Transplantation Within 6 Months of Registration does not Enhance Survival for Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Determine if timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation has emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. METHODS: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 - 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or drop out was 5.74 (3.25-7.06) months. Compared to a short wait time (0-3 months), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3-6 months) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.84; (6-9 months) HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39-1.65; (9-12 months) HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.26-1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.67-1.42; AB or B blood group HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.62-1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97). This benefit began after a 6 month waiting time minimum (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.26-1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR; 0.43 95% CI 0.20-0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

Hepatic Sinusoidal Disorders.

Hepatic sinusoids are highly specialized microcirculatory conduits within the hepatic lobules that facilitate liver functions. The sinusoids can be affected by various disorders, including sinusoidal dilatation, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), sinusoidal cellular infiltration, perisinusoidal infiltration, and endothelial neoplasms, such as hemangioendothelioma and angiosarcoma. While these disorders, particularly SOS and neoplasms, can be life threatening, their clinical manifestation is often nonspecific. Patients may present with right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites, splenomegaly, and unexplained weight gain, although the exact manifestation depends on the cause, severity, and duration of the disease. Ultimately, invasive tests may be necessary to establish the diagnosis. A comprehensive understanding of imaging manifestations of various sinusoidal disorders contributes to early diagnosis and can help radiologists detect subclinical disease. Additionally, specific imaging features may assist in identifying the cause of the disorder, leading to a more focused and quicker workup. For example, a mosaic pattern of enhancement of the liver parenchyma is suggestive of sinusoidal dilatation; peripheral and patchy reticular hypointensity of the liver parenchyma on hepatobiliary MR images is characteristic of SOS; and associated diffuse multiple hyperintensities on diffusion-weighted images may be specific for malignant sinusoidal cellular infiltration. The authors provide an overview of the pathogenesis, clinical features, and imaging appearances of various hepatic sinusoidal disorders, with a special emphasis on SOS. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Imaging of Bowel Ischemia: An Update, From the AJR Special Series on Emergency Radiology.

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a life-threatening condition that results from abrupt reduction in or cessation of blood flow to the bowel. Characterized by nonspecific abdominal symptoms, mesenteric ischemia is infrequently encountered and commonly misdiagnosed, with potentially catastrophic consequences. Prompt clinical diagnosis and early implementation of therapeutic interventions are critical to improving patient outcomes. Because cross-sectional imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia, radiologists must be familiar with the varied imaging manifestations of intestinal ischemia. Thus, the objectives of this article are to review the various types and common causes of mesenteric ischemia and to describe its spectrum of multimodality imaging findings, with special attention to novel imaging techniques and emerging diagnoses.

Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron Evaluation with MRI and Fibrosis and Fat Evaluation with US: A Practical Guide for Radiologists.

Quantitative imaging biomarkers of liver disease measured by using MRI and US are emerging as important clinical tools in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Because of their high accuracy and noninvasive nature, in many cases, these techniques have replaced liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. The most commonly evaluated imaging biomarkers are surrogates for liver fibrosis, fat, and iron. MR elastography is now routinely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and typically combined with MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification to exclude or grade hepatic steatosis and iron overload, respectively. US elastography is also widely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and has the advantage of lower equipment cost and greater availability compared with those of MRI. Emerging US fat quantification methods can be performed along with US elastography. The author group, consisting of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Liver Fibrosis Disease-Focused Panel (DFP), the SAR Hepatic Iron Overload DFP, and the European Society of Radiology, review the basics of liver fibrosis, fat, and iron quantification with MRI and liver fibrosis and fat quantification with US. The authors cover technical requirements, typical case display, quality control and proper measurement technique and case interpretation guidelines, pitfalls, and confounding factors. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for radiologists interpreting these examinations. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Early Cholangiocarcinoma Detection With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Ultrasound in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early detection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is important to identify more people eligible for curative therapy. While many recommend CCA screening, there are divergent opinions and limited data regarding the use of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early CCA detection, and it is unknown whether there is benefit in testing asymptomatic individuals. Our aims were to assess the diagnostic performances and prognostic implications of ultrasound and MRI-based CCA detection. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This is a multicenter review of 266 adults with PSC (CCA, n = 120) who underwent both an ultrasound and MRI within 3 months. Images were re-examined by radiologists who were blinded to the clinical information. Respectively, MRI had a higher area under the curve compared with ultrasound for CCA detection: 0.87 versus 0.70 for the entire cohort; 0.81 versus 0.59 for asymptomatic individuals; and 0.88 versus 0.71 for those listed for CCA transplant protocol. The absence of symptoms at CCA diagnosis was associated with improved 5-year outcomes including overall survival (82% vs. 46%, log-rank P < 0.01) and recurrence-free survival following liver transplant (89% vs. 65%, log-rank P = 0.04). Among those with asymptomatic CCA, MRI detection (compared with ultrasound) was associated with reduction in both mortality (hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.96) and CCA progression after transplant listing (hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.90). These benefits continued among patients who had annual monitoring and PSC for more than 1 year before CCA was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is superior to ultrasound for the detection of early-stage CCA in patients with PSC. Identification of CCA before the onset of symptoms with MRI is associated with improved outcomes.

