 eligible patients in the study. There was no significant correlation between self-perceived degree of adherence and the objective classification of adherence (Rho: 0.10, 95% CI: -028 to 0.46, P: 0.61) and between the classification of adherence based on the proportion of missed CFC doses assessed by participants' self-report and objectively (Rho: 0.32, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.59, P: 0.11). Conversely, we found evidence of moderate correlation between the proportion of missed CFC doses as assessed by participants' self-report and objectively (Rho: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.77, P: 0.003). Participants' self-perceived adherence was 3 times more likely to be rated as very good or good than it was for the objective assessment to be classified as adherent or suboptimally adherent. CONCLUSION: Our results showed significant discrepancies between subjective and objective measures of adherence, which likely reflect the influence of social desirability bias in self-reported measures and different concepts of adherence between patients/caregivers and haemophilia experts. Additionally, our results allow us to hypothesize that studies on adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia relying exclusively on information from self-reports and questionnaires may substantially overestimate adherence levels.

Effectiveness of probiotics on the occurrence of infections in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: infectious diseases in older people are associated with higher mortality rates and probiotics have been hypothesised to reduce the occurrence of infection. OBJECTIVES: to assess the effectiveness and safety of probiotics in the occurrence of infections in older adults in comparison to placebo. METHODS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials were conducted on 30 December 2016 using Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science and LILACS databases. Efficacy outcomes were: occurrence of infection, quality of life, mortality and mean duration of infection per episode. Safety outcomes were adverse events. Data were analysed using relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Relative risk ratios were pooled where more than three estimates were available. RESULTS: fifteen articles were included, with a total of 5,916 participants with a mean age of 75.21 years. The effect of probiotics was not significantly different from that reported for placebo on the occurrence of infection, adverse events, mortality or mean duration of infection episodes (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.08; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.12; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.72; MD -0.35, 95% CI -1.57 to 0.87, respectively). CONCLUSION: the current low-quality evidence does not support the use of probiotics for the reduction in the occurrence of infection in older adults, however, the safety outcomes were similar between probiotics and placebo. Further research is required to confirm these findings.PROSPERO: CRD42014013707.

Mycobacterium peregrinum Skin Infection: Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium peregrinum is a rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM) that rarely causes skin infections. The correct identification of the specific RGM infecting the skin will enhance therapeutic success. OBJECTIVE: To highlight the importance of rapid and precise identification of the Mycobacterium involved in skin infections in order to enhance therapeutic success. METHODS: We describe an RGM skin infection in an immunocompetent patient. RESULTS: Classic methods (biochemical tests and culture) of RGM identification are time-consuming, and the histopathological features are not specific. Some molecular methods are reliable but expensive. The PRAhsp-65 is a simple procedure that is helpful in identifying the specific agent of an RGM. CONCLUSION: Although skin infections caused by M peregrinum are rare, they represent a substantial clinical challenge. Specific and more effective treatment options depend on the development of precise and rapid methods for identifying mycobacterial species.

A Microcost Analysis of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment During and Before the COVID-19 Pandemic From a Hospital Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the direct cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) used during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of a Brazilian tertiary public hospital. METHODS: We evaluated the cost of PPE during the pandemic to the cost before (2021 vs 2019, respectively) using the microcosting method. Cost estimates were converted into US dollars in 2023, taking inflation into account and using purchasing power parity conversion rates. Our expenses included gloves, disposable gowns, head coverings, masks, N95 respirators, and eye protection. The number of PPE used was determined by the hospital's usual protocol, the total number of hospitalized patients, and the number of days of hospitalization. We used the following variables for uncertainty analysis: PPE adherence, an interquartile range of median length of hospitalization, and variance in the cost of each PPE. RESULTS: In 2021, 26 618 individuals were hospitalized compared with 31 948 in 2019. The median length of stay was 6 and 4 days, respectively. The total and per-patient direct cost of PPE were projected to be 2 939 935.47 US dollar (USD) and 110.45 USD, respectively, during the pandemic, and 1 570 124.08 USD and 49.15 USD, respectively, before the pandemic. The individual cost of PPE was the most influential cost variable. CONCLUSIONS: According to the hospital's perspective, the total estimated direct cost of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic was nearly twice as high as the previous year. This difference might be explained by the 3-fold increase in PPE in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 compared with patients without isolation precautions.

Impact of long-term care facilities' size on adherence to COVID-19' infection prevention guidance. / Impacto do tamanho das instituições de longa permanência na adesão às orientações de prevenção de infecções por COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the adherence of Brazilian long-term care facilities to the World Health Organization Infection Prevention and Control guidance, and assess the association of their size with the adherence to these recommendations. METHOD: cross-sectional study conducted with facilities' managers. Authors developed a 20-item questionnaire based on this guidance, and a global score of adherence, based on the adoption of these recommendations. Adherence was classified as (1) excellent for those who attended ≥14 out of 20 recommendations; (2) good for 10 to 13 items; and (3) low for those with less than ten items. Facilities' sizes were established as small, intermediate, and large according to a two-step cluster analysis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: among 362 included facilities, 308 (85.1%) adhered to 14 or more recommendations. Regarding its size, adherence to screening COVID-19 symptoms of visitors (p=0.037) and isolating patients until they have had two negative laboratory tests (p=0.032) were lower on larger ones compared to medium and small facilities. CONCLUSION: adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures in Brazilian facilities was considered excellent for most of the recommendations, regardless of the size of the units.

Mapping Research Conducted on Long-Term Care Facilities for Older People in Brazil: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics, strengths, and gaps in research conducted in Brazilian long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults. Electronic searches investigating the residents (≥60 years old), their families, and the LTCF workforce in Brazil were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, and Google Scholar, within the timescale of 1999 to 2018, limited to English, Portuguese, or Spanish. The reference lists were hand searched for additional papers. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for critical appraisal of evidence. Data were reported descriptively considering the study design, using content analysis: 327 studies were included (n = 159 quantitative non-randomized, n = 82 quantitative descriptive, n = 67 qualitative, n = 11 mixed methods, n = 6 randomized controlled trials, and n = 2 translation of assessment tools). Regardless of the study design, most were conducted in a single LTCF (45.8%), in urban locations (84.3%), and in non-profit settings (38.7%). The randomized trials and descriptive studies presented the lowest methodological quality based on the MMAT. This is the first review to provide an overview of research on LTCFs for older people in Brazil. It illustrates an excess of small-scale, predominantly qualitative papers, many of which are reported in ways that do not allow the quality of the work to be assured.

Institutional care in four Latin American countries: the importance of fostering public information and evaluation strategies / Atención en centros de cuidados a largo plazo en cuatro países de América Latina: importancia de fomentar la información pública y las estrategias de evaluación / Cuidados institucionais em quatro países da América Latina: a importância de promover informações públicas e estratégias de avaliação

ABSTRACT More than 8 million older people in Latin America depend on long-term care (LTC), accounting for 12% of people aged ≥ 60 years and almost 27% of those aged ≥ 80. It is crucial to develop sustainable strategies for providing LTC in the area, including institutional care. This special report aims to characterize institutional LTC in four countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica and Mexico), using available information systems, and to identify the strategies adopted to support institutional care in these countries. This narrative review used nationwide, open-access, public data sources to gather demographic estimates and information about institutional LTC coverage and the availability of open-access data for the proportion of people with LTC needs, the number of LTC facilities and the number of residents living in them. These countries have a larger share of older people than the average in Latin America but fewer LTC facilities than required by the demand. National surveys lack standardization in defining disability, LTC and dependency on care. Information about institutional care is mainly fragmented and does not regularly include LTC facilities, their residents and workers. Data are crucial to inform evidence-based decisions to favor prioritization and to support advances in promoting policies around institutional LTC in Latin America. Although information about institutional care in the region is fragmented and insufficient, this paper profiles the four selected countries. It highlights the need for a better structure for data-driven LTC information systems. The lack of information emphasizes the urgency of the need to focus on and encourage research into this topic.

RESUMEN En América Latina, más de 8 millones de personas mayores dependen de los cuidados a largo plazo (CLP), lo que representa el 12% de las personas de 60 años o más y casi el 27% de las de 80 años o más Resulta crucial elaborar estrategias sostenibles para la prestación de CLP en la región, incluida la atención en centros de CLP. Este artículo especial tiene como finalidad determinar las características de la atención prestada en centros de CLP en cuatro países (Brasil, Chile, Costa Rica y México), utilizando los sistemas de información disponibles, así como determinar cuáles son las estrategias adoptadas en estos países para brindar apoyo a la atención en centros de CLP. En esta revisión descriptiva se utilizaron fuentes de datos públicas, de libre acceso y de ámbito nacional para recopilar estimaciones demográficas e información sobre la cobertura de la atención en centros de CLP, así como sobre la disponibilidad de datos de libre acceso acerca de la proporción de personas con necesidades de CLP, el número de centros de CLP y su correspondiente número de residentes. Estos países tienen una proporción de personas mayores superior a la media de América Latina, pero menos centros de CLP de los necesarios para cubrir la demanda. En las encuestas nacionales no hay una definición estandarizada de la discapacidad, los cuidados a largo plazo y la dependencia. La mayor parte de la información sobre la atención en centros de CLP está fragmentada y no incluye datos periódicos sobre los centros de CLP existentes, sus residentes o sus trabajadores. Estos datos son cruciales para fundamentar decisiones basadas en la evidencia destinadas a propiciar la priorización y brindar apoyo a los avances en la promoción de políticas en materia de centros de CLP en América Latina. Aunque la información sobre la atención en centros de CLP en la región es fragmentaria e insuficiente, en este artículo se presenta el perfil de los cuatro países seleccionados. Se resalta la necesidad de mejorar la estructura de los sistemas de información sobre CLP basados en datos. Esta falta de información pone de relieve la necesidad urgente de centrarse en este tema y fomentar la investigación al respecto.

RESUMO Na América Latina, mais de 8 milhões de pessoas idosas dependem de cuidados de longa duração (CLD), o que representa 12% das pessoas com mais de 60 anos e quase 27% das pessoas com mais de 80 anos. É fundamental criar estratégias sustentáveis para oferecer CLD na região, inclusive cuidados institucionais. O objetivo deste relatório especial é caracterizar CLD institucionais em quatro países (Brasil, Chile, Costa Rica e México), usando os sistemas de informação disponíveis, e identificar as estratégias adotadas para apoiar os cuidados institucionais nesses países. Esta revisão narrativa usou dados públicos de acesso aberto de âmbito nacional para coletar estimativas demográficas e informações sobre a cobertura de CLD institucionais e a disponibilidade de dados de acesso aberto sobre a porcentagem de pessoas com necessidades de CLD, o número de instituições de CLD e o número de residentes nessas instituições. Esses países têm uma parcela maior de pessoas idosas do que a média da América Latina, mas menos instituições de CLD do que a demanda exige. Falta padronização na definição de incapacidade, CLD e dependência de cuidados nas pesquisas nacionais. Em sua maior parte, as informações sobre cuidados institucionais são fragmentadas e não incluem instituições de CLD, seus residentes e trabalhadores de maneira regular. É essencial usar dados para guiar decisões baseadas em evidências a fim de favorecer a priorização e apoiar avanços que promovam políticas para CLD institucionais na América Latina. Embora as informações sobre cuidados institucionais na região sejam fragmentadas e insuficientes, este documento traça o perfil dos quatro países selecionados, destacando a necessidade de uma estrutura melhor para sistemas de informações de CLD orientados por dados. A falta de informações ressalta a urgência de aumentar o foco no tópico e encorajar pesquisas sobre o assunto.

