RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is well established in adults but has been underinvestigated in children. As day-case procedures are increasingly common, it is important to establish whether children suffer significant POCD. Pediatric POCD has been associated with several intravenous and inhalation anesthetics, but isoflurane has not been studied. As evidence indicates superior recovery after propofol, the study compared POCD after propofol or isoflurane anesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of propofol versus isoflurane upon children's POCD. METHODS: Fifty-eight children aged 5-14 years were randomized to propofol (total intravenous anesthesia) or isoflurane for day-case dental procedures. Reaction time (RT), verbal and visual memory, psychomotor coordination, and attention were assessed preoperatively, prior to discharge and at 24 h. RESULTS: Reaction time and psychomotor control were impaired postoperatively in both groups but recovered at 24 h. Delayed verbal recall was significantly impaired only after propofol. Both groups had significant impairment of visual memory postoperatively and at 24 h, and of recognition memory postoperatively only. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol and isoflurane exert similar adverse effects on RT, psychomotor coordination, and visual memory. Selective impairment of verbal recall by propofol is consistent with adult evidence of the drug's effect on retrieval. The enduring postoperative impairment of memory has implications for instructions to parents and caregivers for the safety and well-being of children in the 24 h after day-case anesthesia with propofol and isoflurane.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia Dental , Anestesia General , Anestésicos por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Cognición/fisiología , Isoflurano/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Propofol/efectos adversos , Anestesia por Inhalación , Anestesia Intravenosa , Atención/fisiología , Niño , Restauración Dental Permanente/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria/fisiología , Recuerdo Mental/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Recuperación de la Función , Extracción Dental/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In line with research highlighting the role of observer appraisals in understanding individuals' pain experience, recent work has demonstrated the effects of parental child- and self-oriented injustice appraisals on child pain-related outcomes. However, research on parental injustice appraisals is in its infancy and lacks a valid and context-specific operationalization of what parental injustice appraisals of child pain precisely entail. The current study presents an in-depth qualitative analysis of parental child- and self-oriented appraisals of injustice in the context of their child's chronic pain. METHODS: Twenty-one mothers of children living with chronic pain participated in one of five focus group interviews conducted in Ghent (Belgium), Glasgow (Scotland) and Indianapolis (USA). RESULTS: The interviews were subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis, which revealed three key justice-related themes, labelled 'You shouldn't be in this much pain', 'The problem's probably with the mother' and 'At least it's not cancer'. Maternal injustice appraisals focused mainly on the child rather than the self and reflected various perceived barriers to their efforts to provide quality of life for their child. A fourth theme labelled 'Not everybody gets a healthy child' reflected maternal strategies to effectively cope with the child's condition and the associated appraisals of injustice. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings attest to the relevance of (child- and self-oriented) injustice in the parental experience of caring for a child with chronic pain and provides insight into the specific content and scope of these appraisals. As such, this study provides valuable insights to further research in this area. SIGNIFICANCE: The current study presents an in-depth qualitative analysis of parental appraisals of injustice in the context of their child's chronic pain condition. The findings provide valuable insights into the phenomenology of this construct and may inform future research and assessment methods. Furthermore, the themes reported in this study may contribute to clinical practice, as they may raise awareness of parental concerns regarding their child's pain management.