Reporting standards for primary sclerosing cholangitis using MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography: guidelines from MR Working Group of the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the bile ducts and is characterized by biliary strictures, progressive liver parenchymal fibrosis, and an increased risk of hepatobiliary malignancies primarily cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). PSC may lead to portal hypertension, liver decompensation, and liver failure with the need for liver transplantation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are considered the imaging standard for diagnosis and follow-up in patients with PSC. Currently, there are no universally accepted reporting standards and definitions for MRI/MRCP features. Controversies exist about the definition of a high-grade stricture and there is no widely agreed approach to their management. The members of the MRI working group of the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group (IPSCSG) sought to define terminologies and reporting standards for describing MRI/MRCP features that would be applied to diagnosis and surveillance of disease progression, and potentially for evaluating treatment response in clinical trials. In this extensive review, the technique of MRI/MRCP and assessment of image quality for the evaluation of PSC is briefly described. The definitions and terminologies for severity and length of strictures, duct wall thickening and hyperenhancement, and liver parenchyma signal intensity changes are outlined. As CCA is an important complication of PSC, standardized reporting criteria for CCA developing in PSC are summarized. Finally, the guidelines for reporting important changes in follow-up MRI/MRCP studies are provided. KEY POINTS: • Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the bile ducts, causing biliary strictures and liver fibrosis and an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma. • This consensus document provides definitions and suggested reporting standards for MRI and MRCP features of primary sclerosing cholangitis, which will allow for a standardized approach to diagnosis, assessment of disease severity, follow-up, and detection of complications. • Standardized definitions and reporting of MRI/MRCP features of PSC will facilitate comparison between studies, promote longitudinal assessment during management, reduce inter-reader variability, and enhance the quality of care and communication between health care providers.

Small bowel radiology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear radiology have improved the diagnosis and characterization of small bowel pathology. Our purpose is to highlight the current status and recent advances in multimodality noninvasive imaging of the small bowel. RECENT FINDINGS: CT and MR enterography are established techniques for small bowel evaluation. Dual-energy CT is a novel technique that has shown promise for the mesenteric ischemia and small bowel bleeding. Advanced US techniques and MRI sequences are being investigated to improve assessment of bowel inflammation, treatment response assessment, motility, and mural fibrosis. Novel radiotracers and scanner technologies have made molecular imaging the new reference standard for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Computational image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to augment physician expertise, reduce errors and variability in assessment of the small bowel on imaging. SUMMARY: Advances in translational imaging research coupled with progress in imaging technology have led to a wider adoption of cross-sectional imaging for the evaluation and management of small bowel entities. Ongoing developments in image acquisition and postprocessing techniques, molecular imaging and AI have the strongest potential to transform the care and outcomes of patients with small bowel diseases.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Current State and Future Directions.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by biliary inflammation and fibrosis leading to bile duct strictures, cirrhosis, and carries an increased risk of hepatobiliary malignancies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice in PSC. As an evolving technology, MRI has other potential applications in the care and study of those patients with PSC. In this review, the authors aim to provide a technical overview on MRI/MRCP and related technologies, summarize its contemporary use in PSC, and discuss its evolving role to predict outcomes and look ahead toward emerging MRI technologies relevant to PSC.

¹¹C-Choline PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer and Nonprostatic Neoplastic Processes.

Choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), with both carbon 11 ((11)C) choline and fluorine 18 ((18)F) choline, is an increasingly used tool in the evaluation of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. It has allowed detection and localization of locally recurrent and metastatic lesions that were difficult or impossible to identify using more conventional modalities. Many of the patients followed for their prostate cancer are elderly and have a higher rate of nonprostate cancer lesions or malignancies. As our experience with choline PET/CT has grown, it has become apparent that many of these nonprostate cancer processes, both benign and malignant, can be detected. Invasive thymoma, renal cell carcinoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and parathyroid adenoma are a few of the processes that have been incidentally detected with (11)C-choline PET/CT at our institution and have significantly altered subsequent clinical management of the patient. Although most of the secondary lesions are detected due to their increased (11)C-choline avidity, several have been detected due to their decreased or lack of avidity in the background of a highly avid organ. For instance, large liver masses that are relatively non-choline-avid create large activity defects in the otherwise highly active liver. Familiarity with normal (11)C-choline physiologic activity, the most common prostate metastatic patterns, and imaging characteristics of secondary lesions is essential for the detection and correct diagnosis of such lesions so that proper follow-up and management can be recommended.

MR elastography in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a pictorial review.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by biliary ductal inflammation and fibrosis causing both intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary strictures and dilatation. There is currently no effective medical treatment and the disease leads to cirrhosis and liver failure, with patients often requiring liver transplantation in end-stage disease. Liver fibrosis is one of the most important factors in determining patient outcome in PSC, and the diagnosis and monitoring of fibrosis are vital to patient care. MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the non-invasive imaging modality of choice in PSC and is useful for the evaluation of parenchymal and biliary changes. Biliary ductal abnormalities, however, cannot always predict the presence of liver fibrosis and alternative means are needed. MR Elastography (MRE) is the most accurate non-invasive method for assessing liver fibrosis and is particularly helpful in PSC due to unique hepatic manifestations. Like other non-invasive modalities, MRE measures liver stiffness as an indirect method for assessing fibrosis. Given the ability of MRE to assess liver fibrosis and the importance of fibrosis in PSC patients, MRE can reliably predict patient outcome. In this pictorial review, we will review MR findings of PSC, with an emphasis on MRE, and demonstrate scenarios where MRE is particularly helpful in evaluating PSC patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a large and ever-growing problem in both the US and world health care systems. While histologic analysis through liver biopsy is the gold standard for hepatic parenchymal evaluation, this is not feasible in such a large population of patients or as a way of monitoring change over time. This review discusses MRI-based techniques for assessing hepatic fibrosis, hepatic steatosis, and hepatic iron content, with discussions of both current techniques and future advancements.

Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started.

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the liver has emerged as the non-invasive standard for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases (CLDs). The utility of MRE in the evaluation of different CLD in both adults and children has been demonstrated in several studies, and MRE has been recommended by several clinical societies. Consequently, the clinical indications for evaluation of CLD with MRE have increased, and MRE is currently used as an add-on test during routine liver MRI studies or as a standalone test. To meet the increasing clinical demand, MRE is being installed in many academic and private practice imaging centers. There is a need for a comprehensive practical guide to help these practices to deliver high-quality liver MRE studies as well as troubleshoot the common issues with MRE to ensure smooth running of the service. This comprehensive clinical practice review summarizes the indications and provides an overview on why to use MRE, technical requirements, system set-up, patient preparation, acquiring the data, and interpretation.

Comparative Performance of Quantitative and Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metrics in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Background and Aims: Several quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics have been reported to predict outcomes among those with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We aimed to compare the reproducibility and prognostic performances of MRI biomarkers and examine if combining these measurements adds value. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 388 patients with PSC who underwent a magnetic resonance elastography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Liver stiffness (LS) was determined by validated automated software, whereas spleen volume was calculated by semiautomated software, and radiologists manually determined the ANALI scores. The primary endpoint was hepatic decompensation. Results: LS and spleen volume values had perfect and near-perfect agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient of 1.00 and 0.9996, respectively), whereas ANALI with and without gadolinium had a moderate inter-rater agreement between 3 radiologists (kappa = 0.42-0.54 and 0.46-0.57, respectively). As a continuous variable, LS alone was the best predictor of hepatic decompensation (concordance score = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93). A quantitative-only MRI model [LS (>4.70 kPa = 2 or ≤4.70 kPa = 0) + spleen volume (>600 mm3 = 1 or ≤600 mm3 = 0)] had the optimal reproducibility and performance (concordance score = 0.85; 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.89) and enabled patient risk stratification by estimating the 5-year incidence of hepatic decompensation: 7.49%, 44.50%, 70.00%, and 91.30% (score 0-3). Conclusion: Quantitative MRI markers of fibrosis and portal hypertension generated by automated and semiautomated software are highly reproducible. LS is the single best imaging predictor of hepatic decompensation. However, a quantitative MRI score using LS and spleen volume is well suited to risk stratify those with PSC.

Dual contrast liver MRI: a pictorial illustration.

Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a commonly performed imaging technique with multiple indications and applications. There are two general groups of contrast agents used when imaging the liver, extracellular contrast agents (ECA) and hepatobiliary agents (HBA), each of which has its own advantages and limitations. Liver MRI with ECA provides excellent information on abdominal vasculature and better quality multi-phasic studies for characterization of focal liver lesions. HBA improves lesion detection, provides information regarding liver function and can be helpful for evaluating biliary tree anatomy, excretion, anastomotic stenoses, or leaks. Most liver MRI studies are usually performed with one agent, however in some cases, a second study is performed with another agent to obtain additional information or confirm the findings in the first study. Administering both agents in a single exam can potentially eliminate the need for additional imaging in certain situations. In this pictorial review, the techniques and indications for dual contrast MRI will be detailed with multiple demonstrative examples.

