Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 129(3): 517-21, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23528928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A change has recently been made to the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer to account for size within stage IIA cancers. This study was designed to investigate the impact of size within stage I-IIIB cervical carcinoma, and to validate these changes. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database was used to extract data on patients from 1988 to 2008. Patients were included who had information recorded regarding stage, size, and type of treatment received. They were then stratified by stage and size, and analyzed for cause-specific survival (CSS) using Kaplan Meier estimates, as well as hazard ratios using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 18,649 cases were evaluated. All stages evaluated demonstrated improved CSS on Kaplan Meier estimates for smaller tumor sizes (largest p=0.0003). Hazard ratios were significantly worse for larger tumor sizes on both univariate and multivariate modeling. Specifically, stage IIA cancers demonstrated a hazard ratio of 2.0 on univariate, and 1.69 on multivariate analysis (C.I. 1.46-2.75, p<0.0001 and C.I. 1.20-2.38, p=0.0025, respectively). Further size subdivisions of 2 and 4cm for stage I, 4cm for stage IIB, and 4 and 6cm for stage IIIB also maintained prognostic significance. On multivariate analysis within each stage, size was the only variable to maintain independent significance in all stages evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Size is independently prognostic within each stage in cervical cancer, validating the recent changes to the FIGO staging system.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Case Rep Med ; 2020: 3938270, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32318112

RESUMEN

We present a unique case of a patient simultaneously diagnosed with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) and unrelated adenocarcinoma of the lung, both proven with separate pathology. It was subsequently found that the SFT had metastasized to the brain by additional pathology, and not the predicted adenocarcinoma. SFTs are a rare mesenchymal neoplasm that accounts for less than 2% of all reported soft tissue tumors. SFTs most commonly arise in the thoracic cavity, but are frequently found in various locations throughout the body, and rarely metastasize to the brain. This case highlights that rare neoplasms, such as SFT, should not be ruled out as a potential cause of metastasis. Due to the rarity of this clinical situation, we also provide a review and discussion of previously reported SFT cases and the use of postoperative radiation therapy. The optimal treatment for individual patients remains unclear in this unique situation. Surgical resection followed by adjuvant Gamma Knife radiation therapy to the surgical bed appears to be a safe option for local treatment of SFT in select patients. Further studies are needed of this rare clinical situation in order to better understand and optimize future treatments for patients with SFT and metastasis to the brain.

3.
World J Clin Oncol ; 11(12): 1029-1044, 2020 Dec 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33437665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare malignancy of the head and neck; however, it accounts for a majority of the tumors of the salivary glands. This study used a national population-based registry to describe the pre-treatment and treatment-related prognostic factors that influence survival in patients with MEC of the major salivary glands. To our knowledge, this is the largest population-based study examining predictors of both overall and cause-specific survival of MEC of the major salivary glands. AIM: To identify prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients with MEC of the major salivary glands. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Database of the National Cancer Institute to investigate a variety of factors that could influence survival of patients diagnosed with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands. A total of 2210 patients diagnosed with MEC of the major salivary glands during the years of 1975-2016 were studied. The primary endpoints were OS and CSS. Cox regression analysis was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical variables such as age at diagnosis, diagnosis year, sex, race, tumor size, stage, grade, treatment with or without surgical excision, and adjuvant radiotherapy treatment. RESULTS: A total of 2210 patients diagnosed with MEC of the major salivary glands met inclusion criteria. In this study, 95% of patients underwent surgical excision and 41% received adjuvant radiation therapy. Median OS time for Grade I, II, and III/IV was 401 mo (± 48.25, 95%CI), 340 mo (± 33.68, 95%CI) and 55 mo (± 11.05, 95%CI), respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lack of surgical excision was associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) 4.26, P < 0.0001] and that patients with localized disease had improved OS compared to both regional and distant disease (HR 3.07 and 6.96, respectively, P < 0.0001). Additionally, univariate analysis demonstrated that male sex, age over 50 at diagnosis, Grade III tumors, and increasing tumor size were associated with worsened OS (P < 0.0006). Univariate analysis of CSS similarly revealed that lack of surgical excision and Grade III carcinoma conferred decreased CSS (HR 4.37 and 5.44, respectively, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that increasing age, in 10-year age bands, advanced tumor stage, increasing tumor size, Grade III carcinoma, male sex, and lack of surgical excision were associated with a statistically significant decrease in OS and CSS (P < 0.04). Of note, multivariate analysis revealed that the use of adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with improved OS or CSS. CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis demonstrated increasing age, advanced tumor stage, increasing tumor size, Grade III carcinoma, male sex, and lack of surgical excision were associated with decreased OS and CSS (P < 0.04).

4.
World J Oncol ; 11(5): 188-196, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33117462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We analyzed a population-based national registry to identify the most influential patient pretreatment and treatment factors affecting overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in patients diagnosed with acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) of the major salivary glands. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) related to survival, a total of 1,254 patients with diagnosed ACC of the major salivary glands from 1975 to 2016 met inclusion criteria. Factors significant for OS and CSS were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Univariate OS analysis demonstrated that surgery favorably influenced longer survival compared to no surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, P < 0.05). Patient age was found to be highly predictive of superior OS (divided into 10-year age bands, P < 0.0001, younger age better). In multivariate OS analysis, there were statistically significant worse outcomes for men (HR 1.54, P < 0.05), grades III/IV (HR 2.5, P < 0.05), and distant disease (HR 3.55, P < 0.05) or regional disease (HR 1.22, P < 0.05). Patients diagnosed during years 1996 - 2016 had better OS when compared to earlier decades 1975 - 1995 (HR 1.38, P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, the mean CSS for grades I, II, and III/IV were 429 months (95% confidence interval (CI), ± 38.39), 426 months (95% CI, ± 25.73) and 198 months (95% CI, ± 66.38). Multivariate analysis of CSS further demonstrated that there were statistically significant worse outcomes for men (HR 1.68, P < 0.05), grade III/IV (HR 3.2, P < 0.05), tumor size greater than 40 mm (P < 0.001), and distant disease (HR 4.48, P < 0.05) or regional disease (HR 1.84, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest population-based study of OS and CSS of major salivary gland ACC. We found that the patient pretreatment and treatment factors including younger age at diagnosis, female sex, early stage, lower grade, surgical excision, and recent year of diagnosis are associated with improved survival in patients diagnosed with ACC of the major salivary glands. We hope that this information will aid in construction of further research projects that better refine optimal treatment protocol of individualized patient care.

5.
Case Rep Oncol Med ; 2018: 3989716, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30652038

RESUMEN

Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare high-grade malignancy identified by Enzinger in 1970. It accounts for 1% of all reported soft tissue sarcomas and presents most commonly in distal upper extremities in young adults with a male predominance. At this time, there are only 5 previously reported cases of primary epithelioid sarcoma of the orbit. We present a primary orbital epithelioid sarcoma case of a patient who underwent orbital exenteration followed by external beam radiation treatment. Because the literature is limited, this is to our knowledge the largest descriptive analysis of cases of orbital epithelioid sarcoma. We also provide a detailed review of all the previously reported primary orbital epithelioid sarcoma cases, as well as a discussion on the use of postoperative radiation therapy for patients with epithelioid sarcoma. Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy appears to be a safe option for local treatment of this rare malignancy, but further future studies are needed of this rare clinical situation in order to better understand and optimize treatment for patients with orbital epithelioid sarcoma.

6.
J Radiosurg SBRT ; 3(2): 111-121, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29296392

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is well established in the treatment of brain metastases, however it's exact role remains unclear. A single metastasis at presentation raises additional challenges, however there is minimal outcome data within this subgroup. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of treatment in patients with a single brain metastasis, as well as factors impacting local control. METHODS: All patients treated with SRS for a single brain metastasis were evaluated. Data was collected regarding patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and treatment outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of treatment and patient variables on these outcomes. Emphasis was placed on analyses of factors impacting LC. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2011, a total of 141 patients underwent SRS for a single brain metastasis; in addition 31 had surgical resection, 15 received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 2 underwent both. There was no statistical impact on local control (LC) or distant intracranial control (DIC) with the addition of WBRT or surgery (LC 74%, 100%, and 58%, and DIC 37%, 67%, and 49% for SRS alone, SRS + WBRT, and SRS + surgery, respectively, smallest p = 0.17). Local control was decreased with larger tumors, doses <20Gy, and tight overtreatment ratios (i.e. conformity) (largest p = 0.02), although the independence of these factors could not be established. Long term freedom from requiring future whole brain radiotherapy was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: SRS alone for patients with single brain metastases demonstrates acceptable intracranial outcomes. Further evaluation into factors impacting LC are warranted.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA