Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artif Organs ; 42(4): 444-451, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29105103

RESUMEN

The development of a pediatric cardiac support program is a complex, multidisciplinary project. This study describes the University of Iowa Congenital Heart Program's experience from its inception to the present. In, we examine those specific factors that have led to substantial improvements in the program, additionally identifying where further gains can be made. We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who received mechanical cardiac support at the University of Iowa from the inception of the program in 1991. In total, 29 patients received mechanical support between December 1991 and December 2015 and are included in the study. Twelve patients received continuous flow devices and 17 patients received pulsatile flow devices. Median age at implant was 12.8 years (range 0.1-18.2 years). Median weight at implant was 40.5 kg (3.2-123.4 kg). Factors examined included: operating room (OR) time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, intubation days, blood product usage, pre- and post-operative bilirubin, creatinine, natriuretic peptide B (NPPB), and device implanted. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, respectively. Of the 29 patients who received mechanical support, 17 (58.6%) were discharged home, 11 (37.9%) died during their hospitalization, and 1 (3.5%) remains hospitalized. Median length of ventricular assist device support was 59.5 days (range 1-653 days). Between December 1991 and December 2011, in-hospital mortality was 64.3%. Following this period, significant changes were made to patient management with in-hospital mortality decreasing to 13.3% between February 2013 and December 2015. Comparison between deceased and living patients revealed several significant factors including: median number of packed red blood cells transfused, 8 versus 4 units (P = 0.048), median OR time, 396 versus 299 min (P = 0.003), and device implanted. During the early stages of the mechanical support program, higher than expected mortality rates prompted changes in the management of pediatric cardiac patients, specifically, the development of a dedicated management team. These changes significantly improved outcomes and we suggest can be used as a model for similar cardiac support programs, especially in smaller volume programs.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Corazón/fisiopatología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/mortalidad , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Iowa/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Flujo Pulsátil , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 107(1): 165-171, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Historically, steroids and endomyocardial biopsies have, respectively, been part of standard immunosuppression for preventing cardiac transplant rejection and monitoring for rejection. However, these treatments come with numerous adverse effects. Some transplant programs have questioned whether the risks and costs outweigh the benefits or whether they may interfere with patient outcomes. METHODS: Pediatric cardiac transplantations over 15 years (n = 49) were examined in a single-center retrospective study. Two groups of patients were formed: group 1 received induction steroids and underwent routine protocol biopsy (n = 18), and group 2 neither received steroids nor underwent routine biopsy (n = 13). RESULTS: The 1-year survival rate was similar between the two approaches: group 1 survival was 94% and group 2 survival was 92%. However, differences between the two groups were observed for comorbidities. Group 1 had 11 patients that exhibited rejection, and group 2 had only 1 patient (p = 0.003). Group 2 had fewer cases of posttransplant hypertension (p = 0.001) and insulin dependence (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a less-invasive posttransplant approach that avoids biopsies and steroids was safely implemented in this single center. Both groups had similar survival. However, group 2 had statistically significant less posttransplant rejection, hypertension, and diabetes. Overall, this study shows no increased risk associated with steroid and biopsy avoidance in posttransplant patients, but with some clear benefits.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Biopsia , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Miocardio/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA