Intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder associated with severe food selectivity: An electronic health record review.

OBJECTIVE: Expert consensus increasingly recognizes intensive multidisciplinary intervention (IMI) as the standard of care to address chronic and severe feeding problems in pediatric populations. In this study, we examined the clinical presentation, intervention characteristics, and treatment outcomes for young children receiving IMI for avoidant restrictive rood intake disorder (ARFID) involving nutritional insufficiencies associated with severe food selectivity. METHOD: We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement to conduct this retrospective chart review. The review focused on consecutive patients (birth to age 21 years) admitted to the IMI program over a 5-year period (June 2014 to June 2019). Inclusion criteria required micronutrient insufficiencies (vitamins A, B12, C, D, E; folic acid; calcium; iron; and zinc) and chronic mealtime refusal behavior (e.g., turning head away from food/spoon, pushing or throwing spoon, crying, screaming, and leaving the table) associated with severe food selectivity. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period, 63 of the patients met study entry requirements. Of these, 60 patients (50 boys and 10 girls; mean age = 72 ± 39 months; range = 23-181) completed intervention (95% treatment completion rate). At discharge, dietary diversity improved by 16 new therapeutic foods (range: 8-22), rapid acceptance and swallowing of new foods exceeded clinical benchmarks (80% or > bites), and risk for nutritional inadequacies declined for this patient cohort. DISCUSSION: Results of the current study support the benefits of IMI to increase dietary variety, improve mealtime behaviors, and enhance nutritional intake for children with ARFID presenting with severe food selectivity.

Examination of pediatric tube feeding schedules and oral intake: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A common treatment goal for children dependent on enteral feeding is to advance oral nutrition intake and decrease enteral feeding dependence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between tube feeding schedule and oral intake in feeding tube-dependent children diagnosed with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed including 76 tube-dependent children with ARFID between the ages of 1 and 14 years who were evaluated by a registered dietitian, in conjunction with a multidisciplinary feeding team, during January 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019. Eligible participants were diagnosed with ARFID and receiving enteral nutrition via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube during the time of evaluation. The participants were categorized into groups according to tube feeding schedule type (bolus vs. overnight continuous) and further stratified by severity of oral motor deficit, as documented by the speech language pathologist or occupational therapist: none/mild and moderate/severe. The exclusion criteria included children aged <1 year, appetite stimulant listed as an active medication, overnight enteral feeding infusion of >12 h, or calculated percentage of calories from oral intake not specified. The primary study outcome was dichotomized percentage of oral intake, >0% vs 0%. RESULTS: Following adjustment for confounders, this retrospective chart review showed statistically higher odds of percentage of oral intake >0% in ARFID patients receiving overnight continuous enteral feeding schedules (odds ratio = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.83, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: A bolus feeding schedule may not promote oral intake in feeding tube-dependent children diagnosed with ARFID.