Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia and confronting amputation: A Heideggerian derived understanding of Being-with and discourse.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the notion of Being-with and authentic discourse for people making decisions about major amputation. BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is a devastating disease with a high burden of pain and complex wounds. Patients may deteriorate suddenly after multiple revascularisation procedures and, amputation is offered when further reperfusion is considered futile. Delayed decisions about amputation have negative consequences for patients, families and health systems, yet little attention is given to training clinicians for the sophisticated communication required. Clinicians need to engage in authentic discourse about amputation to create shared meaning and facilitate decision-making. DESIGN: Qualitative study using hermeneutic Heideggerian phenomenology. METHODS: Twelve patients offered major amputation, and 13 family participants from three vascular units in Australia engaged in 42 semi-structured interviews, representing 19 cases of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Hermeneutic phenomenology using the Heideggerian tenet of Being-with as an analytic framework, a philosophically based understanding of Being-with and Discourse related to treatment discussions and decisions was derived. The research was reported in accordance with the COREQ checklist. FINDINGS: Effective discourse between the person and family was hampered by changed circumstances of Being-with, characterised by guilt, and a retreat from discourse through deficient discourse and filtering information. Clinician Being-with was hampered by discourse that was deficient, poorly delivered, discordant and disconnected through a lack of empathetic listening. There were also examples of enhanced clinician Being-with that made room for more constructive discourse and more timely decisions about amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Heidegger's construct of Being-with provides a useful framework to reveal the role of authentic discourse in improving patient and family experience and decisions about treatment. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not engage consumers other than as patient and carer participants. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Decisions about amputation are often difficult for patients or family members who may be substitute decision-makers. A better understanding of the experience may assist clinicians in their interactions with patients and families.

Making things work: Using Bourdieu's theory of practice to uncover an ontology of everyday nursing in practice.

Seeking to answer the question of what it is that nurses do, scholars researching nursing have worked with theoretical approaches ranging from the more abstract to the concrete: from philosophizing the nature of nursing to emphasizing the interpersonal nature of nursing practice to exploring processes of clinical decision-making. In this paper, we engage with Bourdieu's theory of practice as an alternative approach that helps to understand the finer points of nurses' everyday practices of nursing as being grounded in an ontology of practice. We first outline the foundations of Bourdieu's thinking as he established both a relational philosophy of science and an embodied philosophy of action to develop the theory of practice around notions of habitus, capital and field. Then, using the inter-relationships of these key elements of the theory of practice as a 'toolkit to think with', we explore an instance of nursing in practice in an acute care setting and show how, in taking account of social context, the dialectics between the elements reveal the social interactions that are accomplished in the doing. Moving to the relationships of these three elements with Bourdieu's further notions of illusio, symbolic power and symbolic violence, we uncover an ontology of nursing practices in the everyday. We conclude by summarising what this ontology of practice has to offer investigations into practices of nursing in any social context.

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia and reframing the meaning of 'end'.

INTRODUCTION: The possibility of amputation and/or death from chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is real, and deeper understandings of the person and family's capacity and preparedness for limb loss and clinical interventions (active or palliative) are required. BACKGROUND: The lead-in period to the surgeon's recommendation for amputation for CLTI may be sudden or protracted; the number/invasiveness of previous revascularisation interventions varies, and limb loss and end-of-life considerations frame the experience. METHOD: This prospective, longitudinal, interpretative phenomenological study in three vascular surgical units involved 19 CLTI journeys. Participants were interviewed when making decisions about amputation (15 patients, 12 family members) and, where applicable, 6-months postamputation (8 patients, 7 family members). Hermeneutic interpretation using Heidegger's philosophical construct of Being-towards-death guided the analysis. The COREQ checklist ensured rigour in research reporting. FINDINGS: Some participants were unable to face the possibility of death and metaphorically 'fled', either through productive optimism or through hoping for more time (Heidegger's inauthentic positioning towards death). For others, authentic positionings of Being-towards-death were understood as: the confrontation of the certainty of their death by making choices about how to die; the indefiniteness of death where treatment choices influenced timing, yet the time for death remained unknown; the nonrelational nature of death, as the journey could only be lived by the person; and death as not to be outstripped, where for some, there was a freeing of oneself for amputation and/or death. DISCUSSION: The term 'end of limb' to denote the futility of the limb is a useful marker that emphasises the noncurative nature of CLTI. This may help to instigate and support discussions about end of life to support palliation care planning and the person and family's existential preparation for death. CONCLUSION: Death frames the experience of CLTI. Using 'end-of-limb' and 'end-of-life' terminology may facilitate a family/patient-centred approach to possible amputation and other conservative or palliative strategies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding of CLTI illness experience. Decisions about revascularisation, amputation or conservative care. End-of-life care for CLTI.

