Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatitis Crónica/genética , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Tripsina/genética , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Masculino , Mutación , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreatitis Crónica/epidemiología , Pancreatitis Crónica/etiología , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Primary aldosteronism is the most common cause of secondary hypertension. Identifying individuals who have unilateral secretion from aldosterone secreting adenomas allows adrenalectomy. Surgical treatment when feasible may be superior to medical management with improved cardiovascular outcomes and reduced medication dependence. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is required to biochemically lateralise aldosterone secretion prior to adrenalectomy. However, diagnostic success of AVS is variable and can be poor even at tertiary centres; failure is largely due to unsuccessful adrenal vein cannulation. Intra-procedural rapid semiquantitative cortisol testing (RCT) identifies correct catheter placement in real time. We compared diagnostic success rates of AVS before and after the introduction of intraprocedural cortisol testing at the Royal Adelaide Hospital-a medium throughput tertiary centre (average 6.2 procedures a year over the last 8 years). We observed an increase in success rate from 63% to 94%. Intraprocedural cortisol testing also led to a net financial saving of ~$100 AUD per procedure. RCT is likely to be cost effective if pre-RCT success rate is less than 78%. Procedure time and number of samples collected, however, were increased with RCT. This suggests that intraprocedural cortisol testing will improve success in low to medium throughput centres and may make AVS feasible in less specialised centres.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocortisona , Hiperaldosteronismo , Humanos , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hiperaldosteronismo/cirugía , Aldosterona , Venas , Glándulas Suprarrenales/irrigación sanguínea , Cateterismo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to correlate and assess diagnostic accuracy of preoperative staging at multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT) against the original radiology reports and pathological staging in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at two institutions. Patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer and available preoperative imaging were included. Preoperative tumor and nodal staging (cT and cN) as determined by the MDT and the radiology report (computed tomography [CT] and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were recorded. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between MDT and the radiology report for cN staging in colon cancer, cT and cN in rectal cancer, and tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy. Pathological report after surgery served as the reference standard for local staging, and AUROC curves were constructed to compare diagnostic accuracy of the MDT and radiology report. RESULTS: A total of 481 patients were included. Agreement between MDT and radiology report for cN stage was good in colon cancer (k = .756, Confidence Interval (CI) 95% .686-.826). Agreement for cT and cN and in rectal cancer was very good (kw = .825, CI 95% .758-.892) and good (kw = .792, CI 95% .709-.875), respectively. In the rectal cancer group that received neoadjuvant therapy, agreement on TRG was very good (kw = .919, CI 95% .846-.993). AUROC curves using pathological staging indicated no difference in diagnostic accuracy between MDT and radiology reports for either colon or rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Preoperative colorectal cancer local staging was consistent between specialist MDT review and original radiology reports, with no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy identified.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Radiología , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The grading of radiological severity in clinical trials in tuberculosis (TB) remains unstandardised. The aim of this study was to generate and validate a numerical score for grading chest x-ray (CXR) severity and predicting response to treatment in adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB. METHODS: At a TB clinic in Papua, Indonesia, serial CXRs were performed at diagnosis, 2 and 6 months in 115 adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB. Radiographic findings predictive of 2-month sputum microscopy status were used to generate a score. The validity of the score was then assessed in a second data set of 139 comparable adults with TB, recruited 4 years later at the same site. Relationships between the CXR score and other measures of TB severity were examined. RESULTS: The estimated proportion of lung affected and presence of cavitation, but not cavity size or other radiological findings, significantly predicted outcome and were combined to derive a score given by percentage of lung affected plus 40 if cavitation was present. As well as predicting 2-month outcome, scores were significantly associated with sputum smear grade at diagnosis (p<0.001), body mass index, lung function, haemoglobin, exercise tolerance and quality of life (p<0.02 for each). In the validation data set, baseline CXR score predicted 2-month smear status significantly more accurately than did the proportion of lung affected alone. In both data sets, CXR scores decreased over time (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This simple, validated method for grading CXR severity in adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB correlates with baseline clinical and microbiological severity and response to treatment, and is suitable for use in clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Radiografía , Esputo/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Vena Femoral , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico , Vena Cava Inferior , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadAsunto(s)
Ética Médica , Medicina Militar/ética , Prisioneros , Tortura , Humanos , Irak , Rol del Médico , Tortura/ética , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Methotrexate is a well recognised cause of diffuse symmetrical leucoencephalopathy. The widespread use of the drug in chemotherapeutic regimes necessitates awareness of this complication. A case report and a brief literature review is presented.