Relationship between self-reported health and neuroticism in older adults: a scoping review / Relação entre saúde autorreferida e neuroticismo em idosos: uma revisão de escopo

This scoping review aims to identify and map the existing literature regarding the relationship between neuroticism and self-reported health in community-dwelling older adults. We adopted the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis recommendations and followed the PRISMA-SCr when reporting it. The search was performed on ten different databases, including: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, United States National Library of Medicine, Scopus, Web of Science, Ageline and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde/Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde databases until February 2021. Data screening and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. We included primary studies with older adults (≥60 years) [participants] that adopted validated instruments to assess neuroticism and self-reported health [concept] in the community [context], published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. We identified 3453 articles and included 15 studies in this review. We extracted the main categories of included studies, characteristics of the participants, methodological issues, and biopsychosocial factors. Outcomes were reported in three sections: Focus of studies; Definitions and measures of neuroticism and self-reported health; Associations with biopsychosocial factors. We found an association between high neuroticism and poor self-reported health. Some biopsychosocial factors may influence this relationship, such as chronic diseases, depression, social support, and a sense of control, which must be considered in future studies to shed light on this topic

Esta revisão de escopo tem como objetivo identificar e mapear a literatura existente sobre a relação entre neuroticismo e saúde autorreferida em idosos vivendo na comunidade. Adotamos as recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis e seguimos o PRISMA-SCr ao reportá-lo. A busca foi realizada em dez bases de dados diferentes, incluindo: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, United States National Library of Medicine, Scopus, Web of Science, Ageline e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde/Centro Latino -Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde até fevereiro de 2021. A triagem e extração dos dados foram realizadas por dois revisores independentes. Incluímos estudos primários com idosos (≥60 anos) [participantes] que adotaram instrumentos validados para avaliar neuroticismo e saúde autorreferida [conceito] na comunidade [contexto], publicados em português, inglês ou espanhol. Identificamos 3.453 artigos e incluímos 15 estudos nesta revisão. Extraímos as principais categorias dos estudos incluídos, características dos participantes, questões metodológicas e fatores biopsicossociais. Os resultados foram relatados em três seções: Foco dos estudos; Definições e medidas de neuroticismo e autoavaliação de saúde; Associações com fatores biopsicossociais. Encontramos uma associação entre alto neuroticismo e má saúde autorrelatada. Alguns fatores biopsicossociais podem influenciar nessa relação, como doenças crônicas, depressão, suporte social e senso de controle, que devem ser considerados em estudos futuros para elucidar esse tema

Inter-University Network for Healthy Aging, Latin America and the Caribbean (RIES-LAC): a university contribution to the Decade of Healthy Aging / Rede interuniversitária para o envelhecimento saudável, América Latina e Caribe (RIES-ALC): uma contribuição universitária para a década do envelhecimento saudável / Red interuniversitaria de envejecimiento saludable, Latinoamérica y Caribe (RIES-LAC): un aporte universitario a la década del envejecimiento saludable

A população mundial está envelhecendo e a América Latina e o Caribe (ALC) não são exceção. Atualmente, 8% da população da ALC tem mais de 65 anos e prevê-se que esse número aumente para 30% até 2050. Sabe-se que o processo de envelhecimento envolve alterações moleculares, fisiológicas, funcionais, psicoafetivas e sociais. Todos envelhecemos, a questão é envelhecer com saúde. Como nem sempre é esse o caso, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) declarou esse período (2021-2030) como a Década do Envelhecimento Saudável. A Década é uma iniciativa global de colaboração de diferentes setores e partes interessadas (governos, sociedade civil, organizações internacionais, profissionais, instituições universitárias, meios de comunicação social e setor privado) para melhorar a vida de pessoas idosas, suas famílias e comunidades. A colaboração centra-se em quatro pilares de ação estreitamente interligados: mudar a forma como pensamos, sentimos e agimos em relação à idade e ao envelhecimento; garantir que as comunidades promovam as capacidades dos idosos; fornecer cuidados integrados e centrados nas pessoas e serviços de saúde primários que respondam às necessidades dos idosos; e fornecer acesso a cuidados de longo prazo para idosos que deles necessitem.

The world's population is aging, and the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region is no exception. Currently, 8% of the LAC population is over 65 years old, and this number is estimated to increase to 30% by 2050. The aging process is known to involve molecular, physiological, functional, psychosocial, and social changes. We all age; the point is to age healthily. As this is not always the case, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the period from 2021 to 2030 as the Decade of Healthy Aging. The Decade is a global collaboration involving diverse sectors and stakeholders (governments, civil society, international organizations, professionals, academic institutions, the media, and the private sector) to improve the lives of older people, their families, and communities. The collaboration is centered on four closely interconnected pillars of action: changing how we think, feel, and act towards age and aging; ensuring that communities foster the abilities of older people; providing person-centered integrated care and primary health services responsive to older people; and providing access to long-term care for older people who need it. In light of this situation, what can academics from universities in LAC do? If we organize ourselves and unite efforts, we can contribute to the Decade of Healthy Aging and, consequently, influence the quality of life of older people.

La población mundial está envejeciendo y Latinoamérica y Caribe (LAC) no son una excepción. Actualmente, el 8% de la población en LAC tiene sobre 65 años, y se proyecta un aumento al 30% para 2050. Es conocido que el proceso de envejecimiento implica cambios moleculares, fisiológicos, funcionales, psicoafectivos y sociales. Todos envejecemos, el punto es envejecer saludablemente. Como no siempre ocurre así, la Organización Mundial de la Salud(OMS) ha declarado a este período (2021­2030) como la Década del Envejecimiento Saludable. La Década es una iniciativa de colaboración mundial de distintos sectores y partes interesadas (gobiernos, sociedad civil, organizaciones internacionales, profesionales, instituciones universitarias, medios de comunicación y el sector privado) para mejorar la vida de las personas mayores, sus familias y comunidades. La colaboración se centra en cuatro pilares de actuación estrechamente interconectados: cambiar nuestra forma de pensar, sentir y actuar con respecto a la edad y el envejecimiento; asegurar que las comunidades fomenten las capacidades de las personas mayores; ofrecer una atención integrada y centrada en las personas, y servicios de salud primarios que respondan a las necesidades de las personas mayores; y proporcionar acceso a la atención a largo plazo para las personas mayores que lo necesiten.

Impact of drug therapy on brachioradial pruritus.

Few studies have described therapeutic options in brachioradial pruritus. We describe a cross-sectional study of brachioradial pruritus patients treated in an outpatient unit. We reviewed medical records and interviewed brachioradial pruritus patients without indication for decompressive surgery, in order to access the perceptions of intensity of pruritus prior to treatment and response to therapy. We found that antidepressants and anticonvulsants were the most frequently prescribed drugs. Best reductions in pruritus were associated with its highest intensities prior to treatment, and with longer periods of therapy.

Profile of leprosy in children under 15 years of age monitored in a Brazilian referral center (2004-2012).

Leprosy in children under 15 years of age is a serious public health problem. In this retrospective case series conducted in a Brazilian reference center (2004-2012), we found 18 cases with a mean age of 10.0±3.6 years of age and 16.6% between 0-5 years of age. Almost 56% of the cases were female, with a median time between the first symptoms and diagnosis of 11 months (4-24); 77.8% reported household contact with leprosy patients. Upon hospital admission, 66.7% presented mostly skin symptoms, while 27.8% presented a degree 2 disability. Most were classified as multibacillary (66.7%). Half of the sample developed a reaction (predominantly type 1) during the follow-up period, while 22.2% developed a late disability.

Impacto do tamanho das instituições de longa permanência na adesão às orientações de prevenção de infecções por COVID-19 / Impact of long-term care facilities' size on adherence to COVID-19' infection prevention guidance / Impacto del tamaño de las instituciones de larga estancia en la adhesión a las orientaciones de prevención de infecciones por COVID-19

Resumo Objetivo: avaliar a adesão das instituições de longa permanência brasileiras às orientações de Prevenção e Controle de Infecções da Organização Mundial da Saúde, observando a associação entre seu porte e a adesão a essas recomendações. Método: estudo transversal realizado com gestores de estabelecimentos. Os autores desenvolveram um questionário de 20 itens, com base nessas orientações, e um escore global de adesão, com base na adesão a essas recomendações. A adesão foi classificada como (1) excelente para aquelas que atenderam ≥14 de 20 recomendações, (2) bom para 10 a 13 itens e (3) baixo para aquelas com menos de dez itens. O tamanho das instalações foi classificado como pequeno, médio e grande, de acordo com uma análise de cluster em duas etapas. Estatística descritiva e teste de qui-quadrado foram utilizados com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: das 362 instituições incluídas, 308 (85,1%) aderiram a 14 ou mais recomendações. Em relação ao seu tamanho, a adesão à triagem de sintomas de COVID-19 dos visitantes (p=0,037) e ao isolamento de pacientes até que tenham dois exames laboratoriais negativos (p=0,032) foi menor em estabelecimentos maiores, em comparação com estabelecimentos de médio e pequeno porte. Conclusão: a adesão às medidas de mitigação da COVID-19 nas unidades brasileiras foi considerada excelente para a maioria das recomendações, independentemente do porte das unidades.

Abstract Objective: to evaluate the adherence of Brazilian long-term care facilities to the World Health Organization Infection Prevention and Control guidance, and assess the association of their size with the adherence to these recommendations. Method: cross-sectional study conducted with facilities' managers. Authors developed a 20-item questionnaire based on this guidance, and a global score of adherence, based on the adoption of these recommendations. Adherence was classified as (1) excellent for those who attended ≥14 out of 20 recommendations; (2) good for 10 to 13 items; and (3) low for those with less than ten items. Facilities' sizes were established as small, intermediate, and large according to a two-step cluster analysis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used at a 5% significance level. Results: among 362 included facilities, 308 (85.1%) adhered to 14 or more recommendations. Regarding its size, adherence to screening COVID-19 symptoms of visitors (p=0.037) and isolating patients until they have had two negative laboratory tests (p=0.032) were lower on larger ones compared to medium and small facilities. Conclusion: adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures in Brazilian facilities was considered excellent for most of the recommendations, regardless of the size of the units.

Resumen Objetivo: evaluar la adhesión de instituciones brasileñas de larga estancia a las orientaciones de Prevención y Control de Infecciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud y evaluar la asociación entre su tamaño y la adhesión a esas recomendaciones. Método: estudio transversal realizado con gerentes de establecimientos. Los autores desarrollaron un cuestionario de 20 ítems basado en estas directrices y un puntaje general de cumplimiento acorde a la observancia de estas recomendaciones. La adhesión se calificó (1) excelente para aquellas que cumplieron con ≥14 de 20 recomendaciones; (2) buena para 10 a 13 artículos; y (3) baja para aquellas con menos de diez elementos. El tamaño de las instalaciones se clasificó como pequeños, medianos y grandes de acuerdo con un análisis de clúster de dos pasos. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva y la prueba de chi-cuadrado con un nivel de significancia del 5%. Resultados: de las 362 instituciones incluidas, 308 (85,1%) se adhirieron a 14 o más recomendaciones. En cuanto a su tamaño, la adhesión al cribado de síntomas de COVID-19 de los visitantes (p=0,037) y al aislamiento de los pacientes hasta que tengan dos pruebas de laboratorio negativas (p=0,032) fue menor en los establecimientos más grandes en comparación con los establecimientos medianos y pequeños. Conclusión: la adhesión a las medidas de mitigación de la COVID-19 en las unidades brasileñas fue considerada excelente para la mayoría de las recomendaciones, independientemente del tamaño de las unidades.

Risk of ageism in the use of cost-effectiveness thresholds in the recommendations of the national commission for incorporation of technologies in the Brazilian Unified Health System / Risco de idadismo no uso de limiares de custo-efetividade nas recomendações da comissão nacional de incorporações de tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde no Brasil

Government agencies perform health technology assessment when evaluating requests to incorporate technologies in public health systems. To promote participation in this decisionmaking process, the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the Unified Health System (CONITEC) makes its recommendations available for public consultation for 20 days, which may occasionally be reduced or extended. Recently, CONITEC published its recommendations about the use of cost-effectiveness thresholds in health care decisionmaking. When reviewing the criteria for alternative cost-effectiveness thresholds, given that they promote innovation and equity in the Brazilian Unified Health System, we realized that the criterion "diseases affecting individuals at the end of life" was excluded from the list. This viewpoint article is a request for CONITEC to reconsider this position. The report disregards technical aspects related to the use of quality-adjusted life years as a metric in patients with low life expectancy, indicating the potential to discriminate against older adults and ignore the practical considerations of international organizations on this topic.

A avaliação de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) subsidia as agências governamentais voltadas à avaliação dos pedidos de incorporação de tecnologias junto aos seus respectivos sistemas públicos de saúde. Para promover a participação da sociedade no processo de tomada de decisão para a incorporação de novas tecnologias, a Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC) disponibiliza suas recomendações em consulta pública por um prazo de 20 dias, que pode ser excepcionalmente reduzido ou estendido. Recentemente, a CONITEC disponibilizou para consulta pública suas recomendações sobre o uso de Limiar de Cursto-Efetividade (LCE) nas decisões em saúde. Ao revisar os critérios previamente considerados no início das discussões sobre contextos passíveis de LCE alternativos, por promoverem a inovação e equidade em saúde para o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), percebemos que o critério "doenças acometendo indivíduos no final da expectativa de vida" foi excluído da lista de critérios de flexibilização. Este artigo de ponto de vista discute o pedido de reconsideração enviado à CONITEC para que a posição seja revista. O entendimento expresso no relatório desconsidera aspectos técnicos relacionados ao uso do QALY como métrica em pacientes com baixa expectativa de vida, além disso, tem potencial discriminatório em relação à população geriátrica e ignora considerações práticas de órgãos internacionais em relação ao tema.

Recommendations for the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines / Recomendações para o desenvolvimento de Diretrizes de Prática Clínica

Clinical practice guidelines are statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care, are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options, and ensure that the best available clinical knowledge is used to provide effective and quality care. They can reduce inappropriate care and variability in clinical practice and can support the translation of new research knowledge into clinical practice. Recommendations from clinical practice guidelines can support health professionals by facilitating the decision-making process, empowering them to make more informed health care choices, clarifying which interventions should be priorities based on a favorable tradeoff, and discouraging the use of those that have proven ineffective, dangerous, or wasteful. This review aims to summarize the key components of high-quality and trustworthy guidelines. Articles were retrieved from various libraries, databases, and search engines using free-text term searches adapted for different databases, and selected according to author discretion. Clinical practice guidelines in geriatrics can have a major impact on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, health care, and the management of diseases and conditions, but they should only be implemented when they have high-quality, rigorous, and unbiased methodologies that consider older adult priorities and provide valid recommendations.

As diretrizes de prática clínica são declarações que incluem recomendações destinadas a otimizar o atendimento ao paciente, informadas por uma revisão sistemática de evidências e uma avaliação dos benefícios e malefícios de opções alternativas de atendimento, garantindo que o melhor conhecimento clínico disponível seja usado para fornecer atendimento eficaz e de qualidade. Elas contribuem reduzindo os cuidados inadequados e a variabilidade na prática clínica e podem apoiar a tradução de novos conhecimentos de pesquisa. As recomendações dessas diretrizes podem apoiar os profissionais de saúde, facilitando o processo de tomada de decisão, capacitando-os a fazer escolhas de cuidados de saúde mais informadas, esclarecendo quais intervenções devem ser prioritárias com base em um trade-off favorável e desencorajando o uso daquelas comprovadamente ineficazes, perigosas ou que consistam em desperdício. Esta revisão visa resumir os principais componentes de diretrizes confiáveis e de alta qualidade. Os artigos foram recuperados de várias bibliotecas, bancos de dados e mecanismos de busca por meio de buscas de termos de texto livre adaptados para diferentes bancos de dados e selecionados de acordo com o critério do autor. As diretrizes de prática clínica em geriatria podem ter grande impacto na prevenção, diagnóstico, tratamento, reabilitação, assistência à saúde e manejo de doenças e condições, mas só devem ser implementadas quando tiverem metodologias de alta qualidade, rigorosas e imparciais, que considerem as prioridades da pessoa idosa e forneçam recomendações válidas.