Descriptive title: The body with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: A phenomenologically derived understanding.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore person and family lifeworld narratives of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) after major amputation has been offered as a treatment option. BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia manifests as ischaemic pain, ulceration and/or gangrene and is receiving heightened attention due to the increasing health system burden from associated complex wounds and hospitalisations for repeat procedures. The patient and family impact of these manifestations is not well-reported: current studies largely seek to measure treatment outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measurements need to be developed but should be underpinned by rigorous qualitative research. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, qualitative design using interpretive phenomenology. METHODS: The journeys of 19 people with CLTI were explored via 42 semi-structured interviews with 14 patient and 13 family participants. The initial interview was conducted soon after the advice of the need for major amputation, and where amputation followed, participants were invited for a second interview 6 months postprocedure. Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis was guided by Merleau-Ponty's philosophy of embodiment. RESULTS: People with embodied CTLI faced an existential crisis due to the catastrophic impact of creeping decay of their flesh and vascular system, relentless pain and a sense of spreading poison from gangrene, infection and drugs, which disrupted the interleaving of the physical and existential body. Consequent to the creeping decay and surgery, participants also experienced shifting body boundaries and an unreliable body. CONCLUSIONS: The lifeworld of the patient and family living with CTLI is irrevocably altered through the disruption of a spontaneous and reliable body. This shapes subsequent therapeutic relationships and discourse. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: People facing CLTI require early patient- and family-centred discussions about the possibility for major amputation and its potential to arrest the further decline of the body and to support the body's existential expression.

Heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology as method: modelling analysis through a meta-synthesis of articles on Being-towards-death.

While the richness of Heideggerian philosophy is attractive as a healthcare research framework, its density means authors rarely utilise its fullest possibilities as an hermeneutic analytic structure. This article aims to clarify Heideggerian hermeneutic analysis by taking one discrete element of Heideggerian philosophy (Being-towards-death), and using it's clearly defined structure to conduct a meta-synthesis of Heideggerian phenomenological studies on the experience of living with a potentially life-limiting illness. The findings richly illustrate Heidegger's philosophy that there is either an inauthentic positioning towards death, or an authentic positioning towards death with a proposition that (1) death is certain; (2) death is indefinite; (3) death is non-relational; and (4) death is not-to-be-outstripped. None of the 29 included studies on the experience of a confrontation with death fully utilised this framework, despite claiming a grounding in Heideggerian thought. This demonstrates the value in modelling how Heideggerian existential structures can be used proactively as analytical 'hooks' for data in research claiming a basis in this philosophy and/or method. By modelling the potential application of an important Heideggerian philosophical construct to published qualitative data, this meta-synthesis has revealed new domains and more nuanced understandings of the temporal structure of Being-towards-death. Such an approach helps to more fully unveil the existential concerns of people at the core of interpretative phenomenological enquiry and may provide a blueprint to map either primary or synthesised data to other key ontological existentials.

