RESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Leg length discrepancy studies are labor intensive. They are procedurally simple and represent inefficient use of the radiologists' time and expertise. We hypothesized that radiology technologists could be trained to measure leg length discrepancies, and that their performance would be statistically equivalent to that of board-certified, fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four radiology technologists were selected to participate in a supervised practice session. They independently measured and calculated leg length discrepancies on 10 randomly selected cases. Their performance was compared to measurements obtained by an experienced pediatric radiologist (reference standard). After 1 week, the technologists repeated their measurements on the same cases, which were resorted to simulate new cases. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined interobserver agreement between the technologists and radiologist and intra-observer reliability among the technologists. RESULTS: Among the four technologists, similarity in measurements between session 1 and the reference standard was very high, with ICC values ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 (p < 0.001). The ICC between session 2 and the reference standard was also high, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 (p < 0.001). Finally, among the four technologists, ICC values between session 1 and session 2 were ≥ 0.96 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radiology technologists can be rapidly trained to calculate leg length discrepancies as accurately as a board-certified pediatric radiologist. Delegation of this time-consuming task to technologists or radiology assistants will permit radiologists to spend time on more demanding studies, such as studies that require subspecialty training.