MRI of the liver: choosing the right contrast agent.

Contrast enhanced MRI of the liver provides valuable information in the evaluation of both chronic liver disease and focal liver lesions. Currently, two classes of MRI contrast agents are available for clinical use, namely the extracellular contrast agent (ECA) and the hepatobiliary agent (HBA). The use of appropriate contrast agents for liver MRI requires knowledge of the clinical situation and question to be answered. ECAs have been used for decades since their introduction into clinical practice and provide excellent dynamic phase information that is useful in characterizing focal liver lesions. In the last decade, HBAs, particularly Gadoxetate, have been found useful for characterizing lesions with functioning hepatocytes and more importantly in evaluating the biliary tree. Gadoxetate, however, provides less satisfactory dynamic phase images compared to ECAs, particularly during the arterial phase. In this perspective article, we will discuss the various intravenous contrast agents used for liver MRI and their ideal utilization.

Advances in MR Imaging of the Biliary Tract.

Imaging of the biliary system has improved and has allowed MR to become a key noninvasive tool for evaluation of the biliary system. A variety of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography techniques have been developed, with improved visualization of the biliary system and biliary pathology. Key avenues of advancement include increasing the speed of acquisition, improving spatial resolution, and reducing artifacts. T1-weighted imaging using gadolinium-based hepatobiliary contrast agents allows for evaluation in additional indications, such as liver donor evaluation, biliary leak identification, and choledochal cyst confirmation. There is potential for further increased utility of MR in the evaluation of the biliary system.

Percutaneous Image-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the safety and diagnostic yield of percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: Of 444 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC between 2009 and 2017 at our institution, 42 who had PCNB prior to RNU were identified for analysis. Endpoints included safety, diagnostic yield, and concordance with RNU pathology. PCNB specimens were deemed histologically concordant with RNU specimens for cases when cytologic evaluation of biopsy specimen and corresponding pathologic evaluation of RNU specimen both made a histologic diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 3.8 cm (1.2-10.2 cm). All lesions arose from the pelvicalyceal system. CT-guidance was utilized in 52% (n = 22), and ultrasound-guidance in 48% (n = 20). Relative to RNU pathology, 95% of PCNBs demonstrated histologic concordance. Histologic grade was provided in 69% (n = 29) of PCNBs, with a 90% (n = 26) concordance with surgical pathology. Grades 1-2 and 3 complications occurred in 14.3% (n = 6) and 2.4% (n = 1), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 1.2-97.1 months) after biopsy, no cases of radiographic tract seeding were identified. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of 42 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC, PCNB appeared a safe diagnostic tool with high histologic yield and grade concordance. With greater than 2 years of follow-up, no cases of tract seeding were identified.

Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Interobserver Agreement for Liver Stiffness Measurement with Manual and Automated Methods.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Primary sclerosing cholangitis, a chronic liver disease causes heterogeneous parenchymal changes and fibrosis. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with magnetic resonance Elastography (MRE) may be affected by this heterogeneous distribution. We evaluated interobserver agreement of LSM in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) with manual and automated methods to study the influence of heterogeneous changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 consecutive patients with PSC who had a liver MRI and MRE formed the study group. Three readers with 1-3 years' experience in MRE and a MRE expert (11 years' experience) independently performed LSM. Each reader manually drew free hand (fROI) and average (aROI) on stiffness maps. Automatic liver elasticity calculation (ALEC) was used to generate automated LSM. The expert fROI was the reference standard. Correlation analysis and absolute intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: LSM data of 79 livers and 315 sections were evaluated. There was excellent ICC between expert and reader fROIs (0.989, 95% confidence interval, and 0.985-0.993) and aROIs (0.971, 95% confidence interval, and 0.953-0.983) and ALEC (0.972, 0.957-0.982) with fROI performing better. The areas measured with fROIs and ALEC had moderate ICC with Expert fROI (0.64 and 0.56, respectively) whereas aROI area had a poor ICC of 0.12. Comparison of multiple methods showed significant differences in LSM between expert fROI and aROI of two readers and no significant differences for fROIs of all three readers. CONCLUSION: LSM with MRE in PSC patients shows excellent interobserver agreement with both fROI and aROI methods with better performance with fROI. fROI may therefore be preferred for LSM measurements in PSC.