The chaos of hospitalisation for patients with critical limb ischaemia approaching major amputation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To illuminate the hospital experience for patients and families when major amputation has been advised for critical limb ischaemia (CLI). BACKGROUND: CLI creates significant burden to the health system and the family, particularly as the person with CLI approaches amputation. Major amputation is often offered as a late intervention for CLI in response to the marked deterioration of an ischaemic limb, and functional decline from reduced mobility, intractable pain, infection and/or toxaemia. While a wealth of clinical outcome data on CLI and amputation exists internationally, little is known about the patient/family-centred experience of hospitalisation to inform preservation of personhood and patient-centred care planning. DESIGN: Longitudinal qualitative study using Heideggerian phenomenology. METHODS: Fourteen patients and 13 family carers provided a semistructured interview after advice for major amputation. Where amputation followed, a second interview (6 months postprocedure) was provided by eight patients and seven family carers. Forty-two semistructured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis followed. RESULTS: Hospitalisation for CLI, with or without amputation, created a sense of chaos, characterised by being fragile and needing more time for care (fragile body and fragile mind, nurse busyness and carer hypervigilance), being adrift within uncontrollable spaces (noise, unreliable space, precarious accommodation and unpredictable scheduling) and being confused by missed and mixed messages (multiple stakeholders, information overload and cultural/linguistic diversity). CONCLUSIONS: Patients and families need a range of strategies to assist mindful decision-making in preparation for amputation in what for them is a chaotic process occurring within a chaotic environment. Cognitive deficits increase the care complexity and burden of family advocacy. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A coordinated, interprofessional response should improve systems for communication, family engagement, operation scheduling and discharge planning to support preparation, adjustment and allow a sense of safety to develop. Formal peer support for patients and caregivers should be actively facilitated.

An integrative review of health-related quality of life in patients with critical limb ischaemia.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the domains and the domain-specific characteristics within a peripheral arterial disease health-related quality of life framework for their usefulness in defining critical limb ischaemia health-related quality of life. BACKGROUND: Critical Limb Ischaemia presents a highly individualised set of personal and health circumstances. Treatment options include conservative management, revascularisation or amputation. However, the links between treatment decisions and quality of life require further investigation. DESIGN: The framework for this integrative review was the peripheral arterial disease-specific health-related quality of life domains identified by Treat-Jacobson et al. RESULTS: The literature expanded and refined Treat-Jacobson's framework by modifying the characteristics to better describe health-related quality of life in critical limb ischaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Given that critical limb ischaemia is a highly individualised situation with powerful health-related quality of life implications, further research focusing on patient and family-centred decision-making relating to therapeutic options and advanced care planning is required. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A critical limb ischaemia-specific, health-related quality of life tool is required to capture both the unique characteristics of this disorder, and the outcomes for active or conservative care among this complex group of patients.

Categorising Patients Mental Illness by Medical Surgical Nurses in the General Hospital Ward: A Focus Group Study.

AIM: To gain insight into medical surgical nurses' process(es) of categorising mental illness in general hospitals. BACKGROUND: Categorising patients is a daily social practice that helps medical surgical nurses understand their work and actions. Medical surgical nurses' categorising of mentally ill patients in general hospitals is a means in which they articulate their understanding of mental illness and perform their clinical practice. How medical surgical nurses categorise, and the impact that categorising can have on their work practices is poorly understood. DESIGN: A focus group study. METHOD: Focus group discussions (n=2) of medical surgical nurses' understanding and experience of delivering care to patients with mental illness in a general tertiary referral hospital were conducted in November 2014. Discourse analysis was used to analyse the transcribed data to uncover how participants made discursive evaluations and how this related to their daily clinical practice. RESULTS: The analysis uncovered participant's use of four categories of mentally ill patients: the managed, the unpredictable, the emotional and the dangerous. For participants these categories explained and justified their clinical practice as linked to the challenges and barriers they experienced in providing effective care within the larger healthcare organisation. CONCLUSION: The language used by medical/surgical reflects the wider discourse of managerialism in healthcare organisations. The recognition of these categories can be used by educators, liaison mental health services and policy makers to reconsider service design and learning opportunities for medical surgical nurses to reduce stigmatisation of patients with mental illness.

Conceptualizing nurses' night work: an inductive content analysis.

