Literature reviews and global neurosurgery: a powerful way of doing more with less.

INTRODUCTION: Neurosurgery is an intensely competitive field. With the USMLE Step 1 transitioning to a pass/fail system, research has become a crucial component of the neurosurgery residency application process. This emphasis on research is particularly critical for international medical graduates (IMGs), who often face greater challenges compared to their U.S. counterparts. IMGs typically need more publications and higher H-indices to stand out. However, accessing quality research opportunities is significantly more difficult for those from low- and middle-income countries. This mini-review aims to provide a new perspective for IMGs, demonstrating that publishing in prestigious neurosurgical journals is possible even with limited resources. METHODS: We searched Scopus and reviewed Brazilian publications from 2014 to 2023 in Neurosurgery and the Journal of Neurosurgery. We extracted the methodological designs of the studies and the graduation status of the first authors. RESULTS: In 2023-2024, four Brazilian medical students published systematic reviews in major neurosurgical journals as first authors, marking a revolutionary change in the Brazilian neurosurgical landscape not seen in the past decade. These achievements illustrate that high-impact publications are attainable without geographical proximity, substantial financial support, or access to extensive institutional databases. Letters to the editor also represented a considerable Brazilian contribution. CONCLUSION: Literature reviews and letters to the editor are accessible methods for IMGs to engage in impactful research. IMGs can maximize their abilities and significantly contribute to neurosurgery by embracing literature reviews and meta-analyses. These approaches can open doors for those without other avenues to begin their research careers.

Maxillary artery utilization in subcranial-intracranial bypass procedures: a comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis.

The utilization of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) in subcranial-intracranial bypass for revascularization in complex aneurysms, tumors, or refractory ischemia shows promise. However, robust evidence concerning its outcomes is lacking. Hence, the authors embarked on a systematic review with pooled analysis to elucidate the efficacy of this approach. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Included articles used the IMAX as a donor vessel for revascularizing an intracranial area and reported at least one of the following outcomes: patency, complications, or clinical data. Favorable outcomes were defined as the absence of neurologic deficits or improvement in the baseline condition. Complications were considered any adverse event directly related to the procedure. Out of 418 retrieved articles, 26 were included, involving 183 patients. Among them, 119 had aneurysms, 41 experienced ischemic strokes (transient or not), 2 had arterial occlusions, and 3 had neoplasia. Furthermore, 91.8% of bypasses used radial artery grafts, and 87.9% revascularized the middle cerebral artery territory. The median average follow-up period was 12 months (0.3-53.1). The post-operation patency rate was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%; I2=0%), while the patency rate at follow-up was 82% (95% CI: 68-96%; I2=77%). Complications occurred in 21% of cases (95% CI: 9-32%; I2=58%), with no significant procedure-related mortality in 0% (95% CI: 0-2%; I2=0%). Favorable outcomes were observed in 88% of patients (95% CI: 81-96%; I2=0%), and only 3% experienced ischemia (95% CI: 0-6%; I2=0%). The subcranial-intracranial bypass with the IMAX shows excellent postoperative patency and considerable favorable clinical outcomes. While complications exist, the procedure carries a minimal risk of mortality. However, long-term patency presents heterogeneous findings, warranting additional research.

STA-MCA Double-Barrel Bypass: A Systematic Review of Technique and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Conventionally, one branch of the superficial temporal artery (STA) is utilized to revascularize the middle cerebral artery (MCA). However, there is the possibility of utilizing both branches of the STA when performing the bypass, characterizing the double-barrel (DB) STA-MCA bypass. Notably, a lack of studies evaluating this technique led the authors to conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for publications of DB-STA-MCA bypass on November 1st, 2023. The findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Case reports were not included for statistical analysis purposes. RESULTS: The review included 408 patients and 534 bypasses from 34 studies. The main etiology was Moyamoya disease (64.6%), followed by cerebral ischemia (22.2%) and aneurysms (12.5%). The median of the mean follow-ups of each study was 12.8 months (range 1.5-87.9). The postoperative patency was 100%. The follow-up patency was 98% (95% CI: 96%-100%; I2 = 0%). The procedure-related mortality was 0% (95% CI: 0%-1%; I2 = 0%). Aneurysms obtained 87% (95% CI: 72%-100%; I2 = 4%) of good clinical outcomes, while Moyamoya disease yielded a rate of 70% (95% CI: 10%-100%; I2 = 97%). Ischemic complications occurred at a rate of 6% (95% CI: 2%-11%; I2 = 36%), while hemorrhagic occurred at 6% (95% CI: 1%-11%; I2 = 56%). Hyperperfusion syndrome rate was calculated as 18% (7%-30%; I2 = 55%) for Moyamoya disease. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure appears to be safe, with excellent patency rates. The clinical efficacy for ischemic and Moyamoya diseases warrants further standardized robust investigation with a broader number of patients, and aneurysm studies are required to enhance sample sizes. The main complication for the Moyamoya subgroup is hyperperfusion syndrome.

Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.

Brain death and management of the potential donor.

One of the first attempts to define brain death (BD) dates from 1963, and since then, the diagnosis criteria of that entity have evolved. In spite of the publication of practice parameters and evidence-based guidelines, BD is still causing concern and controversies in the society. The difficulties in determining brain death and making it understood by family members not only endorse futile therapies and increase health care costs, but also hinder the organ transplantation process. This review aims to give an overview about the definition of BD, causes, physiopathology, diagnosis criteria, and management of the potential brain-dead donor. It is important to note that the BD determination criteria detailed here follow the AAN's recommendations, but the standard practice for BD diagnosis varies from one country to another.

Biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: a short review.

Cellular response to TBI is a mixture of excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and cell death. Biomarkers that can track these lesions and inflammatory processes are being explored for their potential to provide objective measures in the evaluation of TBI, from prehospital care to rehabilitation. By understanding the pathways involved, we could be able to improve diagnostic accuracy, guide management, and prevent long-term disability. We listed some of the recent advances in this translational, intriguing, fast-growing field. Although the knowledge gaps are still significant, some markers are showing promising results and could be helping patients in the near future.

Stellate Ganglion Block in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Promising Protective Measure Against Vasospasm?

BACKGROUND: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) may have protective effects in patients at risk of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to reduced sympathetic activity. However, the safety and clinical outcomes of SGB in this scenario are not definitively known. The objective was to evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients submitted to SGB or cervical sympathectomy with SAH. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating SGB or cervical sympathectomy use in SAH were conducted. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were evaluated. Patients with mRS from 0 to 2, GOS from 4 to 5, or symptom resolution were considered favorable clinical outcomes. Related mortality was defined as death by vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia. RESULTS: The analysis included 8 studies comprising 182 patients. Only 2 studies employed SGB prophylactically. The results revealed favorable outcomes in 52% of patients (95% CI: 37%-65%). The overall incidence of complications was 2% (95% CI: 0% -26%). The mortality rate was 13% (95% CI: 7%-21%), with a vasospasm-related mortality rate of 11% (95% CI: 2%-20%). A decrease of cerebral blood flow velocity was reported in 4 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The notable reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity following SGB, alongside positive outcomes and a low occurrence of mortality and complications, highlights its significance as a therapeutic intervention for vasospasm following SAH. While the number of studies evaluating SGB as a preventive measure is limited, the promising results emphasize the importance of future research.

Stellate ganglion block: what else is necessary to include in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients?

Cerebral vasospasm is determined as a temporary narrowing of cerebral arteries a few days after an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The onset of this vascular event usually evolves with new neurological deficits or progression of ischemic areas. The success of interventions to treat or revert this condition is not satisfying. In addition to cerebral vasospasm, early brain injury plays an important role as a contributor to subarachnoid hemorrhage's mortality. In this sense, stellate ganglion block appears as an alternative to reduce sympathetic system's activation, one of the main pathophysiological mechanisms involved in brain injury. Over the past few years, there is growing evidence that stellate ganglion block can contribute to decline patient morbidity from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Is it time to include this procedure as a standard treatment after aneurysm rupture?

Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery for Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Treating complex posterior circulation aneurysms poses challenges, and extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass techniques are potential therapeutic options. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach for posterior circulation aneurysms remain unclear. The study's objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of EC-IC bypass in these aneurysms. METHODS: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on EC-IC revascularization for posterior circulation aneurysms. Included studies had at least 4 patients and reported data on mortality, patency, complications, or clinical outcomes. Favorable clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale below 3 or Glasgow Outcome Scale above 3, and complications were any issues related to the bypass procedure. RESULTS: From 3036 articles reviewed, 22 studies involving 196 patients who underwent 210 EC-IC bypass procedures for posterior circulation aneurysms were selected. The median follow-up period of 14 studies was 31.66 months (6-61 months). Final follow-up indicated a high bypass patency rate of 96% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-100%; I2 = 12%], with a mortality rate of 5% [95% CI: 1%-9%; I2 = 0%]. Additionally, 83% [95% CI: 70%-96%; I2 = 77%] of patients showed good outcomes at the last follow-up. Complications were observed in 40% [95% CI: 26%-55%; I2 = 80%]. Heterogeneity was associated with specific studies. CONCLUSIONS: EC-IC bypass procedures are a viable treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms, with high bypass patency rates and favorable clinical outcomes. However, complications, especially neurological deficits, exist. Open revascularization remains essential for neurovascular surgeons dealing with complex aneurysms.

Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological condition, especially in the elderly population. Atorvastatin has shown the potential to reduce the recurrence of CSDH and improve overall outcomes. New studies have emerged since the last meta-analysis, increasing the sample size and the variety of outcomes analyzed. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing the use of atorvastatin in CSDH patients with a control group or placebo. The primary outcome was the recurrence of CSDH. Secondary outcomes of interest were hematoma volume, composite adverse effects, mortality, and neurological function, measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel index for activities of daily living. RESULTS: Seven studies, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials, were included, containing 1192 patients. Overall recurrence significantly decreased compared to the control group (risk ratio [RR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.83; P=0.009). The benefits of atorvastatin were sustained in the subgroup analysis of patients who underwent initial conservative therapy (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.70; P=0.001). However, there was no significant difference when atorvastatin was combined with surgical intervention (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.21-1.32; P=0.17). Adverse effects were not increased by atorvastatin (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.51-1.34; P=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin might be beneficial in reducing CSDH recurrence, especially in conservative treatment patients. Atorvastatin was not significantly associated with adverse effects. Larger, higher-quality randomized studies are needed to adequately evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of atorvastatin in CSDH patients.

Clinical and Technical Outcomes of Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treating Complex Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding their outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least 4 patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose them with the results of IC-IC. RESULTS: Of the 2509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (odds ratio=0.60 [95% CI: 0.18-1.96]). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85%-97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (odds ratio=1.29 [95% CI: 0.43-3.88]). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5%-18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). CONCLUSIONS: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences.

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass versus Occipital Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass for Treating Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: When traditional therapies are unsuitable, revascularization becomes essential for managing posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or vertebral artery aneurysms. Notably, the PICA-PICA bypass has emerged as a promising option, overshadowing the occipital artery-PICA (OA-PICA) bypass. The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses for treating posterior circulation aneurysms. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 studies for the PICA-PICA bypass and 16 studies on the OA-PICA bypass, involving 84 and 110 patients, respectively. The median average follow-up for PICA-PICA bypass was 8 months (2-50.3 months), while for OA-PICA, it was 27.8 months (6-84 months). The patency rate for OA-PICA was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) for PICA-PICA. Complication rates were 29% (95% CI: 10%-47%) for OA-PICA and 12% (95% CI: 3%-21%) for PICA-PICA. Good clinical outcomes were observed in 71% (95% CI: 52%-90%) of OA-PICA patients and 87% (95% CI: 75%-100%) of PICA-PICA patients. Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-6%) for OA-PICA and 1% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for PICA-PICA. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures have demonstrated promising results in efficacy and safety. PICA-PICA exhibits slightly better patency rates, better clinical outcomes, and fewer complications, but with a lack of substantial follow-up and a smaller sample size. The choice between these procedures should be based on the surgeon's expertise and the patient's anatomy.

Comparative anatomical analysis between lateral supraorbital and minipterional approaches.

Background: The pterional craniotomy, described by Yasargil and Fox in 1975, constitutes the most traditional and important surgical access in vascular neurosurgery. Minimally invasive alternatives include the minipterional (MP) and lateral supraorbital (LSO) craniotomies, which avoid complications such as injury to the frontal branch of the facial nerve, temporal muscle dysfunction, depression of the craniotomy site, frontal sinus opening, and cosmetically unacceptable outcomes. We evaluated and compared the exposures provided by MP and LSO craniotomies through quantitative measurements of the surgical exposure area around the circle of Willis and parasellar regions, as well as angular and linear exposures of the internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, middle cerebral artery (MCA), midpoint of the anterior communicating artery, and tip of the basilar artery (BA). Methods: Seven fresh cadavers were dissected at the São Paulo Medical Examiner's Office, SP, and three at the skull base laboratory of Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA. The craniotomies were performed sequentially, initially with the LSO craniotomy followed by the MP. After the craniotomy, the surgical exposure area, craniotomy area, and angular exposures in the horizontal and vertical axes were determined. Results: The MP craniotomy provided better angular exposure for the ipsilateral MCA, while the LSO craniotomy and BA provided better vertical axis exposures. The LSO craniotomy provided better angular exposure in the vertical axis for the midpoint of the anterior communicating artery and contralateral ICA bifurcation. Regarding surgical exposure and craniotomy area, there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The MP craniotomy offers a significantly larger surgical exposure compared to the LSO craniotomy, with specific advantages regarding angular exposure to important neurovascular structures. This study provides important quantitative data to guide the choice between these minimally invasive access techniques in vascular neurosurgery.

Sole Stenting Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling For Treating Dissecting Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Among the reconstructive methods for treating dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms (DPCAs), there are stent-assisted coiling (SAC), and sole stenting (SS) therapy. Despite SAC being widely employed when compared to SS, no study systematically analyzed the difference in their outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies employing both therapies to compare their outcomes. A search was performed in January 2024, including only studies with consecutive patients submitted to SS or SAC. The studies had to have at least one of the following outcomes: complete aneurysm occlusion, complications, mortality, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment, and good clinical outcome. Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized for statistics. RESULTS: In a pooled analysis of 17 studies, comparing 173 SS and 377 SAC procedures for DPCAs, no significant differences were found in related mortality (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.49-4.27); total mortality (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.53-3.37); retreatment (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.16-1.26); recurrence (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.43-2.33); postoperative complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.09-6.77); follow-up complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.62-3.94); intraoperative complications (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.29-3.73); postoperative complications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.61-2.45); hemorrhagic complications (OR 2.16; 95% CI 0.77-6.06); ischemic complications (OR 1.68; 95% CI 0.68-4.15). Good clinical outcomes significantly favored SAC (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.86). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest there is no substantial basis for favoring SAC over SS across all cases. Instead, an individualized approach should be considered, according to the patient's characteristics, surgeon skills, and the available material.

Surgical clipping and endovascular treatments for small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A comparative pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Small and very small anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms pose a complex challenge in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology due to their critical location and potential for severe consequences upon rupture. Surgical clipping has been a traditional approach, but it presents challenges requiring precision and expertise. Endovascular treatment has emerged as an alternative, offering minimally invasive techniques with potential advantages. This study aims to comprehensively compare outcomes and efficacy between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small or very small ACoA aneurysms. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms comparing surgical clipping and endovascular treatments. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on both treatment modalities. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Pooled analyses with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare treatment effects, and statistical analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 637 patients were included. Endovascular treatment, predominantly coiling, was performed in 60.3% of patients, while 39.7% underwent surgical management. Endovascular treatment exhibited an 18% retreatment rate, contrasting with 0% in the surgery group. Mortality rates were 3% and 6% for endovascular and surgical treatments, respectively. Overall complications occurred in 1.8% of patients, with intraoperative rupture and cerebral infarction being the most common. CONCLUSION: In summary, our study indicates a comparable outcome between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small ACoA aneurysms, with the former showing a lower retreatment rate. Decision factors include surgeon expertise, healthcare context, and patient age. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies, considering variations in aneurysm status and evolving techniques.

Are ventriculopleural shunts the second option for treating hydrocephalus? A meta-analysis of 543 patients.

BACKGROUND: Some centers utilize ventriculopleural shunt (VPLS) for treating hydrocephalus when conventional approaches are not feasible. Nonetheless, the literature regarding this approach is scarce. PURPOSE: Evaluate the outcomes of VPLS through a single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for articles utilizing the VPLS in a cohort with more than four patients. Outcomes included: mortality, pleural effusion, number of patients who underwent revisions, obstructions, shunt migration, emphysema, and subdural hematoma. RESULTS: A total of 404 articles were reviewed, resulting in the inclusion of 13 retrospective studies encompassing 543 patients, with the majority being children (62.6 %). The median average follow-up period was 35.4 months (10-64.1). After analysis, results yielded a revision rate of 54 % (95 % CI: 44 %-64 %; I2=73 %). The most common complication observed was pleural effusion, with a post-analysis incidence of 16 % (95 % CI: 11 %-21 %; I2=63 %), followed by infections at 7 % (95 % CI: 4 %-10 %; I2=33 %). Shunt obstruction occurred in 13 % (95 % CI: 4 %-21 %; I2=84 %) of cases after analysis, while migrations, overdrainage, subdural hematoma, and cutaneous emphysema had minimal occurrence rates (0 %, 95 % CI: 0 %-1 %; I2=0 %). Notably, there were no reported cases of shunt-related mortality. CONCLUSION: VPLS can be considered when there are no other suitable options for placing the distal catheter. However, the notable rates of shunt revisions, pleural effusion, infections, and the inherent heterogeneity of outcomes currently limit the widespread adoption of VPLS. In this scenario, other alternatives should be given priority.

Socioeconomic and educational factors interference in the prognosis for glioblastoma multiform.

BACKGROUND: To compare the survival of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients operated on at public hospital with that of patients operated on at the private hospitals. METHOD: We carried out a retrospective analysis of the patients' medical records, the surgical reports and the pre- and post-operative images of patients with a histopathological confirmed adult supratentorial GBM. Sixty-three patients were treated at public hospital and twenty-one at private hospitals. RESULTS: The present study revealed that the survival of patients treated in private hospitals was statistically superior to that of patients treated in public hospitals (11.9 vs. 7.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our study advances towards the confirmation of the hypothesis that socioeconomic and educational factors influence the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and the performance of radiotherapy treatment, with negative effects over the GBM patients' survival.