An observational cohort study examined the change point of kidney function stabilization in the initial period after transplantation.

Baseline kidney function following kidney transplantation is often used in research and clinical decision-making yet is not well defined. Here, a method to determine baseline function was proposed and validated on three single-center retrospective cohorts consisting of 922 patients from Belgium (main cohort) and two validation cohorts of 987 patients from the Netherlands and 519 patients from Germany. For each transplant, a segmented regression model was fitted on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) evolution during the first-year post-transplantation. This yielded estimates for change point timing, rate of eGFR change before and after change point and eGFR value at change point, now considered the "baseline function". Associations of eGFR evolution with recipient/donor characteristics and the graft failure rate were assessed with linear regression and Cox regression respectively. The change point occurred on average at an eGFR value of 43.7±14.6 mL/min/1.73m2, at a median time of 6.5 days post-transplantation. Despite significant associations with several baseline donor-recipient characteristics (particularly, donor type; living vs deceased), the predictive value of these characteristics for eGFR value and timing of the change point was limited. This followed from a large heterogeneity within eGFR trajectories, which in turn indicated that favorable levels of kidney function could be reached despite a suboptimal initial evolution. Segmented regression consistently provided a good fit to early eGFR evolution, and its estimate of the change point can be a useful reference value in future analyses. Thus, our study shows that baseline kidney function after transplantation is heterogeneous and partly related to pretransplant donor characteristics.

Probable antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation is a rare and challenging phenotype to define: Findings from a single-center study.

The Banff 2022 consensus introduced probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), characterized by mild AMR histologic features and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibody (DSA) positivity. In a single-center observational cohort study of 1891 kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2021, 566 kidney biopsies were performed in 178 individual HLA-DSA-positive transplants. Evaluated at time of the first HLA-DSA-positive biopsy of each transplant (N = 178), 84 of the 178 (47.2%) of first biopsies were scored as no AMR, 22 of the 178 (12.4%) as probable AMR, and 72 of the 178 (40.4%) as AMR. The majority (77.3%) of probable AMR cases were first diagnosed in indication biopsies. Probable AMR was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) than no AMR (20.2 [8.3-32.3] vs 40.1 [25.4-53.3]; P = .001). The one-year risk of (repeat) AMR was similar for probable AMR and AMR (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), 0.99; 0.42-2.31; P = .97) and higher than after no AMR (sHR, 3.05; 1.07-8.73; P = .04). Probable AMR had a higher five-year risk of transplant glomerulopathy vs no AMR (sHR, 4.29; 0.92-19.98; P = 06), similar to AMR (sHR, 1.74; 0.43-7.04; P = .44). No significant differences in five-year risk of graft failure emerged between probable AMR and AMR (sHR, 1.14; 0.36-3.58; P = .82) or no AMR (sHR, 2.46; 0.78-7.74; P = .12). Probable AMR is a rare phenotype, however, sharing significant similarities with AMR in this single-center study. Future studies are needed to validate reproducible diagnostic criteria and associated clinical outcomes to allow for defining best management of this potentially relevant phenotype.

Healthcare professional education in shared decision making in the context of chronic kidney disease: a scoping review.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative effort between healthcare professionals, individuals with CKD whereby clinical evidence, expected outcomes and potential side-effects are balanced with individual values and beliefs to provide the best mutually decided treatment option. Meaningful SDM is supported by effective training and education. We aimed to identify the available evidence on SDM training and education of healthcare professionals caring for people with chronic kidney disease. We aimed to identify existing training programs and to explore what means are used to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of these educational efforts. METHODOLOGY: We performed a scoping review to study the effectiveness of training or education about shared decision making of healthcare professionals treating patients with kidney disease. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and APA PsycInfo were searched. RESULTS: After screening of 1190 articles, 24 articles were included for analysis, of which 20 were suitable for quality appraisal. These included 2 systematic reviews, 1 cohort study, 7 qualitative studies, and 10 studies using mixed methods. Study quality was varied with high quality (n = 5), medium quality (n = 12), and low quality (n = 3) studies. The majority of studies (n = 11) explored SDM education for nurses, and physicians (n = 11). Other HCP profiles included social workers (n = 6), dieticians (n = 4), and technicians (n = 2). Topics included education on SDM in withholding of dialysis, modality choice, patient engagement, and end-of-life decisions. LIMITATIONS: We observed significant heterogeneity in study design and varied quality of the data. As the literature search is restricted to evidence published between January 2000 and March 2021, relevant literature outside of this time window has not been taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on training and education of SDM for healthcare professionals taking care of patients with CKD is limited. Curricula are not standardized, and educational and training materials do not belong to the public domain. The extent to which interventions have improved the process of shared-decision making is tested mostly by pre-post testing of healthcare professionals, whereas the impact from the patient perspective for the most part remains untested.

Sensitive HLA antibody testing and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure.

Solid phase detection and identification of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation currently relies on single antigen bead (Luminex®) assays, which is more sensitive than the previously used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). To evaluate the impact of more sensitive HLA testing on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft survival, we analysed 1818 renal allograft recipients transplanted between March 2004 and May 2021. In 2008, solid phase testing switched from ELISA to Luminex. We included 393 (21.6%) transplantations before and 1425 (78.4%) transplantations after transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based testing. For this study, bio-banked ELISA era samples were tested retrospectively with Luminex. Significantly less pretransplant DSA were found in patients transplanted with pre-existing HLA antibodies in the Luminex (109/387) versus the ELISA period (43/90) (28% vs. 48%, p < 0.01). Throughout histological follow-up, 169 of 1818 (9.3%) patients developed AMR. After implementing Luminex-based testing, the rate of AMR significantly decreased (p = 0.003). However, incidence of graft failure did not significantly differ between both eras. In conclusion, less patients with pretransplant DSA were transplanted since the implementation of Luminex HLA testing. Transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based HLA testing was associated with a significant decrease in AMR occurrence post-transplantation. Since the decline of AMR did not translate into improved graft survival, Luminex-based testing has the added value of preventing low-risk AMR cases. Therefore, Luminex' high sensitivity must be balanced against waiting time for a suitable organ.