AIM: To develop a conceptual model of nurse-identified effects of night work. BACKGROUND: Studies designed to predict shift work tolerance are frequently unsuccessful in incorporating the intersections between physiological, psychological and social issues involved in such work. Where nurses have been the participants of such studies they have rarely been involved in ways that would allow their points of view to be heard directly. Consequently, the issues of personal importance to nurses as shift and night workers in 24/7 organizations are rarely identified in discussions about that work. DESIGN: Inductive qualitative content analysis. METHODS: Survey responses were provided by 1355 night working RNs employed in a state/public health system in 2012. Data derived from open-ended questions about nurses' own perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of night work are analysed here. RESULTS: Four main categories providing a descriptive summary of the major elements of nurses' night work were identified: 'Lives' and 'Bodies' of night working nurses, the 'Work' of nurses at night and the nurses' 'Workplace' at night. CONCLUSION: The work nurses undertake at night, and the demanding organizational and clinical environments where they do this are uniquely related to the time of day that this work occurs. The Nurses' Night Work model deconstructs the established binary considerations of the lives and bodies of workers to permit a 24/7-based consideration of nurses' night work and its frequently unacknowledged relationship with the day work required of the same nurses when working a rapidly but randomly rotating shift work schedule.

Building research capacity and productivity among advanced practice nurses: an evaluation of the Community of Practice model.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate Wenger's Community of Practice as a framework for building research capacity and productivity. BACKGROUND: While research productivity is an expected domain in influential models of advanced nursing practice, internationally it remains largely unmet. Establishment of nursing research capacity precedes productivity and consequently, there is a strong imperative to identify successful capacity-building models for nursing-focussed research in busy clinical environments. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, qualitative descriptive design was used in this study. METHODS: Bruyn's participant observation framed evaluation of a Community of Practice comprising 25 advanced practice nurses. Data from focus groups, education evaluations, blog/email transcripts and field observations, collected between 2007 and 2014, were analysed using a qualitative descriptive method. FINDINGS: The Community of Practice model invited differing levels of participation, allowed for evolution of the research community and created a rhythm of research-related interactions and enduring research relationships. Participants described the value of research for their patients and families and the significance of the developing research culture in providing richness to their practice and visibility of their work to multidisciplinary colleagues. Extensive examples of research dissemination and enrolment in doctoral programmes further confirmed this value. CONCLUSION: A Community of Practice framework is a powerful model enabling research capacity and productivity evidenced by publication. In developing a solid foundation for a nursing research culture, it should be recognized that research skills, confidence and growth develop over an extended period of time and success depends on skilled coordination and leadership.

Making decisions about amputation for chronic limb threatening ischaemia.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic limb threatening ischaemia causes pain, loss of function and complex wounds, necessitating urgent interventions. While growing options for minimally invasive revascularisation make operating on frail and older persons safer, the challenge is knowing when to stop this option and offer amputation. Decisions about amputation are difficult for the person, or for the family who act as substitute decision-makers. Timely treatment decisions are important to optimise clinical outcomes but do not always align with outcomes that are acceptable to patients. AIM: To provide a philosophically-based understanding of patient/family experiences of making decisions for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. METHODS: Longitudinal qualitative study using Heideggerian phenomenology. Patient and family participants were recruited from three sites. Semi-structured interviews occurred at two time points: soon after advice to consider major amputation, and for those who experienced amputation, six-months post-operatively. The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist guided this report. FINDINGS: Variable timelines, disease progression, and interventions were encountered prior to confronting the possibility of amputation. Decision-making was interpreted as an initial irresoluteness (neglecting or renouncing decisions). For most, this was eventually followed by a resoluteness where participants either turned away or towards amputation, according to one's preferred mode of suffering, and thus owning the decision to turn. Those who opted for amputation often experienced better-than-anticipated outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients and families had difficulty making decisions about amputation. Clinicians may have been complicit in the neglecting and renouncing of decisions and have an important role in sharing decision-making through their authentic discourse. IMPLICATIONS: Chronic limb threatening ischaemia requires complex discussions to support decisions and shared decision-making requires clinician presence and engagement in discourse. Patients and family members benefit from more time to experience and process the phenomenon as they move towards owning their decision about amputation.

The Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Epidemiological studies of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have consistently demonstrated variation in incidence, location, age at presentation, and outcomes among non-Hispanic white, black, and Hispanic populations. We report here the design and methods for this large, prospective, multi-center case-control study of ICH. METHODS: The Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study is a multi-center, prospective case-control study of ICH. Cases are identified by hot-pursuit and enrolled using standard phenotype and risk factor information and include neuroimaging and blood sample collection. Controls are centrally identified by random digit dialing to match cases by age (±5 years), race, ethnicity, sex, and metropolitan region. RESULTS: As of March 22, 2013, 1655 cases of ICH had been recruited into the study, which is 101.5% of the target for that date, and 851 controls had been recruited, which is 67.2% of the target for that date (1267 controls) for a total of 2506 subjects, which is 86.5% of the target for that date (2897 subjects). Of the 1655 cases enrolled, 1640 cases had the case interview entered into the database, of which 628 (38%) were non-Hispanic black, 458 (28%) were non-Hispanic white, and 554 (34%) were Hispanic. Of the 1197 cases with imaging submitted, 876 (73.2%) had a 24 hour follow-up CT available. In addition to CT imaging, 607 cases have had MRI evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The ERICH study is a large, case-control study of ICH with particular emphasis on recruitment of minority populations for the identification of genetic and epidemiological risk factors for ICH and outcomes after ICH.

Clinical credibility and trustworthiness are key characteristics used to identify colleagues from whom to seek information.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of information by nurses making decisions in clinically uncertain situations in one aspect of critical care nursing practice (enteral feeding). In this paper, we report the characteristics, which participants identified as important, of the people from whom they sought information for the purpose of making clinical decisions. BACKGROUND: Registered nurses have a plethora of information sources available to assist them in making clinical decisions. Identifying and selecting the best information to support these decisions can be difficult and is influenced by factors such as accessibility, usefulness and variations in quality of the information. DESIGN: An instrumental case study design using multiple case study analysis. METHOD: Twenty-two critical care nurses from two intensive care units contributed to the data through multiple methods of data collection including concurrent verbal protocols (think aloud), retrospective probing and focus group interviews. RESULTS: Nurses preferentially used colleagues as a source of information when faced with uncertainty about their clinical practice. Most participants placed greater emphasis on evaluating the individual providing the information rather than on evaluating the information itself. Key features used for identifying an individual as a source of information included experience, clinical role, trust and approachability. CONCLUSION: Establishing clearly what clinical credibility means, and to what extent trustworthiness and expertise play a role in the establishment of credibility, is an important debate for nursing. We need to carefully consider what defines the construct of clinical credibility and how this aligns with the concept of clinical currency, to allow clinicians to determine in others the characteristics associated with clinical credibility to access quality information through social interaction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Processes to focus on determining the quality of information obtained from colleagues should be emphasised. What these processes are and how they could be implemented into clinical practice remains unknown and is highlighted as an area for future research.

Black nurse in white space? Rethinking the in/visibility of race within the Australian nursing workplace.

This article presents an analysis of data from a critical qualitative study with 14 skilled black African migrant nurses, which document their experiences of nurse-to-nurse racism and racial prejudice in Australian nursing workplaces. Racism generally and nurse-to-nurse racism specifically, continues to be under-researched in explorations of these workplaces; when racism is researched, the focus is nurse-to-patient racism and racial prejudice. Similarly, research on the experiences of migrant nurses from a variety of ethnicities in Australia has tended to neglect their experiences of the social dynamics of the workplace, thus reinforcing their racialisation. When racialised, the migrant nurse becomes 'the problem' through a focus on English language competency and ensuing communication barriers. This paper applies Essed's framework of 'everyday racism' to theorise narratives of racism by black African migrant nurses in Australia. In so doing, it not only brings to the fore silenced discussions of nurse-to-nurse racism in Australia, but also exposes the subtle, mundane nature of contemporary racism. For this reason, while the data we present must be read within their context, that is, the Australian nursing workplace, it has significance for advancing a critical analysis of racialised minority groups' experiences of racism within seemingly 'race-less' nursing workplaces internationally.

Rethinking shiftwork: mid-life nurses making it work!

Many current analyses of shiftwork neglect nurses' own voices when describing the dis/advantages of a shiftworking lifestyle. This paper reports the findings of a critical re-analysis of two studies conducted with female mid-life Australian nurses to explore the contention that the 'problem-centred' focus of current shiftwork research does not effectively address the 'real' issue for mid-life nurses, that is, how to develop and maintain shiftwork tolerance. Participants used shiftwork to: (i) manage, navigate and negotiate various aspects of their nursing work and the workplace itself; (ii) facilitate more manageable work/life negotiations; and (iii) self-identify opportunities to engage in their own self-care (body work and mind work). The findings thus went beyond simply exposing what nursing bodies do in time and space by bringing to the fore discussions of 'time-body' relationships, the embodiment of time and nurses re/configuration of that time demonstrating that the frequently unacknowledged positive aspects of shiftwork, when centred in discussions, give voice to other ways to think about shiftwork and a shiftworking lifestyle. Thus, our contention is that the 'problem-centred' focus of current shiftwork debates does little to address the 'real' issue for shiftworking mid-life female nurses - the development and maintenance of shiftwork tolerance.

Uncovering the common ground in qualitative inquiry: combining quality improvement and phenomenology in clinical nursing research.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of a common qualitative data set analysed with both a quality improvement tool to facilitate service improvement, and a rigorous research methodology to engage beginning nurse researchers in a mentored project. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A qualitative cohort study of the experience of hospitalisation across six diagnostic groups interrogated data from 104 patient and carer interviews using the Picker Dimensions of Experience and Heideggerian Phenomenology. FINDINGS: The paper reveals that well-conducted qualitative interviews can provide common ground for service improvement initiatives and rigorous research analysis. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The Picker Dimensions use simple coding methods that push findings towards utility, but at times are overly reductionist and exile any data not related to hospital services. Heideggerian phenomenology is training and resource intensive, but its exploration of the meaning of the illness experience provides a profound backdrop for the subsequent understanding of hospitalisation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The access that qualitative data provides to the patient and family's perspective is becoming increasingly valued in processes of ongoing quality improvement, clinical redesign and evaluation for hospital accreditation. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The intrinsic rewards of deep qualitative analysis for the staff involved are extraordinary. Clinicians were humbled by new understandings, which surprised them despite their long clinical experience. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While quality improvement processes require training, ethics applications and data collection, the same framework can support rigorous qualitative research through use of the data as "common ground". The researchers experienced a tension, but eventually, a balance between the strengths and limitations of these combined modes of qualitative inquiry:

Preferred information sources for clinical decision making: critical care nurses' perceptions of information accessibility and usefulness.

BACKGROUND: Variability in clinical practice may result from the use of diverse information sources to guide clinical decisions. In routine clinical practice, nurses privilege information from colleagues over more formal information sources. It is not clear whether similar information-seeking behaviour is exhibited when critical care nurses make decisions about a specific clinical practice, where extensive practice variability exists alongside a developing research base. PURPOSE: This study explored the preferred sources of information intensive care nurses used and their perceptions of the accessibility and usefulness of this information for making decisions in clinically uncertain situations specific to enteral feeding practice. METHODS: An instrumental case study design, incorporating concurrent verbal protocols, Q methodology and focus groups, was used to determine intensive care nurses' perspectives of information use in the resolution of clinical uncertainty. FINDINGS: A preference for information from colleagues to support clinical decisions was observed. People as information sources were considered most useful and most accessible in the clinical setting. Text and electronic information sources were seen as less accessible, mainly because of the time required to access the information within the documents. DISCUSSION: When faced with clinical uncertainty, obtaining information from colleagues allows information to be quickly accessed and applied within the context of a specific clinical presentation. Seeking information from others also provides opportunities for shared decision-making and potential validation of clinical judgment, although differing views may exacerbate clinical uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The social exchange of clinical information may meet the needs of nurses working in a complex, time-pressured environment but the extent of the evidence base for information passed through verbal communication is unclear. The perceived usefulness and accessibility of information is premised on the ease of use and access and thus the variability in information may be contributing to clinical uncertainty.

Linking hospital and residential aged care: a nurse-led vascular-geriatric model of care.

The interplay of frailty, multimorbidity and polypharmacy in the older person results in complex care needs. Monitoring and proactive management of chronic diseases in this context can be challenging. Early identification of deterioration reduces the risk of hospitalisation in older people, particularly in residential care, where the person can be particularly vulnerable. Deterioration of a resident often results in an expectation of in-hospital care, which especially where there are life-limiting conditions, may not align to the wishes of the person and their family. However, links between tertiary hospital services with the expertise to upskill and mentor those providing the more complex care to residents of aged care facilities need to be developed. Current models of care need to be adapted to incorporate the provision of specialist nursing within residential facilities to support higher-level care delivered in the person's familiar environment, improve the person and family experience, and reduce the costs and potential for iatrogenic problems associated with hospitalisation. Vascular dysfunction is common in aged care and results in impaired healing and complex wounds. We developed a Vascular and Geriatric (VaG) model of care to support specialist care for aged care residents with vascular dysfunction. The VaG model enhances existing links between hospital and residential care settings and builds workforce capacity in residential care facilities by the use of clinical consultation, peer learning and networking to increase the vascular skill set initially of the hospital outreach nurse and then modelled to residential care clinicians. This paper reports the development and implementation of the VaG model as part of the Aged Care Outreach Service.

Concept formation: a supportive process for early career nurses.

BACKGROUND: Individuals come to understand abstract constructs such as that of the 'expert' through the formation of concepts. Time and repeated opportunity for observation to support the generalisation and abstraction of the developing concept are essential if the concept is to form successfully. Development of an effective concept of the 'expert nurse' is critical for early career nurses who are attempting to integrate theory, values and beliefs as they develop their clinical practice. AIM: This study explores the use of a concept development framework in a grounded theory study of the 'expert nurse'. DESIGN: Qualitative. METHOD: Using grounded theory methods for data collection and analysis, semi-structured interviews were conducted with registered nurses. The participants were asked to describe their concept of the 'expert nurse' and to discuss their experience of developing this. RESULTS: Participants reported forming their concept of the 'expert nurse', after multiple opportunities to engage with nurses identified as 'expert'. This identification did not necessarily relate to the designated position of the 'expert nurse' or assigned mentors. When the early career nurse does not successfully form a concept of the 'expert nurse', difficulties in personal and professional development including skill/knowledge development may arise. CONCLUSION: To underpin development of their clinical practice effectively, early career nurses need to be provided with opportunities that facilitate the purposive formation of their own concept of the 'expert nurse'. Formation of this concept is not well supported by the common practice of assigning mentors. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Early career nurses must be provided with the time and the opportunity to individually develop and refine their concept of the 'expert nurse'. To achieve this, strategies including providing opportunities to engage with expert nurses and discussion of the process of concept formation and its place in underpinning personal judgments may be of assistance.

The Frontline Nurse's Experience of Nursing Outlier Patients.

The frontline nurses' experience of nursing with overstretched resources in acute care setting can affect their health and well-being. Little is known about the experience of registered nurses faced with the care of a patient outside their area of expertise. The aim of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of nursing the outlier patient, when patients are nursed in a ward that is not specifically developed to deal with the major clinical diagnosis involved (e.g., renal patient in gynecology ward). Using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach, eleven individual face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with registered nurses in New South Wales, Australia. The study identified that each nurse had a specialty construct developed from nursing in a specialized environment. Each nurse had normalized the experience of specialty nursing and had developed a way of thinking and practicing theorized as a "care ladder". By grouping and analyzing various "care ladders" together, the nursing capacities common to nurses formed the phenomenological orientation, namely "the composite care ladder". Compared to nursing specialty-appropriate patients, nursing the outlier patient caused disruption of the care ladder, with some nurses becoming less capable as they were nursing the outlier patient. Nursing the outlier patient disrupted the nurses' normalized constructs of nursing. This study suggests that nursing patients in specialty-appropriate wards will improve patient outcomes and reduce impacts on the nurses' morale.